Meta tag question
-
Through research our competitors have created independent product codes like FT-5750 and are using it as an independent SKU#, when I search this product code they are the only search result.
can we use their abbreviated SKU# in our meta tag or keywords to show up in the SERP?
Thanks,
Michelle & Blake
-
Michelle & Blake,
Tim raised some good points, so rather than address those I'll try to answer your question directly.
Yes, you could theoretically rank for these unique SKUs if you were to build some half-way decent content around them - especially if the competition is low as you say.
It's not likely as easy as putting the keywords in your Meta tags ( I assume you mean the meta description tag, or even the meta keywords tag which most folks don't use anymore)
If you really want to rank for these keywords, they should probably be a natural part of your content and body copy. To Tim's point, could you target these terms in a way that made sense to visitors? Perhaps yes. If your visitor was looking for a product similar too or a substitution for a particular SKU, this might make sense - but you actually have to create content around the terms, and not simply stick them on the page or hide them in the meta data - does this make sense?
You would want to target these keywords and ideas just like any other. Tools like the on-page grader might give you good idea where to start.
Hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO!
-
Hey Michelle and Blake,
There's nothing inherently black hat about targeting the same keywords as your competitors. It's sort of an underhanded business tactic, but it's not something that will directly get you in trouble with Google.
I still think it might be harder to rank for those SKUs than you think it will be. If you competitor is the industry leader and these SKUs are closely associated with their brand just mentioning the SKUs in the content of a page might not be enough to rank for them. You might also need some link building to be on the same level as your competitor. If you're trying to build links around keywords that aren't naturally part of your brand, it could easy to slip into some shady tactics.
There might be other out there with more experience in building organic SEO campaigns that target a competitors keywords (and hopefully, they'll chime in here), but I still think AdWords is your best bet for getting started with this. It's instant and you're guaranteed to rank above your competitor. You'll also start getting data about whether it would be worth investing in a larger organic campaign to rank for these keywords.
Tim
-
Tim,
Thank you for the response, However, our competitor is the industry leader and that SKU is specific to that company. They have made these SKU's because they are solely searchable in SERP. Interestingly, the second and third industry sites have now made up their own SKU all using the same base number but different letter configurations. Ideally, our meta and keywords could include our competitors individual SKU's so theoretically we would rank along with their site search. It would be worth our time and effort if including this information in our meta and keyword if this tactic worked.
We are trying to distinguish if this would be a black hat practice or a competitive white hat tactic? Thoughts?
Thanks,
M & B
-
Hi Michelle and Blake,
I think the first thing you need to ask yourselves is if people are actually searching for your competitor's SKUs. Is it really worth your time to try to optimize for these when you could instead spend time and money optimizing for keywords that might drive more traffic?
Also, since these are SKUs that only your competitor uses, it almost functions in the same way that a branded search for their company name would. Even if you created a page that focused on FT-5750, would it really deserve to rank above a page on your competitor's site? Probably not since they actually use that SKU as part of their business.
Optimizing for these SKUs might be more difficult than you think depending on how closely associated the SKUs are with you competitors brand.
Targeting your competitors keywords is a tactic that some companies use, but I've seen it done more often through AdWords than through organic SEO. If you search for Eloqua (a marketing automation tool), you'll see an ad for Marketo (one of their competitors). https://www.google.com/search?pws=0&q=eloqua
But again, you need to figure out if it's worth it to go after these SKUs. A small AdWords campaign could help you figure out if it's worth your time and money. Otherwise might just end up wasting a lot of resources on something that doesn't drive much traffic.
Hope this help.s
Tim
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Ranking Research Question
Hi Mozzers,This is probably a nooby question, but I was wondering how you guys end up deciding if a Keyword is too hard to rank for? Also vice versa, when do you decide that a keyword is too low volume to rank for so you try to rank for a harder keyword? Eg.
Keyword Research | | steve45058
Deciding that ranking for "Dell Computers" is too hard and then deciding to rank for "Dell Small Business Computers" Post-question: Do indirectly rank for Dell Computers if you try to rank for Dell Small Business Computers? If so, how much? Also, how many words inbetween Dell & Computers would there have to be to stop indirectly ranking for Dell Computers?1 -
'key word' SEO question
Does having ' ' around your keyword/phrase within the content on your website have an effect on SEO for that keyword?
Keyword Research | | MeridianGroup
For example, in the copy of my site, we reference 'buy local' instead of buy local. I am trying to optimize for buy local and I am wondering if the apostrophes are getting in the way? Thank you so much! -Sam0 -
Question about ranking for long tail keywords
So I am looking at some long tail keywords for my web design company, for example: "website development and design company" The top results are websites that are not optimized for that specific keyword but about "web design & development" in general. The top ranking sites also have quite high PA with lots of links. If I were to create a page specifically about that term would it be fairly easy to rank for since the top ranking pages are not optimized for that keyword?
Keyword Research | | WebAdvancedUK0 -
Ranking for more keywords - Noob question
Hi, I've noticed recently that our site is ranking for a fraction of the keywords that our competitors are ranking for. In terms of increasing the number of keyword rankings per page would it simply be a case of adding optimised copy to each page? Thanks, Dan
Keyword Research | | Sparkstone0 -
Is there any value to meta keywords?
The more I read the more I realize that meta keywords are not as helpful as they once were. Is there any SEO value to meta keywords anymore or should the emphasis be put on the content and title tags in regards to keywords? As always, I appreciate any feedback.
Keyword Research | | TracSoft0 -
E-Commerce keyword question
We sell ItemA. One of the phrases that brings people to our site is "ItemA for sale". Should I just try to target "ItemA" or should I try to get "for sale" in there? I have seen a few other variations such as "on clearance" or "to purchase" as well. Can I just focus on "ItemA" or do I need all of those variants as well?
Keyword Research | | EcommerceSite0 -
Phone numbers in the meta titles
Is it best practice to have phone numbers in the meta titles? Will google penalize for that? It is actually useful for the users...
Keyword Research | | CMTM0 -
Few questions about panda and penguin
I seem to be a little confused about how SEO has changed recently and what things should be avoided even though I am still seeing these things impacted on my site. The recent panda and penguin updates have scared many of us SEO'ers into thinking that keyword optimization is now a no-no as apposed to how it used to be necessary. Let me explain Concerning keyword optimization in the past in SEO we would practice placing keywords into our pages to make sure we are properly optimizing for such keywords. For instance bolding keywords, placing them in content, titles and descriptions. With panda Google seems to be negativly impacting the use of over optimization with keywods and it is what is preached about on most SEO blogs now, but I have been experimenting with such things with my sites and have noticed a few things. Before the panda update I used to rank with my main site on a particular keyword in second place. While the panda update effected me negatively with ranking it was not so much the ranking that hurt me as apposed to the adsense revenue. I used to place consistently second place with my keyword, since panda I have dropped on average to 4th - 7th place, almost changing daily. The ranking was not so much a drop but the adsense revenue difference a month is about 2,000 which did impact me. Since then I have been going over panda rules and making the appropriate changes like getting rid of low quality content, to many keywords, ad placement. I am one who likes to experiment all the time so there are a few things that I have discovered with my diligence. I have noticed that when I cross a threshhold of about 5 repeated keywords on a page I am safe, when I begin to add more than 5 I start to notice a drop in ranking. If I go back to 5 and under I tend to rank back up. As well with that I have noticed that the placement of the keywords also impacts my ranking. When I place keywords more spread out over my page I see better rankings, if I tend to optimize my keyword more on the top portion of my page I see a drop in ranking. My question is even though keyword optimization is considered a no-no I still see that it will impact my rankings greatly. Since everything I read kind of goes against this I am wanting to hear your opinions about this. Another issue is relative content and the amount of pages/articles. It seems that to many pages or articles will flag you as a spam site. Now the idea of less is more is the practice we see. If this is the case then what I am questioning is how is it that google can determine a sites quality based on less. With less to use, google would have to have some serious and definitive triggers to determine the quality of the site. Can one simple page really change your ranking that much? How in the world does google determine the quality with just a few pages as apposed to many? My site freescrabbledictionary.com (and no I am not back linking right now :)) I am a scrabble based site that helps users find words and definitions for scrabble games and other word games. On some of my pages I have articles/pages which give users important info like 2 letter words, high scoring words and other stuff. When I show these words I place a link on every word to my dictionary portion so users can easily click the link and look up the word and its definition. Some of these pages show over a thousand words, so yes I have a thousand links on that page to other pages on my site. I want to keep this feature so users don't have to type in the word to look it up, but I am torn as to if this is hurting me as apposed to helping. I would love some info on this please.
Keyword Research | | cbielich0