Best option for Affiliate links on your website?
-
Hello!
I have a website which is completely affiliate based.
What is the best option for the links on-page?
Examples would be:
- affiliate.website.com/12901730?2=3532523=user12342901730?2=3532523=user?Whittie
- www.website.com/affiliate=user?Whittie=load-of-tracking=date=blah=blaH?blah
- And So on...
Which look ugly as sin when you hover over the Anchor Text.
Ideally I would like a 301 redirect to mysite.com/goto/affiliatename, which would then have a rel nofollow.
This way I could also track the exit pages via Analytics too guess, which I've not currently got set up and i'm desperate for it to be done.
Does this method effect anything on search engines though? I've seen mixed report, but going back to 2011 which is too long ago in the SEO world.
Another option is to use the likes of "Bit.ly" or use another domain and host 301s on there? The new bit.ly integration from moz might come in handy here.
Please advise on the subject, I really appreciate any help on this, as i'm at a brick wall. Thanks
-
Great thanks for that donford.
I've noticed a well ranked competitor is using 302 redirects to do what i'm after. Would this benefit me at all?
-
The sub issues,
I'll have to preference my response with I have no direct experience with sites that derive their income from solely affiliate clicks / impressions. I have been on the other side of the coin though, where my site was the one doing the affiliation recruitment.
Page load time, always a concern. Thankfully this has a myriad of ways to control it. Script optimization, less affiliates per search, using pagination, etc.
Image size this goes back to the page load time, is it possible to host the images locally? When you start pulling images from everywhere and their brother you end up waiting for their site to relay that information.
Tracking and Analytics, I have no good suggestions here. I know of course you want to compile your own data, but most affiliates sites provide you with inbound metrics.
Good luck hope it helps sort things,
-
Hi Donford,
I appreciate your reply, in reply to your points;
1 - Sorry I wasn't clear on this, and completely wrote Anchor text when I actually meant the URL usually in the lower left hand corner which you mentioned in point two! Doh!
2 - I see what you're saying, I guess I just want nice clean URLS! Other issues have appeared such as
- Page Load time - Links are tracked currently on the site for impressions, therefore using a script and slowing the site down.
- Image size out of my hands - Images are hosted on the affiliates site and can be up to 80-100kb (which starts to take its toll on the page loads, although it doesn't sound a lot)
- Tracking the links in Analytics - If the links stay as they are, do you know of any solution to track? Never had to add a goal to an outbound link before now.
I feel like moving them to mysite.com/donford/link1 i'd be helping the above 3 points. On the other side of things, i'm assuming Google would see it as cloaking / hiding the url?
-
Hi Whittie
My opinion would be to use the actual url, avoid using bit.ly anything.
What I am hearing is you're primarily concerned with the hover text on the link. If this is the case, this brings up 2 questions.
1. Are we talking about the Title Text which is which is what should be displayed when you hover over a link? If that is the case it is as simple as fixing/changing the title tag.
2. Are we talking about the browser displayed URL usually in the lower left hand corner? If that is the case, I think it is of little concern as long as the URL directs to a non-frightening website. Most people from my research, do not even pay attention to the browser displayed URL unless they are very security conscience or in the industry. As one of those people who actually look at links, it brings me back to my very first sentence. If I see something like (amazon.com/affiliate/AID=200282xx/Moreblah/Otherstuff=2222422) I am fine clicking the link. If I see any sort of obfuscation link like bit.ly I will not click the link unless I 100% trust the website I'm on.
There are other points that can be made about about SEO practices but I don't believe that is the core of the question being asked.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can anyone please explain the real difference between backlinks, 301 links, and redirect links?which one is better to rank a website? i am looking for the help for one of my website
Can anyone please explain the real difference between backlinks, 301 links, and redirect links? which one is better to rank a website? I am looking for help for one of my website vacuum cleaners
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hshajjajsjsj3880 -
If my website uses CDN does thousands of 301 redirect can harm the website performance?
Hi, If my website uses CDN does thousands of 301 redirect can harm the website performance? Thanks Roy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kadut1 -
Links Questions and advice?
I have a website which has a fair few link assets that are doing very well (a lot of really powerful sites have link to them with follow links) but my commercial pages are not doing as well as a lot of sites without any other investment than (mediocre) links direct to there commercial pages with at least 10% of them carrying the money anchor text. Even pages we have had a few links for with generalized real anchor text and reasonable links do not do as well as the above due to none of them carrying the money keyword? Is it me or does google still rely on links to the commercial page and keywords with anchor text to match the money term?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
My website is not indexing
Hello Experts As i search site :http://www.louisvuittonhandbagss.com or just entering http://www.louisvuittonhandbagss.com on Google i am not getting my website . I have done following steps 1. I have submitted sitemaps and indexed all the site maps 2.i have used GWT feature fetch as Google . 3. I have submitted my website to top social book marking websites and to some classified sites also . Pleae
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aschauhan5210 -
100% links within the website - could it rank?
Hi, If I create blog posts inside my website and link it back to my website, Would it still rank? I understand that its better to get links from the established domain. But I just wonder what kind of impact would my site have if the blog posts within my site link back to itself for ranking. Please let me know. thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | zsyed0 -
Best practice for duplicate website content: same root domain name but different extension
Hi there I have a new client who has two websites: http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.co.nz
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | turnbullholdingsltd
http://www.bayofislandsteambuilding.org.nz They are the same in every regard apart from the domain extension (.co.nz & .org.nz) which is likely to be causing them issues with Google ranking given the huge amount of duplicate content. What is the best practice approach to fixing this? Normally, if I was starting from scratch, I would set one of the extensions as an alias which redirects to the main domain. Thanks in advance. Laurie0 -
Site wide footer links vs. single link for websites we design
I’ve been running a web design business for the past 5 years, 90% or more of the websites we build have a “web design by” link in the footer which links back to us using just our brand name or the full “web design by brand name” anchor text. I’m fully aware that site-wide footer links arent doing me much good in terms of SEO, but what Im curious to know is could they be hurting me? More specifically I’m wondering if I should do anything about the existing links or change my ways for all new projects, currently we’re still rolling them out with the site-wide footer links. I know that all other things being equal (1 link from 10 domains > 10 links from 1 domain) but is (1 link from 10 domains > 100 links from 10 domains)? I’ve got a lot of branded anchor text, which balances out my exact match and partial match keyword anchors from other link building nicely. Another thing to consider is that we host many of our clients which means there are quite a few on the same server with a shared IP. Should I? 1.) Go back into as many of the sites as I can and remove the link from all pages except the home page or a decent PA sub page- keeping a single link from the domain. 2.) Leave all the old stuff alone but start using the single link method on new sites. 3.) Scratch the site credit and just insert an exact-match anchor link in the body of the home page and hide with with CSS like my top competitor seems to be doing quite successfully. (kidding of course.... but my competitor really is doing this.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nbeske0 -
Duplicate Content http://www.website.com and http://website.com
I'm getting duplicate content warnings for my site because the same pages are getting crawled twice? Once with http://www.website.com and once with http://website.com. I'm assuming this is a .htaccess problem so I'll post what mine looks like. I think installing WordPress in the root domain changed some of the settings I had before. My main site is primarily in HTML with a blog at http://www.website.com/blog/post-name BEGIN WordPress <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | thirdseo
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.php [L]</ifmodule> END WordPress0