Sudden Increase In Number of Pages Indexed By Google Webmaster When No New Pages Added
-
Greetings MOZ Community:
On June 14th Google Webmaster tools indicated an increase in the number of indexed pages, going from 676 to 851 pages. New pages had been added to the domain in the previous month. The number of pages blocked by robots increased at that time from 332 (June 1st) to 551 June 22nd), yet the number of indexed pages still increased to 851.
The following changes occurred between June 5th and June 15th:
-A new redesigned version of the site was launched on June 4th, with some links to social media and blog removed on some pages, but with no new URLs added. The design platform was and is Wordpress.
-Google GTM code was added to the site.
-An exception was made by our hosting company to ModSecurity on our server (for i-frames) to allow GTM to function.
In the last ten days my web traffic has decline about 15%, however the quality of traffic has declined enormously and the number of new inquiries we get is off by around 65%. Click through rates have declined from about 2.55 pages to about 2 pages.
Obviously this is not a good situation.
My SEO provider, a reputable firm endorsed by MOZ, believes the extra 175 pages indexed by Google, pages that do not offer much content, may be causing the ranking decline.
My developer is examining the issue. They think there may be some tie in with the installation of GTM. They are noticing an additional issue, the sites Contact Us form will not work if the GTM script is enabled. They find it curious that both issues occurred around the same time.
Our domain is www.nyc-officespace-leader. Does anyone have any idea why these extra pages are appearing and how they can be removed? Anyone have experience with GTM causing issues with this?
Thanks everyone!!!
Alan -
Yes, and I appreciate it!
Alan -
I did what I asked you to do.
-
-
-
- in my first post and repeated frequently.
-
-
-
-
Hi Egol:
How did you locate this duplicate or re-published content?
Obviously what you have pointed out is a major source of concern so I ran Copyscape search this afternoon for duplicate content and did not locate any the URLs you mention in the "this", "this" link above. It appears you entered the URL of the blog post in Google's search bar. Would that work? This method would be pretty slow going with 600 URLs.
Thanks,
Alan -
Those are the 448 URLs from your website that have been filtered.
You should find garbage in them like shown below.
Have you done what I have suggested three times above? Do that if you want to identify the problem pages.
-
www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/wp-content/plugins/...
A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more.
-
www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/wp-content/plugins/...
A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more.
-
www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/wp-content/plugins/...
A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more.
-
-
Hi Egol:
Thanks for the suggestion.
When I click on _ repeat the search with the omitted results included _I get 448 results not the entire 859 results. Seems very strange. Some of these URLS have light content but I don't believe they are dups. I don't see any content outside our website when I click this.
Am I doing something wrong? I would think the total of 859 would appear not 447 URLs.
Thanks!!
Alan -
I don't know. You should ask someone who knows a lot about canonicalization.
Did you drill down through all of those indexed pages to see if you can identify all of them?
I've suggested it twice.
-
Hi Egol:
In the content of launching an upgraded site, could the canonicalization have implemented incorrectly? That could account for 175 pages sudden new content as the thin content has been there for some time.
I am particularly suspicious regarding canonicalization as there was an issue involving multi page URLs of property listings when the site was migrated from Drupal to Wordpress last Summer.
Thoughts?
Thanks, Alan
-
Apparently infitter24.rssing.com/chan-13023009/all is poaching my content, taking my original content and adding it to there site. I am not quiet sure what to do about that.
You can have an attorney demand that they stop, you can file DMCA complaints. Be careful
**However it does not explain the sudden appearance of the 175 pages on Googles index **
-
Do this query: site:www.nyc-officespace-leader.com
-
Start drilling down the SERPs. One page at a time. Look for content that you didn't make. Look for duplicates.
-
Get a spreadsheet that has all of your URLs. Drill down through the SERPs checking every one of them. Can you account for your pagination. You have a lot of it and that type of page is usually rubbish in the index. Combine, canonicalize, or get rid of them.
-
-
Hi Egol:
Thanks so much for taking the time for your thorough response!!
Apparently infitter24.rssing.com/chan-13023009/all is poaching my content, taking my original content and adding it to there site. I am not quiet sure what to do about that.
You have pointed out something very useful and I appreciate it and will act upon it. However it does not explain the sudden appearance of the 175 pages on Googles index that did not appear at the end of May and somehow coincided with uploading of the new version of our website in early June. Any ideas???
Thanks,
Alan -
-
Do this query: site:www.nyc-officespace-leader.com
-
Start drilling down the SERPs. One page at a time. Look for content that you didn't make. Look for duplicates.
-
When you drill down about 44 pages you will find this...
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 440 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.The bad stuff is usually behind that link. Google doesn't want to show that stuff to people. It could be thin, it could be duplicate, it could be spammy, they just might not like it.
- Find out what is in there.
Possible problems that I see....
I see dupe content like this and this. Either your guys are grabbin' somebodyelse's content or they are grabbin' yours. Can get you in trouble with Panda. You need original and unique. Anything that is not original and unique should be deleted, noindexed or rewritten.
A lot of these pages are really skimpy. Think content can get you into trouble with Panda. Anything that is skimpy should be deleted, noindexed or beefed up.
I see multiple links to tags on lots of these posts. That can cause duplicate content problems.
The tag pages are paginated with just a few pages on each. These can generate extra pages that are low value, suck up your linkjuice or compound duplicate content problems.
You have archive pages, and category pages and more pagination problems.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why google stubbornly keeps indexing my http urls instead of the https ones?
I moved everything to https in November, but there are plenty of pages which are still indexed by google as http instead of https, and I am wondering why. Example: http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/barum correctly redirect permanently to https://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/barum Nevertheless if you search for pneumatici barum: https://www.google.it/search?q=pneumatici+barum&oq=pneumatici+barum The third organic result listed is still http. Since we moved to https google crawler visited that page tens of time, last one two days ago. But doesn't seems to care to update the protocol in google index. Anyone knows why? My concern is when I use API like semrush and ahrefs I have to do it twice to try both http and https, for a total of around 65k urls I waste a lot of my quota.
Reporting & Analytics | | max.favilli0 -
GA visitor number inconsistencies?
Hey Mozzers Recently a client of ours undertook a paid campaign using Taboola and have a vast difference between reported clicks and visitors reported by GA. On further investigation the _utm.gif event is sent to google-analytics.com 50% of the time and stat.g.doubleclick.net the remaining 50% of the time Is this likely to be the cause of the discrepancy and if so is it possible to resolve this without removing the remarketing tag (which seems to be responsible for stats.g.doublelclick.net). Many thanks Justin
Reporting & Analytics | | JustinTaylor880 -
Google analytics is not tracking well
Hey, There is something not working in our GA account, its shows too many visits per day, when look where this traffic comes from, the majority comes from (not set). Please find attached. Really appreciate help! Thank you! BvmAKtO
Reporting & Analytics | | Comunicare0 -
Google analytics for your mobile sub-domain
Hi All, I have just started mobile sub-domain for my desktop site. But I don't to know how to configure analytics for mobile sub-domain. I want to track result between desktop and mobile site. Can any one help me to sort out this problem? Waiting for reply
Reporting & Analytics | | Hexpress0 -
New GA interface - Number of conversion by source
Hi Guys, Hope this is an easy one for a GA ninja. In the new GA interface, how can I view the number of conversions by source, instead of the default conversion rate by source. For example, if I want to view the number of conversion from Adwords. I'm looking at Goals > Source / Medium > Google CPC and looking at Goal Set 1. However all data is expressed in percentages. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | David_ODonnell0 -
Google Keyword Tool versus Google Analytics
Hi I'm trying to establish a methodology to best show the gap between potential and realised organic keyword traffic. To obtain potential keyword traffic I'm using the Google Adwords keyword tool to derive local monthly search volumes for exact keyword matches. To get the realised data I'm using Google Analytics. However, to get the I'm confused as to which is the best way of getting a comparable metric from Google Analytics (GA). I was using custom reports and the 'organic searches' metric. However, this provides different values to a standard report selecting non-paid search in the default advanced segments. What is the best report/metric in GA to use for both organic and paid search volumes that would be comparable to the Google Adwords keyword tool. Thanks Neil
Reporting & Analytics | | mccormackmorrison0 -
Adding Something to htaccess File
When I did a google search for site.kisswedding.com (my website) I noticed that google is indexing all of the https versions of my site. First of all, I don't get it because I don't have an SSL certificate. Then, last night I did what my host (bluehost) told me to do. I added the below to my htaccess file. Below rule because google is indexing https version of site - https://my.bluehost.com/cgi/help/758RewriteEngine OnRewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^kisswedding.com$ [OR]RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^kisswedding.com$RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^443$RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.kisswedding.com [R=301,L] Tonight I when I did a google search for site:kisswedding.com all of those https pages were being redirected to my home page - not the actually page they're supposed to be redirecting to. I went back to Bluehost and they said and 301 redirect shouldn't work because I don't have an SSL certificate. BUT, I figure since it's sorta working I just need to add something to that htaccess rule to make sure it's redirected to the right page. Someone in the google webmaster tools forums told me to do below but I don't really get it? _"to 301 redirect from /~kisswedd/ to the proper root folder you can put this in the root folder .htaccess file as well:_Redirect 301 /~kisswedd/ http://www.kisswedding.com/" Any help/advice would be HUGELY appreciated. I'm a bit at a loss.
Reporting & Analytics | | annasus0 -
Google Webmaster not accounting for internal links
Hi SEO gurus! All my websites in GWT show the website in question at the top of the "Links to your site", in the form of: Domains Total links my-site.com 1,000 third-party-1.com 500 third-party-2.com 300 third-party-3.com 200 etc.com 100 However, I have a specific account that suddenly (a few weeks back) disappeared its own link count: Domains Total links third-party-1.com 500 third-party-2.com 300 third-party-3.com 200 etc.com 100 Has this happened to any of you? Any ideas how to solve it? The website is www.gmvbodybuilding.com which you can see has plenty of properly formed links.
Reporting & Analytics | | hectorpn0