How to use robots.txt to block areas on page?
-
Hi,
Across the categories/product pages on out site there are archives/shipping info section and the texts are always the same. Would this be treated as duplicated content and harmful for seo?
How can I alter robots.txt to tell google not to crawl those particular text
Thanks for any advice!
-
Thanks for the info above. I think I'll find out if I can cut the text and try to put popup link.
-
Hi Laura
I have not used lazy loading except with images, however I did some reading around and it might be a solution. There is a large section in Google Webmasters that talks about how to make AJAX readable by a crawler/bot so obviously it is not normally readable (Google Webmaster on AJAX crawling).
The other option is to provide a summary on the product page for shipping info and link to a larger shipping info page (as suggested earlier) and get it to open on a new page/tab. At least this keeps the product page open too.
(Note good UX practice recommends you tell the user they will open a new page if they click on the link - this could be as simple as using the anchor text: "More Detailed Shipping Information (opens new page)".
cheers
Neil
-
Here is a tip that I use for my clients and I would recommend. Most CMS / Ecommerce platforms allow for you to put a category description in the page. But, what they do is when the page paginates is they use the same category description and just different products on the page (some use a querystring on the url, others use a shebang, others use other things).
What I recommend to my clients to escape any thin content issues is to point the canonical url of all of the paginated pages back to the 1st category page. At the same time I will add a noindex, follow tag to the header of the paginated pages. This is counter to what a lot of people do I think, but the reason I do it is because of thin content. Also you don't want your page 3 results cannibalizing your main category landing page results. Since no CMS that I know of lets you specify different category descriptions for each pagination of a category it seems like the only real choice. It also makes it where you do not really need to add rel=next and rel=previous to the paginated pages too.
-
Thanks, the info above is quite detailed.
We are not a shipping company those text are just to ensure visitors accordingly. The shipping info is quite long as we want to prompt as mush as we could to avoid customer leaving current page to search.
-
Hi Laura
I am not sure that you can use robots.txt to prevent a search engine bot from crawling a part of a page. Robots.txt is usually used to exclude a whole page.
The effect of the duplicate content on your search engine optimisation depends in part on how extensive is the duplication. In many cases it seems that Google won't penalise the duplicate content (it understands that some content will of necessity be duplicated) - see this video by Matt Cutts from Google.
Duplicate Content is Small (Short Paragraph)
From your question it sounds like you are talking about part of page and it sounds like a relatively small part - I assume you are not a shipping company so the shipping info would be a small part of the page.
In which case it may not affect your search engine optimisation at all (assuming you are not trying to rank for the shipping info).
As long as the content on the rest of the page is unique or different from other pages on the site.
Duplicate Content is Large (but not a page)
If the shipping info is substantial (say a couple of paragraphs or half the content on the page) then Google suggests you create a separate page with the substantial info on it and use a brief summary on other pages with a link to the separate page:
- Minimize boilerplate repetition: For instance, instead of including lengthy copyright text on the bottom of every page, include a very brief summary and then link to a page with more details. In addition, you can use the Parameter Handling tool to specify how you would like Google to treat URL parameters.
(from Google Webmaster: Duplicate Content)
Duplicated Pages
Much of the discussion about duplicated content is more about whole pages of duplicated content. The risk with these pages are that search engines may not know which to rank (or more to the point rank the one you don't want to rank). This is where you might use a rel=canonical tag or a 301 redirect to direct or hint to the search engine which page to use.
Moz has a good article on Duplicate Content.
All the best
Neil
-
Hiya,
First off the main answer is here - http://moz.com/learn/seo/robotstxt
an alternative solution might be use of the canonical tag meaning you're getting all the link juice rather than letting it fall off the radar. I wouldn't be overly worried about duplicate content its not a big bad wolf that will annihilate your website.
Best idea if you're worried about duplicate content is the canonical tag it has the benefit of keeping link juice where as the robots tends to mean you loose some link juice. One thing to remember those is the canonical tag means the pages will not be indexed (same as robots tag in the end) so if they are ranking (or getting page views) something to remember.
hope that helps.
Good luck.
-
Google smart enough to recognize what it is, it won't get you penalized for duplicate content.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it good practice to use hreflang on pages that have canonicals?
I have a page in English that has both English & Spanish translations on it. It is pulled in from a page generated on another site and I am not able to adjust the CSS to display only one language. Until I can fix this, I have made the English page the canonical for both. Do I still want to use hreflang for English & Spanish pages? What if I do not have a Spanish page at all. I assume (from what I've read) I should not have an hreflang on the English page. Is this correct? Thank you in advance.
Technical SEO | | RoxBrock0 -
Robots.txt error
Moz Crawler is not able to access the robots.txt due to server error. Please advice on how to tackle the server error.
Technical SEO | | Shanidel0 -
Duplicate page titles for blog snippets pages
I can't figure the answer to this issue, on my blog I have a number of pages which each show snippets and an image for each blog entry, these are called /recent-weddings/page/1 /2 /3 and so on. I'm getting duplicate page titles for these but can't find anywhere on Wordpress to set a unique title for them. So http://www.weddingphotojournalist.co.uk/recent-weddings/…/2/ has the same title as http://www.weddingphotojournalist.co.uk/recent-weddings/…/3/
Technical SEO | | simonatkinsphoto0 -
Joomla creating duplicate pages, then the duplicate page's canonical points to itself - help!
Using Joomla, every time I create an article a subsequent duplicate page is create, such as: /latest-news/218-image-stabilization-task-used-to-develop-robot-brain-interface and /component/content/article?id=218:image-stabilization-task-used-to-develop-robot-brain-interface The latter being the duplicate. This wouldn't be too much of a problem, but the canonical tag on the duplicate is pointing to itself.. creating mayhem in Moz and Webmaster tools. We have hundreds of duplicates across our website and I'm very concerned with the impact this is having on our SEO! I've tried plugins such as sh404SEF and Styleware extensions, however to no avail. Can anyone help or know of any plugins to fix the canonicals?
Technical SEO | | JamesPearce0 -
Robots.txt issue - site resubmission needed?
We recently had an issue when a load of new files were transferred from our dev server to the live site, which unfortunately included the dev site's robots.txt file which had a disallow:/ instruction. Bad! Luckily I spotted it quickly and the file has been replaced. The extent of the damage seems to be that some descriptions aren't displaying and we're getting a message about robots.txt in the SERPs for a few keywords. I've done a site: search and generally it seems to be OK for 99% of our pages. Our positions don't seem to be affected right now but obviously it's not great for the CTRs on those keywords affected. My question is whether there is anything I can do to bring the updated robots.txt file to Google's attention? Or should we just wait and sit it out? Thanks in advance for your answers!
Technical SEO | | GBC0 -
Why is an error page showing when searching our website using Google "site:" search function?
When I search our company website using the Google site search function "site:jwsuretybonds.com", a 400 Bad Request page is at the top of the listed pages. I had someone else at our company do the same site search and the 400 Bad Request did not appear. Is there a reason this is happening, and are there any ramifications to it?
Technical SEO | | TheDude0 -
Robots.txt blocking site or not?
Here is the robots.txt from a client site. Am I reading this right --
Technical SEO | | 540SEO
that the robots.txt is saying to ignore the entire site, but the
#'s are saying to ignore the robots.txt command? See http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/norobots.html for documentation on how to use the robots.txt file To ban all spiders from the entire site uncomment the next two lines: User-Agent: * Disallow: /0 -
Robots.txt file getting a 500 error - is this a problem?
Hello all! While doing some routine health checks on a few of our client sites, I spotted that a new client of ours - who's website was not designed built by us - is returning a 500 internal server error when I try to look at the robots.txt file. As we don't host / maintain their site, I would have to go through their head office to get this changed, which isn't a problem but I just wanted to check whether this error will actually be having a negative effect on their site / whether there's a benefit to getting this changed? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | themegroup0