Making unresponsive site responsive, should I expect any ranking penalties?
-
Hello,
I have a website made with asp.net and ranking quite well for a number of competitive keywords like in google top 10 results for more than a dozen competitive keywords.
Recently in order for better user experience, I am having it developed so it is fully responsive for all screen resolutions. Basically all the design element / site text will remain the same including color scheme / layout etc outwardly but internally this will change everything all the css / page html (tables converted to divs) etc.
Now my question is:
1. Will this considered by bots a complete site overhaul and ranking will take a hit even if I stay with current platform i.e. asp.net?
2. While making design responsive I can also develop a wordpress theme, which will make it easier to work with the website as the site does not require any programming. So if I also change the platform like from MS IIS/asp to Apache / php how will search engine bots take this?
3. If above in fact will result in ranking drop, how much time will it take for the rankings to get back to normal?
Note that I use extensionless urls so the urls will remain the same as well even if we convert from asp to php.
Sorry for long details but question is bugging me from weeks.
-
I'd recommend you run some A/B tests. In our experience with site revamps, it's best to ensure your visitors are happy first, whcih you can measure using conversion rates.
If you notice a big dip in conversions, something may be broken which could then have a knock-on effect with your rankings.
From a massive revamp we recently did to make things responsive (1.5M pges) we noticed an increase in most of our rankings.
But just remember - treat google as a mobile user, so if you start simple and progressively add more content via ajax as the screen size increases, remember google may not pick these up, it will see your 'simplest' page, so make sure you don't remove any important on-page factors.
-
Hi,
I did several major site migrations in recent months and if you get the basics right, there should be no (negative) impact on your rankings. It's a myth that site migrations always lead to a drop in rankings. Changing technology should not have an impact - Google is all about the user experience, not about the technology used to create the user experience. Having a responsive site should increase your traffic (and rankings).
Not affiliated to them - but as already indicated by Travis a tool like Screaming Frog (the paid version) is almost a pre-requisite for a successful migration.
The main thing you should take care of is that all your current url's are properly redirected to avoid 404's after migration. You indicate that the url's are not going to change so this should be no problem. To be sure - crawl your current website with a tool (like ScreamingFrog) to get the full list of url's. Export the list of url's & replace the current domain with your test domain and crawl the responsive version based on this list. Check if all url's return a 200 status (if they return a 301 - check if the redirected url's return a 200 status). As a side effect, crawling your current site could also show you other areas of improvement like images that are too heavy, endless loops, unbalanced site structure, etc. If you encounter issues with your current site - try to solve them with the migration.
Compare the main on-page items between the two sites (H1, page title, metadescription) - in your case they should be identical (if you use ScreamingFrog this is a pretty basic task - just export the craw results to xls & see if they match)
Crawl your new site - check if the number of pages crawled is identical (or close) to the number of pages crawled on the current site. Screamingfrog allows you to see the site structure - compare it with your current site, to be sure that important content is not pushed deeper into your site.
Use a tool like webpagetest.org to check the speed of your site - both for your current site and your new site to be sure that with the new designs you are not slowing down your site - do this for a number of typical pages on your site (hint: look at your most popular landing pages in Analytics). Do the same checks with https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/ - see if you improve the results with your new responsive site. Your score for mobile should be a lot better - if not - you did something wrong with your re-design.
For your most important pages (probably your most important landing pages / most visited pages) - do some visual checks between old & new site - is all the content present, does it look ok, ...etc.
I don't know if you get a lot of traffic from image search (check your webmastertools). If this is the case: if the url's and/or the names of the images change - make sure that the 'old' images remain accessible under the old url (in my experience it takes a bit longer for google to update the index for Image search).
Make sure that your sitemap is updated when migrating. Probably you block your test site for indexing - don't forget to remove this when putting your new site online.
After migration, check your webmastertools for 404's - idem for Google Analytics. Correct 404's as fast as possible (make sure that your 404 page is tagged in Analytics).
To answer your point 3 - if something goes wrong during migration, in my experience you should count on approx. 3 months for recovery, but with no guarantee that you'll return to previous positions, so better make sure that you get the points above right from the start.
Good luck with the migration!
-
Why not just adopt WordPress? ; ) I generally don't work with the .Net platform in the wild, unless I'm prospecting. You may or may not believe some of the crazy things that platform does out of the box. So make sure to get a full crawl of the site and sort out any issues prior to dev work. I recommend Screaming Frog in most instances. But if you have a gigantic site and/or you may not be able to identify problems readily, you may find Deep Crawl worth the price.
At any rate, just make sure you have a pre and post launch crawl for comparison. That alone can save you hours of time, should something go a awry. If nothing else the crawls will help a consultant, should you need one in the future.
Since you're making major site changes, it's also a good idea to get some site speed benchmarks. (Get benchmarks under various traffic loads, if possible.) It's possible that you can end up with a slower site, even though it's responsive. There are a number of ways that can happen, but at least you'll know if you have a speed problem.
I recommend GTmetrix and Pingdom for the above tasks. Here are some really simple fixes from Feed The Bot that should help with speed, once you're on an Apache server.
Just remember, redesigns are a great time to catch any loose ends you 'didn't have time for' or were 'minor problems'. Those minor problems stack up to considerable wins, once they're righted. You're on the right path with a responsive redesign. Remember to preserve the source order of the site between versions (desktop, mobile, tablet) as much as possible. That will help with the speed as well.
-
Hi-
If the page content is the same is the url structure is the same, I don't suspect you'll see too much, if any, damage. You might even do better because you went responsive. Just be careful to make sure of things like placement of the title tag, etc, and your stylings (H1, etc) are similar to where they were before.
Good Luck
Ken
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ranking Issue for New Site
Hi all, I have got a specific SEO challenge. 6 months ago, we started to build an eCommerce site (located in the UK). In order to speed up the site launch, we copied the entire site over from an existing site based in Ireland. Now, the new UK site has been running for 5 months. Google has indexed many pages, which is good, but we can't rank high (position: between 20-30 for most pages). We thought it was because of content duplication in spite of different regions. So we tried to optimize the pages for the UK site to make them more UK-related and avoid content duplication. I've also used schema to tell google it's a UK-based site and set up Google my business and got more local citations. Besides, If you could give me any suggestions, it'd be perfect.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Insightful_Media
Thank you so much for your time and advice.1 -
Site Rollback for Careless Website Design That Caused Rank Drop
New PPC Client (out of necessity) had their site redesigned for mobile without much care given to it by a "SEO Expert". None of the meta data was copied over to the new images and pages, much of the old content was simply deleted, intra site links completely changed. Huge hits in organic rank, resulting in traffic declines occurred as their lead volume hit zero the following month (April 21 until Present). Any concerns I should have in doing a simple rollback beyond redirects and GWT (Search Console) ops? Current plan is 1. Setup redirects back to old site 2. Launch PPC campaign to recover call volume and leads. 3. Optimize old site for mobile simultaneously with simple responsive framework for menu, text. 4. Start disavowing poor-quality links that were added (got 10 with spam rating >4). 5. Eventually move them back to Wordpress and the theme they paid for with site content, meta data, etc all in tact.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jclmns0 -
Ranking sites in vertical markets with 90% scraped content
Hi, Hoping to get advice about ranking sites (a vertical market search engine/portal like a car site for example) that gets its content from scraping car sites. For various reasons (mostly scale eg cant get car dealers to push their listings to us) content was scraped. The startup has received great press, TV interviews, incubator programs etc, and has also secured very significant investment. I feel if this site was launched pre-panda it would be ranking much better. We have invested significantly in our tech, our search tools and site innovation place us easily as market leader in this space. Anyone with experience in ranking sites with legitimate reasons for using scraped content?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | edthomasnp0 -
Google penalty or what???
Hi, we have a blog site xxxxxxxxxxx.es, that yesterday dissapear from google ranks all of a sudden it only appears if you write xxxxxxxxx.es I have checked gogle webmaster tools and there are no manual actions, no messages. Also, we don't have much links pointing to this site. Webmaster tools show only 319 links. We don't understand what have happenned. Never see something similar. What do you think? Any help would be appreciated. How do you proceed in this cases? It doesn't seem to be a link problem. How do you know what kind of penalty do you have? Thank you. Update: Hi, the domain is www.crearcorreoelectronico.es I have check the majestic seo, ose, and wmt and get the links. We have some links that are not good, but are automatic ones, that some portals generate. Maybe is something related with the content. I don't know Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | teconsite1 -
Will an inbound follow link on a site be devalued by an inbound affiliate link on the same site?
Hey guys, quick question I didn't find an answer to online. Scenario: 1. Site A links to Site B. It's a natural, regular, follow-link 2. Site A joins Site B's affiliate program, and adds an affiliate link Question: Does the first, regular follow link get devalued by the second affiliate link? Cheers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ipancake0 -
Duplicate content across hundreds of Local sites and they all rank #1
Usually when we discuss duplicate content, we're addressing the topic of penalties or non-indexing. In this case, we're discussing ranking high with duplicate content. I've seen lots of dental, chiropractor and veterinarian sites built by companies that give them cookie cutter sites with the same copy. And they all rank #1 or #2. Here are two companies that do that:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | katandmouse
http://www.rampsites.com/rampsites/home_standard.asp?sectionid=4
http://mysocialpractice.com/about/ The later uses external blogs to provide inbound links to their clients' site, but not all services do that, in fact, this is the first time I've seen them with external blogs. Usually the blog with duplicate copy is ON SITE and the sites still rank #1. Query "Why Your Smile Prefers Water Over Soft Drinks" to see duplicate content on external blogs. Or "Remember the Mad Hatter from the childhood classic, Alice in Wonderland? Back then, the process of making hats involved using mercury compounds. Overexposure could produce symptoms referred to as being" for duplicate content on chiropractor sites that rank high. I've seen well optimized sites rank under them even though their sites have just as much quality content and it's all original with more engagement and inbound links. It appears to me that Google is turning a blind eye on duplicate content. Maybe because these are local businesses with local clientele it doesn't care that a chiropractor in NY has the same content as one in CA, just as the visitor doesn't care because the visitor in CA isn't look at a chiropractor's site in NY generally. So maybe geo-targeting the site has something to do with it. As a test, I should take the same copy and put it on a non-geo-targeted site and see if it will get indexed. I asked another Local SEO expert if she has run across this, probably the best in my opinion. She has and she finds it difficult to rank above them as well. It's almost as if Google is favoring those sites. So the question is, should all dentists, chiropractors and veterinarians give it up to these services? I shudder to think that, but, hey it's working and it's a whole lot less work - and maybe expense - for them.0 -
Does it make sense to combine multiple news sites under one domain?
My company operates multiple news site brands across several markets and typically operates one website per market/brand. We've been advised that in the case of one of the newer markets, where each brand might only be publishing 3 articles a week, that combining all that market's brands under one domain will drive higher traffic from search because Google values higher article flow. Getting this done will be a lot of work. Is the juice worth the squeeze? And assuming we get the UX right and execute 301 redirects correctly, are there major risks to search traffic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlecD0 -
Site: on Google
Hello, people. I have a quick question regarding search in Google. I use search operator [site:url] to see indexing stauts of my site. Today, I was checking indexing status and I found that Google shows different numbers of indexed pages depends on search setting. 1. At default setting (set as 10 search result shows) > I get about 150 pages indexed by Google. 2. I set 100 results shows per page and tried again. > I get about 52 pages indexed by Google. Of course I used same page URL. I really want to know which data is accurate. Please help people!!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Artience0