Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Schema, aggregate ratings and trustpilot
-
Hi!
I'm looking to include rich snippets on some of my product sites, such as price etc.
In addition, it would be nice to include our overall ratings (from Trustpilot) on the different pages.
However, I've been looking all over, and haven't really found a clear answer, as to if this is even in adherence with the Google guidelines.As it is our company overall, and not the specific products that are being rated, I have done it likes this (on product pages):
name of organization
248
8,2
10.- other product-specific information
Would this be against guidelines?
-
Okay, but I would just like to follow guidelines, in case Google spots it
-
That's a common cheating technique (Product schema in place of Organization), so far I never saw google spotting it.
-
I will test it, Dirk, and get back to you. At the moment, we have star ratings for a specific product page in SERP. Today I've changed the classification from
toand I will keep an eye on what happens to the stars.
Thank you all for your help
-
It is clear - however maybe not what I hoped for
On Trustpilot, it is our company's services AND products that are being rated, and not a specific product, necessarily.
So maybe in this case I should stick to one aggregate rating for the company.I will however test it. By mistake I classified the aggregate rating on the product page with
instead of , and in Google, star ratings have appeared for this specific product. However, since this is not accurate, I have changed it to the "organization", and I will check if/when Google removes the star rating from the product page in SERP
-
I would expect product pages to have AggregateRating markup for that specific product. Not for the organization. Google is not going to show that rating anyway, so why put it there?
Keep in mind, you want star rating to appear in SERP because will improve CTR.
To have star rating appear in SERP you need markup and a user query matching the target of the rating.
Let's assume you sell vegetables and your organization name is "Veggie Inc".
Would you expect the product page for "Early Girl Tomato" to show up in SERP when people search for "Veggie Inc."? Unlikely. So if you add organization aggregate rating markup on that page no one will see that.
Do you think the star rating will appear on "Early Girl Tomato" page for other queries? No way.
Best practice is Organization AggregateRating on 1 page, usually the homepage, which people will likely search for using your brand as query, a query which will match your Organization name...
Hope I was clear.
-
You can put in all your product pages. It seems a logical thing to do both for your company & and your users - a good score from a reliable source will reassure potential buyers that you're a serious company that can be trusted to buy stuff.
I am not sure if the aggregate rating will be displayed in the SERP's (most examples you see are ratings & reviews for individual products), but it will certainly do no harm.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Thank you!
I'm definitily using the aggegate rating, only, at the moment. If I'll include reviews at a later point, I will be sure to add an additional schema.
Question - can I use the aggregate rating for my organization on more than one of my (product) pages, as long as it is only one time per page?
-
In addition to all the good things said by others. Be careful about the following:
- if you add AggregateRating markup for "ACME Inc." it will probably (as you may know google takes into account a variety of factors, not just the markup presence) show up, when people are querying for "ACME Inc.", but if your organization is "Potato and Tomato Inc.", and the user query is "Potato Tomato" won't show up.
- don't confuse google guidelines for "Reviews" with "AggregateRating", you may have multiple reviews on the same page all nicely marked up, it's perfectly fine for google, but you may have only one AggregateRating markup per page.
Of course you can have AggregateRating plus additional schema.org markup on the same page, like reviews, but only one AggregateRating markup.
-
Thank you so much Dirk
That helpsKind regards
Trine -
It is inline with Google policies as long as you add the rating to your organisation & not to an individual product.
If you check the different guidelines
(sources: https://developers.google.com/structured-data/policies & https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/reviews)- When you have multiple entity types on a page, we recommend you mark up all entities on that page to help Google algorithms better understand and index your content
=> OK -both organisation & product are being tagged - Make sure the review or ratings markup refers clearly to a specific product or service as shown in the examples above
=> OK - aggregate reviews are done on item: organisation - Review and rating markup should be used to provide review and/or rating information about a specific item, not about a category or a list of items.
=> same as above - Make sure the reviews and ratings you mark up are readily available to users from the marked-up page. It should be immediately obvious to users that the page has review or ratings content.
=> I imagine you put the rating quite visible on the page, you probably also provide a link to the original source (trustpilot)
Don't see any issue here.
rgds,
Dirk
- When you have multiple entity types on a page, we recommend you mark up all entities on that page to help Google algorithms better understand and index your content
-
Hi Dirk
Thank you for you answer
The product-specific info would be in a separate markup, but on product-basis, as that info relates to that specific product:
and so on
The mark-up is working, according to Googles testing tool, so I guess my question is rather focused on, whether or not I'm following Google's guidelines, inserting aggregated ratings for the organization (collected through a third party app) on my product pages
/
-
Hi,
The tagging seems to be on organisation level and looks ok on first sight (you can always check the tag inside WMT or using this tool . From your question I do not really understand where you add the product specific info. Normally they should be in two separate itemtypes: organisation / product (the one for the product should be without the aggregate rating - as this only exist for the organisation & not for the product).
You could check the example on https://schema.org/LocalBusiness (scroll to the bottom) for the tagging of your organisation. For the product - you could check the tagging on https://schema.org/Product (idem).
Hope this helps,
Dirk
-
Hi Patrick,
Thank you for your reply
It is the ratings from a third party app (called Trustpilot).
Every time a person makes a purchase on our site, they get an invitation to rate our business (webshop, products, service).My site is an online webshop, and not a local business, so the info listed is metatags (RDFa's) from schema.org.
So basically, what I want to do is to include these ratings on my product pages.Did that make sense?
-
Hi there
Are these ratings on the website? If not, you can look into tags. Here is more information on the Schema.org site.
You may also want to look into Google+ Business pages, verifying that page, and linking it to your website.
From there, you can see snippets appear in your SERPs. I would also look into Moz Local to help you get on listings that assist in these reviews.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or comments, or if I am missing the point of the question. Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Schema Markup Warning "Missing field "url" (optional)"
Hello Moz Team, I hope everyone is doing well & good, I need bit help regarding Schema Markup, I am facing issue in my schema markup specifically with my blog posts, In my majority of the posts I find error "Missing field "url" (optional)"
Technical SEO | Jun 20, 2023, 7:35 AM | JoeySolicitor
As this schema is generated by Yoast plugin, I haven't applied any custom steps. Recently I published a post https://dailycontributors.com/kisscartoon-alternatives-and-complete-review/ and I tested it at two platforms of schema test 1, Validator.Schema.org
2. Search.google.com/test/rich-results So the validator generate results as follows and shows no error
Schema without error.PNG It shows no error But where as Schema with error.PNG in search central results it gives me a warning "Missing field "url" (optional)". So is this really be going to issue for my ranking ? Please help thanks!6 -
Product schema GSC Error 'offers, review, or aggregateRating should be specified'
I do not have a sku, global identifier, rating or offer for my product. Nonetheless it is my product. The price is variable (as it's insurance) so it would be inappropriate to provide a high or low price. Therefore, these items were not included in my product schema. SD Testing tool showed 2 warnings, for missing sku and global identifier. Google Search Console gave me an error today that said: 'offers, review, or aggregateRating should be specified' I don't want to be dishonest in supplying any of these, but I also don't want to have my page deprecated in the search results. BUT I DO want my item to show up as a product. Should I forget the product schema? Advice/suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | Aug 12, 2019, 7:00 AM | RoxBrock1 -
Correct use of schema for online store and physical stores
I have been getting conflicting advice on the best way to implement schema for the following scenario. There is a central e-commerce store that is registered to it's own unique address which is "head office". There are a few physical shops each of which has their own location and address. Each shop has its own landing page within /our-stores/. So each page on the website has the Organisation schema for the central 'organisation', something like: Then on each physical store landing page is something like the following as well as the Organisation schema: Is this correct? If it is should I extend LocalBusiness with store URL and sameAs for GMB listing and maybe Companies House registration? It's also been suggested that we should use LocalBusiness for the head office of the company, then Departmentwith the typeStore. But i'm not sure on that?
Technical SEO | Feb 19, 2019, 11:26 AM | MickEdwards0 -
Size of image for article Schema
Hi, I implemented schema markup for an article and all tested fine and I can see it being fired in preview mode of Google Tag Manager. But when I run the URL which has it applied through Google Structured Testing tool it is not appearing. I have now read that the image needs to be a certain size. For AMP articles this appears to be 12oo pixels wide http://www.thesempost.com/google-changes-image-size-requirements-amp-articles/ But what about non-AMP articles? Does it need to be that big too?
Technical SEO | Jun 25, 2018, 12:36 PM | AL123al0 -
Crawl rate dropped to zero
Hello, I recently moved my site in godaddy from cpanel to managed wordpress. I bought this transfer directly from GoDaddy customer service. in this process they accidentally changed my domain from www to non www. I changed it back after the migration, but as a result of this sites craw rate from search console fell to zero and has not risen at all since then. In addition to this website does not display any other errors, i can ask google manually fetch my pages and it works as before, only the crawl rates seems to be dropped permanently. GoDaddy customer service also claims that do not see any errors but I think, however, that in some way they caused this during the migration when the url changed since the timing match perfectly. also when they accidentally removed the www, crawl rate of my sites non www version got up but fell back to zero when I changed it back to www version. Now the crawl rate of both www and non www version is zero. How do I get it to rise again? Customer service also said that the problem may be related to ftp-data of search console? But they were not able to help any more than .Would someone from here be able to help me with this in anyway please?
Technical SEO | Apr 2, 2016, 8:41 AM | pok3rplay3r0 -
Schema markup for products is missing "price": Is this bad?
Hey guys, So a current client of mine has an e-commerce shop with a few hundred products. They purposely choose to keep the prices off of their website, which is causing errors in Google Webmaster Tools. Basically the error shows: Error: Structured Data > Product (markup: schema.org) Error type: missing price 208 items with error Is this a huge deal? Or are we allowed to have non-numerical prices for schema ie. "call for quote"
Technical SEO | Aug 29, 2014, 4:15 PM | tbinga1 -
Using Schema.org: Product or Event as the schema type?
Hello, Most of you heard from the launch of the new format for microdata: Schema.org and my question is about the different types of Schema they provide. Our websites provide an overview of courses, visitors can search/filter training courses and most important: read peer reviews. Until now we formatted (the source) of those courses with the schema type "Product" because it allows us to provide search engines with metadata about reviews via the "Aggregrated Rating". Recently we updated the information about courses, to also provide start dates and locations to users, just like the schema type for: "Events". Because we would like to provide search engines also with both types of data I would like to know your opinion. Schema.org looks like not to support the Aggregated Rating for Events and vice versa for Startdates/Locations for the Product type. And combining the two Schema types also does not looks like an option because we can't put them on the same level like it should be. So what would you recommend to use for kind of schema type(s), are we able to use the 'Product' type next to the 'Event' type and so to combine them? Thanks a lot!
Technical SEO | Sep 22, 2011, 12:55 PM | Martijn_Scheijbeler0 -
Schema for Price Comparison Services - Good or Bad?
Hey guys, I was just wondering what the whole schema.org markup means for people that run search engines (i.e. for a niche, certain products) or price comparison engines in general. The intend behind schema.org was to help the engines better understand the pages content. Well, I guess such services don't necessarily want Google to understand that they're just another search engine (and thus might get thrown out of the index for polluting it with search result pages). I see two possible scenarios: either not implement them or implement them in a way that makes the site not look like an aggregator, i.e. by only marking up certain products with unique text. Any thoughts? Does the SEOmoz team has any advice on that? Best,
Technical SEO | Jun 20, 2011, 2:33 AM | derderko
schuon0