Are sliders killing our site?
-
Our website, http://shatterbuggy.com, has what I believe is a systemic issue that stems from the heavy reliance upon the Revolution Slider for Wordpress. I am not an SEO expert and our site has vexed many SEOs in the past.
We get feedback regularly from customers (especially those that are not tech savvy) that express gratitude for the ease of use via following an image to image sequence to get to their respective booking. This was our goal when creating the site. Incidentally, in many cases, the only linking from page to page is within the slider itself (clickable image) and there is little to no content. That said, we seems to stumble in SERPS against seemingly inferior competition. For example, we should be ranked in spot 1, 2, or 3 ish for "iPhone repair Minneapolis" but rather we are stuck near spot 15.
Any thoughts on whether this is a strategy that may be harming us? If so, would simply creating content on these empty (slider only) pages help? Should we create "static links" that connect to the same places as the slider? Also, is our particular use of the slider creating H1 issues?
Thank you all!
B.
-
Moosa, Dirk-
Thank you both.
B.
-
I agree with Moosa - I crawled your site with Screaming Frog, and it had no problem to crawl the links inside the slider.
-
If the slider is crawl-able, i dont think there will be a much advantage of normal static links.
#personalopinion
-
Hi Moosa-
Thank you for the reply. Much appreciated!
Cheers!
B.
-
Hi Dirk-
Thank you for the detailed reply. Very much appreciated. All of your suggestions make a great deal of sense.
Do you have an opinion regarding linking within the slider though? Specifically, do you know if there would be any advantage to creating static links that are the same as the links that the slider images link to? These would be below the slider.
Cheers!
B.
-
Benjamin,
I don’t think the issue is with the slider but there are other issues you should be considering as important. I will quickly go over it.
- 3XX errors. I am not saying 301 redirection is bad but too many 301s can damage your website so try to minimize them where possible.
- Few URLs contain “underscore”. Not really a very good practice. Also there are one or two URLs that contain upper case as well.
- Not saying it’s a ranking factor, but it can affect CTR which again is a ranking factor. You have missing descriptions on different pages of the website
- Images are not properly optimized.
- Page load time can be improved.
- Your DA is not really impressive, so I guess few more links here and there will obviously help!
Just a quick overview! Hope this helps…
-
Hi Benjamin,
Not sure that it's the slider which is causing your issues.
1. Your site has performance issues - especially linked to time to first byte. Check the results from http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150510_ZZ_QZY/ & https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=www.shatterbuggy.com. You might want to read this thread on how you could improve this https://wordpress.org/support/topic/how-to-reduce-time-to-first-byte-on-my-wordpress-site You should consider to combine & minify the css & js files (you have an awful lot of them - 27 each for the homepage) and modify your caching settings (see advice pagespeed insights)
2. You have 366 HTML pages on your site - 121 pages are redirected. You should update your internal links so that the links point directly to the final destination. Example: the homepage links to http://www.shatterbuggy.com/plymouth/ - but this page doesn't exist and is redirected to http://www.shatterbuggy.com/service-areas/plymouth/. Screaming frog can help you to identify which links need to be updated.
3. 128 pages have no meta-description / 38 pages have no H1 title (example http://www.shatterbuggy.com/service-areas/cherry-creek/ipad-repair/)
4. The images you use on site are quite heavy (almost 50% is over 100KB) - some of them extremely heavy (http://www.shatterbuggy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/waiting-in-line.jpeg) - 123 have no alt text
5. Due to the large slider which always is dominating the page - you push the text out of the visible area. Your regional pages are very similar and could almost be considered duplicates. The region specific content is not visible without scrolling. Google prefers important content to be visible - not hidden at the bottom of the page.
6. You might want to check this article on local SEO: https://moz.com/blog/everybody-needs-local-seo - it contains a lot of tips & tricks on how to make your locations more visible for Google.
7. A lot of specific pages have http://www.shatterbuggy.com/repairs/ as canonical - example http://www.shatterbuggy.com/repairs/iphone-repair/gold-iphone-6-issue/ - not sure if for this specific page the /repairs/ page is the best option as canonical - you might want to point to an iphone repair page.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Can I Do To Improve The SEO of My Site?
We have a website that is ranking okay but we can't seem to get past #6 or #7 for a specific national keyword, "self storage software". We are working on a more effective back-linking strategy right now, but we really are having a hard time identifying steps to take besides that. If anyone can help me out and give me some suggestions I would be very appreciative. Maybe even seeing a competitive analysis from someone else would help catch something that I am not seeing. Website is www.storageunitsoftware.com Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | kenturley0 -
Site scraped over 400,000 urls
Our business is heavily dependent on SEO traffic from long tail search. We have over 400,000 pieces of content, all of which we found scraped and published by another site based out of Hong Kong (we're in the US). Google has a process for DMCA takedown, but doing so would be beyond tedious for such a large set of urls. The scraped content is outranking us in many searches and we've noticed a drastic decrease in organic traffic, likely from a duplicate content penalty. Has anyone dealt with an issue like this? I can't seem to find much help online.
Technical SEO | | Kibin0 -
Site Redesign: 302 Query
Hi there, We'll be redesigning our website www.example.com and as such want to 302 users from www.example.com and all other pages to a new URL www.example.com/landingpage while we go through the redesign. The new landing page will have copy and a sign up form on it and once the redesign is completed, we plan on removing the 302 and sending all traffic back to the original url www.example.com. I'd just like to check that a 302 is the most relevant option here? Obviously, once redesign is completed we'll 301 any old URLs to their new locations once completed.
Technical SEO | | Hemblem0 -
Site offline - Mitigating measures?
Hi, Our domain has expired, and it could take up to 48h to recover our website. Appart from the obvious image damage, It worries me Google will just think we have vanisheg Any recommendations? Maybe update something on WebMasterTools? Not having the domain, cannot even do any temporary redirect, etc... Thanks! Jaime
Technical SEO | | BaseKit0 -
Multiple domains pointing to same site
Over the years, we have acquired a great number of variations of our domains, or industry-specific domains to protect our brand. Currently, the majority of those domains are parked at the registrars. Would we do any harm to our rankings if we pointed the dormant domains to our website (www.ellsworth.com)? If not, are there any recommendations as the best way to do this, or just point them to the same IP?
Technical SEO | | Ellsworth0 -
How do you find bad links to your site?
My website has around 900 incoming links and I have a Google 50 penalty that is sitewide. I have been doing research and from what I can see is that the 50 penalty is usually associated with scetchy links. The penalty started last year. I had about 40 related domains to my main site and each had a simple one page site with a link to the main site. (I know I screwed up) I cleaned up all of those links by removing them. The single page site still exist, but they have no links and several of them still rank very well. I also had an outside SEO person that bought a few links. I came clean with Google and told them everything. I gave them all of my sites and that the SEO person had bought links. I gave them full disclosure and removed everything. I have one site that I can't get the link removed from. I have contacted them numerous times to remove the link and I get no response. I am curious if anyone has had a simular experience and how they corrected the situation. Another issue is that my site is "thin" because its an ecommerce affiliate site and full of affiliate links. I work in the costume market. I'm also afraid that I have other bad links pointing to my site. Dooes anyone know of a tool to identify bad links that Google may be penalizing me for at this time. Here is Google's latest denial of my reconsideration request. Dear site owner or webmaster of XXXXXXXXX.com. We received a request from a site owner to reconsider XXXXXXXX.com for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines. We've reviewed your site and we believe that some or all of your pages still violate our quality guidelines. In order to preserve the quality of our search engine, pages from XXXXXXXXXX.com may not appear or may not rank as highly in Google's search results, or may otherwise be considered to be less trustworthy than sites which follow the quality guidelines. If you wish to be reconsidered again, please correct or remove all pages that are outside our quality guidelines. When such changes have been made, please visit https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/reconsideration?hl=en and resubmit your site for reconsideration. If you have additional questions about how to resolve this issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support. Sincerely, Google Search Quality
Technical SEO | | tadden0 -
Site revision
our site has complete redesign including site architecture, page url and page content (except domain). It looks like a new site. The old site has been indexed about thirty thousand results by google. now what should i do first?
Technical SEO | | jallenyang0 -
Canonical on ecommerce site
I have read tons of guides about canonical implementaiton but still am confused about how I should best use it. On my site with tens of thousands of urls and thousands of afiiliates and shopping networks sending traffic, is it smart to simply add the tag to every page and redirect to the same url. In doing this would that solve the problem of a single page having many different entrances with different tracking codes? Is there a better way to handle this? Also is there any potential problems with rolling out the tag to all pages if they are simply refrencing themselves in the tag? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | Gordian0