Should UK websites expect any benefit from using Google+?
-
In several places, Google+ is talked about as something that should be used to help improve the SEO of websites and to engage better with audiences. The problem I am having with this is that these sources are usually from America, and that people I've spoken to in the UK don't even know Google+ exists.
So what I'd like to know, does Google+ give any sort of benefit to UK businesses in terms of SEO, even though it seems it's a platform used mostly in the USA?
-
Thanks Rand! I don't know many, well any, people in America so I couldn't work out whether G+ was a runaway success over there compared to here in the UK. But what you say makes total sense in regards to the communities that are heavily used.
-
Hi Mick - I'd say that if you're not finding value from Google+, I wouldn't worry about it. Google is investing less in it and unless you're in a community/niche where G+ is heavily used (travel, photography, online marketing are a few), probably best to put your effort elsewhere. The only real SEO benefit to G+ left is the personalization of SERPs, but that will only work if you have a large group following you who can be biased in their SERPs by their connection with you. Don't think it's geographically specific, but it's certainly niche-specific.
Best of luck!
-
In the 4 months we've been putting content on to our Google+ page, hashtagging it and posting on to UK communities we've had zero traffic from it. The same posts generate a good stream of traffic from LinkedIn and Twitter, so I think you're right. The information it provides to the searches are about the only use for it in my opinion.
-
Yeah I think this is the only benefit I see from it myself, that and the reviews that it provides. I know that Google deliver 2 G+ pages or posts on the first page of search results, whether the user has to be logged in to their "Google/Google+" account for this to happen I'm not sure of though.
-
You make a good point, but how would you build an audience on Google+ if you don't invest your time on there? Otherwise you're relying on bringing traffic from other platforms to build up your community on there. I can see there are active users on there, but mostly in America.
-
I don't rate Google+ all that much.
We do it because.. well, just because. Probably the same reason you do it, but I don't believe it has helped in the slightest in terms of SEO benefit. It's nice that have that hub where you can feed your company information into Google but that's as far as it goes for us.
Might be wrong!
-
Google+ is a great tool, if you are a local business. The truth is many people in the UK don't really use it as a social platform, but it is great for getting your business in front of people who are looking for a local shop or local service.
-
If experts are discussing about any tactics (that does not specify location) usually means it works for anyone regardless of location. I mean guest blogging is a tactics that allow referral traffic to your blog, no matter where you are geographically no matter what your niche is, strategy will work for you.
As far as Google+ is concern, I am one of the believers that Google+ was another fail from Google after Google Buzz. As far as SEO benefits are concern, I don’t see much direct SEO benefits from Google plus even for Americans.
I think you only should be on Google+ when you have a community around you and you can interact with them to get some referral traffic. If your audience isn’t there what’s the point of investing and wasting time there!
Just a thought!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexed Images: Website Vs Social Media
I use Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram to post images that are already featured on my website. I have been following a routine of uploading the images to these social media platforms only after I can see Google has indexed the image from my original site. My website is ecommerce and the product images drive sales more than any other factor. The thinking behind my method was that when these images are posted on Pinterest, Twitter and the various Instagram crawler sites (I realise Instagram images aren’t indexed directly), Google would recognise that the image was already attributed to my website. The ‘duplicate’ image would not therefore be indexed and the originally uploaded website image would remain in ‘Google Images’. After completing various searches and reviewing other Q&A’s on Moz, it seems as though this is in no way guaranteed and images reposted on social media platforms may still replace the already indexed image from the website. I am assuming this is because Google views these platforms as more authoritative than mine. I usually change the image by adding logos, text, backgrounds, borders etc before posting on Pinterest and this seems to have worked most of the time (both the original and ‘amended for Pinterest’ versions are often indexed) but images posted on other platforms are usually identical. Does it make sense to continue with my method or am I shooting myself in the foot by reposting these images on social media at all? I obviously want customers searching for products, who then click on an image, to be directed to my site rather than one of my social media pages or worse, an image reposting site. Additionally, If I post images on social media before they are uploaded to my website (for example to tease a product launch), would Google likely class these images as the ‘original’ and therefore be less likely to index the website version of the image once it is uploaded? Any thoughts are appreciated.
Social Media | | g3mmab2 -
Do you think that Content Locking (force to share to unlock content) is manipulative and will eventually be penalised by Google?
There is a tactic called content locking which requires a user to share a post or homepage URL in order to unlock content (either a video, a full post or downloadable ebook). Do you think this is manipulating signals to increase search rankings? Argument Against Using Content Locking Social signals and links from Google Plus shares clearly correlate to increased search engine visibility. Requiring a user to pay for content with social sharing is only used to improve search rankings. According to the webmaster guidelines: "Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you, or to a Google employee. Another useful test is to ask, 'Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?'" Argument For Using Content Locker Users tend to value their social profiles and won't share something unless they believe it is valuable. Requiring a share is just a push to motivate them to share something they value. Additionally, it is similar to an email opt-in in that the publisher now has a social media lead they can follow up on. It's not just about SEO, it's about tapping into social network traffic and engagement on social networks.
Social Media | | designquotes1 -
When with Google+ bio area backlinks get devalued if we have everybody link to our site
Hello, As you know, Google+ bios, if they have a link in them are dofollow. I'm doing a link building campaign, and we already linked one of our Google+ pages to our home page and top 2 articles. My question is, to get links, can we have family and friends add links in their bios too for a total of 6 links to the home page (6 people) and some links to our articles? Or will Google devalue them because we are family and friends? How many is too many? Thanks.
Social Media | | BobGW0 -
Anyone just see a massive drop in URL Likes on their websites?
I just saw a big drop in Facebook URL Likes on my clients' websites. Has anyone else seen this too? Looks like Facebook is cleaning out the SPAM Likes.
Social Media | | Francisco_Meza0 -
Google + Profile in Serps
Hello, Ive noticed some of my competitors show up with both verified and non-verified Google+ Icon, and recent activity showing to the right usually where PPC shows. Is it possible for smaller sized businesses to accomplish something like this? Im assuming this is not paid? Thank You
Social Media | | TP_Marketing0 -
Current and Potential Impact of Google+ on SERPs and ranking
After watching Rand & Dharmesh's The State of SEO and Internet Marketing in 2012 webinar, I've been trying to learn more about the (current and potential long-term) impact of Google+ on SERPS and ranking. How can one leverage Google+ to improve SEO? Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks! Sherry
Social Media | | IMM0 -
Google+ What account to use for business?
Ok, we have been pretty dismissive of Google+ but having read more and more about how it is now directly influencing search results (currently in the USA) we are going to suggest setting up accounts for business. The question is, which Google Account should be used for the business page? In the nice presentational video on Google+ the example business is a nice local bike shop, which is simple right? Just use the small business owners account. But what about larger clients? Who in the org should have the business page on their account? What if that individual leaves? Can the page be separated from that account? Should you use maybe a Google Apps for Business account? But the issue with that is you will obviously have no one in any circles to share that page with. It all seems to be too closely tied to the personal side of Google+ Any help would be great. Thanks.
Social Media | | CarlE0 -
Finding google + influencers
I'm trying to sink my teeth into the power (or future power) of Google +. I would like to find people who are already well connected with Google + (in the military space). I can easily find Twitter and Facebook lists to see who is being followed and who the active users are, is there anything like that for Google +?
Social Media | | StreetwiseReports0