Keyword use in city specific "homepages"
-
My company, RightFit Personal Training, is a marketplace for people to find independent personal trainers based on preference. I am currently in the process of expanding nationally, and each city essentially has it's own homepage. Currently, the url of each city page ends in the name of the city only. For example, the url for the Houston page is www.rightfitpersonaltraining.com/houston/.
The issue here is that I actually wanted my contracted developer to add the state abbreviation as well as the words "personal trainers" to the end of each city page url. So what I really wanted to see out of the Houston personal training page was www.rightfitpersonaltraining.com/houston/tx/personal/trainers. Do you think it is worth it for me have my developer go back and change the URL structure of the city homepages to reflect the latter? This should also benefit the structure of the personal trainer profiles, because they could all fall under their specific city homepages. For example, I think it would be to my benefit if each trainer profile url ended in /city/state/personal/trainer/trainername. Thoughts?
-
So because my entire site is a marketplace of personal trainers (and only personal trainers) I won't need to create another category
Correct.
URL structure is such an infinitesimally small ranking factor, it's not worth your time trying to change it at this point.
-
Oh I see... So because my entire site is a marketplace of personal trainers (and only personal trainers) I won't need to create another category?
Alongside that, wouldn't it still help Google recognize us as a reputable marketplace of personal trainers if we end each city page in "city/trainers"? I am also a bit concerned because each trainer profile seems to fall under the general quick search page (http://www.rightfitpersonaltraining.com/personal-trainers/), but not under the trainer's corresponding city. My thought is that the SEO of each city page would strengthen if each trainer profile was listed as "rfpt.com/city/trainers/trainername". Currently, the trainer profiles are listed as "rfpt.com/personal-trainers/trainer/city-state-trainername".
Thank you all so much again for all the help. I really appreciate it. This means a LOT to me, as having a strong organic search presence is essential to the success of my business.
-
Well, I should have clicked through to the link...sorry. Your page is fine as-is. I had thought there were multiple categories of people/products on those pages. IF/WHEN you add those at a future date, that's when you'll want to build out the /Houston/trainers page with trainers (and no redirect would be required).
-
Thanks so much for the response, David. Here is my last question... If I make these URL changes, will it hurt my SEO by causing more redirects?
-
I think in the era of mobile, the shorter your URLs are, the better. So I'd go with
rfpt.com/houston/trainers, which it sounds like would also be easier to implement from a development perspective.
Copy Yelp's implementation in terms of site architecture and getting around what Josh is referring to as 'doorway' content above.
-
Thanks for the quick response, Josh.
So don't you think that I would be better off changing the structure from the current format of "rfpt.com/city" to the more descriptive "rfpt.com/city/state/personal-trainers"? We are a directory of personal trainers, so I think Google values what we provide.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Robots.txt - "File does not appear to be valid"
Good afternoon Mozzers! I've got a weird problem with one of the sites I'm dealing with. For some reason, one of the developers changed the robots.txt file to disavow every site on the page - not a wise move! To rectify this, we uploaded the new robots.txt file to the domain's root as per Webmaster Tool's instructions. The live file is: User-agent: * (http://www.savistobathrooms.co.uk/robots.txt) I've submitted the new file in Webmaster Tools and it's pulling it through correctly in the editor. However, Webmaster Tools is not happy with it, for some reason. I've attached an image of the error. Does anyone have any ideas? I'm managing another site with the exact same robots.txt file and there are no issues. Cheers, Lewis FNcK2YQ
Technical SEO | | PeaSoupDigital0 -
My sites "pages indexed by Google" have gone up more than qten-fold.
Prior to doing a little work cleaning up broken links and keyword stuffing Google only indexed 23/333 pages. I realize it may not be because of the work but now we have around 300/333. My question is is this a big deal? cheers,
Technical SEO | | Billboard20120 -
What is the difference between "Referring Pages" and "Total Backlinks" [on Ahrefs]?
I always thought they were essentially the same thing myself but appears there may be a difference? Any one care to help me out? Cheers!
Technical SEO | | Webrevolve0 -
Rel="canonical" again
Hello everyone, I should rel="canonical" my 2 languages website /en urls to the original version without /en. Can I do this from the header.php? Should I rel="canonical" each /en page (eg. en/contatti, en/pagina) separately or can I do all from the general before the website title? Thanks if someone can help.
Technical SEO | | socialengaged0 -
Rel="next"
Hi I was just wondering if there is any difference in using rel='next' rather than rel="next". Would it still work the same way? I mean using the apostrophes differently, would it matter? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | pikka0 -
Rel="Follow"? What the &#@? does that mean?
I've written a guest blog post for a site. In the link back to my site they've put a rel="follow" attribute. Is that valid HTML? I've Googled it but the answers are inconclusive, to say the least.
Technical SEO | | Jeepster0 -
We are still seeing duplicate content on SEOmoz even though we have marked those pages as "noindex, follow." Any ideas why?
We have many pages on our website that have been set to "no index, follow." However, SEOmoz is indexing them as duplicate content. Why is that?
Technical SEO | | cmaseattle0 -
I am wondering if I should use the Meta 'Cache" tag?
I am working on removing unnecessary meta tags that have little impact on SEO and I have read so many mixed reviews about using the Meta 'Cache' tag. I need to informative information on whether or not this tag should be used.
Technical SEO | | ImagetecLP0