Spammy Website Framed My Site & Stole Rankings
-
Hi
One of the pages of my website was starting to gather some real traction in Google rankings and hit 3500 visitors per day.
This is the page: http://www.naturallivingideas.com/drinking-apple-cider-vinegar-benefits/
On 11th January search traffic to this page fell to virtually 0. The rest of the site rankings were unaffected.
Yesterday I tried searching for some of the main keywords I was ranking for and instead of my search listing, this was appearing:
Image: http://www.naturallivingideas.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/weird-rankings.jpg
It is in the exact position I was ranking in, but instead this evn . moe site has stolen my ranking. Upon opening the website, it is simply my original article page in an iframe. If you look at the source code of the offending website, you will see what I mean.
Hopefully now you are getting a 403 forbidden error as my host blocked referrals from that site but they still hold my rankings.
Has anyone ever seen this before?
How was this done?
And how can I get my ranking back?
Thanks in advance,
James
-
There is no hard and fast answer to this. I've seen a DMCA request with Google take over a year to respond to, and I've seen it take a couple of months. Treat it as a marathon instead of a sprint. If you're lucky you'll be one of the ones whose case is examined and quickly rectified but expect this to take awhile.
-
Just to give an update on the situation.
I submitted a DMCA request here. As yet (5 days later) it has not been responded to but the offending domain has been offline for 3-4 days. Not sure who took it offline.
Still Google is ranking the offending domain instead of mine. In fact if you search for my exact URL (http://www.naturallivingideas.com/drinking-apple-cider-vinegar-benefits/) in Google, it still brings up the offending domain.
How long does it take for a site to be removed from the index once it goes offline?
James
-
@Kevin - Thanks. Is that this tool? https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-dashboard
@Greg - Thanks for the tip. As yet, no changes in ranking with only the 403 error.
@Paul - Thanks - my host have since implemented that line of code to prevent further problems.
@Brett - Thanks. I will do that and hopefully rankings will come back.
-
We're dealing with a similar issue here. Someone from Russia scraped our content and knocked us out of the SERP. Google sees a 200 status code but all others see 404.
We sent in a DMCA takedown request via https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-dashboard and it was responded to in less than a week (4 days). One caveat - make sure you have copyright ownership on that material. If you are an agency representing a client you may not have copyright and you may need to have them submit the request.
When you submit the request to Google and they verify it's legitimate they will remove the offending site from their search results. This is the only way to begin restoring your position.
You can contact their hosting provider and submit a takedown request with them as well. Provide evidence, and threaten legal action if they do not respond. Of course, Google has still indexed the other website, so you still need to submit a DMCA request with them to get your rankings back.
May the odds be ever in your favor.
-
The only sustainable way to protect a site from this kind of abuse is to implement the X_Origin security headers. These headers control whether any other sites are able to iframe content from your site. This protection should be applied to all sites, IMO.
Assuming your site is running on Apache and allows use of htaccess file, you add this line to your htaccess:
Header append X-FRAME-OPTIONS "SAMEORIGIN"
This determines that only other pages on your own domain can iframe your content. If you want extra protection, you can change "SAMEORIGIN" to "DENY" in which case no iframing at all will be possible. This directive can also be adjusted slightly to run in the httpd.conf file if you have root access and control of your server. This is vastly better than 403ing offenders after you have (hopefully) detected them, as it's proactive, Miscreants can't iframe you in the first place. Though they can of course still outright scrape the content. Hope that helps? (and that you get the rankings back after knocking the page content off the scammer's site.) Paul
-
caught my interest with this one, iframe alone shouldn't cause the issue. The 403 should help and after a couple days return to as was. you can also submit a DMCA request - http://www.dmca.com/FAQ/What-is-a-DMCA-Takedown to help. Rings a bell to some hijacking I've read about which ties in with the domain privacy settings for that domain.
Also like Kevin said you can use Google - https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420?hl=en-GB
Let me know in a few days if it returns to normal which it should.
-
Report this to Google thru the Feedback section of your webmaster tools. Google "should" discredit the thief and return your status. Be prepared to verify the content is your original work.
Good Luck,
KJr
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My site in 2 page
my site in 2 page how can i rank with this keywords in dubai legal translation in Dubai
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | saharali150 -
Website that lost ranking and now starting to recovery
Hello guys,
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WayneRooney
About a month ago we got in the webmaster tool a message that saying that we have unnatural links to the website.
We got drop from 200 keys that was in page 1-2 to pages 5-8.
We check our links and notice that someone links more then 1000 links to our site. We apply for reconsideration request plus we send the file with the links to Google to ask to remove. Yesterday we got message from Google that say : Manual spam action revoked.
We check today the ranking and we saw that from 3 keys that was in the first page, now we are with 24 in the first page. Very good improvement but still very far from the 130 keys that was in the first page a month ago. I wanted to ask, what can we expect ?
Are we gonna get the lost ranking now ?
Is this happen overnight ?Maybe the big change will be in the next penguin update ? Bottom Line, what is the chance to get back the ranking as we had before ?
This is the most important thing right now... Thank you0 -
Website that just got hit....Need some tips or ideas...
Hey guys, The website of the company i work hit in the PR update two days ago . A little history , the site was notice by Google about spam links around 5-6 months ago .
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WayneRooney
Since then there is a company that cleans all the spam links and manage all the disavow process. In the last penguin update ( about two months ago ) the site jumped like crazy in the ranking and stayed there ever since... In the last three months we create less than ten links to the site, and we have focus all our work to improve
the optimization of the site.
It should be noted that the company is investing a lot in social networks and all the work in the past 3 month are White and clean... Now, two days ago in the PR update (more or less) the site just dropped , but when i say dropped , it's 200 keys that was in page 1-2 that just want out to page 5-6-7. Like the website is gone, i never see something like this... The things that pass through my head: A lot of the links the linking to the site with high PR lost their pr and now they are worthless, but still this drop ? its to extreme.
Or that Google received the disavow and just disavow a lot of links.... Does anyone have any ideas or tips on the subject ? Thank you0 -
Our site has too many backlinks! How can we do a bad backlink audit?
Webmaster Tools is saying we have close to 24 million links to our site. The site has been around since the mid 90s and has accumulated all these links since. We also have our own network of sites that have links in their templates to our main site. I'm fighting to get these links "nofollow"'d but upper management seems scared to alter this practice. This past year we've found our rankings have dropped significantly and suspect it's due to some spammy backlinks or being penalized for doing an accidental link scheme network. 24 million links is too many to check manually for using the disavow tool and it seems that bulk services out there to check backlinks can't even come close. What's an SEO to do?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | seoninjaz0 -
Untrusted site - malware!
I recently had my link profile done as I was badly effected by something in 2012 (Penguin, Panda.. who knows? never got a message from google in webmaster about anything). Loads of INBOUND links were identified as being 'dodgy'' and the person highlighted them in different colors. However, another seo éxpert' told me to leave them (perhaps remove just 3 of them) and don't bother with the rest. Now I am not sure what to do? Any opinions? RED
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Llanero
3 were highlighted as being from untrusted malware. I think I should disavow them but really, would 3 make that much difference for a fall in my site? ORANGE
240 were said to be spam articles and I was advised:
The following pages highlighted in orange are on sites created for the purpose of publishing articles for link building. Since the same articles appear on multiple sites, Google views this as duplicate content. Links to Monteverde Tours in these articles should be removed or tagged "nofollow." Where this is not possible, the domains should be disavowed. YELLOW
85 were said to be from Low-quality directories
The following pages highlighted in yellow are on low-quality directories and link farms. Links to Monteverde Tours on these pages should be removed or the domains disavowed. GREEN
340 were said to be from sites were the page was not found , Account suspended, Problem loading page, Link removed, domain expired
The following pages highlighted in green include pages whose links to Monteverde Tours have been removed and pages that were inaccessible for various reasons, as shown in the Comments column. These pages or their domains should be disavowed to remove them from the Google index. I have read (and asked on this forum) about disavow but the more I read the more I am getting confused about the next action. I tried for one year to get rid of any bad outbound links, did blogging, social media, improved content, landing pages etc but all to no avail. Any opinions appreciated. I am not looking for a magic bullet, I know there isn't one. I know I need to keep improving content etc but after a year of NO improvements should I consider the link removal route? <colgroup><col width="215"></colgroup>
| Untrusted site - malware! |0 -
Google penalty having bad sites maybe and working on 1 good site ?!!!
I have a list of websites that are not spam.. there are ok sites... just that I need to work on the conent again as the sites content might not be useful for users at 100%. There are not bad sites with spammy content... just that I want to rewrite some of the content to really make great websites... the goal would be to have great content to get natual links and a great user experience.. I have 40 sites... all travel sites related to different destinations around the world. I also have other sites that I haven't worked on for some time.. here are some sites: www.simplyparis.org
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | sandyallain
www.simplymadrid.org
www.simplyrome.org etc... Again there are not spam sites but not as useful as they coul become... I want to work on few sites only to see how it goes.... will this penalise my sites that I am working on if I have other sites with average content or not as good ? I want to make great content good for link bait 🙂0 -
Www.oru.edu & oru.edu
Everyplace I check, the pagerank for both of those domains is either 0 or NA. However on this site oru.edu actually has a pagerank and this is the only source I can find for that. The sub www.oru.edu still has a zero on this site. A historical checker has oru.edu a N/A ranking just a few days ago and in June.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Oklahoma_0 -
Redirecting doesn't rank on google
We are redirecting our artist's official website to copenhagenbeta.dk. We have two artists (Nik & Jay and Burhan G) that top ranks on Google (first on page 1), but one of them (Lukas Graham) doesn't rank at all. We use the same procedure with all artists. http://copenhagenbeta.dk/index.php?option=com_artistdetail&task=biography&type=overview&id=49 Doesn't rank but the old artist page still does. Is it the old page that tricks Google to think that this is the active page for the artist?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Morten_Hjort0