Angular SPA & MOZ Crawl Issues
-
Website: https://www.exambazaar.com/
Issue: Domain Authority & Page Authority 1/100
I am using Prerender to cache/render static pages to crawl agents but MOZ is not able to crawl through my website (https://www.exambazaar.com/). Hence I think it has a domain authority of 1/100. I have been in touch with Prerender support to find a fix for the same and have also added dotbot to the list of crawler agents in addition to Prerender default list which includes rogerbot. Do you have any suggestions to fix this?
List: https://github.com/prerender/prerender-node/commit/5e9044e3f5c7a3bad536d86d26666c0d868bdfff
Adding dotbot to Express Server:
prerender.crawlerUserAgents.push('dotbot'); -
Cheers Gaurav
I will try that technique. We use something similar for the title but in the Angular app.js file, however have struggled to do the same for the description, canonical tags etc.
Actually right now we add the tags we need in Javascript, using the DOM and prerender and google seems to like it. We can;t run a crawl any longer in the std Moz package for some reason we can only do one per week now. Moz doesn't seem to cope too well with the Javascript though. When we tried other tools it seemed to c heck out fine.
I'm not sure if it is Moz crawlers that are causing us the issue here, anyway!
We're also still using Angular 1.6 so we really need to upgrade to v4 or at least 2.
-
Hi Dave
Thanks for asking. You can set the pageDescription variable (similarly for other meta tags) in each route/state of the SPA which gets cached by Prerender. If you are using prerender you can see the list of default crawler agents supported here: https://github.com/prerender/prerender-node/commit/5e9044e3f5c7a3bad536d86d26666c0d868bdfff
If you wish you can enable prerender for the crawler dotbot too!
-
Hi Gaurav
We're also launching a new MEAN SPA, We've gotten our site looking quite good for SEO now, other than the meta description and canonical tags.
However I believe the MOZ crawler still doesn't understand javascript, we use AngularJS or JQEURY to change and add the meat tags for each page, which I am confident is OK with Google but MOZ and SEMRush don't like it.
That could be something to do with the lower score on Moz?
Do you mind me asking how do you set your page meta descriptions and canonical tags?
Dave
-
Hey, Dave from the Help Team here!
I just ran your site through our crawler and didn't have any issues crawling your site. I think the Domain Authority score of 1/100 is actually caused by us not having your site in our Mozscape Index. To find out more about how we Index the web, you can read about it here
https://moz.com/help/guides/research-tools/open-site-explorer/updates/index-process
Hopefully that helps to clarify, let us know if you need anything else!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz tool to estimate a website's organic traffic?
Moz has tons of great tools, so I was quite suprised there is nothing similar to Alexa's siteinfo tool, or SimilarWeb's site comparison tool. Am I missing something? Or does such a tool exists at Moz? Or is there a different way of estimating my competitor's traffic? It would be great if Moz would have something like that.
Link Explorer | | GrandRapids0 -
Strange error in MOZ report
I get the following warning about our domain name in Link Explorer Moz tool You entered the URL debtacademy.com which redirects to www.hugedomains.com/domain_profile.cfm?d=debtacademy&e=com. Click here to analyze www.hugedomains.com/domain_profile.cfm?d=debtacademy&e=com instead. Please advice me. How I can fix it.
Link Explorer | | jeffreyjohnson0 -
Is Moz's backlink checker.... just... not good?
Hey everyone! Can somebody explain to me why this keeps happening: Whenever I'm trying to backlink my competitors, I typically use RavenTools. Every time, without fail, if I put that same URL into Moz's Open Site Explorer - It gives me about 1/20th of what RavenTools shows me. Sometimes it literally comes up with 2 or 3 links total. Unfortunately, RavenTools has a cap on how many backlink checks you can perform in a month - so once I've used those up, I have to start using OSE... But, it just doesn't work. Does anyone else have this issue? Thanks!
Link Explorer | | TaylorRHawkins1 -
Sudden Spike in 404 Pages Not Found in Moz Crawl But No Errors in WMT
Recently I received a spike in errors from the Moz crawler. When I looked into the matter I noticed that all the URI's looked right but then I looked a little closer and there was a /page/2 and /page/3 in front of the URI's. I'm running a WordPress website. Immediately I thought to myself this must be some kind of caching or permalinks error. So I disabled all my plugins including W3 Total Cache and ran the Integrity Link Crawler for the Mac and found that the errors were still popping up. 404-errors-ncworkercomp.png?dl=0
Link Explorer | | NCCompLawyer0 -
Low Internal Equity-Passing Links: Open Ste Explorer Issue
Does anyone know why Open Site Explorer shows so few Internal Equity Passing Links? When a page is part of the main navigation of a website and the website has over 3500 pages indexed in Google with high DA's why would the Open Site Explorer number be so low? I have run scans on other tools and see a much larger number than OSE reports. Thoughts? Has anyone else ever experienced that?
Link Explorer | | slangdon0 -
403 errors in Moz but not in Google Search Console
Hello, Moz is showing that one of the sites I manage has about ten 403 errors on main pages, including the home page. But when I go to Google Search Console, I'm not getting any 403 errors. I don't know too much about this site (I handle the SEO for a few sites as a contractor for a digital marketing agency), but I can see that it's a WordPress site (I'm not sure if that's relevant). Can I assume this a Moz issue only? Thanks, Susannah Noel
Link Explorer | | SusannahK.Noel0 -
Moz's Spam Score - WWW v Non-WWW
Given that going with a www or non-www TLD is a coin-toss in Google's eyes, I'm curious as to how this relates to Moz's spam score (if at all)? Specifically, we've got a client who has several sites across a number of industry verticals, and for some of them, the www and the non-www versions of their websites are both in play (sigh). Obviously we'll sort that out shortly, but my question is why, when we put both TLDs into Open Site Explorer does the www and the non-www version of the sites get different spam scores? With some of their sites (www v non-www) the difference in the spam score might be a 2 for the www v a 3 for the non-www. But in others it might be 0 for the www v 8 for the non-www! And it's unclear which one is the 'real' spam score, as there seems no rhyme or reason to the results. Anyway, any thoughts from the room would be appreciated.
Link Explorer | | SEO-NS0 -
Moz Crawl Canonicals and Duplicates
Hi all, I am using Moz Crawl to analyze some sites I am having to optimize.
Link Explorer | | Eurasmus.com
I keep seeing many of my pages detected as duplicate content when they have the rel=canonical applied. Example: www.spain-internship.com/zh-CN/blog-by-aaron
I have seen that in other sites. Of course I understand that Moz is not perfect but, is there a known issue or am I doing something wrong with the canonicals? Regards,0