Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Sentences RDF Format
-
Just thought about one last thing, is there a distance to main keyword where the related keyword that are given by the keyword tool should be, + 5 + 10 or no distance ? For example write Barolo within a 5 word window to Piedmont bike tours ?
Thank you,
-
Perfect! yes exactly - keep the focus on Piedmont.
You can still use Piedmont at the front of selected keywords as long as you don't overdo it. Keyword stuffing carries with it its own algorithmic penalty problems, so if try to restrain yourself when using it! Replace it with 'the area' 'the region' etc. If you do this well you will dominate SERPS
Regards
Nigel
-
I see what you mean, Barolo doesn't want to become the main focus of my content.
For the keyword tool: I know understand, I need to remove the word piedmont in front of all the keyword suggestions and then need to pepper the words within my content.
-
You can have related topics on the page as long as they don't swamp the main keyword, making it invisible within the text. If you are going to do this then have a heading for each and continue like this.
"Barolo, set in the heart of Piedmont in the province of Cuneo is the perfect place to pack up your trail bike and hit the road. There are miles of country routes to choose from..........."
So you are weaving a story about how great these areas are to cycle in whilst occasionally mentioning the region and province, all of which are important baby anchor texts.
I am not saying 'don't' mention the towns - I am saying that if you do make it clear where they are and don't swamp the main keyword - i.e dilute it too much on the page. And, if Barolo is very prominent maybe consider a page for it.
You could end up with a category killer page of 1000 words + but remember that this pages need to keep the attention of the reader so pepper them with a nice balance of text and images.
In terms of the MOZ keyword tool.
Enter the term 'Piedmont bike tours' and filter by medium lexical similarity. You will see words like 'Cycle'', 'cycling routes' 'rental' ' trail'. Weave these into the sentences that you are constructing. It takes some skill to write in a fluid manner without repetition - make it for the reader, not Google - make it engaging so that people will read it - make sure all pics have different Alt text.
Regards
-
If i fill out my page about "Piedmont bike tours" with villages like Barolo and Barbaresco doesn't it help to have related topics on the page ? I thought so whatching this video ? https://moz.com/blog/related-topics-in-seo-whiteboard-friday
For the additonal keywords I am not sure how to use it ? Does the link you sent me mean that for "Piedmont bike tours" I should "only" have sentence with "Bike through Italy" "Cycling Piedmont Italy "or "Turin bike tours" ?
The issue I have I don't see how I can integrate this naturally in my content...
If you could give me an example of how you would moz keyword tool that would be great as I am a little confused.
Thank you,
-
Hi SEOanalytics
If the page is about 'Piedmont Bike Tours' then make the Meta title 'Piedmont Bike Tours - Cycling in North West Italy" something like this and the same for the H1 - also upload an image with the same for the Alt.
You can then talk about the area on your page. I wouldn't be so rigid as to stick to one paragraph per town like Barolo but likewise, I wouldn't fill the page with mentions of those keywords too frequently because the subject of the page is Piedmont and the more you fill the page with towns and villages, the more you dilute the main focus keyword.
If you want to have separate cities/towns/villages e.g. 'Barolo Bike Tours' then consider that you may need separate pages. So these can all be listed on the Piedmont Bike Tours' page but with their own separate links off.
Search Moz keyword tool for additional keywords here: https://moz.com/explorer/keyword/suggestions?locale=en-GB&q=piedmont bike tours
You see how it doesn't mention the separate towns?
Regards
Nigel
Regards
Nigel
-
Thank you for your detailed reply Nigel, this is very clear.
I just have one more question. When writting on a page about multiple topics. Let's take for example the keyword " Piedmont bike tours" do i need to write a paragraph about Piedmont, a paragrah about Barolo, one about Barbaresco and can I in my introduction just write one sentence about each (see that I am trying to sell a product and have people dream)
I know that most blog do 1 topic per paragraph but they answer questions when you are trying to make people dream one topic per paragh seems booring to me but maybe I am wrong ?
What is your advice on all that ?
Thank you,
-
Hi SEOanalytics
The better a sentence is written with contextually strong keywords intertwined throughout, the more elegant it reads and the more professional it looks. Just compare reading Oscar Wilde to JK Rowling. Wilde's writing is poetic and richly written with proselike descriptions, fabulously florid verbs, alliteration and dialogue.
For me, it's important not to repeat nouns. for example 'The singer stalked the stage' (Subject, Predicate (verb), noun), then the singer leapt into the audience, smashing his face bloody on the ground'. You would change the second 'singer' to 'he' or 'front man'. There are a million examples and this is a very obvious way of using semantics.
There is an art to good writing and the Subject/Predicate/Object form is just a discipline to ensure you write in a clean and precise way. It's also good for SEO as it ensures that the correct keywords are used in the right way, using the correct tense and not stuffed.
One could imagine that if my sentence was targetting the keyword 'singers' then the use of alternative, or semantic would enhance the SEO value of the piece.
There is rather a wonderful video here: https://www.brightstorm.com/english/grammar/sentence-basics/subject-predicate-and-objects/
But of course, I have tried to explain the practical use of this in relation to SEO. If we didn't write in this way then the piece would simply be a list of interconnected words or bullet points.
I hope that helps,
Regards
Nigel
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
For implementing AMP, is it compulsory that the website needs to support HTTPs ?'.
In order to get the AMP version of my website show up on the SERP, is it a complusory factor that my website needs to support HTTPs.
Whiteboard Friday | | Starcom_Search0 -
Refreshing old blog content with dates in the URL
In today's Whiteboard Friday (Keyword Targeting, Density, and Cannibalization), Rands makes a comment about updating content on pages that have dated URLs and states: "If I were advising him on SEO, I'd urge him to maintain a single page called "Best Seattle Coffee" or "Best Seattle Espresso" and update that annually (changing the title to 2012, 2013, 2014, etc but leaving the URL the same). I'd also urge him to take the prior year's content and put that on a new URL like "/coffee-from-2012" (or the like)." What are the opinions from an SEO perspective to update pages that have dates in the URL to reflect new content? Does this confuse the search engines if they see one date in the URL but another in the page copy? If this content is from a blog and they are listed / displayed based on chronological order, this fresh content would be buried. Obviously internal links and other ways to promote the content would be beneficial but Is it a bad UX to move this page to the top of the "list" when it clearly has an older date associated with this fresh content?
Whiteboard Friday | | Your_Workshop0 -
Guest Posting At Scale - A Definition!
Hi, have just watched the latest Whiteboard Friday entitled 'Why Guest Posting and Blogging is a Slippery Slope'. Rand mentions '"guest posting at scale", but what does he actually mean? For the purpose of building website authority and brand awareness we post around 1-4 blog posts per month for our clients, all on authoirty sites, some of which accept guest posts with little editorial restriction, some we have to jump through hoops for. We don't use KW specific anchor text, instead we link to the clients site with semantically related, varied anchor text, as well as linking to other useful third party sources. We also publish regular useful content on our clients blogs in the hope of getting natural backlinks. Would this be classed as 'guest posting at scale'? Do you think we could we be targeted and penalised by the upcoming guest post algorithm? Many thanks in advance, Lee.
Whiteboard Friday | | Webpresence0 -
Should ebook content be a download or hosted on site for SEO?
We have written ebook(s) on subjects of interest to our prospects (B-C market). We have taken many recurring questions asked over the years plus helpful graphics and put into short 12+ page ebooks. After filling out form to receive ebook- (first name & email on form) for any option below- Should we: a) send them to Landing page to download ebook to their desktop? b) send them e-mail with link to download ebook? c) send them directly to page on our site with the ebook content? d) something else? My thoughts are to do c) which will put content on site, though 'protected' via gate. This way the search engines can crawl the content. However, if that content is not directly reachable through menu will that degrade the importance of that content? Obviously we want to provide good, helpful information to prospects. We would also love to benefit from that content from a Search point of view if possible. Anyone have experience with this through A/B test or otherwise? Thanks, Steve
Whiteboard Friday | | PhotographerSteve0 -
Temporary landing pages and SEO
Hi guys! I have a question that has been running through my mind for quite a while now. On our company, we offer different products that we put on specific landing pages (one per product). This products are "live" on a 20 day period. Right now, when the product expires, we put a label "This product expired" and return a 404. Is this the right way to do it? Take into account that keeping the page "alive" is not an option. The options would be: 301 redirecting to another listing (should I worry about this implementation being wrong? Wouldn't Google find it suspicous that lots of pages redirect to the same listing?) Return a 200 instead Thanks for your time!
Whiteboard Friday | | lhernandezBum0