Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How do you guys deal with product description and titles in PLA for different variation products?
-
Hello guys!
I have to say that I have been browsing, reading, learning and so on Moz for a long time now, and when I had a question to ask I was scared of askings so I don't look stupid but since I've asked my first question a few weeks ago and got a really helpful answer that helped me to no longer think like that. Therefore here is my question:What is the best way of writing product description and titles on Google PLA for product variation? Let's say you have a rope for example which come in different diameter and colour. Right... The title yes it should include variation such as Brand Size Model Colour Other Attributes on each individual product title but the question is .. does to description has to be different for each product so that you also include the attributes for the given product variation?
I hope someone out there will understand my question and come up with a good answer.
Thank you!
-
Hi yes, I agree. What I found really annoying is that some of the product groups they still have a high Search Lost IS because of ad rank but I have submitted every single attribute I could possibly think of, also wrote a very long description of the product with high def. product images and still can't see much improvement. I guess the last thing would be to look into bids but trouble is that the Benchmark CPC is lower than what we bid.. This is all very strange. Trouble is that because I have lots of different product types with different brands I cannot find a proper rule in to put in place for google merchant center to create the product title, therefore, we more likely write each product title separately and still the Lost IS ad rank is still high..
Regards,
Sorin -
Hi Sorin
I think that resulting Google title should always be like this:
Brand, Product Title, Colour, Size
Google pretty much does this.
If you list very few products then you can send them individually with colour and size in the title. Just don't put size and colour as variants as they will appear twice in the Google title!
I have however always found that the way Google concatenates (puts together) title + colour + size as perfectly OK.
Concentrate on optimising the title of the products and descriptions along with on-page content.
Regards
Nigel
-
Thanks Nigel,
This makes things better to understand for me. Is it a good practice to set a rule in place so that google merchant append size and colour to the product title or is it better to control that when you don't have too many products? I am wondering that maybe some products might perform better if they have the colour in front of the size or the other way around .. What do you think?
Thanks
Sorin -
Hi Sorin
I think it's down to interpretation.
1. Their titles are identical in the feed (Dubarry Ultima) - Google appends (adds to the end) the colour (if there is one) and the size.
2. Yes, description is used to help PLA ranking by a combination of search term, title and descriptive content. That is why it is essential to have a full description. It is however only visible when a searcher hits the shopping tab.
3. The parent product does not need (and in fact can't because it is non-variation specific) to show the size and colour because Google appends (adds to the end) anyway!
4. You don't need to because the description describes the product and Google appends the colour (if there is one) and size to the end of the title, so Google knows what the product is, its colour and its size!
Making descriptions for every variant (take a product with 7 sizes and 5 colours - 35 variations!) is just not necessary as Google knows all of this information anyway.
I hope you understand better what I have written.
Kind Regards & Good Luck!
-
Hi Nigel,
Sorry I really didn't want to sound rude. I do appreciate your answer - it was very helpful! I just like to hear other opinion and don't stop on the first answer I get.. we might unleash some other tips I believe.."They only have one title and they come up multiple times because they send all the sizes to Google and are paying more than the next person for PPC." - Their title is different for each product - One title would mean the product would only show once not multiple times if all products would have the same title.
As in regards to the product description, I read in many places that this is actually used in PLA rank.
Sorry for the thumbs up! I really should've pressed it (still new around the discussion forums so didn't know it is so important - but now I do!).As for the parent product not to show size in the title description is a quite a missed opportunity no? What if someone is looking for a " 12mm 3 strand rope" - And assuming this is my actual parent product... Let's say my product will still show but with the title 3 Strand Rope - Colour Navy - Would this be as appealing to the searcher? My competitor his title would be the exact "12mm 3 strand rope" - Which one would you click on?
In regards to the description ... let's pretend you have 10 product variations - I have nothing else to do than actually optimizing my products - Is it a good practice to come up with a unique description for each product variation? Obviously, the description would be the exact same one for all product variation except for the fact that I would change the size and colour according to each product variation. - Is this a good practice?
Maybe this would make you understand better my confusion. I'm not saying you're wrong but not right either... Maybe my question wasn't clear enough.
Best Regards,
Sorin -
I don't know what more you need to know. I work with many retailers who send in a Google feed as well as configuring them so just tell me what the issue is. The odd thumbs up wouldn't go amiss either! We do give out advice for free!
-
Hi Nigel,
Thank you so much for your response. In fact, the size is in the title for each of the variations, as in regards to the multiple times display we also send every single variation to Google so that is not quite the answer I would say ... there is something else going on.
Thanks for your time. I wish I could also get another opinion on this matter.Regards,
Sorin -
If a product only has one colour then it's OK to have it in the title as it won't have a colour - child. Th description isn't used in PLA's
For the Dubarry Ultima - their title is just that: 'Dubarry Ultima'with the size being pulled in from the feed. Size is not in the title.
They only have one title and they come up multiple times because they send all the sizes to Google and are paying more than the next person for PPC.
The description is also being pulled in but it doesn't contain colour or size. The description is common to all sizes and colours. There is no way anyone could manage a different description for each size anyway - it's time-consuming enough coming up with one!
Regards
Nigel
-
Hi Nigel,
Your answer is really close to what I was thinking to be honest except for the parent product. I take it that the parent product title should not include the colour of the product? Even if that product is one colour? (ok .. I am here talking about another set of products rather than ropes I guess). But how about the description? The parent description should not include the size (should include colour if is only 1 option right?) but the child products should they have the exact same description as the parent one or on these ones I should include the actual unique attributes?
Let's take an example:
I noticed you are in UK
If you try and search for Dubarry Ultima Extra Fit Sailing Boots
You will see one specific shop who come up and take more than 70% of the listings with a really short title such as : Dubarry Ultima EU 48 - Dubarry Ultima EU 42 and so on.
So every single variation of their product does include the product size... How do they manage to come up so many times? Do they have a different description for each size? Are they using the same description?Thanks,
Sorin
-
Hi Sorin
When you send your products to Google Merchant Centre you will have a parent product and children which will be listed as size and colour. The XML feed should have those all listed out separately, so that if someone is looking for a Black Widget size 9 then that will be an individual listing.
The parent title will be appended with the colour and size in search results.
So the answer is: do not include colour or size in the parent title as this will be appended to from the correct attribute data in your merchant feed.
Generally too, on your website, the title of the product, where products have variants or attributes is not to list them in the product title. It's fine to add them to the description, so in organics, they may be visible, but not the title.
I hope that helps,
Regards
Nigel
-
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your answer. I don't quite get the "rec-con" tag ... Could you please be more explicit?
Sorin
-
Consider being as descriptive as possible for the primary "Rope" page. On the "Other Options" for rope, use the rec-con tag back to the primary and describe why this rope is unique to the primary.
Hope this helps.
KJr
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website is flagged by Google as Compromised Site
Hi everyone, We have been running Google Ads for a while now and last week all of our Google Ads were paused with reason Compromised Site. We reached out to Google and they identify this page as one of the affected page: https://manpower.com.vn/vi/dich-vu-san-dau-nguoi-and-tu-van-nhan-su-cap-cao? The malicious links they found are:
Paid Search Marketing | | ManpowerVietnam
• googie-anaiytics[.]com
• vty68[.]net We have asked our Website vendor to scan and they found nothing. We would be greatly appreciated if you could help. I tried Google Search Console and even the tool Google Safe Browsing that Google itself suggested but both the tools showed that our website does not have any malicious links at all. And yet Google Ads support team keeps telling us our page contains these links. I am wondering if anyone in the community has experienced this before and how did you address this issue. Or could you guys please help to share any tools that you know can do a deep scan on this page and if possible our entire website to help us identify where the links are located? Please let me know if you need any additional information from us and I would be happy to provide it.1 -
Keyword & negative keyword overlap
So I just read your blog on quality score and after reading the negative keyword section I'm a little confused and I need clarification. In that paragraph you mentioned about not overlapping your negative keywords with your active keywords and you used an example of dog food and dog bed. So my question is, if you put the word dog bed into the negative keyword list isn't the word dog the over lap word? Would you ad not show because the word dog is in the active keyword list?
Paid Search Marketing | | Vallerinspects0 -
"Duplicate without user-selected canonical” - impact to Google Ads costs
Hello, we are facing some issues on our project and we would like to get some advice. Scenario
Paid Search Marketing | | Alex_Pisa
We run several websites (www.brandName.com, www.brandName.be, www.brandName.ch, etc..) all in French language . All sites have nearly the same content & structure, only minor text (some headings and phone numbers due to different countries are different). There are many good quality pages, but again they are the same over all domains. Current solution
Currently we don’t use canonicals, instead we use rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default": <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-BE" href="https://www.brandName.be/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CA" href="https://www.brandName.ca/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CH" href="https://www.brandName.ch/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-FR" href="https://www.brandName.fr/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-LU" href="https://www.brandName.lu/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default" href="https://www.brandName.com/" /> Naturally this si reflected in ""Duplicate without user-selected canonical” . Issue
We create the same ad in Google Ads for 2 domains. So the content is mostly identical, ads are identical, target URLs differ only in domain. Yet Google Ads “Quality score” is different (10/10 vs. 6/10) and “Landing page experience” is very different (Above average vs. Average). Some members of our team think lower “Landing page experience” increases the Google Ads costs, which I personally don't believe, but I want to double check. Question: Can “Duplicate without user-selected canonical” issue decrease the “Landing page experience” rating and as result can it cause higher Google ads costs? Any suggestions/ideas appreciated, thanks. Regards.0 -
Top of funnel google ads campaign not hardly converting, why?
Hi, I really hope someone can help me with this. I'm running two search ad campaigns and a google shopping campaign in google ads. The search campaigns are targeting top-of-funnel keywords as the business doesn't have universally known collections which everyone would search for so they are just unique to my business. So the campaigns are driving traffic but really converting whereas google shopping is converting because searchers are looking for particular products so they're lower down the funnel closer to aking a purchase decision. I feel I've optimised the campaign well and for the most part, most keywords have 7/10 quality score. The landing page seems fine. However, our offering wasn't as strong as competitors so we've offered a discount the same as them to compete. Since I started google ads we have nearly doubled our monthly revenue and the product types targeted in campaigns have increased in quantity sold so it seems it's having an effect but the campaigns aren't showing a good performance. Does anyone have any suggestions or input that could help me? I looked at first interaction attribution model and even there it's not performing well which makes this even more difficult to resolve. I'm thinking I should enable USER id feature in Google analytics so i can track signed in users across devices which may then help attribute sales to paid search channel as I saw in search console that the keyword that generates the most traffic to the site is our brand name and we're not a well-known brand so makes me think they may be starting their buyer's journey on a work computer on their mobile and finishing on their computer at home as an example. However, I don't believe this will be the main cause or solution as I would only have data for signed in users which still won't give me the full picture. Also if the campaign is optimised effectively but conversions are minimal could not having many conversions affect quality score? If someone can help or provide me with a different perspective it would be much appreciated. Please let me know if I need to clarify or explain further. I hope I've made myself clear. Thanks, T
Paid Search Marketing | | TZ19820 -
Special Characters in Negative Keywords in Ads
Howdy, fellow mozzers, I came across this weird suggestion in my Bing account (screenshot link: https://dmitrii-regexseo.tinytake.com/tt/NDY3OTc5NF8xNDgyMzY4OA) It almost that the dollar sign in the negative keyword is acting like a wildcard character, or being disregarded completely. I did some tests, it seems that in Google Ads that is not happening. Does anyone have an idea if this is normal behavior? I have never seen this before.
Paid Search Marketing | | DmitriiK0 -
How much website would be worth for SEO?
I have a website that I'm considering selling. It gives no profit, but I think it has decent SEO value. Link explorer report: domain authority = 69, linking domains: 9.8k, inbound links: 44.2m, ranking keywords: 294. Is that any good? Website is about web design, so keywords are also related to it. Would it be useful for SEO links building for other people? I did sell similar website once, but it was about 7-8 years ago and I've sold it for very high 5 digit amount. However things have changed since then in SEO world, so I don't know if today similar website would be worth much. There is so much information out there that contradicts each other, so I think I'd rather ask professionals here.
Paid Search Marketing | | CyberAlien70 -
Adwords Duplicate Keywords with Different Match Types - Good or Bad?
If you have the following keywords in an Ad Group advertising for a product, let's for example call it "target" product [target product] "target product" +target +product I've found that the exact match keyword has the highest conversion rate in almost all circumstances. So it would make sense to have a higher max bid on the exact match then phrase or broad batch. Even with lots of negative search terms to maximize conversion on the broader matches, if the bid is the same as exact match, the cost per conversion will be much higher (too high.) However in chatting with an Adwords Support Rep (on a different matter) they stated after looking through my account at the end of the chat: " duplicate keywords will impact on quality score. your all keywords will compete with each other" However many of the ad groups in question these duplicate keywords have quality score of 9 and 10. So obviously if there is an effect it seems it may be minimal. I thought it was pretty common for people to bid higher on more exact match and lower on more broad match. What's the real story here? Was this support rep not seeing the big picture?
Paid Search Marketing | | JCCMoz1 -
How to deal with the InCorrect Price Issue for the Google Shopping Product Listing Ads?
Hello All, Yesterday when i was checking with the one of the search term for "canvas prints"..i come to know that one of the advertiser EasyCanvasPrints.com is showing Incorrect price. On Search result they guys are showing $7.46 incorrect price for the PLA - Product listing ads. Go to below links: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=webhp&tbs=vw:l,mr:1,seller:8521978&tbm=shop&q=canvas+prints&sa=X&ved=0CJkGELMrahUKEwjmj-PSgfzIAhUHBY4KHc0VBBQ https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=canvas+prints&tbm=shop https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=canvas+prints&start=0 But when we click on it then i can not this price $7.46 http://www.easycanvasprints.com/single-canvas?singlecanvas=1&height=19&width=14&pcode=5345334C6B74647246774137536C786768544B5458776C35644F747855796D39&utm_source=google_base&utm_medium=data_feed I have done various claim and send to Google support about this misguiding price for the Easy Canvas Prints but they not taking any actions on it. Guy Can u please help me how can i pass this message to Google to take actions for this advertiser? Waiting for your reply Regards Dinesh
Paid Search Marketing | | CommercePundit0