Website cache has removed
-
Hi Team,
I am facing an issue with cache of the website, despite various r&d I couldn't able to find the solution as code seems to be ok to me. Can any one of you check and let me know why home page and some of the product pages removed from the caching.
See here: https://bit.ly/2Kna3PD
Appreciate a quick response!
Thanks
-
Yes Vijay,
We changed the title and re-submitting the cache and it cached. we are hoping to get this stable.
Thanks for your time
-
The script looks fine.
The website cache is available on google for past 24 hours, please try to avoid re-submitting the website for next couple of days and let us watch for some time. I just want to rule out that whether it was a problem with resubmission of the website to google over and over.
Regards,
Vijay
-
Thanks Vijay,
Here is the script team used in the head section of the page:
Yes, I read many posts which say caching not affect ranking but con-incidenlty as the cache removed, ranking are very bad too so it is stating a reason here.
Awaiting your response
Thanks
-
Hi There,
I thought so, it must be some JS script change that could trigger such a problem. If you are regularly submitting the URLs, I would recommend stopping that and watch for cache being rebuilt. In the meanwhile can you send the script that was used to disable the right click, or the file where it resided.
I agree with Joseph that not having cache is not a problem in itself for ranking failure, but it can be a symptom of another problem which might be affecting ranks.
Thanks,
Vijay
-
The missing of the Google cached version of your website shouldn't be the causation of ranking loss.
If you have lost in ranking that is more likely going to be other factors causing that drop in ranking, did you recently made any big changes to your website?
Is there any error when you fetch with Google?
-
Hi Vijay,
Thanks for looking into this
Here are the responses:
1. It is more than 2-3 weeks, but at that time when we request cache it gets cached but after 2-3 days caching again shows 404
2. No, as such nothing done, only we disabled "right click" which we have resumed now
3.since we are got seeing any cache so we are manually submitting the request thru webmaster
kindly provide a solution here
thanks
-
Hi There,
I have checked the history of your website using https://archive.org/web, and it seems the site has been same for the past 6-12 months. Before I jump to any conclusions, can you answer these questions?
- When was the problem first noticed?
- Was there anything that was changed before the problem happened?
- Are you or a software you are using frequently re-submitting the site to google webmaster?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Vijay
-
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for your response!
I followed the post but the fact is I lost rankings and it is almost 2+ weeks where I am doing "Fetch as Google" but no results
-
Hello there,
That seems to be happening for the website that's recently moved or updated, here's a post from SER:
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-cache-404-mobile-first-index-25803.html
It doesn't have any negative impact as John said, and it can be their internal issue with the caching server.
Anyway, you can try using the "Fetch as Google" tool from Google Search Console and hopefully, it will expedite the process they recache your site.
Hope this answered your question.
- Joseph Yap
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If my website do not have a robot.txt file, does it hurt my website ranking?
After a site audit, I find out that my website don't have a robot.txt. Does it hurt my website rankings? One more thing, when I type mywebsite.com/robot.txt, it automatically redirect to the homepage. Please help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | binhlai0 -
New websites
Hi Moz community, My company updated and used a new developer to build and re-design their charity websites: www.runforcharity.com, www.cycleforcharity.com and www.sportforcharity.com. This sites were "re-launched" at the beggining of December 2015 and I have now been able to get a good 6 weeks worth of data. I've been religiously using Moz.com for a couple of years and I use it simply for SEO purposes. Our websites are built upon organic traffic being driven to them and I have noticed that the PA on the new sites has taken a hammering. They all appear to have a PA of 1 and I'm at a loss why? It appears that no page has h1 text? Would this be an issue with the developer or something the content team is doing wrong? Any help of advice would be much appreciated. Many thanks Ryan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bennerya0 -
How do you check the google cache for hashbang pages?
So we use http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:x.com/#!/hashbangpage to check what googlebot has cached but when we try to use this method for hashbang pages, we get the x.com's cache... not x.com/#!/hashbangpage That actually makes sense because the hashbang is part of the homepage in that case so I get why the cache returns back the homepage. My question is - how can you actually look up the cache for hashbang page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | navidash0 -
Credit Links on Client Websites
I know there have been several people who have asked this but a lot of them were back in 2012 before many of the google changes. My question is the same though. With all the changes with Google's algorithm. Is it okay to put your link on the bottom of your clients website. Like Web Design by, etc. Part of the reason is to drive traffic but also if someone is actually interested who designed the website, they will click it. But now reading about how bad links can hurt you tremendously, it makes me second guess if this is ok. My gut feeling says, no.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | blackrino0 -
Site wide links removal
A website of mine has about 4,000 backlinks of which 2,500 of them are coming from one website to the homepage and about 6 internal pages. These have been built up over about 5 years, mainly via article posts. The site was recently hit via penguin 2.0 but has only had natural links built so i'm wondering if the sitewide links are in fact the issue? The website linking to mine is an authority source within its niche but the concern is the amount of backlinks coming from this one site and if it may now be seen as having a negative impact. When ive reviewed the links from this one site via a backlink removal tool about 80% seem fine and suggestions are to remove about 20% of the backlinks. Would you keep all the sitewide backlinks or remove them?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jazavide
Have you come across a similar situation and how did it affect ranking/traffic?0 -
How does a competing website with clearly black hat style SEO tactics, have a far higher domain authority than our website that only uses legitimate link building tactics?
Through SEO Moz link analysis tools, we looked at a competing websites external followed links and discovered a large number of links going to Blog pages with domain authorities in the 90's (their blog page authorities were between 40 and 60), however the single blog post written by this website was exactly the same in every instance and had been posted in August 2011. Some of these blog sites had 160 or so links linking back to this competing website whose domain authority is 49 while ours is 28, their Moz Trust is 5.43 while ours is 5.18. An example of some of the blogs that link to the competing website are: http://advocacy.mit.edu/coulter/blog/?p=13 http://pest-control-termite-inspection.posterous.com/\ However many of these links are "no follow" and yet still show up on Open Site Explorer as some of this competing websites top linking pages. Admittedly, they have 584 linking root domains while we have only 35, but if most of them are the kind of websites posted above, we don't understand how Google is rewarding them with a higher domain authority. Our website is www.anteater.com.au Are these tactics now the only way to get ahead?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Peter.Huxley590 -
Website is not getting indexed in Google! Not sure why?
I just came up with my new blog, its not live yet but the 1<sup>st</sup> landing page is ready, up and running… all is fine but here is the only problem is its not getting indexed in Google and I am not really sure why? .xml sitemap is there Google webmaster and analytics are there Website contain at least that much real social shares that it should get indexed in Google Few Links may be coming from Famous Bloggers and SEOmoz (both sites are very authentic in their respective domains) It’s the 4 day the website is up I don’t think website is not getting indexed in Google just because it contains 1 landing page and a thank you page! Any clue or help will be appreciated. www.setalks.com is the domain
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MoosaHemani0 -
Should I remove footer links?
I added footer links to my site some months ago as I figured that any authority my home page had would be distributed to several of my other most important pages on my site helping them to rank. Would I be better to remove them and would that improve the authority of my home page as less 'link juice' is being distributed. I did originally set up a page per keyword on my site and start building links to each one but as my home page has a good authority I am going to target several keywords on my home page instead as I have some way to go to improve the authority of my other important pages and think this would be a better solution. It would reduce the number of links I have per page however I did see Matt Cutts say that the no more than 100 links per page rule doesn't apply any more. Do footer links add any SEo value?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0