Product Subdomain Outranking "Marketing" Domains
-
Hello, Moz community!
I have been puzzling about what to do for a client. Here is the challenge.
The client's "product"/welcome page lives at
this page allows the visitor to select the country/informational site they want OR to login to their subdomain/install of the product.
Google is choosing this www.client.com url as the main result for client brand searches.
In a perfect world, for searchers in the US, we would get served the client's US version of the information/marketing site which lives at https://client.com/us, and so on for other country level content (also living in a directory for that country)
It's a brand new client, we've done geo-targeting within the search console, and I'm kind of scared to rock the boat by de-indexing this www.client.com welcome screen.
Any thoughts, ideas, potential solutions are so appreciated.
THANKS!
Thank you!
-
thanks! Such a great answer.
-
You are very right to be worried about rocking that particular boat. If you de-index a page, it basically nullifies its SEO authority. Since the page which you would nullify, is a homepage-level URL (you gave the example 'www.client.com') then this would basically be SEOicide
Most other pages on your site, probably get most of their SEO authority and ranking power from your homepage (directly or indirectly, e.g: homepage linking to sub-page vs homepage linking to category, which then links to sub-page)
This is because, it's almost certain that your homepage will be the URL which has gained the most links from across the web. People are lazy, they just pick the shortest URL when linking. I'm not saying you don't have good deeplinks, just that 'most' of the good ones are probably hitting the homepage
So if you nullify the homepage's right to hold SEO authority, what happens to everything underneath the homepage? Are you imagining an avalanche right now? That's right, this would be one of the worst possible ideas in the universe. Write it down, print it out and burn it
Search-console level geo-targeting is for whole sites, not pages or (usually, though there can be exceptions) sections - you know that right? What that does is tell Google which country you want the website (the whole property which you have selected) to rank in. It basically stops that property from ranking well globally and gives minor boosts in the location which has been selected. If you just took your homepage level property and told it that it's US now, prepare to kiss most of your other traffic goodbye (hard lesson). If you were semi-smart and added /US/ as a separate property, and only set the geo targeting to US for that property - breathe a sigh of relief. It likely won't solve your issue but it won't be a complete catastrophe either (phew!)
Really the only decent tool you have to direct Google to rank individual web pages for regions and / or languages is the hreflang tag. These tags tell Google: "hey, you landed on me and I'm a valid page. But if you want to see versions of me in other languages - go to these other URLs through my hreflang links". Hreflangs only work if they are mutually agreed (both pages contain mirrored hreflangs to each other, and both pages do NOT give multiple URLs for a single language / location combination - or language / location in isolation)
The problem is, even if you do everything right - Google really has to believe "yes, this other page is another version of exactly the same page I'm looking at right now". Google can do stuff like, take the main content of both URLs, put it into a single string, then check the Boolean string similarity of both content strings to find the 'percentage' of the content's similarity. Well, this is how I check content similarity - Google does something similar, but probably infinitely more elegant and clever. In the case of hreflangs string translation is probably also enacted
If Google's mechanical mind, thinks that the pages are very different - then it will simply ignore the hreflang (just like Google will not pass SEO authority through a 301 redirect, if the contents of the old and new page are highly dissimilar in machine terms)
This is a fail-safe that Google has, to stop people from moving high rankings on 'useful' or 'proven' (via hyperlinks) URLs (content) - onto less useful, or less proven pages (which by Google's logic, if the content is very different, should have to re-prove their worth). Remember, what a human thinks is similar is irrelevant here. You need to focus on what a machine would find similar (can be VERY different things there)
So even if you do it all properly and use hreflangs, since the nature of the pages is very different (one is functional, helps users navigate, log-in and download something - that's very useful; whilst the other is selly, marketing content is usually thin) - it's unlikely that Google will swallow your intended URL serves
You'd be better off making the homepage include some marketing elements and making the marketing URLs include some of the functional elements. If both pages do both things well and are essentially the same, then hreflangs might actually start to work
If you want to keep the marketing URLs pure sell, fine - but they will only be useful as paid traffic landing pages (like from Google Ads, Pinterest Ads or FaceBook ads) where you can connect your ad to the advertorial (marketing) URLs. People expect ads to land on marketing-centric pages. People don't expect (or necessarily want) that for just regular web searches. The channel (SEO) is called 'organic' for a reason!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does this type of writing follow the "original content" criterion of structured data?
Hi!' So, in Google's general guideline for structured data, it's stated that the webmasters must "provide original content that you or your users have generated." If I were to write an article about post similar to stuff like "how to get a driver's license" or "how to apply for an accounting license", which requires looking up information from official and non-official sources. After researching, I compiled the information I found and wrote a few blog posts. Are these considered original content? Can I apply structured data to these posts without Google penalizing them? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | EverettChen0 -
Many "spin-off" sites - 301 or 401/410?
Hi there, I've just started a new job with a rental car company with locations all over New Zealand and Australia. I've discovered that we have several websites along the lines of "rentalcarsnewzealand", "bigsaverentals" etc that are all essentially clones of our primary site. I'm assuming that these were set up as some sort of "interesting" SEO attempt. I want to get rid of them, as they create customer experience issues and they're not getting a hell of a lot of traffic (or driving bookings) anyway. I was going to just 301 them all to our homepage - is this the right approach? Several of the sites are indexed by Google and they've been linked up to a number of sites - the 301 move wouldn't be to try to derive any linkjuice or anything of that nature, but simply to get people to our main site if they do find themselves clicking a link to one of those sites. Thanks very much for your advice! Nicole
Technical SEO | | AceRentalCars0 -
Does a sub-domain benefit a domain...
I have seen some mixed comment as the whether a sub-domain would benefit from the authority built up by its domain... but does a domain benefit from a sub-domain?
Technical SEO | | Switch_Digital0 -
Forwarding kw rich domains to main domain
Hi My client has a clutch of kw rich domains that want to point to main domain, apart from being good for promotional reasons is there any seo benefit for doing so (i know there used to be years ago but under impression hasn't been any benefit for a long while) Most importantly though can any bad come from doing this ? Best Rgds Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Rel="author" showing old image
I'm using http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets to test my rel="author" tag which was successful, but I noticed I wanted to change my image in Google+ as it is not what I want. I changed my image in Google+, it's been over 14 hours now and still not showing the new picture using the RichSnippets tool. I know Google can take a couple weeks at least to show changes in search results, but this RichSnippet tool I thought was immeidate. Am I missing something here or am I just impatient? I want my new photo to show.
Technical SEO | | Twinbytes0 -
Cn I use SEOMOZ to find "Bad Links"
We were hit by the Penguin update and I am told it make be because of "Bad Links", but no one can seem to tell me how to find them. We never buy links, and in fact the only links I know about are those from paid affiliates through shareasale - and these affiliates are paid based on performance, not links. 1. Does anyone know how to figure out what links are bad? 2. Once I know, how do I get them to stop linking to my site? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | trophycentraltrophiesandawards0 -
Can name="author" register as a link?
Hi all, We're seeing a very strange result in Google Webmaster tools. In "Links to your site", there is a site which we had nothing to do with (i.e. we didn't design or build it) showing over 1600 links to our site! I've checked the site several times now, and the only reference to us is in the rel="author" tag. Clearly the agency that did their design / SEO have nicked our meta, forgetting to delete or change the author tag!! There are literally no other references to us on this site, there hasn't every been (to our knowledge, at least) and so I'm very puzzled as to why Google thinks there are 1600+ links pointing to us. The only thing I can think of is that Google will recognise name="author" content as a link... seems strange, though. Plus the content="" only contains our company name, not our URL. Can anybody shed any light on this for me? Thanks guys!
Technical SEO | | RiceMedia0 -
I have a lot of warnings for "Overly-Dynamic URL"
I have a lot of warnings for "Overly-Dynamic URLs" but all the pages listed have a canonical with a static url , does this mean that I can ignore the warnings? Seems to me that I can but I just want to make sure?
Technical SEO | | Arnx1