Still Need to Write Title & Description Tag?
-
My SEO has advised me that Google has stopped using title and description tags for search results and as such, it is no longer necessary to write specific title and description tags.
I see that Yoast seems to pull text to create these tags and sometimes it looks like it reflects the best elements of the content, sometimes it does not.
Should I be asking our SEO team to write dedicated title and description tags or is it best practices to leave it to the Yoast plugin? My SEO is of the opinion that writing these tags is not a productive use of time as Google will serve results based on the user inquiry rather than the content on his tags. It sounds logical but it would be reassuring to receive further confirmation of this.
Thoughts?"
Thanks, Alan -
Not a problem Alan
-
Dear Effect Digital:
Thanks for your very detailed and thorough response. Confirms what I suspected, but with ranking factors in flux great to have this confirmed.
Thanks so much,
Alan
-
Thanks as always!
-
Great response from EffectDigital.
-
It's true that Google no longer necessarily must use Meta descriptions and Title tags, however Google is still pre-disposed to using them if they are written well. Why let Google crawl all your content, let a mechanical brain 'decide' which snippet (or paragraph) to display - when you can still control it with minimal effort?
If Title tags and Meta descriptions are written badly (poor grammar, keyword stuffed) then Google now can take these elements from your content instead. That's a fall-back though, it's not a reason to 'get lazy' and 'not do stuff'
In SEO, there are no 'magic bullet' solutions (that's commonly said, in our industry). But if there are no magic bullet solutions, that means that there are very rarely, any single changes that massively increase results. If that is true, it means that most factors in SEO only hold a very small (yet relatively equal) weighting
If you follow me on that, you'll see why the small 'seemingly unimportant' stuff is still critical. If in SEO, all factors under your control only make up a tiny sliver of the whole pie - then by saying 'I won't do the small stuff' what you are really saying is 'I won't do any SEO'. But these small, seemingly unimportant changes - are all part of what gives you an 'edge'. When you come up against a competitor of relatively equal standing (and popularity), you might just get ahead. That's what SEO is really for
Imagine you have two car manufacturers stripping down and gutting out their cars for the rally track (maybe one is Mitsubishi and one is Subaru). They go around the chassis, making tiny reductions here and there - so that their car finishes the track less than a second faster than the other. That has value to them, but if the team said "well each of these tiny changes doesn't do much, so let's sit on our butts and do nothing" - the opposition WOULD beat them
The art of optimisation is small, consistent, fractional weight loss and streamlining. That's what it means, not just in SEO but everywhere
If you have an SEO company which is hesitant to do their own darn job, look elsewhere. You need someone who just 'gets on with it' instead of taking your money and making excuses when you pull them up on stuff (although budget is also a factor there, since I don't know anything in that area - I at least have to say that for them)
Meta descriptions don't influence Google's rankings any more, but a search result which has a nicely written description may draw more traffic through from Google without having its ranking position increased. If people see it and it looks more attractive, they may choose that result over the top one. Although Google can 'generate' SERP snippets from your content - since when has generated crap ever been better than hand-written, targeted, authored text? Do you let Google Ads write all your own Ad-text for PPC? No? Then don't do it in SEO
Page titles can still influence rankings. Not as strongly as they used to, but I see evidence every day that they can still make the difference in some small situations. That's what optimisation is, bundling up all the small stuff into a package and benefiting from it. Someone who says "this is too small to bother with" ISN'T an optimiser. Optimisation is attention to detail for small, cumulative, multiplicative gains which snowball over time
Too many people are still selling SEO as a pure marketing package instead of a B.I. & fat-trimming / competitive edge based product
Final thoughts: Yes, write your own page titles and Meta - and don't let people fob you off when you're paying them your own real money. They should be coming to you with things they have missed (it does happen, people are human after all) not the other way around with you having to pick up on stuff, go to forums, aggregate answers. You're doing the research now - that they should have done before they even opened their doors. Everything I have said is (EXTREMELY) common SEO knowledge
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Original Source Tag or Canonical Tag for News Publishers?
I have been sourcing content from a news publisher who is my partner for publishing content online. My website deals with sourcing content from a couple of websites. I did use a canonical tag pointing towards the respective syndicated source but I have not seen traffic for those articles. I did some research and found out that Google does have a tag for news publishers which is the "original-source" tag which helps news publishers to give proper credit for their work. Here's a link to the official word by Google" https://news.googleblog.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html Although Google has officially stated that the "syndication-source" tag has been replaced by the "canonical" tag. However, there is no mention about the "original-source" tag.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Starcom_Search
Can I still use the "original-source" tag to syndicate content from my partner site instead of the "canonical" tag? P.S.: The reason why I am not convinced with the use of the canonical tag is because:
1. As per what Google says, duplicate content won't harm my website unless it is spam. (And since we are rightfully content from our partner'website and showcasing it to a larger audience by hosting it on our website as well, we are thereby not indulging in any unethical practices) 2. The canonical tag could possibly hamper my crawl bandwidth issues as it would essentially need the crawler to crawl the whole page to figure out that the canonical is present, post which any possible valuation that my site could have garnered gets lost.3. Moreover, since I am from the news, media and publication industry, content republication is a widely accepted practice and in such cases simply including a link to the original source of the article or using the original source tag should suffice, That being mentioned, I do not want to go ahead without taking a second opinion about this. Kindly help me to resolve this issue.0 -
Duplicate meta descriptions
Hi All Does having quite a few Duplicate meta descriptions hurt SEO. I am worried that I have too many and thinking this could be the reason for my recent drop in search visibility. Thanks in Advance. Andy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Andy-Halliday0 -
Proper Form for Title & Description Tags
Greetings MOZ Community: I operate a real estate web site in New York (www.nyc-officespace-leader.com) that I suspect has been hit by Panda 4.0. I believe a problem is thin content on product pages, which in my case are 350 listing pages. However I am also looking at how title and description tags are formatted for these 350 pages to ensure this is not a factor in the ranking drop. The title descriptions are written like this: <title></span><span class="webkit-html-tag">Flatiron loft for rent | West 21st Street | 1441SF $6604/month</span><span class="webkit-html-tag"></title> Is this sufficiently diverse? Will constantly repeating various street names, square footages and prices work against me? Will Google in a sense consider this thin or repetitive content? It does provide the visitor with key information. The descriptions meta tags are written along these lines: description" content="One of the most desirable full floor sublets in Midtown South. Recent build out, pristine condition, panoramic views, tech chic, spectacular. Top location." /><meta< span=""></meta<> From an SEO perspective are these critical tags written the way they should be? Thanks everyone!! Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
I need help!
Please select best theme for me, from the below themes. I want to create printing website. I select these themes after long research. http://us-themes.com/demo/?theme=ImprezaWP http://themeforest.net/item/salbii-responsive-multipurpose-wordpress-theme/full_screen_preview/6265876 http://themeforest.net/item/codeus-multipurpose-responsive-wordpress-theme/full_screen_preview/6906054
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlexanderWhite0 -
Is a different location in page title, h1 title, and meta description enough to avoid Duplicate Content concern?
I have a dynamic website which will have location-based internal pages that will have a <title>and <h1> title, and meta description tag that will include the subregion of a city. Each page also will have an 'info' section describing the generic product/service offered which will also include the name of the subregion. The 'specific product/service content will be dynamic but in some cases will be almost identical--ie subregion A may sometimes have the same specific content result as subregion B. Will the difference of just the location put in each of the above tags be enough for me to avoid a Duplicate Content concern?</p></title>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | couponguy0 -
Duplicate titles and descriptions problem?
We had an old site that used the urls for items site.com/32423432 we changed that to site.com/item name The old stuff has gone away and we have 301 redirects up. For some reason we are getting hit with duplicate titles on those pages and duplicate meta tags. The site relaunch was in November and we have a had a few problems but this just started showing up in the last week after having gone down. Any thoughts on a fix?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Help needed on Google Webmaster tools
Hi I notice that one of my oldest sites , even if I put hundred of backlinks (good or bad) google webmaster tools never index more like 20 per day. Why is this happening? They control it? I mean they dont let them all to get indexed and they take it slowly slowly? If I put just 20 per day is the ideal link building amount? Thnk you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nyanainc0 -
Page Titles SEO Title
Hi, I run an e-commerce store and within the CMS I define the SEO title, SEO description and SEO keywords for each item. I spoke to a SEO firm who advised me to start every product title with the colour, as this will reduce the duplicate page titles and serve me well in the future. Whats everyones view on this? Does naming something Grey Armani Jeans | Armani Jeans from Designer Boutique stand up better against Armani Jeans Grey | Armani Jeans from Designer Boutique? Any help or tips on how to format the page titles and descriptions would be great. Thanks Will
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WillBlackburn0