Should I noindex user-created fundraising pages?
-
Hello Moz community!
I work for a nonprofit where users are able to create their own fundraising pages on the website for supporters to directly donate. Some of them are rarely used, others get updated frequently by the host. There are likely a ton of these on our site. Moz crawl says we have ~54K pages, and when I do a "site:[url]" search on Google, 90% of the first 100 results are fundraising pages.
These are not controlled by our staff members, but I'm wondering if meta noindexing these pages could have a big effect on our SEO rankings. Has anyone tried anything similar or know if this strategy could have legs for our site?
My only concern is whether users wouldn't be able to find their fundraising page in our Google CSE implemented on the website.
Any insight you fine folks could provide would be greatly appreciated!
-
I'd tread very carefully here as thing 1 and thing 2 seem to contradict each other at face value. You're right, Google can send traffic to a site in ways other than keywords, but it's not the norm. The next thing I'd look at is, hmm - how are we tracking keyword rankings? Is it an online, cloud based rank tracker that relies on you specifying all of (and all of the right) keywords to track? Most of those trackers track between 50 and 300 KWs (daily, weekly) but it's not uncommon for such sites to have 10,000+ keywords contributing. If they're not all in there, it's a bad sample you are looking at. Connect Google Search Console to Google Analytics. let it run for a few weeks, analyse the 'search query' data from within Google Analytics (which can be done once it's all hooked up). GSC only lets you export 1k keywords (usually, sometimes it can be more) but GA will take 5k and that's much better for your analysis. You might be surprised to find, those pages rank for more keywords than you thought. maybe hundreds of little ones, instead of a few big ones
-
Effectdigital is right in looking at your analytics and backlinks to help make this decision.
In the Moz case study we referenced earlier, they were getting rid of pages that didn't provide value at all to anyone. Those pages probably didn't have any links pointing to them at all. So it made sense to get rid of them.
Since your pages are providing value (it seems) and your getting 1/3 of your traffic coming into those pages, we would tread carefully on meta noindexing them.
You might only consider meta noindexing a group of them that haven't brought in any traffic this whole year and that don't have any links pointing to them. That way, you won't lose any existing traffic that your getting but you can see if the trimming helps your site's overall traffic and rankings.
-
Appreciate the word of caution, I'm relatively new and am looking for well-rounded opinions about the repercussions such a massive move could make for our site. As a response:
Thing #1: We don't have many fundraising pages that rank highly for keywords, as we're still working on juicing up our regular site pages as is to improve in the SERP results. I was mainly wondering whether the glut of fundraising pages could be harming our SERP results. Some certainly have duplicate content but that's beyond our control, and I'm not sure if that could significantly be harming our results. Any thoughts on that?
Thing #2: Great call on checking the data. YTD nearly 1/3 of our user sessions have landed on one of these fundraising pages. I'm guessing that's likely either the hosts using google to find their page and then subsequently log in, or friends searching for it on google and then navigating and donating. We do still have a Google Custom Search Engine on our site. Presumably people could find them that way?
If you have any additional opinions or feedback given what I detailed above, I'd very much appreciate it!
-
Be VERY careful
Thing #1) Just because you stop Google indexing and crawling some pages, that doesn't mean they will give that same traffic (keywords linking to those pages) to other URLs on your site. They may decide that your other URLs, do not satisfy the specific keywords connecting with the fundraiser URLs
Thing#2) CHECK. Go onto Google Analytics and actually check what percentage of your Google traffic (and overall traffic, I guess) comes specifically through these URLs. If it's like 2-3%, no big deal. If most of your traffic comes to and lands on these pages, no-indexing them all could be the single largest mistake you'll ever make
Blog posts and articles are fun but no substitute for checking your own, real, actual, factual data. Always always do that
-
Thanks! I've been wondering about it for awhile and actually stumbled upon this very article today - which prompted the question
-
Britney Muller, with Moz, did just that when she meta noindexed over 70,000 low quality profile pages created by users. As a result, Moz saw an increase in organic users, almost 9% the following month and then they saw a lift of 13.7% year-over-year for organic traffic the following month.
You can read all about it or watch the interview about it here: https://www.getcredo.com/britney-muller/
We think it's worth a try for sure.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz page optimizer - avoid keyword stuffing
Hi Moz community, A quesiton about our dutch travel insurance website. Two weeks ago we had a ranking drop from 17 to position 35. The project is still fresh (we started in may this year). I quess penguin 4.0 didn't like our rapid linkbuilding. But we also receive a message in page optimization tool for keyword stuffing. When we analyze the homepage www.reisverzekering.net for reisverzekering (meaning travel insurance) Moz suggests to avoid keywords stuffing. But I dont understand, we don't use the keyword that much and Yoast doesnt give this message. How much key
Moz Pro | | remkoallertz0 -
To Worry or Not? Duplicate Content Created from Redirect After Login
One of my Moz reports is flagging duplicate content. For example, https://redchairmarket.com/Account/LogOn?ReturnUrl=%2FAccount%2FSaveSearch%3FsearchId%3D0&searchId=0 and https://redchairmarket.com/Account/LogOn?ReturnUrl=%2FAccount%2FSaveSearch%3FsearchId%3D1&searchId=1 are created when a user logs in and the website sends them back to the page they were looking at before. What is the best way to deal with this duplicate issue? How serious is it? Thank you!
Moz Pro | | BrittanyHighland0 -
Problem with On-page
I have an issue. I have added 5 keywords but when i go to the "on page" tab. They are not there... So i press on "Add keyword" and it takes me to another page where i can see all my keywords. So i go back to the "on page" and no keyword shows up. I wanna have a summary of the weekly crawl for the on page of these keywords and it's not showing up 😞 Anybody knows why?
Moz Pro | | theseolab0 -
Can I view inbound links to my Facebook business page?
I changed the title of my facebook page for my business Admiral Movers. I realized that all the listings that I manually entered over the years may be lost. Is there a way to view old page and new page inbound links to our facebook page?
Moz Pro | | Smcnelley0 -
On-Page Report Card Questions
First post here, a couple questions as I work through some of the SEOMOZ tool reporting, specifically the On-page Report Card. I've just received the report results yesterday, so working through the data now. There are two issues categorized as critical by the tool: (1) The grader is stating I don't have any instances of the target keyword in my page title, yet it's there. (The page title is too long, but I'm in the process of hacking the blog software to fix this, it's auto-generated by the CMS.) (2) It's also saying under "Broad Keyword Usage in Document" that I have zero instances of the keyword in the body text, and while I certainly don't have enough, there is at least one instance at the bottom of the blog post. All the text is contained with tags. (3) Related to #2, what's the difference between "Appropriate Keyword Usage in Document" under "High Importance Factors" and "Broad Keyword Usage in Document" under "Critical Factors"
Moz Pro | | webranger0 -
What is the difference between the Rank Tracker and the On-page Optimization page?
Both of them track keywords. In the Rank Tracker, you add each keyword manually and you associate it with a URL. For On-page Optimization page, the URLs are generated automatically based on searches and traffic?
Moz Pro | | ehabd0 -
Question to SEOMOZ when will the On-Page Optimization tool be Updated
Hi, When will your On-page Optimization Tool be updated to reflect the Over Optimization Penalty which is coming. I would think that grading out at an 'A' will have adverse effects.
Moz Pro | | Bucky0 -
On page links tool here at Seomoz
Hi Seomoz - first of all, thanks for the best SEO tools I have ever worked with (this is my first question in this forum, and also I just subscribed as a paying customer after the 30 days trial you guys offer). My question: After having worked for several weeks on getting the numbers of links in our forum on www.texaspoker.dk down, we are somewhat surprised to see that we didn't succeed in getting lower numbers. For instance, this page: http://www.texaspoker.dk/forum/aktuelle-konkurrencer/coaching-projekt-bliver-du-den-udvalgte has (that's what Seomoz seo tool tells us): 239 on page links. Can this really be true? We can't find these links, and we actuually did a lot to lower the numbers of links, for instance the forum members picture was a link before, and also there was a "go to top" link in each post in the forum. Thanks a lot.
Moz Pro | | MPO0