Multi Store SEO Drop
-
I have two stores (thespacecollective.com and thespacecollective.com/us) and over the past month the keyword rank for the US store had dropped by half, while the UK store is relatively the same. The content is mostly the same, except the US site uses US spelling. I assumed that this would not be flagged as duplicate content because it is the same site, just serving two locations.
I'd be interested to hear some thoughts on the reason for this drop and how I might fix it.
-
The redirect service is the gray area here for me. I don't know them or their services. With that parameter in play, you need the self-referring canonical. The hreflang is set up right now, but I don't know how all of this is interacting together.
I'd suggest starting by addressing the hreflang with the parameters in them. Make sure those parameters are not in the hreflang tags. Also, do you have sitemaps for both languages submitted to Google?
For what it is worth, I don't see things wrong in the SERPs. You are still on the first page for 'NASA gifts' and 'meterorite gifts' in the US. What other drops are you seeing? Some adjustment is expected when making changes like this.
-
All UK and USA website traffic has both dropped by 70% since I made the initial change you suggested.
The georedirect section of the URL is from an external redirect service called geotargetly.com
-
Can you tell me specifically what is plummeting? Just this page? All US, All UK pages? If you can share specifics, I can try to ID what is up. My theory is that the canonical is messing with things, but since you had the issue with parameters in some indexed URLs, it seemed relevant to keep in.
In face, I am digging a little, and when I google your name from my location in the US, this is the first page:
view-source:https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/archive?utm_source=georedirect
The hreflang there has that utm source in it. There is something that might be messing things up. Any idea where that thing is coming from yet? It seems very prevalent.
Also, how is the traffic to your site? With your rankings down, I'd assume a major drop in traffic. But if the URLs with that parameter are taking over, you might still be getting traffic, just to the wrong URL.
-
I believe it has now been done correctly as of a week ago, and yet, my rank continues to plummet - literally plummet.
-
It is possible that fluctuations will happen once the canonical is removed. That tag was equating the two pages and google was in the middle of trying to figure out that they were similar but not the same. So removing that canonical is going to reset the pages for a bit. If you are seeing a drop, I expect it to come back up shortly as long as the hreflang is there.
I looked at: view-source:https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery
And am seeing:
<link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-US</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">x-default</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> So with the above, you are confusing Google. That is says that it is it's own canonical (good) and is a language variation but you provide no others (including the strong page that is the UK). Rather than the above, it should be this:
<link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-US</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery</a>" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">alternate</a>" hreflang="<a class="attribute-value">en-GB</a>" href="<a class="attribute-value">https://www.thespacecollective.com/meteorite-jewellery</a>" />
The X-default is meant for pages that allow the user to select a country and/or language for a big company like IKEA or fedex. ```
-
Is it a coincidence that my rank for both sites just dropped by nearly 40% each after making this change?
-
That is news to me! Thank you so much for this. I will remove all of the canonical tags and leave only the hreflang, and see how this effects the site rank.
-
No canonical at all for either side, rather they should have hreflang tags that act as canonicals but not as strong (they are specific for language differences).
-
Thank you so much Kate. Just to double check, are you saying that there should be no canonical tag at all on the US site? Or just one (leading to the UK or US site)?
-
Ah, apologies on the logs thing! You can read more about it here: https://moz.com/blog/server-log-essentials-for-seo
It's not something you can see from search console. You'll need to get to your logs from your website host. Do you have a developers you can talk to or a website host team that can help you out?
The canonical!!!! Yeah, that is a problem! You should not use a canonical when dealing with international signals. You need to use HREFLANG. https://moz.com/learn/seo/hreflang-tag
On the linking, if Moz isn't showing anything, consider looking at search console. There is a links area, and if you can find the URL in the list of top pages, Google will give you an idea of where they found that URL.
-
I'm sure not what you mean by "check your crawl logs", can you please elaborate on that? Check them where exactly? I looked in the Google Search Console but there was no reference to IP addresses in any logs.
I tried looking up the linking domains in the Moz Link Explorer for "thespacecollective.com/ us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect" but it just says that it isn't a valid domain... so I'm not sure how to check how the URL is being linked to either.
I also noticed on the US site there are two canonical (attached), one for the UK and one for the US. This could be causing problems - I need to find out what is causing this and stop it. On that note, even the US site should still canonical to the UK site, right? Otherwise we would have two sites canonicalising to themselves respectively.
Thank you for your help thus far!
-
It can have SEO impact as Google primarily crawls from the US. They will from other locations but this has flip flopped over the years. This might be something that is causing this problem, if they are getting redirected to the US side but see many people mentioning the main domain (what you call the UK side). You can check by looking at your logs for when Google crawls and check the IP address in their list mentioned here. https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6144055?hl=en That will narrow down if it is a problem.
However, I do want to stress that using IP based redirects is frowned upon from a usability perspective. Giving people more choices is almost always better. A situation to consider outside of the issue that Google itself crawls from the US: When not in COVID times, people travel. I once tried to design my IKEA kitchen when traveling for work. I went back to continue my design I did one night in my hotel room, and it was gone! Little did I know, the design I did was on the UK side. People travel and you don't want to stop that from happening.
I get your point though, which is why it is preferred to do something like, funny enough they figured it out, IKEA does. If you go to ikea.com fresh, they welcome you with a message that they think you are in the US. It doesn't have to be a whole page, many sites use popups. But I would strongly urge you to consider this. And with that, I promise to drop the subject
Now, back to ranking. I see you at #6, and I am fresh eyes in the US space. I looked for NASA gifts and got this at exactly #6.
Where are you looking at ranking? Moz or Google Search Console or ?
I do see the issue with the meteorite jewelry. I see the URL https://www.thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect -- It's canonicalized properly, so Google is being ... annoying. I would, if you have time, take a look at how that is exact URL is linked to. Somehow, that one is seen as particularly powerful, so if you can narrow down where it is and get that parameter removed, that should change over time.
-
Hi Kate,
Thanks for answering. The redirect is deliberate, we do not want our customers to have a choice - if they're in the US or ROW, they go to the US site, if they're in the EU, they go to the UK site - anything else would be detrimental. So long as this doesn't negatively affect SEO, it is the perfect solution for us.
"NASA gifts" is a good example. We were 6th and now relegated to 51+, or "Meteorite Gifts", we were 2nd and not 51+.
"Meteorite Jewelry" took a nosedive too (thespacecollective.com/us/meteorite-jewellery?utm_source=georedirect) and I noticed the URL is picking up the redirect, that can't be good (attached).
-
First major thing, you are auto redirecting based on the user's location. I would not do that, rather ask the user where they want to go. But that is more of a usability thing.
Second, I don't see an issue with one search for "nasa mercury memorbilia" - the US page showed up for me. Can you be more specific about the terms and pages that are seeing problems? Below was my earch result and it is for the US page (I checked to be sure, not just going to the page).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
After Ranking Drop Continue SEO or Focus on Improving User Experience Instead?
Six months after starting a marketing campaign and spending a lot of money on SEO audits, link removals, wire frames, copywriting and coding my web site (www.nyc-officespace-leader.com) traffic dropped significantly after I launched a new version of my site in early June. Traffic is down about 27%, but most of the traffic from competitive terms is gone and the number of leads (phone calls, form completions) is off by about 70%. On june 6th an upgraded version of the site with mostly cosmetic changes (narrower header without social media buttons, streamlined conversion forms, new right rail was launched. No URLs were changed, and the text remained mostly the same. But somehow my developers botched up either canonical tags or Robot Text and 175 URLs with very little/no content were indexed by Google. At that point my ranking and traffic. A few days ago a request to remove those pages was made via Google WebmasterTools and now the number of pages indexed is down to 675 rather than the incorrect 850 from before. But ranking, traffic and lead generation have not yet recovered. After spending almost $25,000 over nine months this is rather frustrating. I might add the site has very few links from incoming domains and those links are not high quality. An SEO audit was performed in February and in April a link removal campaign occurred with about 30 domains agreeing to remove links and a disavow file being submitted for another 70-80 domains that would not agree to remove links. My SEO believes that we should focus on improving visitor engagement rather that on more esoteric SEO like trying to build incoming links. They think that improving useability will improve conversions and would generate results faster than traditional SEO. Also, they think that improving click through rates, reducing bounce rates will improve ranking by signaling to Google that the site is providing value to visitors. Does this sound like a reasonable approach? On one hand I don't see how my site with a MOZ domain authority could possibly compete against sites with a high number of quality incoming links and that maybe building a better link profile would yield faster results. On the other hand, it seems logical that Google would reward a site that creates a better user experience. Any thoughts from the MOZ community???? Does it sound like the recent loss of traffic is due to the indexing of the 175 pages? If so, when should my traffic and ranking return? Incidentally, these are the steps taken since last November to improve SEO: SEO Traffic & Ranking Drop Analysis and Recommendations (included in-depth SEO technical audit and recommendations). Unnatural Link Removal Program Content Optimization (Audit & Strategy with 20 page keyword matrix) CORE (also provided wireframe for /visitor-details pages at no-charge) SEO Copywriting for 10 pages New wire frames implemented on site on June 6th Jump in indexed pages by 175 on June 10th. Google Webmaster Tools removal request made for those low quality pages on June 23rd. Thanks, Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan11 -
SEO and Internal Pages
Howdy Moz Fans (quoting Rand), I have a weird issue. I have a site dedicated to criminal defense. When you Google some crimes, the homepage comes up INSTEAD of the internal page directly related to that type of crime. However, on other crimes, the more relevant internal page appears. Obviously, I want the internal page to appear when a particular crime is Googled and NOT the homepage. Does anyone have an explanation why this happens? FYI: I recently moved to WP and used a site map plugin that values the internal pages at 60% (instead of Weebly, which has an auto site map that didn't do that). Could that be it? I have repeatedly submitted the internal pages via GWT, but nothing happens. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mrodriguez14400 -
Mobile SEO? Do we need it or not?
Hi Guys, I am about to start to redesigning a new mobile website and am curious if mobile SEO is actually having an affect or not. The site I am doing the redesign for, already has a very well optimized desktop site and has an existing mobile website with no optimization. The mobile website is ranking well in Mobile search so I am curious why I I would need to optimize the new mobile website properly, especially when the mobile website has a canonical tag for its desktop counter part? Love to get everyone's thoughts on this & where they see mobile SEO going in the next 12 months.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seekjobs0 -
Optimal URLs for SEO and UX
We are considering restructuring the URL scheme on one of the websites we maintain. We have a few options. Currently news article URLs are as follows:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Peter264
http://domain.com/news/1234/article-title-name/ Download section URLs are as follows:
http://domain.com/downloads/files/1234/file-title-of-download-here/ Forum URLS:
http://forum.domain.com/forum/topic/1234/title-of-forum-topic-here/ We feel that these are a bit too long for both SEO and user experience. We want to remove as many directories from the URLs as possible. From experience, what do you recommend changing for the example URLs above? We have some ideas below...and we need to keep the ID in the URLs...however I know this is a little frustrating. Some ideas we have for news articles:
http://domain.com/news/article-title-shorter-1234
http://domain.com/article-title-shorter-n1234 Some ideas for the download pages:
http://domain.com/downloads/file-title-shorter-d1234
http://domain.com/downloads/files/file-title-shorter-1234
http://domain.com/file-title-shorter-d1234 Some ideas for the forum URLs:
http://forum.domain.com/topic-title-shorter-t1234
http://forum.domain.com/topic/topic-title-shorter-1234 What do you think of these suggestions? Any other URL ideas? Recommended URL length? The purpose of is question was to find the perfect URLs for the site we are working on; your thoughts, suggestions and tips are very much appreciated.0 -
Domain name match and SEO
I was asked a question today and would like a second opinion on it : Knowing that Alex wants to rank for personnal training the question is, from a SEO standpoint, which domain name would you recommend me using and why : personnaltraining.com ( IS not available) Personnaltrainingalex.com alexpersonnaltraining.com alextraining.com trainingalex.com I have my idea on this, but I'd like to have your so we can share and discuss on that. Thanks !
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Catalyste0 -
SEO Penalties for Splitting Page for Two Store Locations
Hello fellow SEO'ers! I have a question regarding the overall SEO implications of using a single page to describe the services/products offered at two different locations. The locations are in two different states/cities. I have tried to explain to the client that I working with that this is essentially splitting the page in two from a search ranking perspective. I have a feeling that Google sees this page as partially dedicated to one city, and partly to another... meaning that it won't rank as well as it could for either city. Is my thinking correct? Seems logical. The client has done this site-wide for every service/product that they offer in their facilities. I'm offering some title/description recommendations for the entire site right now, and I'm going back and forth with myself whether to include the city names in the titles and descriptions at all. Let me know what you smart folks think. I appreciate it. Sam
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theBREWROOM0 -
SEO vs 301
I have a website about "Download of games" and im planning open one about "games online" i know that "games online" its super hard to get good ranks, soo im thinking and do a 301 from my website of "download games" to my new website, do you think that is a good strategy ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nafera21 -
Do interstitials hurt SEO?
If you go to www.homeportfolio.com and click on one of the links in the footer. you'll notice you are presented with an interstitial. Can you tell me if that hurts our SEO and if we lose any link juice or suffer in any other way as a result of this linking method? my main concern is whether having anchor text that says "bathroom ideas" that goes to an interstitial that doesn't mention bathroom ideas is non-relevant... even if it refreshes 12 seconds to a page that is.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KaplanSEM0