How important is Lighthouse page speed measurement?
-
Hi,
Many experts cite the Lighthouse speed as an important factor for search ranking. It's confusing because several top sites have Lighthouse speed of 30-40, yet they rank well. Also, some sites that load quickly have a low Lighthouse speed score (when I test on mobile/desktop they load much quicker than stated by Lighthouse).
When we look at other image rich sites (such as Airbnb, John Deere etc) the Lighthouse score can be 30-40.
Our site https://www.equipmentradar.com/ loads quickly on Desktop and Mobile, but the Lighthouse score is similar to Airbnb and so forth. We have many photos similar to photo below, probably 30-40, many of which load async.
Should we spend more time optimizing Lighthouse or is it ok? Are large images fine to load async?
Thank you,
Dave
-
It's absolutely essential that your company website is fast.
Don't purchase slow, cheap web hosting, regardless of your business type.
Instead purchase super fast hosting for your business.
Sometimes, it's much more expensive, but it's well worth it as it can help improve your organic SEO.
We purchased lightning-fast hosting; this is the one reason why we are now selling more bath garden offices than ever before before.
-
it is important to distinguish between PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse. Maybe it's more important to follow PageSpeed Insights for your website. It becomes rather clear after reading this article https://rush-analytics.com/blog/google-pagespeed-insights-vs-lighthouse-how-do-they-differ. The differences between PageSpeed Insights and Lighthouse are explained in an easy way.
-
My understanding is that "Page Experience" signals (including the new "core web vitals) will be combined with existing signals like mobile friendliness and https-security in May, 2021. This is according to announcements by Google.
https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2020/05/evaluating-page-experience
https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2020/11/timing-for-page-experience
So, these will be search signlas, but there are lots of other very important search signals which can outweigh these. Even if a page on John Deere doesn't pass the Core Web Vitals criteria, it is still likely to rank highly for "garden tractors".
If you are looking at Lighthouse, I would point out a few things:
- The Lighthouse audits on your own local machine are going to differ from those run on hosted servers like Page Speed Insights. And those will differ from "field data" from the Chrome UX Report
- In the end, it's the "field data" that will be used for the Page Experience validation, according to Google. But, lab-based tools are very helpful to get immediate feedback, rather than waiting 28 days or more for field data.
- If your concern is solely about the impact on search rankings, then it makes sense to pay attention specifically to the 3 scores being considered as part of CWV (CLS, FID, LCP)
- But also realize that while you are improving scores for criteria which will be validated for search signals, you're also likely improving the user experience. Taking CLS as an example, for sure users are frustrated when they attempt to click a button and end up clicking something else instead because of a layout shift. And frustrated users generally equals lower conversion rates. So, by focusing on improvements in measures like these (I do realize your question about large images doesn't necessarily pertain specifically to CLS), you are optimizing both for search ranking and for conversions.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Non-Interaction Virtual page views
Hello, I would like to know if it is possible in Google Analytics, to generate "non-Interaction" Virtual Page views. In other words, Virtual Page Views, that do not affect the bounce rate (exactly like when we set "non-Interaction": True when we fire an event). I am presently fixing a Google Analytics implementation, where virtual page views were used all over the place instead of events. I am pulling my hairs. Cheers Luca
Reporting & Analytics | | Lvet0 -
GA Landing Page Inaccuracies
I had seen a thread on this a while back but no solution posted. There was a link posted to someone else explaining the issue but I got a 404 when clicking. Have a client that does mostly PPC and they are getting their conversion page showing up as landing page from paid many times. This is definitely not a sitelink, etc. The only way you get to this page is if you filled out the form. There are a few other pages showing up as landing pages that don't make sense too. Can this be attributed to someone being "inactive" for 30 minutes and then coming back and performing an action on this page (leaving)? If so, does this double count the conversion if a page visit here is a conversion? Just trying to make sense of the landing page report showing so many instances of our conversion page. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | jeremyskillings0 -
Google Analytics reporting traffic for 404 pages
Hi guys, Unique issue with google analytics reporting for one of our sites. GA is reporting sessions for 404 pages (landing pages, organic traffic) e.g. for this page: http://www.milkandlove.com.au/breastfeeding-dresses/index.php the page is currently a 404 page but GA (see screenshot) is reporting organic traffic (to the landing page). Does anyone know any reasons why this is happening? Cheers. http://www.milkandlove.com.au/breastfeeding-dresses/index.php GK0zDzj.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | jayoliverwright2 -
High Temporary Redirects: Login required pages
Noticed something interesting, a high temporary redirect report from Moz. Reviewing the pages they are caused by the user having to login and getting redirected. I can see the returnto query in the URL too. My thoughts: Since a login is required and the user is being redirected, these should remain 302 and not 301. I tested my Google Analytics account to **Exclude URL Query Parameter **returnto, just to see if it affected traffic. It didn't, I mean I don't see urls duplicated with the parameter anymore, just grouped together, so traffic is still being counted. I'm going to wait 1 more day and see what impact the GA traffic is before applying the exclusion to my true Google Analytics profile. This got me thinking, I should probably exclude this parameter from Google and Bing Webmaster Tools, that way Google/bing won't read those urls. Now does Moz's crawler follow that? Do you think that would change my moz crawl diagnostic report because I told Google/Bing crawlers to exclude that parameter. What do you think of my approach to reduce these high temporary redirects reported by Moz? Will it work? Has it plagued you?
Reporting & Analytics | | Bio-RadAbs0 -
Universal Analytics Tracking code for Measuring Addition/Removal from Cart via GTM
Hello Experts, Can you please tell me Universal Analytics Tracking code for Measuring Addition/Removal from Cart via GTM? Any one tell me process and code? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | bkmitesh0 -
Not many pages being indexed on google
Hi I am putting in to Google: site:www.mysite.com to see the pages listed on Google - the figure Google is coming back with is much lower than the actual pages, I have no crawer warning etc... What could the problem be? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | acumenadagency0 -
Does analytics track an order two times by refresh on the confirmation-page?
Hi there,
Reporting & Analytics | | Webdannmark
I have a quick question. Does Google analytics track an order two times, if the user buys a product, see the confirmation page and then click refresh/click or back and forward again?
The order/tracking data must be the same, but i guess the tracking code runs for every refresh and therefore tracks the order two times in Analytics or does analytics know that it is the same order? Someone that can clearify this?Thanks! Regards
Kasper0 -
Why is the page title sometimes missing in the API results?
Why is the page title sometimes missing in the API results? It exists on the page and in the "keyword difficulty tool", but missing in the API. It is never returned when upa= 1For example:stdClass Object(
Reporting & Analytics | | kirza
[fmrp] => 7.05087881216
[fmrr] => 5.05983022077E-6
[pda] => 91.758307504
[ueid] => 0
[ufq] => www.yellowpages.com/
[uid] => 0
[umrp] => 0
[umrr] => 0
[upa] => 1
[upl] => yellowpages.com/
[us] => 0
[ut] =>
[uu] =>
) {"fmrp":5.679443875178763,"fmrr":2.052551993215746e-07,"pda":70.05750830306422,"ueid":0,"ufq":"education-portal.com/","uid":0,"umrp":0,"umrr":0,"upa":1,"upl":"education-portal.com/","us":0,"ut":"","uu":""}How to get the titles for these pages?0