Rank regional homepages using canonicals and hreflangs
-
Here’s a situation I’ve been puzzling with for some time:
The situation
Please consider an international website targeting 3 regions. The real site has more regions, but I simplified the case for this question.There is no default language. The content for each regional version is meant for that region only.
The website.eu page is dynamic.
-
When there is no region cookie, the page is identical to website.eu/nl/ (because Netherlands is the most important region)
-
When there is a region cookie (set by a modal), there is a 302 redirect to the corresponding regional homepage
What we want
We want regional Google to index the correct regional homepages (eg. website.eu/nl/ on google.nl), instead of website.eu.
Why? Because visitors surfing to website.eu sometimes tend to ignore the region modal and therefor browse the wrong version.
For this, I set up canonicals and hreflangs as described below:The problem
It’s 40 days now since the above hreflangs and canonicals have been setup, but Google is still ranking website.eu instead of the regional homepages.
Search console’s report for website.eu:Any ideas why Google doesn’t respect our canonical?
-
Maybe I’m overlooking something in this setup (combination of hreflangs and canonicals might be confusing)? Should I remove the hreflangs on the dynamic page, because there is no self-referencing hreflang?
-
Or maybe it’s because website.eu has gathered a lot of backlinks over the years, whereas the regional homepages have much less, which might be why Google chooses to ig nore the canonical signals?
-
Or maybe it’s a matter of time and I just need to wait longer?
Note: I’m aware the language subfolders (eg. /be_nl) are not according to Google’s recommendations. But I’ve seen similar setups (like adobe.com and apple.com) where the regional homepage is showing ok.
Any help appreciated!
-
-
@terentyev Great insights!
I believe you might have nailed the issue with interlinking! I missed two home buttons on each page which were still pointing to the non-regional site. I'm getting it fixed right away and keep an eye on it.
Crawl budget shouldn't be a problem, I see a daily refresh in the logs for our homepage.
If interlinking doesn't fix it, I'll get into collecting backlinks to the regional homepages. I'll wait to see the effect of the interlinking fix though, as I'm curious what's the real cause.
Truly appreciate your feedback! Will try to report back if / what of the above helped.
-
@dmduco said in Rank regional homepages using canonicals and hreflangs:
re not according to Google’s recommendations. But I’ve seen similar setups (like adobe.com and apple.com) where the regional homepage is showing ok.
What you are describing is quite common among many international sites. Google can choose a different canonical, and you are right, it can happen because of the backlinks or because of some technical issues on your site.
I would suggest to dig into both directions.
first, please make sure that all canonicals are set up properly.
second, try to run an experiment for one of the locales that is causing your problems with adjusting interlinking within your site, to increase the internal pagerank of the pages that are not indexing correctly.
third, it would help to do more detailed backlinks analysis on each of the problematic locales, and maybe even gain a few backlinks within the appropriate locale (eg. from strong websites in the same country) even on a temporary basis, to rule out if the lack of backlinks is an issue.
Regarding the 40 days time period - it really depends on how often Google crawls your site, and your crawl budget / authority. Check googlebot logs, how often each of the problematic pages get crawled. It can also give you some clues to proceed with your investigation.Hope my suggestions will help. Let me know if you have any follow up questions, and I would appreciate some info sometimes down the road, how this issue will evolve.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hey guys, for some reason my homepage has gone down in rankings though other pages on my site have not.
This is not something I have ever seen before. The site is still indexed if I search for it directly, but not in top 100 rankings for keywords even though sub-pages are ranking for the given keyword. Changes I have made recently include site transfer to wordpress, force redirect http to https removal of www by redirect and adding new property instance in Google Search Console. I have checked htaccess file and sitemap and all seem fine. ideas? Site: https://dublinSEO.co
Technical SEO | | HappyApple840 -
Which url should i use? Thanks!
I have a question regarding how to use my url, we are a Swedish-based website which have the url, http://interimslösning.se/ (that contains the Swedish letter “ö”) so the url can also be written as http://xn--interimslsning-3pb.se/. Which of the following url should I use for my backlinks, http://interimslösning.se/ or http://xn--interimslsning-3pb.se/ ? What is the difference between them regarding SEO? And is it good or bad to use letter like "ö" or other characters like that in your url? I was thinking that maybe it is good to use the letter "ö" for local search optimization in sweden, but i don't know.. Thanks in advance! Greetings,
Technical SEO | | Kiwibananlime
Paul Linderoth0 -
Will rel=canonical work here?
Dear SEOMOZ groupies, I manage several real estate sites for SEO which we have just taken over. After running the crawl on each I am find 1000's of errors relating to just a few points and wanted to find out either suggestion to fix or if the rel=canonical will resolve it as it is in bulk. Here are the problems...Every property has the following so the more adverts the more errors. each page has a contact agent url. all of these create dup title and content each advert has the same with printer friendly each advert has same with as a favorites page several other but I think you get the idea. Help!!! .... suggestions overly welcome Steve
Technical SEO | | AkilarOffice0 -
Am I Doing this Canonical Right?
Hi,I admit to new to the Mod Rewrite.Here is my mod rewrite in my .htaccess# Begin non-www page protection # <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
Technical SEO | | Force7
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [L,R=301]</ifmodule> # End non-www page protection #If I have my home page set toI really want the canonical to be www.domain.com no trailing slashDid I create a confllict, and if so, how should I change it?0 -
What is campaign based rank tracking tool? How to use it?
I'm having difficulties with SEOmoz Rank Tracker tool. During last month, it hasn't worked properly. I was suggested to use "campaign based rank tracking tool"- I would like to learn if anyone has already used it? Thanks, Sema
Technical SEO | | WTGEvents0 -
Canonical Issues
Hi Guys, I have a technical question. Ive started optimising an ecommerce site for a client and come across some duplicate content issues:- This page: http://www.bracknelllamps.com/projector-manufacturer/SANYO/70 is actually indexed in Google as:- http://www.bracknelllamps.com/projector-lamps.php?make=SANYO Both pages have the same content and I'm guessing the indexed page refers to an old way of navigating the site. As I'm concerned about duplicate content issues, what's the best approach as this seems to be the case for all 'projector manufacturer' pages. would it be to 301 redirect each manufacturer url (this could take forever with 107) manufacturers or rel="canonical" tag? to show Google which page I want indexing? Kind Regards Neil
Technical SEO | | nezona0 -
Canonical URLs and screen scraping
So a little question here. I was looking into a module to help implement canonical URLs on a certain CMS and I came a cross a snarky comment about relative vs. absolute URLs being used. This person was insistent that relative URLs are fine and absolute URLs are only for people who don't know what they are doing. My question is, if using relative URLs, doesn't it make it easier to have your content scraped? After all, if you do get your content scraped at least it would point back to your site if using absolute URLs, right? Am I missing something or is my thinking OK on this? Any feedback is much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | friendlymachine0 -
Rel=Canonical being ignored?
Hi all, We have a toys website that has several categories. It's setup such that each product has a primary category amongst the categories within it can be found. For example... Addendum's primary url is http://www.brightminds.co.uk/childrens-toys/board-games/addendum.htm but it can also be found here http://www.brightminds.co.uk/learning-toys/maths-learning/addendum.htm. Hence, in the for that url it has a rel=canonical that points to the first url. For some reason though seomoz ignores this and reports duplicate page content. It doesn't seem to record the canonical tag either. Any ideas what's going on? Thanks, Josh.
Technical SEO | | joshgeake_gmail.com0