Moz scores
-
Hi All,
Could anyone please explain for me why the moz scores that show under SERPs in Google search show one set of values, but when i click on the SERP listing and go to that page, the Moz scores at the bottom of the tab the page is open in are completely different. I.E -
SERP result
-
Wireless Alarms
<cite>www.wireless-alarms.net/</cite>Honeywell, Friedland, Response, Wireless house home intruder burglar alarms and wirefree doorbells chimes and accessories.<iframe class="SEOmoz-iframe" src="chrome-extension://eakacpaijcpapndcfffdgphdiccmpknp/html/serpbar.html#{" settings":{"dmr":false,"dmt":false,"mr":true,"mt":true,"serp-overlay":true,"toolbar-enabled":true,"subdomain-metrics":false,"serp-panel-open":true,"toolbar-position":"bottom"},"lsdata":{"feid":3,"fipl":3,"fmrp":2.0446037910058426,"fmrr":5.396862303226778e-12,"ftrp":1.8723654310590483,"ftrr":9.21604483751679e-12,"fuid":3,"pda":8.903939958502189,"peid":3,"pid":3,"pmrp":1.6026230610187469,"pmrr":1.3566326316606153e-10,"ptrp":1.025503845909542,"ptrr":1.4972548621304158e-11,"puid":3,"ueid":2,"uemrp":2.577887966559377,"uemrr":5.40110633420739e-13,"uid":2,"uipl":2,"ujid":2,"umrp":2.577887966559377,"umrr":5.40110633420739e-13,"upa":23.634692786039714,"utrp":4.9331532541404854,"utrr":1.9684091945588755e-16},"user":{"level":"pro","options":{},"proenabled":true,"aclurl":"http:="" moz.com="" users="" level?src="mozbar","loginURL":"https://moz.com/login","logoutURL":"https://moz.com/logout","apiRequest":"url-metrics","cols":"133146078688","expired":false,"accessId":"pro-RGFkZHlTbXVyZg%3D%3D","expires":1374925378,"signature":"tBSBXpLbBmk073ofsfBwnilmODw%3D","displayName":"DaddySmurf"},"serp":4,"host":"www.wireless-alarms.net"}"" scrolling="no"></iframe>
Page result
<label>Page:</label><label id="Page Authority" class="key lsdata">PA:</label> <label id="SEOmoz-data-PA" class="val lsdata">27</label><label id="mozrank" class="key lsdata" title="MozRank">mR:</label> <label id="SEOmoz-data-mR" class="val lsdata">5.30</label><label id="moztrust" class="key pro-only lsdata" title="MozTrust">mT:</label> <label id="SEOmoz-data-mT" class="val pro-only lsdata">5.61</label><label id="SEOmoz-data-uid">1,950</label> links from
<label id="SEOmoz-data-uipl">2</label> Root Domains<label>Root Domain:</label><label id="dom-pageauthority" class="key lsdata" title="Domain Authority">DA:</label> <label id="SEOmoz-data-DA" class="val lsdata">24</label><label id="SEOmoz-data-puid">100,262</label> links from
<label id="SEOmoz-data-pid">3</label> Domains<label>Subdomain:</label><label id="SEOmoz-data-fuid">19,953</label> links from
<label id="SEOmoz-data-fipl">3</label> DomainsThank you.Si -
-
Why the .net is ranking and the .com is was the first question that went through my mind too.
Looking at the link profiles for the two domains the first impression is that the .com domain should rank because it's got loads more links than the .net domain.
Virtually all of these links come from the .net variant of the domain.
If you look a bit closer you'll see that wireless.com has external links from wireless-alarms.net & resonsesecurityweek.com. (And wireless-alarms.net is redirected to .com so I'm sure google wouldn't count these.)
Wireless.net has links from: cheviotsecurity.co.uk & saboteurcrimeprevention.com.
So out of the two, the .net looks marginally stronger.
-
HI Doug,
I'm about 50 miles away from you. Thank you for your answer. This leads me to ask, if wireless-alarms.com has such better stats (thank you for picking that up) then why is their .net domain the one with the great position?
I am not in the SEO sector, just a businessman on a steep learning curve.
Many thanks
Si
-
When you click on the www.wireless-alarms.net you get re-directed to www.wireless-alarms.com. So in the serps you're seeing the Mozscape stats for the .net domain and when you get to the page you're seeing the stats for the .com domain.
The www.wireless-alarms.net home page is using a meta-refresh to do the redirect. Looking at the wayback machine this has been in place since before December 2010.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080701000000*/http://www.wireless-alarms.net
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved How to concat moz.com
Hello,
Moz Pro | | GrzegorzZ
I wanted to contact moz.com. I started my 30 day trial to test service.
After 2-3 days totally forgot about it. I remembered about moz.com when i received invoice saying they're gonna charge me.
I immediately wrote email to them that I do not want this service. I forgot and only put credit card data because i was required to. And would like a refund since it was 2-3 hours after bill. Unfortunately sending messages via their contact form is not an option. There is no confirmation on my email they received message nor return message from them.0 -
Unsolved Moz Pro crawl signaling missing canonical which are not?
Hi,
Moz Pro | | rolandvintners
I'm trying MozPro considering using it.
One of the tool which is appealing is the crawl and insights.
After quick use, I really question many of the alerts, for instance, I got a "missing canonical tag" on this url: https://vintners.co/wine/grawu_gto#2020 but when I check my markup, there's clearly a canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="https://vintners.co/wine/grawu_gto"> Anybody can explain?
I asked Moz Pro staff when being onboarded but didn't get an answer...
Honestly, I'm questioning the value of these crawls, or may be I miss something?0 -
Does MOZ Provide an On Page Grader Embed?
I am looking to provide an on page grader on our website. Does MOZ provide this feature?
Moz Pro | | WebMarkets0 -
MOZ Pro - Page Grader Queries
Greetings! I started a new position last week and the extremely supportive director promised to give me anything I required to make my job easier. Of course, my first port of call was MOZ Pro. Having never used MOZ Pro before, I've just been getting to grips with it, fixing any pressing issues and giving the whole site a general SEO health check. A few fairly major issues have been flagged, which I'm in the process of fixing, and I'm currently putting our main landing pages through the MOZ Page Grader. After a little bit of tinkering, our iPhone 6 cases page has been graded B for the term 'iPhone 6 cases', but I have a few queries/concerns regarding some of the suggested fixes: **Avoid keyword stuffing in document **- The term 'iphone 6 cases' only appears thrice in the body, so it can't be that? The term, however, appears 23 times in the page's img alt tags. Could this be the issue? This is an ecommerce site that sells iPhone 6 cases, so the img alt tags are bound to contain that keyword. Each img alt tag is unique, so I don't really know what I can do here? "Show details for YouSave iPhone 6 0.6mm Clear Gel Case" is the example of the img alt tag of one of the products on that page, surely I can't remove the words 'iPhone 6 case'? Avoid too many internal links - MOZ suggests keeping the internal links to below 100 or, at a minimum, less than 100 links on the main navigation menu. I haven't counted, but I'd guess that page has more than 100 links, but not too many on the navigation menu. To me, this looks like a standard ecommerce page, with links to products and different pages via the top and bottom menus. Would I improve visibility if I reduced the amount of links by, say, reducing the number of products on the page? We currently have it set to 36, but can easily be reduced. Only One Canonical URL - We've put a fix in place for this issue and are just waiting for it to go live. For some reason rel=canonical tags have been duplicated on the majority of the pages. Like I say, this is being remedied, but I just wondered whether a duplicate tag negatively affect the page's visibility? The tags are identical and just point to the page they're on. I think that's about it for now! Thanks in advance and keep up the good work! Cheers, Lewis (Andrew is the name of the director) UPDATE Now I've sorted the rel=canonical issue, the pages are being graded A but still with the first two suggestions above.
Moz Pro | | PeaSoupDigital0 -
Is there a tool on Moz or out on the internet that does bad link checker
I'm still pretty new to this and I was wondering if there is a free software, one of Moz or free out on the the internet that allows you to check bad links. I've done a lot of link building with citations and directories that for my clients industry. I just don't want to add their website and profile to a bad/risky directory and it penalizes my clients. I've seen a few out there, but I need one that is respectable and reliable. Any suggestions? I found one called bad neighborhood http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm. Thanks Again, Benny
Moz Pro | | ACann0 -
The pages that add robots as noindex will Crawl and marked as duplicate page content on seo moz ?
When we marked a page as noindex with robots like {<meta name="<a class="attribute-value">robots</a>" content="<a class="attribute-value">noindex</a>" />} will crawl and marked as duplicate page content(Its already a duplicate page content within the site. ie, Two links pointing to the same page).So we are mentioning both the links no need to index on SE.But after we made this and crawl reports have no change like it tooks the duplicate with noindex marked pages too. Please help to solve this problem.
Moz Pro | | trixmediainc0 -
Using MOZ Keyword Rankings with Google Analytics in Excel to track paid keywords
Hi, I sorted my keywords in GA from highest incoming traffic to lowest, exported it and then imported these 280 or something keywords into SEO Moz. The problem is, it appears that SEO Moz Keyword Rankings tool pulls traffic data (in the traffic column) only for NON-PAID traffic ... So what I'm seeing is that keywords that brings A LOT of traffic to my site (because of AdWords) sometimes have 0 of traffic in SEO Moz, because I'm on page 3 of SERP and I literally got no non-paid traffic that week. The thing is: I want to improve my rankings for keywords that I'm already performing well, even if they are paid keywords, because they already bring me a lot of traffic to my website. The way this is working is not helping me out, because when I sort by the traffic column very important keywords end up in the last place for me. Questions: Whey does SEO Moz pull traffic data from non-paid keywords only ? Shouldn't be at least an option for this or I'm missing something here ? While they don't change it, any Excel Gurus could help me how to export SEO Moz ranking data, import it on Excel and MERGE a new "paid traffic" column that I export from Google Analytics ? How to assing each keyword line the paid traffic value I'm getting from GA ? Thanks ! Felipe
Moz Pro | | pqdbr0