Site Navigation
-
Hello, I have some questions about best practices with site navigation & internal linking. I'm currently assisting aplossoftware.com with its navigation. The site has about 200 pages total. They currently have a very sparse header with a lot of links in the footer. The three most important keywords they want to rank for are nonprofit accounting software, church accounting software and file 990 online.
1. What are your thoughts about including a drop down menu in the header for the different products? (they have 3 main products). This would allow us to include a few more links in the header and give more real estate to include full keywords in anchor text.
2. They have a good blog with content that gets regularly updated. Currently it's linked in the footer and gets a tiny amount of visits. What are your thoughts about including it as a link in the header instead?
3. What are best practices with using (or not using) no follow with site navigation and footer links? How about with links to social media pages like Facebook/Twitter?
Any other thoughts/ideas about the site navigation for this site (www.aplossoftware.com) would be much appreciated. Thanks!
-
Jason -
I took a look at the Aplos Software site, and I tend to agree with you.
what I like about the site is it's simplicity, which is good for an organization promising to "Simplify Your Nonprofit's Finances"
The color scheme is basic, there's a big strong call to action (Get Started for Free).
That said, there's very few options for the end user to interact with the site. And links at the footer are not going to make that happen.
To answer your three questions:
1. What are your thoughts about including a drop down menu in the header for the different products?
My answer: I think this would be really helpful. If the end user is on a long, long page, a footer navigation is helpful to allow someone to quickly click to something else on the site. But it's not how most main stream users navigate a site. The top navigation is...2. They have a good blog with content that gets regularly updated. Currently it's linked in the footer and gets a tiny amount of visits. What are your thoughts about including it as a link in the header instead?
My answer: Yes! You should add the blog to the top of the site. The blog is a way that end users can see a little bit under the covers of an organization, as it's not the content that's been through so many rounds of revisions that it's 100% polished. The blog is a great place to feature new clients, awards, and other information. If it's updated frequently, it also demonstrates that the company is active, and conveys the idea that the software product the company is selling is not static / done, but is continuously supported. That may or may not be true, but a blog that is updated all the time will tend to convey that the company is still actively working on the product.
3. What are best practices with using (or not using) no follow with site navigation and footer links? How about with links to social media pages like Facebook/Twitter?
My answer: honestly, I wouldn't worry too much about using no-follow tags on your footer navigation. At least on this site. You don't have so many links that Google is going to ignore them. Plus, it's at the end of the page anyway. You certainly could, though, and it won't hurt in any way. Just make sure that your site map, privacy policy, etc are followed links.
Hope this helps!
- Jeff
-
Glad to hear you are helping them - they need it from the quick look I just did...
It would be helpful to add those three to the main navigation in a drop-down (as long as it functions across devices). These are the primary product offerings and it would help visitors know right away that they offer these specific solutions without having to first click through, then scroll through the poorly constructed pages the main nav currently links to.
The problem with that scenario is "are these the only products they want to be found for?" If not, that would confuse anyone coming to the site for other solutions.
A better solution would be when someone clicks on the main navigation links for "accounting" or "oversight", that should take the visitor to a page that specifies each of the different products or services they offer in that bucket. They would benefit from having a "sub-navigation" bar in each section unique to that section that appears on every page in that section.
On the home page they can have a paragraph describing those most important offerings and linking directly to them. And on each main landing page they can have a paragraph describing each product/service in that section and linking to that specific product/service as well.
The problem with footer nav is it's just that - footer material - meaning "not as strong" as main navigation or in-content navigation. Loading it up with links to "all the things" is not helpful, even with a nofollow attribute, becuase it still has those words on the page, which can dilute topical focus of the main topic on individual product / service page.
Footer links should be streamlined to only a few "standard / common" links most sites have in footers.
The blog is best served with a main nav link as well, for the reasons you described.
Nofollow should really only be used when linking to a page you don't want indexed, or in rare situations, it can be used (with moderation) for other reasons It is NOT a panacea.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site-wide Links
Hey y'all, I know this question has been asked many times before but I wanted to see what your stance was on this particular case. The organisation I work for is a group of 12 companies - each with its own website. On some of the sites we have a link to the other sites within the group on every single page of that site. Our organic search traffic has dropped a bit but not significantly and we haven't received any manual penalties from Google. It's also worth mentioning that the referral traffic for these sites from the other sites I control is quite good and the bounce rate is extremely low. If you were in my shoes would you remove the links, put a nofollow tag on the links or leave the links as they are? Thanks guys 🙂
Technical SEO | | AAttias0 -
Bing is not Indexing my site.
Hi, My website is four months old and has more than 8000 pages. Bing has indexed only 8 pages till date and Google also keeps playing hide and seek with it. There was a time when google indexed almost all the pages of my site but now there are only 5000 pages indexed. Moreover when I check my site on google (by typing site:socktail.com), it shows only 26 pages. Please let me know what should I do. If somebody wants to take a look, my website is http://socktail.com Thanks
Technical SEO | | saurabh19050 -
Seo For Forum Sites
I have forum site.I've opened it 2 months ago.But there is a problem.Therefore my content is unique , my site's keyword ranking constantly changing..Sometimes my site's ranking drops from first 500.After came to 70s. I didn't make any off page seo to my site.What is the problem ?
Technical SEO | | tutarmi0 -
Why would this site outrank a Pr2 site with higher domain authority?
I am trying to get a pr2 site to be on top 7 local spot for the keyword Van Nuys Bail bonds but have discovered a site which has barely any back links and is not even a year old on top results. Their backlinks are from lower authority domains than what we have. How could this site be beating a 7 year old pr2 website? The site I'm working on is http://bbbail.com/ The site that is ranking in 5th spot local with pr0 is http://www.vipbailbonds.org/ is it maybe because it is a .org site? Also I notice that all websites in top spots have www, could that be a factor as well?
Technical SEO | | jesse13410 -
How to link site.com/blog or site.com/blog/
Hello friends, I have a very basic question but I can not find the right answer... I have made my blog linkbuilding using the adress "mysite.com/blog" but now im not sure if is better to do the linkbuilding to "mysite.com**/blog/ "** Is there any diference? Thanks...
Technical SEO | | lans27870 -
Why is this site ranking better than me
Hi just used the compare tool to try and find out why a site is ranking better than me http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=www.lifestylemonthly.co.uk%2F my site is www.in2town.co.uk and the site i am comparing with is http://www.lifestylemonthly.co.uk/ Can anyone explain what is going on and how i can achieve better ranking results
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
What to do if my site was De-indexed?
Hello fellow SEOs, I have been doing SEO for about a year now, I'm not expert, but I know enough to get the job done. I'm learning everyday about better techniques. So enough about that... Tonight I noticed that my site has, I believe, been de-indexed. Its a fairly new site, as we just launched it a few days ago and I went in and did all the title tags and meta. I still have to go in to do the h1 and h2 tags...plus add some alt tags and anchor text. Well anyways, after a couple of days after the title tags were implemented. I was propagating all over the place. Using my keyword tool here...I was number on the first page in Google for 71 or the 88 keywords. My new site was just indexed yesterday and thats when i noticed all my keywords. Well today I noticed that I am no where to be found, even if i type in my company's name. PLEASE help me out...any advice would be appreciated. Thank you. p.s. could my competitors could have done something to my site? just wondering... The website is www.eggheadconsultants.com
Technical SEO | | Jegghead1 -
Are lots of links from an external site to non-existant pages on my site harmful?
Google Webmaster Tools is reporting a heck of a lot of 404s which are due to an external site linking incorrectly to my site. The site itself has scraped content from elsewhere and has created 100's of malformed URLs. Since it unlikely I will have any joy having these linked removed by the creator of the site, I'd like to know how much damage this could be doing, and if so, is there is anything I can do to minimise the impact? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Nobody15569050351140