Moz crawl duplicate pages issues
-
Hi
According to the moz crawl on my website I have in the region of 800 pages which are considered internal duplicates. I'm a little puzzled by this, even more so as some of the pages it lists as being duplicate of another are not.
For example, the moz crawler considers page B to be a duplicate of page A in the urls below: Not sure on the live link policy so ive put a space in the urls to 'unlive' them.
Page A http:// nuchic.co.uk/index.php/jeans/straight-jeans.html?manufacturer=3751
Page B http:// nuchic.co.uk/index.php/catalog/category/view/s/accessories/id/92/?cat=97&manufacturer=3603
One is a filter page for Curvety Jeans and the other a filter page for Charles Clinkard Accessories. The page titles are different, the page content is different so Ive no idea why these would be considered duplicate. Thin maybe, but not duplicate.
Like wise, pages B and C are considered a duplicate of page A in the following
Page A http:// nuchic.co.uk/index.php/bags.html?dir=desc&manufacturer=4050&order=price
Page B http:// nuchic.co.uk/index.php/catalog/category/view/s/purses/id/98/?manufacturer=4001
Page C http:// nuchic.co.uk/index.php/coats/waistcoats.html?manufacturer=4053
Again, these are product filter pages which the crawler would have found using the site filtering system, but, again, I cannot find what makes pages B and C a duplicate of A.
Page A is a filtered result for Great Plains Bags (filtered from the general bags collection). Page B is the filtered results for Chic Look Purses from the Purses section and Page C is the filtered results for Apricot Waistcoats from the Waistcoat section.
I'm keen to fix the duplicate content errors on the site before it goes properly live at the end of this month - that's why anyone kind enough to check the links will see a few design issues with the site - however in order to fix the problem I first need to work out what it is and I can't in this case.
Can anyone else see how these pages could be considered a duplicate of each other please? Checking ive not gone mad!!
Thanks,
Carl
-
These days, content is king. It looks like there are a lot of similar internal links in the source code of these pages. When you have thin/or no content, your internal link profile stands out a lot more.
What helped me overcome this for my company is focusing on aggregating customer reviews and having my customer service team generate unique product descriptions. Social media was great for reviews. We offered small coupons at first, and now our customers want to send reviews. Unique product descriptions might be tough for clothes, but, it isn't impossible.
Having a ridiculously duplicated internal link profile and no content is almost as detrimental to your organic rankings as a spammy external linking profile. You want to look like an eCommerce site and not an online catalog.
-
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the response. I tested the canonical side of things but was finding that it was stopping the filtered pages being indexed. While we could get 'Dresses' page indexed we couldn't get 'Black Dresses' 'X retailer brand Dresses' etc indexed. We found this a bit of an issue. On the filtering page the tag always pointed back to the category root.
We are using an seo plugin for Magento so maybe i will need to go back to the dev and ask them. I accept that not putting canonical tag on the filtering could lead to internal duplicate content issues if a product can be found a dresses, red dresses, x brand dresses, x brand red dresses and via price.
Even though the side is still a work in progress we are already seeing the filtered pages getting indexed and ranking fairly well. So, for example (I don't think we rank for this one) we are ranking for term such as Black Size 12 Evening Dress. Sure, this term won't get millions of searches but long tail converts very well. As much as I would love to be no1 for Dresses we are not going to get there for a long long time. Especially given the No1 brand for the term is DA 86 and has hundreds of thousands of links and over 2.1m G+ shares.
We are in a tricky position with the website. Normally we could rank for the filtered terms by product page easy enough, however with all the product pages being pulled externally we need to find an alternative.
-
Hello Carl!
So I checked out the pages you listed and I've had similar issues on my e-Commerce stores. There isn't much text on e-Commerce site pages and there tends to be a ton of links so that always causes a problem for me. E-commerce stores and duplicate content go hand in hand, unfortunately.
I would suggest starting with adding canonical tags into your meta data. There's a few settings in Magento you can turn on and that should take care of some of the problem. Here's a good resource http://www.magentocommerce.com/knowledge-base/entry/canonical-meta-tag
From there you might want to consider making your meta descriptions on the products a bit more unique. Changing out one word (the product name) doesn't make it different or a non-duplicate. When the content is super thin, it's harder to make the pages, titles, and descriptions unique to search engines. With e-Commerce product pages, I understand the trouble with having text on filter pages…it's just not practical and doesn't look right. But it's important to optimize where you can…the meta descriptions. Here's another resource for that http://moz.com/ugc/our-forgotten-friend-the-meta-description
Hope that helps!
-
Might be worth me adding that I'm aware that all the product pages are duplicate content from other websites. The shop section of the website is an affiliate store. However, all the product pages are set as noindex to the search engines as a result of this. The internal link between the category pages and the product pages will be made nofollow in the coming days. If the engines cannot index the individual products then little point wasting bandwidth on them crawling 200,000 products!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Moz can't crawl my site
Moz is being blocked from crawling the following site - https://www.cleanchain.com. When looking at Robot.txt, the following is disallowing access but don't know whether this is preventing Moz from crawling too? User-agent: *
Moz Pro | | danhart2020
Disallow: /adeci/
Disallow: /core/
Disallow: /connectors/
Disallow: /assets/components/ Could something else be preventing the crawl?0 -
URL Parameters causing duplicate content - Login/Registration page
All, I just recently acquired a new client and right away I noticed an abundance of duplicate content being recorded after the moz crawl diagnostics was completed. After a quick digest of the issue, it seems that the majority (90%) of the outlined duplicated content is stemming from the client's Login/Registration page. Upon clicking (without being logged-in) any asset or forum discussion board link within the site, the user is automatically redirected to the Login/Registration page, which seems to create this massive redirect loop associated with dynamic url parameters. Ex. After clicking on a select internal link (asset or discussion board) the user is redirected to the Login/Register page which presents the page and a URL that looks a lot this this: Ex. 1 https://www.clientsite.com/register-login?ReturnUr...xxxx%xxxx%xxxx%...... Ex. 2 https://www.clientsite.com**/register-login?returnurl=/register-login?returnurl=/register-login?returnurl=/page-titl**e/ These URLs seem to becoming larger and larger... The client wants to ensure users have to Login/Register within their site before they're allowed to view the content. This process doesn't allow for any type of preview page to be viewed by a user prior to clicking on the internal link, which in turn doesn't allow any preview pages to be indexed. Right now, Moz is picking up all of the redirect and labeling them as duplicate page content/duplicate page titles based on the Login/Registration page. Questions/Comments: Would it be wise to create preview pages for the asset pages and discussion board pages to allow for proper indexing? - Could this be a CMS issue? Current being used on this is, Kentico. There are thousands of pages being recorded in the crawl as duplicate, however only 14 seem to be indexing with duplicate title tags. 301 or canonical redirect strategy? Moz crawl data issue? Again, this is my first look at this issue, so more information is bound to come out soon! Please let me know if anyone has run into this issue and if you have a possible solution to get rid of this redirect loop process. Thanks! -T
Moz Pro | | MattLacuesta0 -
Moz metrics
This discussion is strictly theoretical... I won't hold anyone to their answer. If I have 2 websites that are identical in every way and let's say the domain authority for both is 40, and I 301 redirect one site to the other, what would the DA become? Same question for single pages, both with a PA of 40. If I 301 redirect one page to the other, what does the PA become for the remaining page?
Moz Pro | | AMHC0 -
Tools that crawl 2 million page sites
Our site is about 2million pages deep, 50% of which is stale content. Yes, I know - OMG #unhygienic. Even if we get approval to get rid of half of it. SEOMoz Pro Elite only crawls 20k deep - what can i do to crawl and diagnose the whole site. Are there any tools anyone can suggest. SEOMoz??
Moz Pro | | ilhaam0 -
I have a Rel Canonical "notice" in my Crawl Diagnostics report. I'm presuming that means that the spider has detected a rel canonical tag and it is working as opposed to warning about an issue, is this correct?
I know this seems like a really dumb question but the site I'm working on is a BigCommerce one and I've been concerned about canonicalisation issues prior to receiving this report (I'm a SEOmoz pro newbie also!) and I just want to be clear I am reading this notice correctly. I presume this means that the site crawl has detected the rel canonical tag on these pages and it is working correctly. Is this correct?? Any input is much appreciated. Thanks
Moz Pro | | seanpearse0 -
I have another Duplicate page content Question to ask.Why does my blog tags come up as duplicates when my page gets crawled,how do I fix it?
I have a blog linked to my web page.& when rogerbot crawls my website it considers tags for my blog pages duplicate content.is there any way I can fix this? Thanks for your advice.
Moz Pro | | PCTechGuy20120 -
On Page missing keywords
I setup my keywords on SEOMoz properly but the On Page result just shows me 2 keywords instead of the 7 that I set for my campaign. I was expecting the application to score the other keywords on wednesday but it did not add the missing keywords. Is this a bug?
Moz Pro | | netbuilder0