Tons of Crappy links in new OSE (Open Site Explorer)
-
I am starting to miss the old OSE. I've found that for a lot of the pages on our site, the new OSE is showing WAY more links and most of them are garbage nonsense links from China, Russia, and the rest of the internet Wild West.
For instance, in the old OSE, this page used to show 9 linking domains:
http://www.uncommongoods.com/gifts/by-recipient/gifts-for-him
It now shows 454 links. Some of the new links (about 5 of them) are legitimate. The other 400+ are garbage. Some are porn sites, most of them don't even open a web page, they just initiate some shady download. I've seen this for other sites as well (like Urban Outfitters) This is making it much harder for me to do backlink analysis on bc I have no clue how many "Normal" links they have. Is anyone else having this problem ? Any way to filter all this crap out ? See attached screenshot of the list of links I'm getting from OSE.
-
Ok thank you. I will email directly.
-
Hey Zack,
Sorry to hear you're still having problems - we've seen an improvement on most sites at this point. Would you want to send me info on the site you're searching and any filters you are using?
If you don't feel comfortable posting that info on this thread, feel free to email me directly: carin@seomoz.org.
Thanks!
Carin
-
Hey Carin,
I just wanted to follow up on this...I'm still seeing these spammy binary files show up as links. Unfortunately it makes OSE quite useless for me in regards to exploring our own backlinks.
What is the status of this problem? Has there been any headway ? Why does our site have problems but most others don't?
Thanks!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack,
Thanks so much for understanding! We are doing everything we can to get the bug resolved. Binary files are the downloadable files you see as links - .pdf, .exe, .img, etc.
I'm really sorry, but we don't have a URL to the old OSE. I saw Steven's response as a workaround - is that possible or are there too many file types to filter out?
Our crawlers that provide the metrics to OSE are always crawling, but will take about a month for our fix to propagate through to all the pages we crawl. Once we have removed these links from our crawlers, then we'll have to process the metrics. This is why it's looking like late September for the fix to show up.
I really appreciate your patience and understanding, we're doing everything we can to fix it!!
Thanks,
Carin
-
Hey Carin-
Thank you so much for this in-depth response. Glad to hear that you guys are aware of it and trying to sort it out. Very interesting info...I'd never hear of "binary" links before but I hope you guys can figure out how to handle these. Seems like a tough task to tackle, just by looking at my CSV it looks like these come in several different forms and they could be hard to identify..I have a few questions:
1. Is there by chance a URL you could give me that points to the old OSE ?
2. How often does OSE crawl? Is it a constant process or are there scheduled crawls?
Thanks!!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack, I saw the ticket you filed was answered by Aaron, but I just wanted to follow up with you as well. We have made some really exciting changes to the crawler, but, unfortunately, there is a pretty obvious bug as well...
The reason for the “questionable” links coming from the Internet Wild West is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download (i.e. binary) links. The first issue is the crawler is counting a binary file as a link, but the larger issue, is that the crawler doesn’t really know how to handle these types of files. This bug is causing some links to be improperly associated with certain domains. This is probably what you're seeing with all the crazy links from China and Russia which don't actually link to the site you're researching.
There are two steps to addressing this issue: changing how the crawler sees these file types and then fixing how the crawler handles these file types. We have made improvements to our algorithm so that we will be handle the majority of these files correctly, however, this update will need about a month to propagate. The fix for this issue probably won’t be seen for two more updates, meaning late September. Our improvements should catch most of the issues, but there still could be a few cases we haven't addressed. If this happens, don't hesitate to let us know; we love feedback since it helps us improve and make our index even better!
The next step is to fix how our crawlers handle binary file links and prevent them from being improperly associated with certain domains. We are in the process of working through that issue right now. We’re doing everything we can to resolve this bug as we know it is alarming to see these “questionable” links associated with your sites.I hope this helps and thanks so much for being patient :)Thanks,Carin
-
2 ways:
- Get as CSV and spend the time going through it
- Wait it out
-
OK cool good info, hope they fix it soon!! Any good ideas on how you can filter this crap[ out ?
-
Hello Zack,
That is an issue that they are working on, I know this because I already discussed this with one of their help desk people. Here is the page that describes the changes: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/brand-new-open-site-explorer-is-here
In addition to that, here is some additional information I can share with you:
you may see “questionable” links with weird file extensions. This is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download links. We are looking into fixing this bug as soon as we can so these won’t be counted as links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Where is the link prospecting tool?
I feel like last year when Moz was still SEOMoz I used a beta tool that would help you build a bunch of queries for link prospecting. You would tell it what your sites about and a few other pieces of information, and it would give you a list of google queries to get you started (ie inurl:directory <industryname> +"add site"</industryname>). However, I'm having a hard time finding this tool, or any reference to it on the web. It's also possible that it wasn't a moz tool but I'm misremembering where I found it. Does anybody have any idea what I'm talking about?
Moz Pro | | brettgus1 -
Why is SEOmoz link tagged with a (nofollow) for my site? I have tried to write a youmoz post a couple of times. But, I am just not an expert, that is why I am on SEOmoz.
Why is SEOmoz link tagged with a (nofollow) for my site? I have tried to write a youmoz post a couple of times. But, I am just not an expert, that is why I am on SEOmoz. Is there something I can do to get juice from my SEOmoz account? (nofollow) Scott McNelley, President: Admiral Movers, Admi... www.seomoz.org/users/profile/423056
Moz Pro | | Smcnelley0 -
Why Doesn't Open Site Explorer show Domain Links from Twitter, WordPress or Feedburner?
I commented on a few blog posts and wanted to see the domain authority of those sites. When I look at our domain links, I notice the links are not there from the blogs (which I now know I have to give it time to show up). But I also noticed that domains with links to our website (regularly) were not showing up either. i .e Twitter, WordPress and Feedburner. I know we have links in these locations, especially Twitter. Why would these domains not show up? Much thanks!
Moz Pro | | SydisNey0 -
Why are inbound links not showing up?
I'm new to SEOmoz but have a question regarding inbound links that I don't see posted in the forum. In order to become more familiar with SEOmoz tools, I've been checking out sites that friends and family members have created as practice. Things have been going really smooth until I came across a 2+ year old page that should have included an inbound link from wsj.com but said link is not appearing in OSE for this page. Background: A friend of mine has a (basically) defunct blog that had a pretty well trafficked posting in 2009. However, when I use OSE to check out both the domain and page inbound links, I don't see the aforementioned inbound link from wsj.com. Why is that? Or, it's insanely late - am I missing something? Friend's blog posting: http://bcclist.com/2009/04/21/craigslist-killer-megan-philipcom-removed/ WSJ posting with a link to my friend's blog (4th paragraph...anchor text = "taken down"): http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/21/who-is-megan-mcallister/ No rush. Again, I'm doing this as practice and being new to the site, I figure I'm overlooking something. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | ICM0 -
Why is open site explorer not showing the top links that if found previously.
In previous months ago open site explorer listed many other sites linking to mine. I have checked those sites and they are still linking to my site. Why doesn't open site explorer list them?
Moz Pro | | call4help0 -
What percentage of total backlinks are shown by "Open site explorer" tool?
What percentage of total good quality back links are shown in the "Open site" or other toolbar. I was checking backlinks for a spammy sites which ranks in #3-5 for a competitive keyword.But could not find nothing more than 10-15 PR4-5 in content backlinks and rest are just forum/profile signatures. 24% Trust/Authority of the Host Domain
Moz Pro | | RyanSat
22% Link Popularity of the Specific Page
20% Anchor Text of External Links
15% On-Page Keyword Usage
7% Traffic and Click-Through Data
6% Social Graph Metrics
5% Registration and Hosting DataI0 -
How accurate is Open Site Explorer?
I noticed for one of my sites, a large number of links do not show up in Open Site Explorer, including some of my stronger links. That being the case, how much weight can I put on using these tools to compare sites? I'm not trying to bash here, I really like the tools but if my PA is 29 and my competition is 34, how much weight can I put on these numbers? Or if it says my site has 50 links from 25 domains and my competition has 60 links from 30 domains, these numbers obviously aren't very accurate? So how much weight can I put on these comparisons? Are there better tools?
Moz Pro | | MattMaresca0