Tons of Crappy links in new OSE (Open Site Explorer)
-
I am starting to miss the old OSE. I've found that for a lot of the pages on our site, the new OSE is showing WAY more links and most of them are garbage nonsense links from China, Russia, and the rest of the internet Wild West.
For instance, in the old OSE, this page used to show 9 linking domains:
http://www.uncommongoods.com/gifts/by-recipient/gifts-for-him
It now shows 454 links. Some of the new links (about 5 of them) are legitimate. The other 400+ are garbage. Some are porn sites, most of them don't even open a web page, they just initiate some shady download. I've seen this for other sites as well (like Urban Outfitters) This is making it much harder for me to do backlink analysis on bc I have no clue how many "Normal" links they have. Is anyone else having this problem ? Any way to filter all this crap out ? See attached screenshot of the list of links I'm getting from OSE.
-
Ok thank you. I will email directly.
-
Hey Zack,
Sorry to hear you're still having problems - we've seen an improvement on most sites at this point. Would you want to send me info on the site you're searching and any filters you are using?
If you don't feel comfortable posting that info on this thread, feel free to email me directly: carin@seomoz.org.
Thanks!
Carin
-
Hey Carin,
I just wanted to follow up on this...I'm still seeing these spammy binary files show up as links. Unfortunately it makes OSE quite useless for me in regards to exploring our own backlinks.
What is the status of this problem? Has there been any headway ? Why does our site have problems but most others don't?
Thanks!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack,
Thanks so much for understanding! We are doing everything we can to get the bug resolved. Binary files are the downloadable files you see as links - .pdf, .exe, .img, etc.
I'm really sorry, but we don't have a URL to the old OSE. I saw Steven's response as a workaround - is that possible or are there too many file types to filter out?
Our crawlers that provide the metrics to OSE are always crawling, but will take about a month for our fix to propagate through to all the pages we crawl. Once we have removed these links from our crawlers, then we'll have to process the metrics. This is why it's looking like late September for the fix to show up.
I really appreciate your patience and understanding, we're doing everything we can to fix it!!
Thanks,
Carin
-
Hey Carin-
Thank you so much for this in-depth response. Glad to hear that you guys are aware of it and trying to sort it out. Very interesting info...I'd never hear of "binary" links before but I hope you guys can figure out how to handle these. Seems like a tough task to tackle, just by looking at my CSV it looks like these come in several different forms and they could be hard to identify..I have a few questions:
1. Is there by chance a URL you could give me that points to the old OSE ?
2. How often does OSE crawl? Is it a constant process or are there scheduled crawls?
Thanks!!
-Zack
-
Hey Zack, I saw the ticket you filed was answered by Aaron, but I just wanted to follow up with you as well. We have made some really exciting changes to the crawler, but, unfortunately, there is a pretty obvious bug as well...
The reason for the “questionable” links coming from the Internet Wild West is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download (i.e. binary) links. The first issue is the crawler is counting a binary file as a link, but the larger issue, is that the crawler doesn’t really know how to handle these types of files. This bug is causing some links to be improperly associated with certain domains. This is probably what you're seeing with all the crazy links from China and Russia which don't actually link to the site you're researching.
There are two steps to addressing this issue: changing how the crawler sees these file types and then fixing how the crawler handles these file types. We have made improvements to our algorithm so that we will be handle the majority of these files correctly, however, this update will need about a month to propagate. The fix for this issue probably won’t be seen for two more updates, meaning late September. Our improvements should catch most of the issues, but there still could be a few cases we haven't addressed. If this happens, don't hesitate to let us know; we love feedback since it helps us improve and make our index even better!
The next step is to fix how our crawlers handle binary file links and prevent them from being improperly associated with certain domains. We are in the process of working through that issue right now. We’re doing everything we can to resolve this bug as we know it is alarming to see these “questionable” links associated with your sites.I hope this helps and thanks so much for being patient :)Thanks,Carin
-
2 ways:
- Get as CSV and spend the time going through it
- Wait it out
-
OK cool good info, hope they fix it soon!! Any good ideas on how you can filter this crap[ out ?
-
Hello Zack,
That is an issue that they are working on, I know this because I already discussed this with one of their help desk people. Here is the page that describes the changes: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/brand-new-open-site-explorer-is-here
In addition to that, here is some additional information I can share with you:
you may see “questionable” links with weird file extensions. This is due to the crawler reaching much deeper into sites where there are more download links. We are looking into fixing this bug as soon as we can so these won’t be counted as links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is introducing an article (first 300 words) then linking to the original on another site considered duplication?
I'm trying to figure out why my DA is so very low. Is introducing an article (first 300 words) then linking to the original on another site considered duplication? Here's the deal: I'm a freelance writer and a blogger. I link to the posts I sold from my blog to the website that posted it in the first place. In order to do so, I keep a few images and the first 300 words, which I post on my blog, then link ("In order to read the full article, click here") to the website that posted the whole article. Here's an example: http://www.continentscondiments.com/where-to-eat-in-paris/ Will my domain (continentscondiments.com) be penalized for that behavior?
Moz Pro | | cedriklizotte0 -
Fresh Web Explorer explorer doesnt seem to work properly
How do I get Fresh Web Explorer explorer to work properly. The feedback I’m getting shows that my brand, Health 2000 had over 4000 mentions on Monday the 13th of January. However when I check out the links that supposedly mention our brand, they bring up general terms related to Health and make no reference to our brand. How can I refine this?
Moz Pro | | Hardley1110 -
Internal Links
I've searched high and low, but I could just be missing it... Is there a report on internal links? Maybe a count? Or better yet, a way to see internal anchor text?
Moz Pro | | MCIMaui0 -
Can someone explain to me why OSE shows two different numbers for Linking Root Domains in the header and in the results area?
See Photo Below. 271 in the header, 500 plus in the results section. I just want an accurate number to chart my progress from here on out. Majestic numbers seem inflated too much. Google Webmaster Tools too. g58HX.png
Moz Pro | | DRPower0 -
Open site Explorer Findings??
On OSE, I am comparing two websites(A and B) and one has a page authority higher than the other (35(A) vs 36 (B)), but all the linking metrics are in favor for website A except for the linking C block (A has 11 and B has 12). The website B is ranked in page 1 for couple competitive keywords whereas the website A don't show up in the search at all. Why is that? Does B have better content and is more kw focused?
Moz Pro | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
About Links API
I'ma Japanese, So, I'm sorry in poor English.
Moz Pro | | flaminGoGo
Question about the API.
Will be returned as unauthorized api 'links' to the following request. http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/links/domain/blog?Scope=page_to_page&Sort=domain_authority&AccessID=xxx&Expires=xxx&Signature=xxx Is it OK in the request parameters?0 -
How can I reduce the number of links on a page and keep the site easy to navigate?
The SEOmoz Site Crawl indicates that we have too many on page links on over 9,970 pages. This is an ecommerce site with a large number of categories. I have a couple of questions regarding this issue: How important is the "too many on page links" factor to SEO? What are some methods of reducing the number of links when there are a large number of categories? We have main categories with dropdown menus currently and have found that they are used to browse and shop the store.
Moz Pro | | afmaury1 -
Reg. internal followed links
Our site is new. So far we have a 534 pages. Our competitors have around 5000. I'm working on building more, but that's a lot of catching up. The report says we have only 174 internal followed links. Why is that? I have all links set in the site to be nofollow links, but not the inside links. I also have lots of landing pages, which are not added to the main menu, obviously. But the the main menu shows up on all landing pages. Just wondering if either the nofollow has anything to do with it or the landing pages set up, or the numbers are accurate. Any ideas? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | FinanceSite0