Anyone getting anything from paid submissions?
-
I was wondering if there was still effectiveness in the finding of directories via: plastic surgery "submit site". Below is an example of the directories I found that offer paid listings into their directory.
How do you measure what a good price is versus too expensive? How do you evaluate which directories are worth it? Alexa rank, pr and inbound links? If so what are the metrics you use? Obviously we are purely looking from a rankings/seo perspective because nobody actually uses these directories right?
Avia directory pr5 - the featured page your link would be on is pr 4. http://www.avivadirectory.com/Health/Cosmetic-Surgery/
A permanent link is $149 and a annual link is $49Findelio pr 4 - however page where my liink would be is pr0 http://www.findelio.com/5981/Cosmetic_and_Plastic_Surgery/
One time fee is $39. So although this is much cheaper but the pr is none. So in this instance do you not buy the submission?I do notice some of my competition in some of these directories. Should that be my indicator?
I thought that maybe these companies bought into these directories a long time ago and wouldn't still do so today. Is there more effective uses of my $50, $100 or $150 or whatever?Interested to see what peoples thoughts are on this type of linkbuilding in todays world. Or if that even matters and this will always be beneficial? Thanks!
-
My valuation is based primarily on page authority with consideration given to domain authority (both SEOmoz metrics).
I usually discover about twenty potential links without buying any and create an Excel spreadsheet with the following columns:
- URL
- Page Authority
- Domain Authority
- Price per Year
With this information you can easily tell which are a good value and which are not. Make sure to keep track of the links you pass on because they may become more attractive when you've already picked all the low hanging fruit.
Recently I started using Raven Tools to manage this process because the spreadsheet starts to get out of control:)
-
Michael,
Thank you for the answer and suggestions. I was wondering if you could please clarify one thing.
What metric led you to suggest that Aviva is a good one to pay and submit to? Is it mostly based on the moz rank of the page? I am assuming you did but was there anything else? If not what is the number you look for in the mozrank for the page? is it above a certain number as a generality?
Thanks!
-
My Unqualified Opinion:
I think directories are the easiest way to get quality links as long as you use common sense when you submit. In some niches, they are the only readily available source of links.
Unfortunately, this type of link building is also the easiest strategy for your competition to copy because the barrier to entry is so low. Like most link building activities, directory submission has value when combined with other methods.
How to Find Good Directories:
Fire up Open Site Explorer and look at your competitor's links. The links with high page authority and high domain authority are the one's you want to pay attention to. Many directories contain the word "directory" in the URL or domain name.
Things You Should Check Before Submitting:
-
Do a search for the domain name in Google to verify that the site is not penalized
- You should see many results for the domain. If not, you are probably looking at a site that is penalized or delisted - stay away!
-
Check the historical page rank with the SEOmoz historical page rank checker to further check for an indication of a penality
- A sudden drop in PR is an indication of a penalty
-
Check the page authority of the page your site will be listed on!
- I blindly submitted to the Yahoo Directory and DMOZ only to discover that the pages my site is listed on were totally weak and not worth the money (Yahoo).
Directory Rant:
There is no such thing as a universally great list of directories mainly for the reason that some verticals are listed on low authority pages. Do not accept recommendations that are not specific to your vertical.
Also:
The Aviva directory is a good buy with a PA of 36 for the page you mentioned. For your vertical, I recommend you check out the following:
http://searchengineland.com/a-link-building-blueprint-the-foundation-62784
-
-
Good point and that's kinda what I'm trying to figure out. I know about those directories and those are DEF without question good ones to belong to as well as DMOZ.
But as part of an overall strategy that's what I am wondering if anyone is still incorporating this? You say that you are concerned with two things one of them being passing pr. Well in my first link example you would be listed on a pr4 page. So in that case would you consider that link or do you ONLY consider the 5 or 6 bigger directories we know about.
Thanks!
-
I would be concerned with two aspects here: visibility (non SEO) and passing PR (SEO). Based on those points, there are few directories left that I feel are still good choices. Here is a list I follow with new websites that appear as backlinks & pass some good link juice:
- Yahoo Directory
- Business.com
- JoeAnt
- BestOfTheWeb
It's tempting to base your site on what your competition does but that will not always work for your own property. The directories mentioned above are used and actually show up in search results. I wouldn't put too much stock in directories as your main platform for SEO but as a small part to an overall strategy - it can't hurt!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does anyone know of a Google update in the past few days?
Have seen a fairly substantial drop in Google search console, I'm still looking into it comparing things, but does anyone know if there's been a Google updates within the past few days? Or has anyone else noticed anything? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Fetch as Google -- Does not result in pages getting indexed
I run a exotic pet website which currently has several types of species of reptiles. It has done well in SERP for the first couple of types of reptiles, but I am continuing to add new species and for each of these comes the task of getting ranked and I need to figure out the best process. We just released our 4th species, "reticulated pythons", about 2 weeks ago, and I made these pages public and in Webmaster tools did a "Fetch as Google" and index page and child pages for this page: http://www.morphmarket.com/c/reptiles/pythons/reticulated-pythons/index While Google immediately indexed the index page, it did not really index the couple of dozen pages linked from this page despite me checking the option to crawl child pages. I know this by two ways: first, in Google Webmaster Tools, if I look at Search Analytics and Pages filtered by "retic", there are only 2 listed. This at least tells me it's not showing these pages to users. More directly though, if I look at Google search for "site:morphmarket.com/c/reptiles/pythons/reticulated-pythons" there are only 7 pages indexed. More details -- I've tested at least one of these URLs with the robot checker and they are not blocked. The canonical values look right. I have not monkeyed really with Crawl URL Parameters. I do NOT have these pages listed in my sitemap, but in my experience Google didn't care a lot about that -- I previously had about 100 pages there and google didn't index some of them for more than 1 year. Google has indexed "105k" pages from my site so it is very happy to do so, apparently just not the ones I want (this large value is due to permutations of search parameters, something I think I've since improved with canonical, robots, etc). I may have some nofollow links to the same URLs but NOT on this page, so assuming nofollow has only local effects, this shouldn't matter. Any advice on what could be going wrong here. I really want Google to index the top couple of links on this page (home, index, stores, calculator) as well as the couple dozen gene/tag links below.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jplehmann0 -
Website Ranks and gets de indexed ??
Hi My website is almost 3-4 months old . Whats strange is that as soon as it get Crawled it ranks for few terms for 1-2 days and all of a sudden gets de Indexed for these same terms or Rank drops like drops from page 5 to page 10 . Nothing shows up in Webmater tools under Manual Action . Assuming its a Algorithmic penalty, How to deal with this kind of stuff. Should I stop working on this site all together ? Or assuming its a New website, google does not want it to rank for medium or high volume keywords ? What keywords I am after have 300 -2k searches per month .
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aus00070 -
If I only Link to Page via Sitemap, can it still get indexed?
Hi there! I am creating a ton of content for specific geographies. Is it possible for these pages to get indexed if I only put them in my sitemap and don't link to them through my actual site (though the pages will be live). Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Travis-W
Travis0 -
How to get head office address appear on SERPS under brand serps?
Hi all, We have different offices in UK in different cities. Until last month our main office was appearing on Google results but lately i noticed that our other office is appearing on serps when i search with brand name. We have 3 addresses registered with Google Places. Any ideas how we can get head office to appear on serps under our brand name? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rubix0 -
How do I create a strategy to get rid of dupe content pages but still keep the SEO juice?
We have about 30,000 pages that are variations of "<product-type>prices/<type-of-thing>/<city><state "<="" p=""></state></city></type-of-thing></product-type> These pages are bringing us lots of free conversions because when somebody searches for this exact phrase for their city/state, they are pretty low-funnel. The problem that we are running into is that the pages are showing up as dupe content. One solution we were discussing is to 301-redirect or canonical all the city-state pages back to jus tthe "<type of="" thing="">" level, and then create really solid unique content for the few hundred pages we would have at that point.</type> My concern is this. I still want to rank for the city-state because as I look through our best-converting search-terms, they nearly always have the city-state in the search term, so the search is some variation of " <product-type><type of="" thing=""><city><state>"</state></city></type></product-type> One thing we thought about doing is dynamically changing the meta-data & headers to add the city-state info there. Are there other potential solutions to this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | editabletext0 -
Switch from CCTLD to .com - Am I missing anything?
We currently have 14 international sites. (.co.uk, .fr, .es, .com.au, etc) and (language differences aside) the content is the same on all. I want to move this content from example.co.uk to example.com/uk/ (and from example.com.sg to example.com/sg/) to consolidate our domain authority, for brand consistency, and to reduce the overhead of maintaining 14 different domains. Our .com has by far the most domain authority (90) and often outcompetes newer smaller sites like .com.sg in local search) Other sites, however, (like .co.uk DA74) do quite well locally. My goal is to improve the performance of those sites with a low DA, without hurting the larger sites, and also to avoid the disappearance of local content in local search. e.g. currently when a user searches for "widgets" they find example.co.uk/widgets/ but in future I want them to find example.com/uk/widgets My plan is to redirect pages with 301 redirects, and use rel-alternate and hreflang metadata to manage indexing. So in the example above, I'd 301 example.co.uk/widgets to example.com/uk/widgets, then use the following metatag on that new page to suggest that it is the UK english version (for users in the UK) of a canonical page in the .com: (this is in accordance with the suggestion on this page http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=189077) My question is: Am I going to severely damage the ranking of, e.g., UK pages in UK search engines by doing this? Is there a better way to do this? Any input greatly appreciated. Thanks, Dennis
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dennis.globalsign0