Why page load time is different in google webmaster vs what is displayed in moz?
-
When I analyze the site through Moz tool and compare the results with google webmaster, I am not able to figure what why Moz does not report the slow pages.
Fro example this page has an avrage LCP of 3.0 sec https://www.collegehippo.com/graduate-school/programs/gre-score-business-analytics-data-analytics
When I see the report in moz, it does not point to any such issue.
Should I be worried about what google reports and try to fix the page?
-
Google is testing your pages using Lightspeed / Core Web vitals, or simply said https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
The page speed testing done by MOZ is different then Lighthouse, because google actually relies on a real rendering scene rather then passively load everything together.
So if you want to get better scores to site speed, optimize using insights as the link above posted. Alot of gains can be made and the Time to first byte and actual rendering time could be improved massively.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Pro OnDemand Crawl fail on on WordPress site
Hello, I just can't seem to understand why OnDemand Crawl fails on further attempts only 4 pages out of 68 I am using WordPress, Divi Theme and on LiteSpeed server. Robots.txt allows rogerbot just can seem to find the issue
Moz Bar | | ChrisSanClaire0 -
Increase Moz authority above 26
Hi, I have been using Moz for 12 months and found some very useful features. My site’s score steadily increased from 18 to 26. But I seem to have now ‘hit a wall’ and my Moz ranking is static. My question is: Where on Moz.com can I find what next steps I need to take to improve my Moz score? Thanks in advance. Matt
Moz Bar | | wonderdome0 -
On page grader tool - ip address
Does anyone know Moz's IP address for the above tool so I can give it access to a staging area of our site?
Moz Bar | | Jennie050 -
Site Crawl - MOz Pro
Hi There, When i look into my site crawl i have thousands of duplicate content issues. Now they are essentially product pages which are in multiple categories - however we have added the canonical tag so im confused as to why all of these are appearing as if there is an error, does the MOZ bot not take canonicals into account? Kind Regards Gemma
Moz Bar | | acsilver0 -
Tracking Across 3 Sub-directories on the Same Domain in Google Analytics
Hello everyone, I'm trying to track 3 sub-directories on the same domain. http://domain.com/1/http://domain.com/2/
Moz Bar | | vndflkvnlkzdfnv
http://domain.com/3/ Could someone help confirm this is the correct code for GA? var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-12345-1"); pageTracker.**_setCookiePath**("/1/"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); pageTracker.**_cookiePathCopy**("/2/"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); pageTracker.**_cookiePathCopy**("/3/"); Thanks in advance.0 -
Moz Crawl Test: Referrer is sitemap.gz?
Hi,
Moz Bar | | Titan552
I'm looking at a crawl test report, and I'm seeing that most of the pages have the sitemamp.gz file listed as the referrer. As I recall in my other reports the referrer is usually the root domain - unless of course there's a redirect. Does having sitemap.gz as the referrer indicate a problem? If so, what problem does it indicate? Thanks!0 -
Did Google Turn Off the Rank Tracking API ??
I might be responding too soon on this... but has anyone been able to use the Moz rank tracker or any other web-based rank-tracking tool that uses the Google API since about noon today (NYC TIME)??
Moz Bar | | EGOL0 -
Moz reporting reliable?
I have been working with our MIS department on addressing our errors on duplicate content and titles caused by parameter URLs. MIS insists that they have solved the problem with canonical tags, which are in place. They said they were getting warnings from Google and Bing, but that after they put the canonical tags in place, those went away. They are questioning the Moz reports, suggesting that I instead rely on SEO Toolit by Microsoft. (As an aside, we are using SharePoint 2010, crossing our fingers for an upgrade to 2013, which presumably will make a lot of the issues we’re having go away). So my questions are: 1) Why are these Moz reports reporting all of these errors that have supposedly been rectified (in 2011)? Do I disregard the duplicate content/title errors on the Moz report and defer to SEO Toolkit, as MIS suggests?
Moz Bar | | SSFCU0