Hiding Page Titles By Display None
-
Hi. I am new to this community, and new to SEO as well. A friend asked me to give them suggestions on onsite optimization for their Drupal website.
I know page titles are very important, and usually they should be set to H1. (At least I think) This particular website has all their page titles set to H2 and they are using display:none in their stylesheet to hide them for graphic design reasons.
What would be the most practical work around for this? We don't want this to appear sketchy in the eyes of the SE's, but putting page titles at the top of their pages really would take away from their graphical design.
The second issue is that they use a module called Quicktabs for tabbed product specs on each page. Each tab is actually pulled from a post (called a node in Drupal), so each tab has it's own title that is an H2. So not only are they hiding the main page title, but they are hiding 5 others within the tabs, and their are 6 H2 elements showing up on each product page all set to display:none.
Any creative suggestions?
Hope that makes sense....
Thank you!
-
WOW! Let me just say that again, WOW!
Yes, I would suggest a Drupal person or perhaps a better template. This one seems out of date as it still uses inline CSS. As Mary Anne mentioned, there are other issues as well.
Before you try and re-write everything for the H2s, I would look at some other code issues such as the alt tags.
Personally, I would look for another template after talking to someone who knows Drupal.
All the best
-
Thanks Maryanne,
I will definitely mention those image sizes. They are pretty large.
I need to get an H1 onto these pages. H1's are important, right?
In your opinions, what would be the most effective/least harmful method of doing this....for short term until we can figure something better out.....
- Set the hidden titles to be H1's instead of H2's?
or
- Manually go into each page and create an H1 using the post WYSIWYG editor? (Using this method, the H1 would come AFTER the H2, but at least it would not be hidden)
What are your thoughts?
-
Sheesh...I knew I wasn't losing my marbles when I thought this looked more complicated than normal. This CMS is Drupal.....just FYI, here's what is happening...
These pages are made in a module (equivalent to a plug in for Wordpress) called Panels. With panels, you can define content areas within your page, kind of like creating
sections. Eachsection is called a pane. In this case, they pulled in the information they are showing in each pane through another module called Views. So, on the lt3g page, there are 2 different panes above the tabbed section.
When you create a pane, Drupal asks you for a pane title. The tabs at the bottom are also a module that pulls posts into a tabbed section. Since each post has its own title, each tab shows an H2. In total, there are 10 H2s on this page!!
And the Analytics code is Google anlaytics installed into a pane. (I don't think they had to install the code onto every page, but they did), and they titled the pane 'Analytics'
I think this might be a job for a Drupal themer. Maybe that's what I will propose this company look into.
Also, for the
| FRS Custom Solutions, which indicates there should be something before the pipe, the <title>tag would go before the pipe, and installing the page_title module would allow you to define that.</p> <p>Usually I hear good things about Drupal, but I think in this case, with the use of panels to make pages, it just complicated things.</p></title>
-
Although the hiding of those headers is a little odd, I doubt you'd get hit for it as the hidden h2's are all consistent with the displayed content - it doesn't look (to me, at least) like anything's being done in a spammy manner. H2's are a very weak ranking factor to begin with, and It's not like you're keyword stuffing or trying to rank for irrellevant keywords. Of course, if you can find someone who can tweak things and treat those elements appropriately, all the better.
Off topic, but you may also suggest to your friend that they optimize their images. Those image files on the first page you mentioned are very large for the sizes at which they are being displayed and needlessly add to the page load times.
-
On the LT3G page, you have these elements that should be headers.
- ComLink LT<sup>3G</sup>
- <sup>MEDICARE APPROVED</sup>
- <sup>ComLink LT<sup>3G</sup> - Product Overview</sup>
- <sup>With the ComLink LT<sup>3G</sup>, you can:</sup>
But they are manipulated by in-line CSS. Even though there are H2s with appropriate text for the header?
Then you have this
## Products-LT3G Main Image
Which would go above your image LT3G-Rtg-Rot-Web.png
So you are saying you do not need the text atop the image for esthetics. Which is understandable.
Therefore, why do you not have that H2 tag classed to swap the text for the image? Or can you not manipulate your CMS this way?
On the Company page I am not sure why the H2 is below the text.
## Analytics Code
And what is the analytics code? : )
First, and for other reasons than the H2, this CMS is not very good. I feel as though you will continue to have many issues moving forward. Such as page titles. For the company page you have | FRS Custom Solutions which indicates that there should be something before the pipe (|).
I do not see yet a clear way out of this as the H2s are used for headers in some cases and then for nothing in others such as the analytics code.
Am I following this correctly, or totally missing the boat here?
-
No, I have no control over showing it. Drupal forces you to give each page a title.
http://www.frs-solutions.com/content/comlink-lt3g
Here is a link to one of the inner pages. This page has an image. But here is a page with no image: http://www.frs-solutions.com/content/Company
I am not knowlegable enough with CSS and creating template pages to go about having the title display as an image on some pages, but as text on others.
-
the first question would be why have it at all if you do not want to show it. I presume you have no control over it showing?
Then I would ask; in that space, what is showing now and why could you not swap for an image?
It might be better for you to post the URL of the site so I can see what you are trying to accomplish.
-
Ok. That's what I thought. But I wasn't sure. Do you know, is there any legitimate way to hide a post title (that's forced by the CMS) from both SE's and visitors without using the image swap method?
-
Sketchy as it adds no value to the visitor. It just depends on how often SEs look at CSS as to if/when you will get penalized. They might not look at the CSS unless they see other indicators.
What you are doing I would consider keyword manipulation, and that is sketchy.
Always look at the value of what you do with respect to visitors. If it adds no value, don't do it.
I hope that helps
-
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your response. Sorry if I was unclear...I am referring to the titles of the post. Not the <title>tag. Drupal forces you to give each post a title. And yes, the post titles are set to display as H2's, but the H2's in the stylesheet are set to display:none like this:</p> <div class="cssHead focusRow "><span class="cssSelector ">h2</span> {</div> <div class=" "> <div class="cssPropertyListBox "> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class=" "> </span><span class="cssPropName editable ">color</span><span class="cssColon ">: </span><span class="cssPropValue editable ">#595959</span><span class="cssSemi ">;</span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class=" "> </span><span class="cssPropName editable ">display</span><span class="cssColon ">: </span><span class="cssPropValue editable ">none</span><span class="cssSemi ">;</span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class=" "> </span><span class="cssPropName editable ">font-size</span><span class="cssColon ">: </span><span class="cssPropValue editable ">22px</span><span class="cssSemi ">;</span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class=" "> </span><span class="cssPropName editable ">margin</span><span class="cssColon ">: </span><span class="cssPropValue editable ">0.8em 0</span><span class="cssSemi ">;</span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class="cssSemi "><br /></span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class="cssSemi ">There is no image swapping or text indent. So, search engines CAN see the H2, but visitors can't. Would this be considered sketchy or creative CSS?</span></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "></div> <div class="cssProp focusRow editGroup "><span class="cssSemi ">And no, they are not in order... H2 obviously comes first on the page, followed by an H1 element if it's manually inserted onto the page.<br /></span></div> </div> </div></title>
-
Hi April,
Headers and Titles are different, so are you saying that Drupal pulls the title from the H2? If so, are you swapping out the text for an image, or just moving the text off the screen?
It is not uncommon to move text off the screen and swap that placeholder with an image, although it would look a bit sketchy to just move the text out of sight.
[Without direct knowledge] I don't believe Google is penalizing for creative CSS work unless they spot sketchy behavior such as moving lots of text out of view, which they would see as adding no value to the visitor, but would see it as keyword manipulation.
When you swap for an image, you have to define a size for the image space. This would indicate to the SEs that you are in fact moving text and swapping for an image of a certain size.
Sketchy would look like text indent of -9999px with no width or height size or with a very small width or height size of perhaps a couple pixels. Or not even indicating an background image for the div.
In short, if you are swapping text for an image, you are fine and this is common practice as long as SEs can see that this is for visual enhancements rather than keyword manipulation.
I would not worry as much about which headers are used as long as they are used in order. Such as H1s followed by H2s followed by H3s followed by H4s. Not H2s then a H3 then H1. Not that this would penalize you, but it is best practice.
I hope this answered your question
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which is better? One dynamically optimised page, or lots of optimised pages?
For the purpose of simplicity, we have 5 main categories in the site - let's call them A, B, C, D, E. Each of these categories have sub-category pages e.g. A1, A2, A3. The main area of the site consists of these category and sub-category pages. But as each product comes in different woods, it's useful for customers to see all the product that come in a particular wood, e.g. walnut. So many years ago we created 'woods' pages. These pages replicate the categories & sub-categories but only show what is available in that particular wood. And of course - they're optimised much better for that wood. All well and good, until recently, these specialist page seem to have dropped through the floor in Google. Could be temporary, I don't know, and it's only a fortnight - but I'm worried. Now, because the site is dynamic, we could do things differently. We could still have landing pages for each wood, but of spinning off to their own optimised specific wood sub-category page, they could instead link to the primary sub-category page with a ?search filter in the URL. This way, the customer is still getting to see what they want. Which is better? One page per sub-category? Dynamically filtered by search. Or lots of specific sub-category pages? I guess at the heart of this question is? Does having lots of specific sub-category pages lead to a large overlap of duplicate content, and is it better keeping that authority juice on a single page? Even if the URL changes (with a query in the URL) to enable whatever filtering we need to do.
On-Page Optimization | | pulcinella2uk0 -
Sitelinks to internal pages
Hi Moz Community, Is it only possible to get sitelinks to your main domain in the SERPs or can you also get them to internal pages in the SERPs? i.e. if this were to pop up in the SERP: www.mysite.com/page1
On-Page Optimization | | Brian_Dowd
Can I get sitelinks such as the examples below:
Sitelink1: www.mysite.com/page1/page1a
Sitelink2: www.mysite.com/page1/page1b
Sitelink3: www.mysite.com/page1/page1c
etc. Just curious and I haven't really find anything like that on the internet. How can I set them up? Thanks.0 -
Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question. This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight 🙂 Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community. **Context... ** We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat. However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme. In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth. Make sense so far? Context end..... Issue. Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on). Possible reason? Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO. 2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO). When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page? I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout. Isaac. EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
How to Handle duplicate pages/titles in Wordpress
The wordpress blog causes problems with page titles. If you go to the second page of blog posts it there's a different URL but with the same page title. for example: page 1: site/blog page 2: site/blog/page/2 Each page gets flagged for duplicate page titles. Thanks in advance for your thoughts,
On-Page Optimization | | heymarshall1 -
Product titles
Hi guys, I'm starting to sell sofas and furniture online in Australia. Many USA companies just use the key ranking words as the Product Title i.e. "Ultra -Modern black leather sectional sofa with bookcase". Even if they have 100s of products. But in Australia they just use the model name, such as "The York", "The Boston", etc. Cause it does create a nicer picture and a neater look on the main page. I was wondering how important this practice is in improving search ranking? is it spammy? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | cowhidesdirect0 -
Noindex child pages (whose content is included on parent pages)?
I'm sorry if there have been questions close to this before... I've using WordPress less like a blogging platform and more like a CMS for years now... For content management purposes we organize a lot of content around Parent/Child page (and custom-post-type) relationships; the Child pages are included as tabbed content on the Parent page. Should I be noindexing these child pages, since their content is already on the site, in full, on their Parent pages (ie. duplicate content)? Or does it not matter, since the crawlers may not go to all of the tabbed content? None of the pages have shown up in Moz's "High Priority Issues" as duplicate content but it still seems like I'm making the Parent pages suffer needlessly... Anything obvious I'm not taking into consideration? By the by, this is my first post here @ Moz, which I'm loving; this site and the forums are such a great resource! Anyways, thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | rsigg0 -
Duplicate page title - blogs
Hope someone can help me, I am a total SEO noivce so please be gentle. My first report shows that I have duplicate page titles. I have been through and changed all of these so they are different and after my latest crawl they are still showing as duplicates. I am wondering if this is because it;s a blog, here is one of the duplicates: http://www.cottagesoapcompany.co.uk/blog/?row=1 Hope you can help!
On-Page Optimization | | emmamoulden0 -
Https and secure pages
Hello, I have a facebook badge in my footer. Is it okay if I make the code call on https. It makes the page secure for IE. I have also have done this for images. These secure urls are also being called on non secure pages. But I don't think that matters does it? Code below. Thanks Tyler
On-Page Optimization | | tylerfraser0