External Sitewide Links and SEO
-
I have one big question about the potential SEO value -- and possibly also dangers? -- of "followed" external sitewide links.
Examples of these would be:
- a link to your site from another site's footer
- a blogroll link
- a link to your site from another site's global navigation
Aside from the link's position in the HTML file (the higher the better, presumably), are these links essentially the same from an SEO point of view or different (and how)?
There used to be an influential view out there that the link juice value of a sitewide link was the same as that of a single link (presumably from the linking site's home page), even though a sitewide link may in fact result a huge number individual links. Is this true or false? What is the math here?
Should one worry about having "too many" sitewide links, in the sense that this may raise red flags by way of the algo?
I talked to someone a few months ago (before the recent algo updates) who believed that he had got a minus 10 penalty or whatever it was for getting too many sitewide links
We offer website design and development as well as SEO, and we put a keyworded link to ourselves in the footer. I think this is a fairly common practice. Is this a good or bad idea SEO-wise?
One opinion is that for external sitewide footer links, you should best have a dofollow link on the home page, but nofollow it on all other pages. What is your opinion about that?
Is there anything else that is distinct, interesting or important about sitewide links' SEO value and pitfalls?
Thank you!
-
Story's still pretty much the same - I'd be MORE worried than before if you're doing either in a way that could be perceived as intentionally manipulative and more for engines than users, but I wouldn't sweat doing either if it's user-focused, high value and editorial.
-
Hi Rand,
Now with Google Panda update do you think the same about this issue?
I am asking from both sides:
-
Having links sitewide on an external web.
-
Having sitewide links in my web to an external one.
Looking forward to your reply!
All the best,
Exequiel
-
-
Hrm. On #1 - maybe sometimes? It really depends on the case scenario. A blogroll link is often either on every page or a separate page linked to on every other page of the site (like SearchEngineLand). That probably gets you 99% of the value you'd get from links to your homepage from another blog. Just having another link from a "what's hot" or "recommended" section doesn't seem like it would do that much more (unless you're talking in terms of user CTR and the benefits that brings, in which case, yes - I like it!)
On #2 - Never heard that. I'd probably say that if the link in the footer is manipulative, ask that it be somewhere else. If it makes sense/belongs there, it's probably OK to have it followed.
-
Thanks much for your helpful response.
I further wonder:
1. One finds that on many blogs there is a blog roll but in the same sidebar there can also be single text links in some section like "what's hot" or "recommended" that appear only on the home page. On your view, these latter links are technically more potent, right? (Assuming everything is high quality and non-spammy.)
2. I have seen it recommended that if you are in a sitewide footer link, it's better if only the home page link were followed, but the same footer link on all other pages were made nofollow. Any truth to that?
-
My general stance would be to worry only if the links are obviously manipulative or non-editorial. If you've just happened to receive links from partners, clients, fans or bloggers that appear in footers sitewide, that's not a big issue. Look at networks like Conde Nast or Techmeme - sitewide links back and forth between all the related properties is a common thing.
They almost certainly don't pass the same value as separate, individually created links from each of those pages - the diversity of your link profile matters a lot, but unless there's other reason they look spammy, I wouldn't sweat it.
BTW - I also wouldn't intentionally target or pursue these kinds of links. SEOs used to do that when PageRank was the big dog in the algo, and every bit of PR juice meant more value, but nowadays, PR is just a small component of rankings.
-
Yes, footer links are not so good as links from top content. So long they are good links my opinion is: I better have footer (relevant) link than no link at all.
-
I would appreciate substantiated, technical opinions, not mere intuitions about what might "make sense," please.
I don't see why an Auto Auction blog roll link on a car blog necessarily "sort of looks spammy," or why there would necessarily be no way to determine the link's topical relevance. Indeed, I think diversification would certainly benefit from at least a few such blog roll links, especially if they appear on authoritative and relevant blogs.
But this doesn't answer any of my questions.
-
Sitewide links sort of look spammy to me, and are more often not based around any sort of content that a search engine can also use to determine the relevance of a link.
This concept makes sense to me.
It's difficult to determine the value, but I think diversification is key in building a link portfolio, especially with the wide variety of websites passing votes to pages today.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong. I will vote myself down on this one.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
CSS background image links bad for seo?
On one of the websites I manage SEO for, the developers are changing how our graphical links are coded. They're basically coding in such away where there is no anchor text and no alt tag, so for example: So there's no anchor nor alt context for Google's crawler. How badly will this affect SEO, or is it extremely minimal and I shouldn't worry about? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | JimLynch0 -
GWT shows 38 external links from 8 domains to this PDF - But it shows no links and no authority in OSE
Hi All, I found one other discussion about the subject of PDFs and passing of PageRank here: http://moz.com/community/q/will-a-pdf-pass-pagerank But this thread didn't answer my question so am posting it here. This PDF: http://www.ccisolutions.com/jsp/pdf/YAM-EMX_SERIES.PDF is reported by GWT to have 38 links coming from 8 unique domains. I checked the domains and some of them are high-quality relevant sites. Here's the list: Domains and Number of Links
Technical SEO | | danatanseo
prodiscjockeyequipment.com 9
decaturilmetalbuildings.com 9
timberlinesteelbuildings.com 6
jaymixer.com 4
panelsteelbuilding.com 4
steelbuildingsguide.net 3
freedocumentsearch.com 2
freedocument.net 1 However, when I plug the URL for this PDF into OSE, it reports no links and a Page Authority if only "1". This is not a new page. This is a really old page. In addition to that, when I check the PageRank of this URL, the PageRank is "nil" - not even "0" - I'm currently working on adding links back to our main site from within our PDFs, but I'm not sure how worthwhile this is if the PDFs aren't being allocated any authority from the pages already linking to them. Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions? Thanks all!0 -
Toxic Link Removal
Greetings Moz Community: Recently I received an site audit from a MOZ certified SEO firm. The audit concluded that technically the site did not have major problems (unique content, good architecture). But the audit identified a high number of toxic links. Out of 1,300 links approximately 40% were classified as suspicious, 55% as toxic and 5% as healthy. After identifying the specific toxic links, the SEO firm wants to make a Google disavow request, then manually request that the links be removed, and then make final disavow request of Google for the removal of remaining bad links. They believe that they can get about 60% of the bad links removed. Only after the removal process is complete do they think it would be appropriate to start building new links. Is there a risk that this strategy will result in a drop of traffic with so many links removed (even if they are bad)? For me (and I am a novice) it would seem more prudent to build links at the same time that toxic links are being removed. According to the SEO firm, the value of the new links in the eyes of Google would be reduced if there were many toxic links to the site; that this approach would be a waste of resources. While I want to move forward efficiently I absolutely want to avoid a risk of a drop of traffic. I might add that I have not received any messages from Google regarding bad links. But my firm did engage in link building in several instances and our traffic did drop after the Penguin update of April 2012. Also, is there value in having a professional SEO firm remove the links and build new ones? Or is this something I can do on my own? I like the idea of having a pro take care of this, but the costs (Audit, coding, design, content strategy, local SEO, link removal, link building, copywriting) are really adding up. Any thoughts??? THANKS,
Technical SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Should I no follow all external links?
I have worked with a few different SEO firms lately and a lot of them have recommended on the sites I was working on to "no-follow" all external links on the site. On one hand this traps all the link equity/Pagerank. On the other I would think this practice is frowned upon by Google. What are some opinions on this?
Technical SEO | | MarloSchneider0 -
Internal Linking
Hello there, I own a "how to" website with 1000+ articles, and the number of articles is growing every day. Often some articles are easier to understand if I link a certain step to an article that was written before, because that article explains the step in more detail. Should I use "read here/read more" or the "title of the article I'm referring to" as anchor text? When is internal linking too much? Should I use nofollow?
Technical SEO | | FisnikSylka0 -
Too many on page links
Yes this question again. I know it get's asked a lot and I know of a few fixes, but this one I'm having a problem with. So we have a fan gallery on our site which is not only causing duplicate page titles, which I'm thinking we can fix with a canonical, but also too many on page links. The issue is this is on drupal which I have very little experience with and it seems to just be located within the fan galleries section of the site. After looking at a few things I know that no-follow wont be an option since from what I read it wont really work anyway so I was wondering if anyone else has an asnwer. I just read through a million articles trying to find a simular situation and can't seem to find anyone with the same thing. It might have something to do with the plugins the programmers used, but my inexperience with drupal is making this difficult. Thanks guys.
Technical SEO | | KateGMaker0 -
What i should do about bad links ?
Hi, my blog is http://www.dota2club.com/ and i have many bad links to my blog what i should do about that and how ? i started 10 days ago guest blogging but my bad links from before are hurting my blog. please help 🙂 thank you !!!
Technical SEO | | wolfinjo0 -
Exchange Links - Problem or Not ?
There's a company that sells a real estate portal sites ready for several companies.
Technical SEO | | imoveiscamposdojordao
And when they install this system they always leave each site in a file calledimobiliarias.php that lists all properties that use your system, so there is a hugeexchange of links between the same sites.
So you can see with the Open Site Explorer that all sites have the same Backlinks.
This would not cause problems with regard to exchange links?
Loss of position or something? Thank you guys.! Sorry. 😛 Google Translator.0