Free Article Previews (Free Registration Wall)
-
My site is www.optionmonster.com It has a few different areas of "Free" and "Premium" content.
1. We have a first click free program for Google visitors, where they can read the first news article in full.
2. Other visitors and subsequent news article views have a content preview, which includes headline and first paragraph of content, and then asks for a name and email address in order to consume the rest of the free news.
3. We have premium content (paid), and all of those folders are currently on our robots.txt file
My questions are as follows....
a. How much content is needed in front of the "pay/reg wall" in order to still get proper juice from linkbacks/pagerank crawls
b. Should I make the premium content a robots meta noindex tag, or because you can't see the article at all without logging in, is a proper place to include on robots.txt
-
Since GoogleBots can't access the premium regardless, is it redundant to have on the robots.txt file?
You are indeed correct the best practice is to minimize your robots.txt file. That is why the very first sentence in my initial response was the suggestion to NOT include your premium sections in the robots.txt file
Will google and other bots will hurt you if you have premium sections that they try to crawl but can't?
No.
-
Okay. But since GoogleBots can't access the premium regardless, is it redundant to have on the robots.txt file? I thought the best practice was to have almost nothing on the robots.txt file per (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/serious-robotstxt-misuse-high-impact-solutions)
So my question comes down to if google and other bots will hurt you if you have premium sections that they try to crawl but can't, vs ignoring them because they are on the robots.txt
-
So you wouldn't No index FOLLOW those pages, in case someone links to them?
I am not sure what I said to offer that impression.
By "those pages" I am guessing you are referring to your premium content? If so, it really doesn't matter what you do with the content as Google can't get to it due to the robots.txt file. Even if you change the meta tag, Google wont be able to see the change.
Yes, it is possible they could try to follow a link but since this is premium content, they wont be able to access it.
Perhaps I am not clear on your Free vs Premium division. In short, any content which you do not desire to be indexed should contain the NoIndex tag, but that only applies if a crawler has access to the content.
-
So you wouldn't No index FOLLOW those pages, in case someone links to them?
-
I would not include your premium area in the robots.txt file at all. Google will recognize that they are unable to access the content, and it won't get indexed. There is no need to block it further.
For your other content, as long as you are showing Google the same exact information as you are showing to other visitors, you are fine. If you show Google more then you do to other visitors, then your site can be blacklisted.
How much content is needed in front of the "pay/reg wall" in order to still get proper juice from linkbacks/pagerank crawls
There are many factors involved. There isn't an answer like "400 words and you are good". These type of setups can be tricky. If you have a forum, then you can allow visitors to see the first thread but not any of the replies. By limiting content based on a number of words, you will be cutting off some articles, and it is possible a small article can be viewed in it's entirety.
It is more important your key words are in the content. If I linked to an article with the anchor text of 1980 Corvette, and your article started off discussing cars but you cut it off before discussing the 1980 Corvette, then that link can be devalued.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is "Article 1 - x of y" showing up in this SERP?
Does anybody have an explanation why this is showing up in the SERP? Ju3VYsW.png
Technical SEO | | jmueller0 -
Is there a good Free tool that will check my entire subdomain for mobility issues?
I've been using the Google tool and going page by page, everything seems great. But I'd really like something that will crawl the entire subdomain and give me a report. Any suggestions?
Technical SEO | | absoauto0 -
Articles and what to do with them
I realise there is a wealth of information out there regarding content etc. But Im getting slightly confused about what to do with my articles for my site. Each week we have 3 articles written, 2 x 300 word articles and 1 x newsletter The question is what the heck do i do with these I apologies but I'm so confused. Do I publish them to my site?
Technical SEO | | NickKer
Get them on a blog?
Publish them on a forum How many times do i get them published and whats the best way, and after all this , is this the right thing that Iam doing, and what else can i do to a) attract back links with this content
b) get it published
c) get google to index this and benefit from the content sorry if this has been repeated , but different people/companies offering different advice. Thanks1 -
No-follow for article directory?
My clients pull from a central article directory on our server (medical directory), as the information is about standard medical issues. This said, the MOZ analytics is showing these articles for each client as indexed and duplicate in content, descriptions, titles, etc. Would it be better to use a no-follow for these articles to avoid looking like duplicate content, or should I consider overhauling the resource section into static pages and making each article unique to each client-considering the latest updates in Google? Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated!!!!! Thanks
Technical SEO | | lfrazer0 -
HELP! Google Business listing removed - check out my SERP free fall!
Hey Moz Community, I need your help. I have (had) a google local business listing. I made some changes last week to clean it up. Now it's gone and I've had a massive fall in my rankings (see images). Changes I made: I changed the business name from a spammy name: BYOL Graphic Design & Web Design Courses. TO: **Bring Your Own Laptop PTY LTD. ** I added Local business schema to my website. I added my telephone, address etc. Previously it was all an image. I tinkered with a few other things while I was there too but I can't remember them all. Other notes: Initially I blamed the dramatic drop on Hummingbird but after doing some research I'm not so sure. I think it's because I was messing around with Google Local. My listing is/was here: https://plus.google.com/111689574762050943425 (though it doesn't work any more). My website is www.bringyourownlaptop.com.au Questions: Do you think the loss of my Google local listing could be the cause of such a big drop? If it is my Google local listing - Is there a way to find out what I did wrong? Is there a place to ask for it to be re-checked? Is it better to just start again with a new listing? Do you think it's tied together with a Hummingbird change some how? What else can I check? What would you do? Thanks for your time. Dan
Technical SEO | | danlovesadobe
_The nervous business owner. _ InKrwvX.png Hv36XUu.png0 -
Local searh results instant preview photo problem
A search result that contains my google plus / places page in the local results is not displaying photos correctly in the preview. It shows an image that appears to represent a broken link or missing image, however, when you click on the "See Photos" link it to takes you to the G+ page that displays the photos without any issues. I also checked the google places account and the photos appear fine in my dashboard. It's seems like maybe a 3rd party uploaded photos or something? It may have to do with the recent upgrade to pages at Google +? (Thats another story, thanks for making me create a circular logo and a cover photo that doesn't style well in your mobile app) Anyway, any thoughts? Where are these photos coming from, plus or places account? I submitted the question on google groups and a non googler told me to submit photos from a unrelated account.. This seems like gaming the system to me and when I looked into it, it takes me to the Google + page.. Search URL - I am first result in local, Yale Creek Seasonal Care. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=&source=hp&q=new+market+mn+snow+removal&oq=new+market+mn+snow+removal&gs_l=hp.3...1801.1801.0.2686.1.1.0.0.0.0.143.143.0j1.1.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.5.hp.nKsMdxTGiW0 Also, I noticed the G+ account says service area is 20 miles from address while I specifically selected an area greater than that in my places account.. So what is it plus or places?!?!? The way they are rolling out this move to plus is frustrating! As a consumer, I prefer listings without the plus page!!
Technical SEO | | dwallner0 -
Are article sites a good way to generate traffic and links
I read a lot that article sites are a great way to generate links and traffic but i would like to hear from people on here to see about their experience with article sites. I have tried article sites and i have to be honest that most of them are no follow links and have also not generate any traffic. I have written over 30 articles for free article sites with no traffic coming from them and this has been done over a eight month period can anyone recommend any good article sites that can produce traffic and also ones that produce do follow If you feel i am wasting my time putting articles on free sites then please do tell me
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
What's the best free tool for checking for broken links?
I'm trying to find the best tool to check for broken links on our site. We have over 11k pages and I'm looking for something fast and thorough! I've tried Xenu and LinkChecker. Any other ideas?
Technical SEO | | CIEEwebTeam0