New URL Strucutre
-
Hello all!
I'm new to SeoMoz and would like to introduce myself and say thanks for all of the great content. This is definitely the premium website I have been looking for.
My question is regarding a new URL structure that will be implemented with our website redesign. We are looking to make our URL's more user and SEO friendly. We will be using 301 redirects to reroute our existing structure when the site goes live.
Background
I work in a company that retails automotive tires. I would consider class (performance, off-road, highway, etc.) to be the most important category, but based on our analytics we receive much more traffic from brand terms. This is most likely because our customers are not educated on specific tire classes and generally do head term searches or search by brand / product name. Ultimately the will have to buy from a certain class based on driving habits.Link and URL Structure
(Parameters)- The model page includes links to individual tire size specific pages.
- We are using the model page as our primary SEO page because the only difference from the 5 - 60 tire size specific pages per model will be the tire size itself. This means that all of the remaining content will be duplicated multiple times over.
- All links to the tire size specific page from the model page will have a rel="nofollow" attribute attached to it.
- All tire size specific pages will have a rel="canonical" tag pointing back to the model page
Out of the following structures, which would you consider to be the best format:
1. http://www.company.com/category/brand/model
or
2. http://www.company.com/brand/category/model
or
3. http://www.company.com/tires/category/modelWe will append the specific tire-size to the URL on the item specific pages.
Any other options or strategies will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your help!
-
Thanks for the fast response guys!
The "By Brand" path is basically for SEO purposes only. 90% of our visitors use one of two forms to find their tire size.
The first form is a vehicle search which breaks down to the specific tire size and the minimum speed rating requirements. This form accounts for 80% of our form completions.
The second form is by the specific tire size.
When a visitor completes one of these forms, they are only given results that link to the specific item pages that match their vehicle.
We actually do not want people using the "by brand / category" method to find their products as this will almost always lead them down an empty path. Tires must match an exact size for that vehicle.
One the other hand, we do want to show up in search results for these products. Our current results bring us quite a bit of traffic. This method is just to get them into the website. We will have a "Do these tires match my vehicle" form on the this page. If they do not, we will take them to a page explaining why not and provide them with alternate, matching results. By Brand is great for browsing but at the end of the day the tire must be a fit for the vehicle.
Ultimately the end focus of the website will be for them to search by vehicle.
An example of an item level URL (based on Roberts reply) would be:
brand category model item (tire size)
www.company.com/Michelin/Performance/Primacy-MXV4/2055516This same page would be duplicated 40+ times for each tire size available, with links to these item pages originating from the model page:
www.company.com/Michelin/Performance/Primacy-MXV4/Would the 40+ individual item pages leading from the model page produce duplicate content issues? These pages will contain the exact same content including our features and benefits and user reviews.
The path of "by brand" from the home page would look as follows:
Home -> Michelin -> Primacy MXV4 - > 205/55R16
or
Home -> Michelin -> Performance -> Primacy MXV4 - > 205/55R16
Whichever one would be deemed better.I just want to make sure I get it right the first time.
Thanks for the responses!
-
When looking at what people search on, besides tire or discount tires, the brands are right up there. Given that most recommend a structure of Category/sub category/product I would suggest: company.com/Michelin/all-terrain/60,000-mile or the same with 60,000-mile replaced with heavy duty or some other product descriptor. Here I am assuming all-terrain would be a model. (My guess is that all companies use their own independent model names and unless someone knows that model they would not necessarily search on it). An example would be a Michelin Primacy MXV4.....how many people search on that model??? Compared to how many search for automobile, light truck, off road, etc. I want to hit what the majority are searching on.
You said you are using the model page (again, Michelin Primacy? or something like All-Terrain?) as the primary SEO page and I am not sure about what you mean. Based on how people seem to search for tires, I would think having the Tire Brands optimized and then optimizing the model would be best (Frankly, short of the tire size links, I don't see a reason to not fully optimize any page - that way they are all working for you).
Another item you did not mention was the ability of the shopper to look up their auto, year, model, etc. and find the tire for their vehicle. Are you including that functionality on the homepage? I think most would like that as it is easier than trying to go figure out what type tire they have.
You said you retail tires so I am assuming you have a retail location (if you are also ECommerce, insure that your CMS will adjust for dynamic urls to search engine friendly like you are describing here). If you have retail locations insure that you have optimized for Google Places, etc.
With this, a final consideration for me (and I am not a subject matter expert in tire purchase habits) would be to be sure I was mobile compatible especially if I was retail.
Hope this helps, got any good deals on Goodyear P285 70 R17's..
-
I would structure the URLs in how the users are going to be navigating your site. How will they GET to the specified page?
Homepage>click
Category>click
Brand>click
Model ?
Is yes, than your first option is the best choice.
The user should be able to look at the URL and deduce the hierarchy of the site from the "folder" structure (even though those folders may be virtual)
Hope this help!
-Dan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Adding picture and new layout on jobs-overview page
Im running a castingsite today, where the jobs-overview page is the highest ranked on google on the important words. There is a big of reasons for that, it's updated daily, the domain is old and wellknown and so. Anyways, the today is this: (Yes it's ugly and old-school :))
Web Design | | KasperGJ
Current design:
http://www.onlinecasting.dk/auditions.asp I've created a new design, which is much nicer and with added pictures. The pictures in the new design, will be somewhat unique to the specific jobs, so the current ones are mostly for testing New design: (Not implemented)
http://www.onlinecasting.dk/auditionsnd.asp Question:
So my question is. Do you think this NEW design could affect my site / page in a bad way in SEO or?
I'm planning basically just to overwrite the old auditions.asp file with the new code. What do you guys think.0 -
Can the design still be considered adaptive if the URL is different?
I was under the impression our site had a mobile dedicated design, but my developers are telling me we have an adaptive design. The mobile site is set up different and has different content and the url is as follows: www.site.com/MobileView/MobileHome.aspx Can it still be considered adaptive if the URL is not the exact same? Hopefully this make sense and I appreciate anyone's input!
Web Design | | AliMac260 -
Moving to new site. Should I take old blog posts with me?
Our company website has needed a complete overhaul for some time now and the new one is almost ready to go live. We also have a separate "news" site that is houses around 800 blog posts and news items. (That news site will be thrown away because it's on a completely different domain and causes confusion.) So we have a main site with about 100 decent blog posts and a separate news site with 800 poor posts. I plan on bringing all the main site blog posts over to the new site (both WordPress), but my question is whether or not to bring over the news site posts? All, handful, none? Another issue is the news site doesn't have Google Analytics, so I'm not sure if any posts actually generate traffic, but I can from the main site we do get some referrals from it. As far as quality of content goes, it's poor. Not sure who wrote it all, but it's mainly text press releases that aren't very interesting. Is it worth bringing over for SEO purposes or simply delete the site and create a mass redirect so all of those pages will direct to the new website's blog page? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Web Design | | codyfrew0 -
Help needed on URL structures
I am busy structuring URL's for a client and an issue i have come across is as follows: i have a URL that is a long one, we cant remove words in it so the question is which one is better structurally: root/courses/businessmanagementandadministration.aspx or root/courses/business-management-and-administration.aspx please help.
Web Design | | nick_pageone0 -
Question Mark In URL??
So I am looking at a site for a client, and I think I already have my answer, but wanted to check with you guys. First off the site is in FLASH and HTML. I told the client to dump the flash site, but she isn't willing right now. So the URLS are generated like this. Flash: http://www.mysite.com/#/page/7ca2/wedding-pricing/ HTML: http://www.mysite.com/?/page/7ca2/wedding-pricing/ checking the site in Google with a site:mysite, none of the interior pages are indexed at all. So that is telling me that Google is pretty much ignoring everything past the # or ?. Is that correct? My recommendation is to dump the flash site and redo the URLS in a SEo friendly format.
Web Design | | netviper0 -
URLs with Hashtags - Does Google Index Them?
Hi there, I have a potential issue with a site whereby all pages are dynamically populated using Javascript. Thus, an example of an URL on their site would be www.example.com/#!/category/product. I have read lots of conflicting information on the web - some says Google will ignore everything after the hashtag; other people say that Google will now index everything after the hashtag. Does anybody have any conclusive information about this? Any links to Google or Matt Cutts as confirmation would be brilliant. P.S. I am aware about the potential issue of duplicate content, but I can assure you that has been dealt with. I am only concerned about whether Google will index full URLs that contain hashtags. Thanks all! Mark
Web Design | | markadoi840 -
Implementing a new Nav Bar: Best practice, SEO benefit, your suggestions?
Hi Mozland, We are going to have a new Nav Bar for our site built from the horror that we currently have to up with. We want to make it a simple affair, similar to The Guardian two-tier Nav Bar - main menu which will drop down to the 2nd tier according to what you clicked on in tier one. Regular stuff, I think. Any suggestions, from your experience, about how best to implement this, what to include, what not to do, what can be included and done to make it as best it can be to get people to peruse our site as easily as possible? Thanks
Web Design | | Martin_S0 -
Can SEO Moz perform a full site crawl and provide a report showing all URLs within an existing domain?
We are conducting a site redesign and need to get an idea of all pages that are out there on our domain (in some report fashion). This would help for discovery and cleanup as we re-work the site and move to a new CMS. Thanks
Web Design | | DCondon0