Any SEO moz users notice a HUGE change in OSE (Open Site Explorer) link data numbers?
-
Hi All,
I am having some serious concern with OSE data recently for numerous clients, one client I want to talk about today has the following data from OSE for the month of August 2011 compared with July 2011:
Total links to the domain: (decrease of around 100,000+)
External Followed links: (decrease by around 5,000)
**Linking Root domains: (decrease of over 60) **The crazy thing is that the domain authority has actually gone up by around 5 points for this client even though every thing has suddenly gone down?
Also funny thing is we have been link building quite strong for this client over the last 12 months using only high quality sources from out niche.
I am worried that their is serious issues with the data, I realise we saw some updates to OSE recently yet I am suprised it can be this drastic.
Kind Regards.
PSV
-
This topic affects everyone and Rand offered a specific reply to address these concerns. In short, they are working on the issue but there is only an opportunity to make adjustments once per month. Then the crawler is set to do it's job and the results wont be seen for another month.
The crawler has to go out and pull data from literally billions of web pages. The data then needs to be processed which takes 1-2 weeks. The team is also trying to improve the quality of the tool as well. My recommendation is to use OSE as a guide, not a solid list of all links.
-
Almost 2 months later from last post (Sep 5) here and I am wondering why this problem with OSE is not rectified??? Oh yea, here's another $100. Thanks so much!!?
-
Hey PSV,
Sorry I'm jumping in so late to the game on this! The response from the Customer Service team by Kenny below is correct - with the adjustments we've made to the new crawler, we're going less deep this crawl than we did in the July crawl. This is because we're still trying to make tweaks to get the domain diversity back up to what is what before. It looks like you had a major change from July to August which is strange - I haven't seen such a drastic change pointed out by any other users.
If I could get the actual domain, I can look into this for you. Is this discrepancy being reported by Open Site Explorer or are you querying the API directly?
It's hard to speculate without knowing which domain you're referring to, but you may see a decrease in inbound links if you had a lot of links from a high MozRank page. If you had a large amount of links on one domain and we didn't crawl that domain as deeply this past index where we went MUCH deeper the index before, many of the links deeper down in the domain won't be in this latest index.
Please let me know which domain you're referring to and I can try to track down some information for you!
Thanks,
Cairn
-
I have seen the same thing and posted a private Q along the same lines, having seen substantial changes with a couple of site profiles, both of which have had link building done very carefully with high value sources. Majestic and Google WMT still show the links - just a spanner in the works at the mozplex by the look of things until the next crawl.
Response as follows:
| Kenny Martin | Aug 31, 2011 |
| Customer Service Expert at SEOmoz |Sorry that you're seeing such drastic changes with the new Linkscape update. We've been adjusting the way that we do our crawls over the past couple of months, and the updates made in July were a bit off the mark. Our new crawler was built to be fresher, but it was going deeper into domains, and, unfortunately, not visiting as many domains. Domains with a high MozRank were getting crawled deeper, but domains with middle to lower MozRanks were not getting crawled. With our newer Index, we tried to get the domain diversity back up to or better than that of our last update (as was originally designed) so we didn't crawl as deeply into some of these higher ranking domains as we had for our July index.
Also, keep in mind that it can take some time for links to be included in our Linkscape index because it takes a few weeks to crawl the web and a couple weeks to process all the data that is acquired.
I hope that helps clear things up and we are anticipating on improving our crawler and index each month. My apologies for any inconveniences
-
I'm sorry PSV, I missed the 60 root domain information which you clearly included.
100,000/60 = 1667 so it sounds like some if not most of the links lost may have been site wide links. It's impossible to tell with this information alone. There are too many factors involved:
-
how many domains are linking to your site
-
which domains did you lose? Were they high DA sites or low?
-
which links did you lose? Were they foot links? Links in content? Links from high/low PA pages?
-
were they links to your home page or deep links?
-
did the links use anchor text or simply provide a URL?
-
How is your site's traffic? Have you noticed any recent changes?
-
How many total domains link to the site?
Do you save your links in Excel or have a tool to compare your current links with the past links so you can determine which ones have been lost? This step is key to understanding how to approach the change.
-
-
Hence why I noted 60 root domains loss, which I find a bit weird, as our other software shows gains.
I thought it must have been down to a system update!!
But yeah easy as to get a footer link a partner site footer, but it is not quality
-
Hi Nigel,
Yes we are using several tools for comparison currently we do not limit our selves to only SEOmoz data. I read Rands post about the link scape update, saying how lower quality smaller sites were removed from the OSE index yet this site we deal with has more high quality links in its profile.
-
I agree with Nigel's assessment and would add one thought. Look a lot closer at the number of linking domains, not the total number of links.
You can add a single footer link to a forum site with 100k pages. The link's value is minimal but you would notice 100k more links. What can you do with that information? Very little. It distorts your true backlink profile. If you were to lose that footer link but add 1 quality link from a source such a the New York Times, your sites DA may increase even though you are technically down 99,999 links.
-
I saw similar changes to the Data sets in the August update. I received feedback from moz, was that with the July data set they were crawling deeper into some of the larger (and more trusted) domains which was, in some cases, producing unusual results. For example, we had links coming from domains such as Warnerbros.com, which have no trace of a link to us.
I think the latest update has moved to rectify these issues but at the same time crawled a wider range of results giving a more accurate picture of link graphs for pages. I would suggest that comparing Data month and month to yourself is not a useful as mapping the changes your competitors are having i.e. with Seomoz making the great changes they do to make their metrics reflective of what matters in the SERPs the data will change month on month but if you are looking at how your competitors shift as well you'll get an idea as to how you perform.
I would also suggest using several tools, (whilst linkscape is pretty darn awesome) it's always worth getting a full picture of the link metrics by checking linking domains in webmaster tools, yahoo site explorer, bing tools, majestic seo etc.
In short I don't think there are serious issues with the data but it would be worth checking which domains you've lost and which you've gained, just to be safe.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Since July 1, we've had a HUGE jump in errors on our weekly crawl. We don't think anything has changed on our website. Has MOZ changed something that would account for a large leap in duplicate content and duplicate title errors?
Our error report went from 1,900 to 18,000 in one swoop, starting right around the first of July. The errors are duplicate content and duplicate title, as if it does not see our 301 redirects. Any insights?
Moz Pro | | KristyFord0 -
Who else has inaccurate reporting? SEO Moz BUG
I have been in contact with support to little avail no timelines for the correction kind of leaves me out in the cold. I have loved SEOmoz in the past but this recent bug is costing me time and money. Can someone please tell me how they are working around all these issues in rank reporting and a zero accuracy rate on page report cards? bugs are holding up my SEO efforts. SEOmoz has been in touch but has provided no timelines. My programs are suffering. I found inaccuracy in each report metric and now have very little faith that this is going to be corrected in a timely fashion. I rely greatly on the wonderful tools SEOmoz provides and now I am flying blind. Who else has been hit by the bug? And, what has support done for you to help?
Moz Pro | | ericajane0 -
SEO moz Report Card
I just ran some on page report cards. As I was playing around with the tool I noticed that I would get different results if I used my primary domain vs a 2nd domain. The main difference was in how the tool was counting keywords on the page. The keyword used was 'vehicle inventory' Primary domain: www.brand-state.com/inventory.htm Title = 1, URL = 0, Meta = 1, H1 = 1, H2-4 = 1 Body =1, Strong = 1, IMG Alt = 1 Total = 7 2nd domain: www.company-name-brand.com/inventory.htm Title = 1, URL = 0, Meta = 1, H1 = 1, H2-4 = 2 Body =5, Strong = 4, IMG Alt = 2 Total = 13 I can understand if the keyword was in the domain, but it's not. So I'm wondering what is going on here - any help or suggestions on what to research would be a great help. Thank you!
Moz Pro | | gormaniavt0 -
Open Site Explorer - Link Export Not Showing Same Number of Links
Noob question. I'm using Open Site Explorer to hunt down some external links for a website. In the attached image (post-pressing the filter button), it says I have 889 external links, but after I've downloaded the CSV, I only get 695 links. Why the difference in number? And if I'm doing something wrong, how do I make sure I'm getting the full amount of external links to my client's website? Thanks! GG6wURf.jpg
Moz Pro | | EEE31 -
Open site explorer result discrepancy
Hi all, I'm a little confused - when using open sites explorer to view of link stats on one of our competitors site I get conflicting results. For example - Page Specific Metircs shows the url www.xyz.com has 265 external links. But Root Domain Metrics show they have 22,687 links Yet the total links at the top of the report says Total links 999 Can someone explain why www.xyz.com has 265 external links and the rot domain (which is the same) has 22687 links? I've also run the report on xyz.com rather than www.xyz.com which yielded no results. Thanks in advance
Moz Pro | | EclipseLegal0 -
Changing the Timeframe of Historical Crawl Data
Hello, Just read a great post about the implications of duplicate content for sites after the most recent Panda update: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+seomoz+(SEOmoz+Daily+Blog) In the post is an image or crawl data history that shows months, not days or weeks, worth of trending data as it relates to duplicate content. So my question is this: How do I change my view/date range on my own campaigns so that I can view the trailing months of data rather than only what seems to be the past 4 weeks or so? This would really help me identify the impact of some on page changes we've recently made for a client. Many Thanks, Jared
Moz Pro | | surjm0 -
BOTW links not recognized by Open Site Explorer
Hi there, I was wondering if I buy a submission to the Best of the Web directory (waiting for the new directory list promised by the seomoz team 🙂 ) but when I get to the category on BOTW website that will fit for my website, I took some links already there and put them on open site explorer to see their value, I had the surprise they are not even recognized... So I am still wondering if it is worth or not... voilà , if anybody knows if this directory still has value...
Moz Pro | | thuraminho750 -
Latest OSE Update - Strange Numbers and Links
Hey everyone. I just checked our website in OSE with the latest update and noticed some strange numbers. The number of linking domains skyrocketed from 300 to 785 which definitely caught me off guard. Like all good SEOers I work hard to get links, but in a typical month I usually get between 40 and 50. To suddenly jump up by over 300 seems odd. Digging deeper, I noticed that some of the incoming link domains could be considered less than trustworthy (pages filled with links), while others I couldn't find at all on the page in question. I also never ever asked for any of these links, nor did anyone on my team. Should I be worried? I've heard of websites who purposely gain bad links to their competitors in order to penalize them. Is there an easy way to find out if this is going on? Could this possibly be a problem with OSE and just reporting non-existant links? Thanks for your feedback! Andrew BTW, the website in question is www.gooverseas.com
Moz Pro | | dunklea0