Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Will a mega menu on all pages dilute the link juice?
-
On our web site (http://www.betxpert.com) we have a mega menu with quite a lot of links in it. I am getting warnings in SEOmoz saying we have far to many links in our pages. But a lot of pages have large menus with a lot of links - are all pages punished for this then?
My primary question is: Since the menu is on all pages, the pages linked in the menu will have a link in from all of our pages (200K+ pages) and a lot of these do not have a good ranking. So what I want to know is if the pages linked in the menu will have lower ranking because of the many links in - or is this a good thing?
Should I consider setting "nofollow" for som of the links on other pages than the homepage (since this is the page with the best rank)?
-
The Stackoverflow site is likely a very bad example to try and follow for two main reasons. First off, it has millions of links and is the #105 most trafficked site in the world. Does your site have similar stats?
Also, it is a forum site. In many senses, a site is a site, but you also need to consider business models. I have used Stack Overflow for years, but today is the first time I have ever been to the site's home page. Would that be ok for your site?
You mention their home page does not hinder usability? I disagree. If you offer 100 links on a page, some people still struggle to locate the right link. When you offer 700 links on a page, many users will be lost.
In short, stackoverflow has a good business model but you will likely not be happy with your SEO results if you attempt to emulate their home page.
-
Depending on how much link juice a page has, really rules how many links it can have.
link juice of a page is split between its links. Each link passes 85% of its link juice, this is so link juice does not flow for ever and stops eternal loops
but even losing 15% link juice as link juice passes though links it will never reach 0, as there with always be 85% left, so at some stage link juice becomes too small to pass on and is discarded.so to get back to my point, if you have too many links it may be that you have split link juice so small that it is discarded and not passed.
Also it would seem that Bing will only index so many links
http://thatsit.com.au/seo/reports/violation/the-page-contains-too-many-hyperlinks
So usability is really secondary
-
What about in the case of tags? Can you speak to this? Look at the home page of Stackoverflow... Tons of links, and most of them are tags for questions. They do not hinder usability at all, and yet a site will still suffer in SEO/indexation because of this?
-
What about in the case of tags? Can anyone speak to this? Look at the home page of Stackoverflow... Tons of links, and most of them are tags for questions. They do not hinder usability at all, and yet a site will still suffer in SEO/indexation because of this?
-
You presently have 348 links on your home page. It is far too many.
You are welcome to keep those links, but it will likely be a poor user experience and your search results will be negatively impacted as well.
If I operated your current site I would redesign it in such a manner so there were under 100 links on your home page. If there are 120 or 140, that can work fine. 348 is far too many, especially for a site with DA of 31.
-
Thanks for the replies in this thread. I've reduced the homepage to about 300-350 links now. That should give me some affect one should think.
-
The number of links on your home page seem too many, but if you have that same menu on every page then I would worry.
You want to try to get a flat as posible linking structure, without losing user exprience. You want as many pages linking to your landing pages, and few to your non ranking pages.
i have a simple tutorial explaining of how page rank flows, hope it explains a little.
http://perthseocompany.com.au/seo/tutorials/a-simple-explanation-of-pagerank
-
Hi Atul,
You go to analytics, and go to "Content". There you find "In-Page Analysis". I just tried it today. Really cool
You can check for several types of users, and see how many of your links have been clicked by over 0%, 0,01% and so on. In this way you can locate the links which are not clicked at all.
-
Hi Ryan,
"You can use Google Analytics or other tools to determine which links are not used"
Would you please clarify about doing link analysis using GA ?.
Thanks
-
Correct.
You will be choosing to flow link juice to your more important pages.
You can use Google Analytics or other tools to determine which links are not used. In most cases, footer links are seldom used. If you were to perform a link analysis of your home page you will likely find only a small percentage of those links are actually used. While you are familiar with your site imagine being a first time visitor to the site and trying to find the right link out of a list of 700+.
-
So can i conclude, that the high number of links in my menu and footer actually dilutes the link juice for all link (on all pages). If i trim the number of links I should see a better passing of rank value throughout my website?
-
But our link count has been this high for a long time.
Are you happy with your site's current SEO performance? If so, there is no need to change. If you wish to improve your site's SEO, I would suggest your link structure is a major issue.
So you are telling me, that if i decrease the link count my page will have a higher authority?
No. Your authority remains the same whether you have 1 link or 1000. The difference is how that authority is distributed throughout your site.
The concept of optimization is about prioritizing. You want the most link juice to go to the most important pages such as your money page, official interviews, and the most popular articles.
The trimming of links is most important on the homepage or should this be done on each and every page?
It should be done of every page. It is more important on the home page, but it affects every page.
-
But our link count has been this high for a long time.
So you are telling me, that if i decrease the link count my page will have a higher authority?
The trimming of links is most important on the homepage or should this be done on each and every page?
-
Should I consider setting "nofollow" for some of the links on other pages than the homepage?
Definitely not. When you nofollow a link, you do not save any link juice. You stop the link juice of flowing to the link but it does not flow to other links on your page.
The idea of optimizing your links is to step back and take a fresh look at your links and question whether they are all truly necessary and helpful. Your home page presently offers over 700 links. You really need to cut your link count to less then 100.
The primary recommendation is to provide links to the main category pages, but not all the subcategories. For example you have a Bookmaker link on your home page, then list out 25 different bookmakers. Instead simply link to the Bookmaker page and offer the bookmaker links there. Apply this process to all your categories.
The New York Times is about the most packed home page of links a site can reasonably offer, then their link count is half of yours. They can support having that many links because their DA is 100, the maximum possible for a web site, whereas your DA is 31. You really need to find a way to get under 100 links. If you do not make a change, your rankings and site indexation will suffer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I disavow these links?
Hi all, I have a ski website that I am currently performing a toxic backlink audit on. I have noted that a lot of the links being flagged as toxic/spammy by the tool I am using seem to be the same/similar sites with different URLs. The sites are vaguely related to skiing (relating to helicopter travel options for travelling to ski resorts) but it is concerning me that there are so many of them and they are being flagged as so toxic.
Link Building | | SolveWebMedia
Do you think it is worth disavowing these? Or contacting the owner to ask them to remove the link? I have included an example of some of the links below. https://www.cannes-helicopters.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://nice-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://monaco-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5 Slightly different site but same favicon icon:
https://monaco-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://www.whitetracks-holidays.com/Helicopter_Transfers_Villars_Switzerland.htm Thanks in advance for any advice / help!0 -
Unsolved Are links from staff profile pages no longer good for SEO?
Hey there, We run a small site that lists lawyers and we have an opportunity to ask the lawyers to display a 'badge' on their own website's staff page, linked back to the page on our site that they are listed on. Initially I thought this would be good link building (i.e. the lawyer's own staff/profile pages on their website linking to our site where they are listed = a highly relevant link). I was less concerned about the authority of the law firm's sites, though these will range from sometimes low-ish to medium. I just assumed that Google would see the value in the lawyer wanting to link to our site where they are listed. However, our SEO has said that these days Google doesn't give much/any value to these types of links from individual staff pages. His advice was to try and get the badge added to one of their service pages (or their About page) which will be unlikely as the badge is person-specific. I thought I'd ask if this was everyone else's experience regarding Google not valuing links from individual staff pages? Thanks for you help 🙂
Link Building | | Andy-H0 -
If I disavow bad links on "disavow link webmaster" will they still show up on my moz reports?
We recently found out we have a lot of bad links linking back to our website from spam sites, I disavowed them through the google disavow link webmaster. On my moz report it still shows the links, is that normal?
Link Building | | Ryan.Cruz0 -
Should my backlinks point to my home page or to internal article pages?
Hi, I run a fitness blog and I get the majority of my backlinks through guest posts that I write on high quality sites. Sometimes they allow me to put a backlink within the article, and I'll link it to a relevant article of mine. However, in the "author bio" section my backlink anchor text is usually just my brand name. I was wondering if this backlink should point towards my home page or is it more beneficial to point it towards an important article of mine? Thanks
Link Building | | jeremyethier0 -
A link with "return false"- OSE sees as a No Followed Link
Hello, I couldn't find a clear answer to the impact on SEO for a link written in this way: [" class="expert_info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">](w</span>ww.yourwebsite.com<span style=) [Does the "return false" act as a "no follow"? I came across this in our link data in Open Site Explorer which lists these links all as "no follows." However, an engineer I spoke to said that it shouldn't impact search engine behavior. Any ideas? Thank you in advance! -Sarah K.](w</span>ww.yourwebsite.com<span style=)
Link Building | | OneMedical0 -
Linking to sites that link to porn or casinos, my site getting penalized?
I have some link exchanges with some sites to get web traffic but when i ran the bad neighborhood link checker, i found that one site links to some casinos and another site has one link to a porn site. Is this getting me penalized? should i remove the links to these sites? Thanks, Ron
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Link Detox and Link Removal
I have a question about which links to remove after running a link detox from Link Research Tools. First a little back story. I had had an SEO company link building for one of the websites I own. But I have recently stopped working with them. In the last month my rankings have near dropped off the charts. I have just recently gotten access to Google webmaster tools and noticed an unnatural link warning from back in March. So yesterday I ran link detox and it reported 19 toxic links, 120 suspicious links, and 24 healthy links. It's rather obvious that I should remove all of the toxic links. They all from sites that have been deindexed by google. But my question is a about the suspicious links. What should my criteria be for removing them? Am I better off removing them all and leaving my site with only 24 healthy links or should I personally comb through them and remove only the worst of the worst so that I leave my site with a few more links? I'd really like to get the site ready to resubmit to google as soon as I can. Thoughts? yyCOf.png
Link Building | | CobraJones950 -
Text Link vs image link?
Which passes most link juice a text link or an image with the correct 'alt' attribute? Do the pass the same amount or is one more valuable than the other?
Link Building | | SamCUK0