Over 90% of anchor text tends to be brand-name on OSE link profiles. Why?
-
I reported this as a bug in OSE, because often I explore these links and find that the pages include both a brand-name link AND a regular keyword link, but for some reason OSE was only reporting the brand-name link...
This led me to wonder how many links this occurred for, and therefore whether or not to trust the fact that the majority of the sites I ran OSE on returned at least (in most cases, more) than 90% brand-name links.
I understand that brand-name links are amongst the most important to obtain, but that it's also important to get anchor text for keywords to build a varied profile. Given this apparent flaw in OSE, is it wrong - in the case of very successful sites - to take this ~90% as being anywhere near the correct percentage of brand-name links that I should be aiming for as a proportion of the total profile?
Extra Credit :)... And this may help potentially help resolve the issue: does "Inbound Links" tab in OSE just report links to the Root Domain, or to that and every other page on the site?
-
Thanks Cyrus, you've been incredibly helpful.
-
Manism is one word and will most likely be interrupted as such by the Search Engines. Since it is thematically related to "man" it might still pass some benefit if contained in anchor text.
Whereas "askmen" is interpreted as 2 separate words. This might pass more value, but the effect is most likely minimal as Google becomes more sophisticated.
-
Thank you, I'll be sure to check out your video. Very final question then: If we're saying "askmen" is a keyword rich domain, could the same be said for "manism," for a site dealing with "men's issues"? i.e. Google recognizes the "man" in there?
-
Thank you, I'll be sure to check out your video. Very final question then: If we're saying "askmen" is a keyword rich domain, could the same be said for "manism," for a site dealing with "men's issues"? i.e. Google recognizes the "man" in there?
-
1. Ideally, but not always the case with smaller sites, local sites and folks who can't get their own branded domain. But you are correct, there's a great deal of difference between a keyword rich domain and a non-keyword domain.
Unfortunately, there's no "correct" answer to the ideal ratio, although 90% branded seems incredibly high to me. In fact, I wish fewer of SEOmoz's inbound links were branded, as we could benefit from more variety.
Here's a video I made on anchor text
Along with some related resources which address the topic:
-
Thanks, Cyrus. Let me just ensure I understand correctly:
1. "The Domains are exact match for their brands." Isn't that nearly always the case? Or are you referring specifically to a highly relevant keyword being present in the brand name (in which case, we're saying Google can detect the word "men" within "askmen" and give "credit" for it?)
2. Understood.
Beyond both of these, I'm still curious why 90%+ of inbound links should be brand name or close variants. You wrote:
"In the end, you want anchors closely associated with the keyword topics you are trying to rank for."
...Yet again, it appears that a 90%+ proportion of SEOMoz's inbound links are ALSO brand name, or close variants. The takeaway I'm getting is that this ~90/10 split is what I should be focused on in order to achieve ranking success. So I guess my final question is, is it wrong to think that?
-
Hi Zachary,
I apologize because I misunderstood your question the first time.
Going back to your original question....
often I explore these links and find that the pages include both a brand-name link AND a regular keyword link, but for some reason OSE was only reporting the brand-name link...
OSE will report the first link found on a page's HTML, and only the first link. This is consistent with testing done on how Google counts anchor text. (If you find something different, it would indeed be a bug)
As for the prevalence of branded anchor text, I think there are a couple of factors at work here:
- The Domains are exact match for their brand, which accounts for the high proportion of branded anchors. See the stats for SEOmoz
- Large online publishers like the examples you cited tend to belong to publishing groups that own a large network of sites. The sites tend to interlink to each other using the same anchors.
Having a keyword rich brand name can really help you in the ranking department. So can developing search volume for your branded terms.
In a vaccuum, I'm not sure branded anchors pass greater or lesser value than others. In the end, you want anchors closely associated with the keyword topics you are trying to rank for. If these are your brand keywords, all the better.
-
Thanks for the great answer. I am still a bit perplexed, however, and here are those examples to clarify:
Just taking the first example - If you plug that in, you'll notice that under the "Anchor Text" tab, almost all of the keywords with an even vaguely significant number of links to them are brand-name or a close variation of this. There is the occasional "cars on askmen," or "fashion on askmen," but even these hardly seem to be very carefully selected.
Askmen is an enormous site with a PR of 7. Can this really not be taken to imply that brand-name links are significantly more (or at least, no less) effective than targeted keyword links, and one's campaigns should thus be heavily weighted in their favor?
Thanks again for your help, and thanks Cyrus.
-
In addition to Robert's answer, I'd like to add that although OSE doesn't have a built in bias towards "name-brand" links, it does favor links with high Page and Domain Authority, and URL that have good inbound link profiles themselves, because these are the most useful to crawl and index.
Of course, OSE doesn't report all links, especially those buried beneath layers of navigation and those on pages with very few inbound links themselves.
Part of the issue may be temporary as well. Each index changes from the last. The most recent index was an improvement in that it reported far more domains, but significantly fewer URLs. This is a trend we may see reversed in future updates.
-
Zachary,
It is a bit difficult to assist without knowing at least a url you are looking at. I just used OSE on a couple of sites we managed to see if there was some type of bug, but it returned to them money what it should have.
When you are looking at anchor text on OSE, you can select a term or phrase and it will make a difference.
When you have clicked on the anchor text tab, just under the url will be two drop down choices:
Show anchor text TERMS/PHRASES for link to THIS PAGE/ALL PAGES ON THIS ROOT DOMAIN/ALL PAGES ON THIS SUB DOMAIN then Filter. After you select what you want, hit Filter.
On your extra credit, When you have clicked on the Inbound Links tab, Look below the URL box and you will see another set of choices. You can see a choice for type of link, from all or internal or external pages, to any page or all pages on the root, sub, or page. You may also group the result by domain.
Hope this helps you out.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Better link metrics, but lower rank??
Hello to all, new member here from Houston. I'm learning a lot! I've brought my site up some but my chief competitor is still at #1 position. I ran a full SERP report for my top keyword. My site appears to rank better on: Page Authority…Domain Authority…MozRank…MozTrust...DmT/DmR… Additionally, his on-page grade is F, mine is B! So, it appears sheer bulk incoming links are really where it's at. He beats me, somewhat, at URL Link Counts, also on Followed External Links. The real difference appears to be External Links to This Domain: I have 65, he has somehow managed to get 3500…I think his webmaster has a local directory where everybody links to each other…I can't imagine how a small biz like this, in a fairly non-competitive industry, could get that many. Anyway, thought I'd bring this up for comments/clarifications, if anyone has any---Also, is there a resource to understand these various parameters. Thanks--- John in Houston
Moz Pro | | vondoba0 -
Campaign link not working?
I imagine most of the initial problems with the domain migration to moz.com will be cleaned up rather quickly. I did however notice right away my links to my campaigns from the dashboard were not working. I then click the campaigns tab up top and my campaign links worked from there. Just thought I'd share real quick incase anyone else is having the same issue.
Moz Pro | | CDUBP0 -
How can i extract back link report in OSE of HTTPS domain?
Hello, Recently i was reviewing backlinks of one of the HTTPS domain and was socked to see the difference of backlinks in Majestic SEO and OSE tool. I tried a lot to find the option to explore the backlink of HTTPS domain but i think OSE is not providing that. Can anyone suggest the tool or method to find link report of HTTPS domains? Thank you, Sophie
Moz Pro | | sophiep0 -
Why are my competitor total links in my dashboard not the same than in open site explorer
Hello, I am measuring a competitor total link in my campaign (Pro app) and the Total links are bigger than in the open site explorer? Did you have an idea? thks
Moz Pro | | VOUS0 -
Can we add sites to the crawl queue for OSE?
Is it possible to request that Open Site Explorer crawls a new URL on its next run? This tool is the first place I go to when working on a new site, and when there is "No Data Available" this is a little frustrating. I fully appreciate that this lack of data is usually a signal that the website is either very new or of low quality, however that if often the reason that I am brought in and would very much like to benchmark and provide initial analysis using this tool. It would make sense that OSE crawls the sites that Moz members are working on wouldnt it? Scott.
Moz Pro | | eseyo0 -
What's Happened To OSE's External Links For My Site?
Hi, I'm just taking my first steps with Open Site Explorer. I've hit a problem that I'd be really grateful for some help with. I'm running a website (that I didn't create) and want to get a clear picture of the inbound links. When I enter the URL into the OSE search bar, there are no external domains listed under the 'Inbound Links' and 'Linking Domains' tabs. Only internal site links are registered. Setting the filters, "only external" + "pages on this root domain", under the Inbound Links tab, does bring up a list of external sites. But I haven't had to enter filters just to see a list of inbound links with any other sites. Also, the breakdown under the Linking Domains tab remains the same - only links within my site are shown. Does this ring a bell? Any ideas what I might be doing wrong, or what might be wrong with my site to cause this problem? Cheers for helping, Josh
Moz Pro | | JoshAustin460 -
Competitive analysis of inbound links
I am trying to figure out how to best use SeoMoz tools to do some competitive analysis of inbound links. With the site explorer tool I can "compare Link Metrics" I see that a competitor is beating me on External Followed Links and Total Linking Root domains. I want to dig further into this data and see how these are distributed. What I am really after is which root domains are sending them the most links. Knowing that 20k of their links are coming from 5 specific root urls would be great to know. Is there anywhere that I can see this data. Ideal column headers would be: Linking Root Domain of Followed Links (from this root domain) Linking Domain Authority The ability to drill down from there into specific links would be mind blowing. Is there any way to browse this type of data in SeoMoz?
Moz Pro | | dantheriver0 -
SEOmoz API - Links and Anchor Text Calls
Hi, I'm testing out the SEOmoz API - however I'm stuggling to understand the use of the Cols parameter within the "anchor-text" method. I've looped through increasing numbers of "Cols" for a standard query and there just seems to be no logical pattern.
Moz Pro | | AlexThomas
** - Could someone please enlighten me as to how this works?** E.g. of results for query: http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/anchor-text/www.seomoz.org/?Scope=term_to_page&Sort=domains_linking_page&Cols=1 1Array ( [0] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451138 ) [1] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451144 ) [2] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451131 ) ) 2Array ( [0] => Array ( [atut] => seomoz ) [1] => Array ( [atut] => seomoz.org ) [2] => Array ( [atut] => seo ) ) 3Array ( [0] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451138 [atut] => seomoz ) [1] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451144 [atut] => seomoz.org ) [2] => Array ( [aturid] => 86128451131 [atut] => seo ) ) 4Array ( [0] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 ) [1] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 ) [2] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 ) ) 5Array ( [0] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451138 ) [1] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451144 ) [2] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451131 ) ) 6Array ( [0] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [atut] => seomoz ) [1] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [atut] => seomoz.org ) [2] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [atut] => seo ) ) 7Array ( [0] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451138 [atut] => seomoz ) [1] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451144 [atut] => seomoz.org ) [2] => Array ( [atui] => 38845159274 [aturid] => 86128451131 [atut] => seo ) ) 8Array ( [0] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 ) [1] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 ) [2] => Array ( [atuiu] => 0 ) ) 9Array ( [0] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 [aturid] => 86128451138 ) [1] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 [aturid] => 86128451144 ) [2] => Array ( [atuiu] => 0 [aturid] => 86128451131 ) ) 10Array ( [0] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 [atut] => seomoz ) [1] => Array ( [atuiu] => 1 [atut] => seomoz.org ) [2] => Array ( [atuiu] => 0 [atut] => seo ) ) Links API: Similar confusion here for:
"TargetCols"
"SourceCols"
"LinkCols" The description here http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/w/page/13991141/Links API - is a bit vague It appears that the links API spits out everything anyway - that one's less of an issue. So... could anyone explain how the Anchor-text API parameter Cols works?? Cheers!0