SeoMoz crawler giving false positives?
-
SeoMoz crawler indicated a few times that my site has a duplicate home page error (http://mysite.com and www.mysite.com)
I eliminated the the couple remaining internal links that pointed to http://mysite on a couple pages (all other internal links point to http://www.mysite.com)
I ran the crawl again and it said no errors this time. I naturally thought the duplicate page error problem was fixed.
However this morning I got the regularly scheduled crawl report from SeoMoz that said again I have those duplicate error pages. No changes were made to any of my site's pages between the crawls.
That makes me wonder if the crawler is providing false positives at times or was wrong when it said on the crawl a couple days ago that I don't have any errors (no duplicate page error).
Now, I don't know what to think.
-
Hey,
Our crawler actually requests the page http://mysite.com first but then finds all your links to www.mysite.com
You will want to contact the person responsible for hosting or developing your site in order to make these changes.
Have a great day!
Kenny
-
Thanks for the explanation. Could you answer a couple questions?
1 - If all internal site links go to www.mysite.com (none link to http://mysite.com), how does a duplicate page even happen? I don't understand how this happened to begin with if I don't have any such internal link to http://mysite.com.
2 - Can you recommend a service who can fix the htaccess page for me to create the 301 redirect? I'm not sure I want the hosting service doing it and making a mistake.
Thanks!
-
Hey,
That third campaign is actually a subdomain setup to crawl non-www. No duplicate content errors were presented because there are not any links to follow since all the links contain the subdomain www in them.
Root domain campaigns are distinguished with an astrick before the domain name.
-
Thanks - I initially thought that was it.
But if you see my 3rd campaign of the crawl, it runs it for the root domain and it shows no duplicates.
-
Hey,
I just looked into the issue that you are experiencing with our crawler. The reason the the discrepancy is because you actually have two separate campaigns running for the same site. One is set to crawl the root domain and one the subdomain.
The root domain campaign actually still presents these errors and has week over week but the sub-domain campaign is setup for the www version of your site and that's why these errors are not present, because the crawler won't even attempt to crawl off of www.
It is advisable to perform a 301 redirect as the other commenters mention.
Hope that helps!
Kenny
-
My point is the inconsistency in the SeoMoz crawler reports.
I got two SeoMoz crawl reports today - one was the regularly scheduled one which said I have duplicate home pages (as noted) and the crawl I started a couple hours ago said there are no errors.
So...how do you tell which one is right? Both cannot be since there were no changes to my website pages between the crawls.
thx
-
Hi,
If needed - this is the .htaccess code to help fix this issue; (Make sure and back up .htaccess before making any chages)
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yourdomainhere.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yourdomainhere.com/$1 [L,R=301]
The above code would redirect all traffic from non www to www version of your site fixing dup content issues in that regard
Source ;http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
PS Spaces between lines not needed (funky formatting here)
Hope this helps
-
You need to redirect one of your home pages to the other. www.mysite.com is different to the crawl robot as my site.com. In addition to having the issue with seomoz, you are losing serp value for your home page because you are dividing up the SEO value. Do a 301 redirect from one to the other and voila....problem solved.
Please make sure you give me the thumbs up for the help!! Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are there ways to avoid false positive "soft 404s" by Google
Sometimes I get alerts from Google Search Console that it has detected soft 404s on different websites, and since I take great care to never have true soft 404s, they are always false positives. Today I got one on a website that has pages promoting some events. The language on the page for one event that has sold out says that "tickets are no longer available" which seems to have tripped up Google into thinking the page is a soft 404. It's kind of incredible to me that in the current era we're in, with things like chatGPT that Google doesn't seem to understand natural language. But that has me thinking, are there some strategies or best practices we can use in how we write copy on the page so Google doesn't flag it as soft 404? It seems like anything that could tell a user that an item isn't available could trip it up into thinking it is a 404. In the case of my page, it's actually important information we need to tell the public that an event has sold out, but to use their interest in that event to promote other events. so I don't want the page deindexed or not to rank well!
Technical SEO | | IrvCo_Interactive0 -
Forum post multiple pages gives meta description duplicate.
My website has a forum that is using the title of the posts as a Meta Description.The problem is that when a posts becomes long and separates in pages Google tells me that i have duplicate meta description issues because the 2nd page and the 3rd page are using the same meta description.What is the best course of action here?
Technical SEO | | Angelos_Savvaidis0 -
Redirect Impact - Moving From SEOmoz to Moz
Hey Guys, This has been on my mind ever since the big announcement, so today I did some searching around for some posts/talk about what the impact of their full site redirect has been for them and didn't find anything. Have they posted on this or are there any threads that I'm missing out on? I'd love to hear more about what the impact has been or any general thoughts/insights people may have. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | TakeLessons
Jon1 -
Rel Canonical problem or SEOmoz bug ?
Hello all, I hope that sombody out there could help me with my question. I am very new in SEO and in SEOmoz community. I am not familiar with coding. I am goining to start learning soon enough but till now I now only basics. At the website where I am trying to optimize for SEO I am reciving this Crawl Diagnostic Programme. Issue: Rel Canonical (Notice) not Error I searched and lerned what it is. So I contact the developers of the website. Build in wordpress and ask them how to corrected ? They told me that they are using Canonical Tags to all their pages and have no idea why SEOmoz keep identifining it as a "notice" They also tel me to check the source code of page to see the canonical tag. I did and their is actuall a canonical tag there. Cjeck please here www.costanavarinogolf.com So do you have any idea why this is happening ? could you help me explaiin to developers what they should do to overcome this ? Or it's just a bug of SEOmoz and not a reall problem exist ? Thank you very much for your time
Technical SEO | | grzontan0 -
Position of elements in the product page
Hello. As I am a SEO Beginner I wonder if the elements of the page will make a better or worse ranking. I ask this because my boss asked to change the order of the elements. He wants to put first the section of Supplies and Accesories, and then additional information. http://www.theprinterdepo.com/hp-9500mfp-refurbished-printer Does it affect my seo for worse or for better?
Technical SEO | | levalencia10 -
Loss of search engine positions after 301 redirect - what went wrong?!?
Hi Guys After adhering to the On Page optimisation suggestions given by SEOmoz, we redirected some of old urls to new ones. We set 301 redirects from the old pages to new on a page by page basis but our search engine ranking subsequently fell off the radar and lost PR. We confirmed redirection with fiddler and it shows 301 permanent redirect on every page as expected. To manage redirection using a common code logic we executed following: In Http module, using “rewrite path” we route “all old page requests” to a page called “redirect.aspx? oldpagename =[oldpagename]”. This happens at server side. In redirect.aspx we are redirecting from old page to new page using 301 permanent redirect. In the browser, when old page is requested, it will 301 redirect to new page. In hope we and others can learn from our mistakes - what did we do wrong ?!? Thanks in advance. Dave - www.paysubsonline.com
Technical SEO | | Evo0 -
SEOMoz is indicating I have 40 pages with duplicate content, yet it doesn't list the URL's of the pages???
When I look at the Errors and Warnings on my Campaign Overview, I have a lot of "duplicate content" errors. When I view the errors/warnings SEOMoz indicates the number of pages with duplicate content, yet when I go to view them the subsequent page says no pages were found... Any ideas are greatly welcomed! Thanks Marty K.
Technical SEO | | MartinKlausmeier0 -
Used SEOMOZ top 100 Directories, my site ranking lowered, what can we do to fix this?
We have made a big mistake.... So what can we do to fix this? A trainee member of staff has used the seomoz 100 top directories and added to sites from PR10 to PR6 approx about 25 sites, using keywords were possible instead of using the website URL "which i now was stupid!. Our website ranking have been lowered big time for all keywords used!, eg from 1st to 10th and even disappeared from the top 100 We are contacting all directories asking for the Title link to be changed to the URL instead of a keyword.. Will this help? I understand that Google give sites a penalty for this!!, but what can i do to put this right and how long would this penalty last for? Any advice would be highly appreciated... Thanks Dean
Technical SEO | | deanpallatt0