Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Removing robots.txt on WordPress site problem
-
Hi..am a little confused since I ticked the box in WordPress to allow search engines to now crawl my site (previously asked for them not to) but Google webmaster tools is telling me I still have robots.txt blocking them so am unable to submit the sitemap.
Checked source code and the robots instruction has gone so a little lost. Any ideas please?
-
Hi,
I edited the robots.txt file for my website http://debtfreefrombankruptcy.com yesterday to allow search engines to crawl my site. However, Google isn't recognizing the new file and is still saying that my sitemap is blocked from search. Here is a link to the file itself:
http://www.debtfreefrombankruptcy.com/robots.txt
The Blocked URLs tester said that the file allows Google to crawl the site, but in actuality it still isn't recognizing the new file. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
-
I can help you out as this issue DROVE ME NUTS.
1. I didnt have a Robots.txt (yet)
2. I had Yoast installed
3. Im pretty sure it created a Robots.txt even though it doesnt exist in my root (.com/here)
4. My Google webmaster tools shows this
User-agent: Disallow: /wp-admin/ Disallow: /wp-includes/ Disallow: /cgi-bin Disallow: /wp-admin Disallow: /wp-includes Disallow: /wp-content/plugins Disallow: /plugins Disallow: /wp-content/cache Disallow: /wp-content/themes Disallow: /trackback Disallow: /feed Disallow: /comments Disallow: /category//* Disallow: /trackback Disallow: /feed Disallow: /comments Disallow: /? Disallow: /?Allow: /wp-content/uploadsAllow: /assets Create a Robots.txt
1. login to wordpress 2. Click SEO in your side toolbar (Yoast WordPress Plugin settings) 3. Go to edit files under SEO (in the side toolbar)
And now you have the option to edit your Robots.txt file.
-
Hi Sophia
I just checked and see your homepage indexed in google.co.uk with a cache date of April 26th. You should be all set!
-Dan
-
Quick update - by amending the robots text file and switching sitemap plugin over to Yoast I finally got the sitemap to index without robots.txt warnings although the Home page of site was not indexed, 'oh dear'. 5 out of the 7 pages in the sitemap were indexed by Google so It's a start but some more investigating to be done on my side.
-
Dan,
Cant thank you enough! The sitemap request is still pending in Google - maybe I sent too many requests But it's time to sit back and wait for the good news hopefully. Thanks again.
-
Hi Sofia
I just ran the same validator on your sitemap and it went through fine - see screenshot
I intended to mean that you should just be sure Google Webmaster Tools accepts the sitemap as valid - if so, there's no need to run through a 3rd party validator. Apologies if I didn't state it clearly!
Let me know, but from what I can see it looks good!
-Dan
EDIT - Looking more closely, it looks like your ran the homepage through the validator - you would actually enter the sitemap address its self in the validator - http://containerforsale.co.uk/sitemap.xml
-
Hi Dan,
I followed the above advice and switched to the Yoast generated sitemap but after testing on http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/validate-xml-sitemap.html I got the following result - no idea what it means but it looks nasty...
Schema validating with XSV 3.1-1 of 2007/12/11 16:20:05Schema validator crashed
The maintainers of XSV will be notified, you don't need to
send mail about this unless you have extra information to provide.
If there are Schema errors reported below, try correcting
them and re-running the validation.Target: http://containerforsale.co.uk
(Real name: http://containerforsale.co.uk
Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 mod_bwlimited/1.4)The target was not assessedLow-level XML well-formedness and/or validity processing output
Warning: Undefined entity raquo
in unnamed entity at line 16 char 83 of http://containerforsale.co.uk
Warning: Undefined entity nbsp
in unnamed entity at line 160 char 10 of http://containerforsale.co.uk
Error: Expected ; after entity name, but got =
in unnamed entity at line 274 char 631 of http://containerforsale.co.u -
Sofia
You are using Yoast SEO plugin for WordPress, so use the XML sitemap within Yoast. You don't need a separate plugin for the XML sitemap. And yes, within Yoast turn the sitemap on.
Hope that helps!
-Dan
-
Indeed, thanks everyone - it's really appreciated!
I have updated the robots.txt as indicated and re submitted site map but looks like Google still has problems with my site since the error warning for robots is there after the processing is done.
Quick question - I am using a plugin called Google XML Sitemaps which has the following tick box option.
'Add sitemap URL to the virtual robots.txt file'.
The virtual robots.txt generated by WordPress is used. A real robots.txt file must NOT exist in the blog directory!'Should this box be ticked or un-ticked please? Fyi I currently don't have the box ticked.
-
Thanks guys for all the responses and helping!
Three Things to try
1.Fix Robots.txt
Sofia - I just checked your robots.txt now and it reads;
User-agent: * Disallow: Sitemap: http://containerforsale.co.uk/sitemap.xml.gz
- with the sitemap on the same line as disallow - I'd check on that and make sure its on a separate line.
- ALSO, you don't need the .gz on the sitemap file just sitemap.xml
2. Re-submit Sitemap
- RESUBMIT your sitemap to webmaster tools and make sure its valid.
3. Submit URL to Webmaster Tools (only last resort)
this is only last case scenario, shouldn't have to do this on the homepage if everything is correct.
- go to fetch as googlebot ->run the fetch ->then submit URL
- do this for the homepage
- see article on google blog for reference
Let us know if you're all set, thanks!
-Dan
-
Ok thanks Brent, I changed to
User-agent: *
Disallow:
Sitemap: http://containerforsale.co.uk/sitemap.xml.gz
Guess I will just have to wait for Google to refresh now...
-
yes, the urls being blocked are includes from your Wordpress program.
-
Thanks for the heads up.
The warning just says 7 Url''s blocked by robots.txt. - have seen this issue posted on the WordPress boards by others but no real insight into solutions.
Perhaps I should try your idea of
Change the robots.txt file to this:
User-agent *
Disallow:
-
Well there is a robots.txt file. You can view it here: http://containerforsale.co.uk/robots.txt
What warnings are you getting in your sitemap submission area? It appears to look alright: http://containerforsale.co.uk/sitemap.xml But I tried to validate it and got a 504 Gateway Time-out error. http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/index.php?op=validate-xml-sitemap&go=1&sitemapurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcontainerforsale.co.uk%2Fsitemap.xml&submit=Validate
-
Its weird, the front page warning on Google webmaster for robots has disappeared now, but still got the warnings in the sitemap submission area. My host suggests I just wait a bit longer for Google to update because he said same as you - that there doesn't seem to be any robot.txt file.
-
Doesn't appear to be blocked, so maybe it has something to do with your /wp-includes/ directory.
Change the robots.txt file to this:
User-agent *
Disallow:
-
Hey Guys,
Thanks for your replies...the domain is http://containerforsale.co.uk ,My host told me to look in the Public HTML file folder for the robots.txt file and just delete it but can't see it in there?
My host said he found a tester site and it doesn't report any issues:
http://www.searchenginepromotionhelp.com/m/robots-text-tester/robots-checker.php
This is the display I get from http://containerforsale.co.uk/robots.txt
User-agent *
Disallow: /wp-admin/
Disallow: /wp-includes/ -
Hi Sofia,
Two things you need to consider when troubleshooting this:
The actual robots.txt file (located in the root directory of your site) and the meta-robots tags in the section of your HTML. When you say you checked the source code and the robots instructions were missing, I think you were talking about the meta-robots tags in the actual HTML of your site.
Webmaster Tools is probably referring to the actual robots.txt file in your domain's root path, which would differ entirely and not be visible by checking the HTML on your site. Like Nakul and Brent said, if you'll let us know your site's URL and paste the content of your robots.txt file here, I'm sure one of us can help you resolve the problem fairly quickly.
Thanks!
Anthony
-
copy whatever you have in your robots.txt file here and we will tell you the issue.
SEOmoz has a great article about Robots.txt files here: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/robotstxt
-
The robots.txt would probably not be a part of the Wordpress Configuration. Allow indexing is controlled via Meta Data by the Wordpress Architecture.
I would look for something like this in yourdomain.com/robots.txt
disallow /
or something like that. If that does not help, PM me your site URL and I would be glad to look it up for you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Role of Robots.txt and Search Console parameters settings
Hi, wondering if anyone can point me to resources or explain the difference between these two. If a site has url parameters disallowed in Robots.txt is it redundant to edit settings in Search Console parameters to anything other than "Let Googlebot Decide"?
Technical SEO | | LivDetrick0 -
Robots.txt in subfolders and hreflang issues
A client recently rolled out their UK business to the US. They decided to deploy with 2 WordPress installations: UK site - https://www.clientname.com/uk/ - robots.txt location: UK site - https://www.clientname.com/uk/robots.txt
Technical SEO | | lauralou82
US site - https://www.clientname.com/us/ - robots.txt location: UK site - https://www.clientname.com/us/robots.txt We've had various issues with /us/ pages being indexed in Google UK, and /uk/ pages being indexed in Google US. They have the following hreflang tags across all pages: We changed the x-default page to .com 2 weeks ago (we've tried both /uk/ and /us/ previously). Search Console says there are no hreflang tags at all. Additionally, we have a robots.txt file on each site which has a link to the corresponding sitemap files, but when viewing the robots.txt tester on Search Console, each property shows the robots.txt file for https://www.clientname.com only, even though when you actually navigate to this URL (https://www.clientname.com/robots.txt) you’ll get redirected to either https://www.clientname.com/uk/robots.txt or https://www.clientname.com/us/robots.txt depending on your location. Any suggestions how we can remove UK listings from Google US and vice versa?0 -
Is there a limit to how many URLs you can put in a robots.txt file?
We have a site that has way too many urls caused by our crawlable faceted navigation. We are trying to purge 90% of our urls from the indexes. We put no index tags on the url combinations that we do no want indexed anymore, but it is taking google way too long to find the no index tags. Meanwhile we are getting hit with excessive url warnings and have been it by Panda. Would it help speed the process of purging urls if we added the urls to the robots.txt file? Could this cause any issues for us? Could it have the opposite effect and block the crawler from finding the urls, but not purge them from the index? The list could be in excess of 100MM urls.
Technical SEO | | kcb81780 -
Blocked jquery in Robots.txt, Any SEO impact?
I've heard that Google is now indexing links and stuff available in javascript and jquery. My webmastertools is showing that some links are blocked in robots.txt of jquery. Sorry I'm not a developer or designer. I want to know is there any impact of this on my SEO? and also how can I unblock it for the robots? Check this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/3VDWikC.png
Technical SEO | | hammadrafique0 -
I accidentally blocked Google with Robots.txt. What next?
Last week I uploaded my site and forgot to remove the robots.txt file with this text: User-agent: * Disallow: / I dropped from page 11 on my main keywords to past page 50. I caught it 2-3 days later and have now fixed it. I re-imported my site map with Webmaster Tools and I also did a Fetch as Google through Webmaster Tools. I tweeted out my URL to hopefully get Google to crawl it faster too. Webmaster Tools no longer says that the site is experiencing outages, but when I look at my blocked URLs it still says 249 are blocked. That's actually gone up since I made the fix. In the Google search results, it still no longer has my page title and the description still says "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more." How will this affect me long-term? When will I recover my rankings? Is there anything else I can do? Thanks for your input! www.decalsforthewall.com
Technical SEO | | Webmaster1230 -
Does Bing ignore robots txt files?
Bonjour from "Its a miracle is not raining" Wetherby Uk 🙂 Ok here goes... Why despite a robots text file excluding indexing to site http://lewispr.netconstruct-preview.co.uk/ is the site url being indexed in Bing bit not Google? Does bing ignore robots text files or is there something missing from http://lewispr.netconstruct-preview.co.uk/robots.txt I need to add to stop bing indexing a preview site as illustrated below. http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/preview-bing-indexed.jpg Any insights welcome 🙂
Technical SEO | | Nightwing0 -
Delete old site but redirect domain to a new domain and site
I just have a quick query and I have a feeling about what the answer is so just wanted to see what you guys thought... Basically I am working on a client site. This client has a few other websites that are divisions of their company. However these divisions/websites are no longer used. They are wanting to delete the websites but redirect the domains to their name main website. They believe this will pass on SEO benefits as these old division sites are old and have a good PR and history. I'm unsure for DEFINITE, which way is correct?
Technical SEO | | Weerdboil0 -
Index forum sites
Hi Moz Team, somehow the last question i raised a few days ago not only wasnt answered up until now, it was also completely deleted and the credit was not "refunded" - obviously there was some data loss involved with your restructuring. Can you check whether you still find the last question and answer it quickly? I need the answer 🙂 Here is one more question: I bought a website that has a huge forum, loads of pages with user generated content. Overall around 500.000 Threads with 9 Million comments. The complete forum is noindex/nofollow when i bought the site, now i am thinking about what is the best way to unleash the potential. The current system is vBulletin 3.6.10. a) Shall i first do an update of vbulletin to version 4 and use the vSEO tool to make the URLs clean, more user and search engine friendly before i switch to index/follow? b) would you recommend to have the forum in the folder structure or on a subdomain? As far as i know subdomain does take lesser strenght from the TLD, however, it is safer because the subdomain is seen as a separate entity from the regular TLD. Having it in he folder makes it easiert to pass strenght from the TLD to the forum, however, it puts my TLD at risk c) Would you release all forum sites at once or section by section? I think section by section looks rather unnatural not only to search engines but also to users, however, i am afraid of blasting more than a millionpages into the index at once. d) Would you index the first page of a threat or all pages of a threat? I fear duplicate content as the different pages of the threat contain different body content but the same Title and possibly the same h1. Looking forward to hear from you soon! Best Fabian
Technical SEO | | fabiank0