Open Site Explorer.. Bit of a let down?
-
Hi, not too sure if this is a discussion or rant!?
I’ve been following SEOMoz for a couple of years now. Testing their tools, reading their blogs, sharing their content, and watching the whiteboard Friday videos (massive thumbs up to that one!). They are at the top of the game, no argument there.
Although I should have done so much earlier, I have eventually signed up to the pro version and am about to migrate all my clients over. But there is one major caveat which I’m not sure should exist.. Open Site Explorer.
Don’t get me wrong, OSE provides invaluable metrics, some that no other ‘crawler’ provides, but it is far from perfect, there are things that we SEO’s need, and are hoping to get!
Some feature SEOMoz could add;
- Ability to view a chart of ‘link types’ (i.e. blog post, social media, Press Release etc..) – Linkdex do this!
- Utilise a ‘fresh‘ backlink index as Majestic SEO do. ( we do use majestic alongside SEOMoz)
- Crawl more frequently – enough said!
- Index all ‘not so good’ backlinks – this will help identify what backlinks AREN’T helping.
I realise this is a lot easier said than done, and I’m sure SEOMoz are working on solutions.. just can’t wait till they launch!
What do you think? IS OSE more than it’s cracked up to be? Could it be improved? Let me know
Lee
-
Wow Rand, thanks for such a detailed and frank answer, I now have a better understanding of the issues you face.. it's much more complex than I imagined. Great to see that you''re doing all you can, look forward to the improvements.
Have a great week! Lee
-
Hi Lee - thanks for bringing these up! I'll try to answer with regards to each of the items you've mentioned:
#1 - This is very tough at our scale (literally 1 trillion+ links, and in the latest index about to launch, 150 billion+ pages across nearly 200 million domains). However, you're correct that we're working towards a classification system that will lean on some seeding + machine learning + user input. I'd suspect 12-18 months before we can launch it, though.
#2 - This is not currently in the plans, at least not at full web scale. We will have Blogscape back up and running soon, and that crawls ~10mm+ fresh sources daily, so if you have a link/mention on a blog/forum/news site with any notoriety, we should be catching those and updating hopefully every 6-8 hours. Mozscape (aka Linkscape, our full web index), will continue to be at least 2-4 weeks between updates and will require 3-4 weeks of processing. We're trying some new things on the technology side, but it's a huge challenge to get to Google's scale and keep our metrics, sorting, views, etc. Majestic can do this with their index because they simply export links directly into the consummable portion of the app, but it limits the sorting/views/filters and ability to generate high quality metrics like PA/DA/mozRank/etc.
#3 - Yup. Definitely agree and working on it. We're trying some new hardware stuff, new parallelization of processing and everything under the sun to make it work.
#4 - Our next index will probably have a lot more of this (and we'll be watching carefully to see how this performs for our customers). We're also working to build a spam score that maps against what we've seen Google penalize/ban over time (currently doing a bunch of research there), so you can get a good sense of what things are likely to be hit over time.
Mozscape/OSE is a huge priority for us and we have 7 extremely talented folks working night and day (and a lot of weekends) to improve this. In the next 3-6 months, it will get massively better than it is today - the next new index is only a few days away now, and after that, we shouldn't ever have such a long period without an update (this round was an impossibly hard-to-fathom confluence of problems that we've taken many steps to prevent from ever happening again).
Thanks for your patience and the good questions.
-
Ignore the last reply John, have just tested Link Detective on a site that I know the link backlink profile of.. it's massively inaccurate! The tool simply isn't able to identify correct link types as they suggest. Dissapointing!
-
I've read they would be indexing 2 x the data Anthony, not 3 x. Suppose there must be some confusion out there, fingers crossed it's 3 x the data!
-
Cheers John, will take a look when I get the chance.. have you used it before? Is it accurate?
Enjoy the weekend! Lee
-
Thanks for all the feedback guys, would be good to hear SEOMoz's official stance on this!
-
You might find this tool helpful to analyse your downloaded report from OSE http://www.linkdetective.com/
-
I have to agree with Kevin on this one...
Items 2,3,and 4 are days away.
Does it suck that OSE's Linkscape Index hasn't been updated since the end of February? YEP!
Will it be worth the wait next week when it is updated and contains three times the data as the previous crawls? YEP!
I consider SEOMoz a community, and though Linkscape's stagnant data is causing some issues, I realize that once those issues are resolved that I'll be getting more bang for my buck than I did before, and I'm totally willing to struggle for a month in order to have better tools at my disposal for many months to come.
Rand and SEOMoz are drastically improving the volume of data that we will have at our disposal. That takes time and resources. They aren't raising prices or making excuses, they're working out bugs and improving the service. I'll take it.
Anthony
-
Lee,
First, I need to say I OSE - it's invaluable in my forensic audit work. Having said that, I would LOVE to see the "link types" chart. The biggest challenge I expect they'd face in that is properly detecting where a link is on a page, or what class to put it in due to how unspectacular code consistency really is across the vast web. For example, I've seen others attempt this and fail miserably ( what should be identified as a sidebar (blogroll type) link is often seen as something else, and what should be seen as a main content area link is often seen as a sidebar link (too many WP themes for example, label their main content area divs as "sidebar2" for example).
And that just gets worse / more challenging when the need comes in identifying if a site is really a blog, or some other site that happens to use WordPress as it's platform.
Having said all that, I would be in heaven if the Moz team could get that data into OSE
-
From following all the talk, I'm pretty sure they are working on points 2, 3 & 4.
While all that is good, I personally feel they should concentrate on updating more often first, then move towards giving those extra features. The two month stretch between updates has been a real pain in the ass. But I'm sure they know that.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Get into Google : New Sites
I have a brand new website. It was created 10 days ago. How long would it take for it to show up in search results? I understand that since the site is new, there are no sites sending it backlinks. Also, i have optimized the page for my keyword "xyz" and it received an A grade. The site does not figure even in the top 50 results. Please help me out. It is a one page web application that needs to drive traffic to survive.
Moz Pro | | dl_s0 -
How can I prevent errors of duplicate page content generated by my tags from my wordpress on-site blog platform?
When I add meta data and a canonical reference to my blog tags for my on-site blog which works using a wordpress.org template, Roger generates errors of duplicate content. How can I avoid this problem? I want to use up to 5 tags per post, with the same canonical reference and each campaign scan generates errors/warnings for me!
Moz Pro | | ZoeAlexander0 -
I can't find any inbound links that I know I have on open site, ahref or majestic. Does anyone know why?
Since the linkscape update before Christmas I have built a couple of links to fairly high quality sites. I can't find them on open site though or the other tools I mentioned. I'm a bit concerned there is an issue with my site. Does anyone have any idea why? I'm stumped. My site: www.emporiumofmanliness.co.uk
Moz Pro | | EmpofMan0 -
Competitive Link Comparison vs. Open Site Explorer
I get different external followed links showing in the Competitive Link Comparison vs. Open Site Explorer. The total number of links is different as well. I thought this was the same info - just one tracks ongoing and one is just a "one-off" tool. Is this not the case? Do the count links differently? Thanks! Kevin
Moz Pro | | yandl0 -
Csv download from open site explorer
After I run a report in Open Site explorer and download the csv, the bar says it processing # of 10,000 links, when the report is done and i open it there are only 450 links
Moz Pro | | thesea0 -
Open Site Explorer Says I have 1,627 inbound links, but only downloads 275\. Am I missing something?
Is there a feature i'm missing out on here? I want to download the complete link profile, but I only see 275 of 1,627 links when I export to CSV. Any guidance would be appreciated!
Moz Pro | | lipoweb0 -
Site recently updated- are my campaign results really accurate?
I recently updated a website and it seems as though my campaign results are not accurate. I feel that the more I learn about SEO, the less I know (if that makes sense?). Every time I check my campaign results for this site I feel like I am missing something but just don't know where to begin. The site is aphroditedesserts.com For example, "aphrodite desserts" is one of my keywords. When I type that into Google, it automatically pulls up the site as #1. But in my campaign, it shows that "aphrodite desserts" does not rank in the top 50 for google. Why is this? (I know there is a lot I could do to improve the SEO keywords on this site, but I am limited because of the client's budget.) However, if I could just get a handle on the answers for these types of issues, I think I would feel much more confident as an SEO specialist. Right now I feel more like a fraud. =( Any insight into what may be causing this would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
Moz Pro | | RuthWrites0 -
Potential site architecture problem.
We are experiencing a problem in which category pages do not appear to be passing Page Authority to subcategory pages. See the example below: Home page has PA of 47 http://www.minespress.com/ The next level category page down has a PA of 34 http://www.minespress.com/category/apparel The next sub category down has PA of 1, and shows no links at all in spite of the fact that we got to it from a category link http://www.minespress.com/category/golf-shirts The page in question is crawlable, is indexed and has nothing that we can see that would be prevent it from showing Page Authority and a link profile using your tools. Do we have a site architecture problem?
Moz Pro | | smines0