301 redirect
-
Guys
Another post by me in regard to a 301 redirect which follows on from this post here
http://www.seomoz.org/q/seomoz-crawl-test
To quickly summarise all i have done is change URL name and done a simple 301 to change name where respective urls form old go to the relevant new pages
Ok Now 14 weeks since we implemented our 301, Originally done In PHP everything looked text book but still 80% down on rankings PR has returned to inner pages Home page has not updated
After some advice from some of the members here i changed the 301 on the old domain name from PHP to Htaccess
This is the code i used on the old server is below
RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newsite.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L]
On the new site the canonical is fixed by PHP , i want to change this to Htaccess, capturing the canonical element along with removing the trailing slash (This is only what has been done in the past so just keeping consistant)
This is the situation
Old site sits on a different server from the new so each have their own individual I.P addresses
I am convinced somewhere in the PHP application we are chaining so want Htaccess on old server to do the 301 and want htaccess on new server to deal with canonical elements and remove trailing slash (if that best practice)
What would be the best way to do this where we wont be chaining 301's
at present all looks perfect and doing what it should, but i know there is an issue and i believe it to be with the php script
Thanks for taking the time to look
Paul
Ps where i had the issue on the old site where Crawl test said page don't exist i now have on the new site if i try and crawl the non www. version of the new site , tested on a site that has the htaccess 301 in place and get the option of crawling the old or the new page so something don't stack up so its not the tool its the PHP
Fetch as Googlebot and every other tool reports the correct header responses
-
Hi Patrick
Thanks for responding
I still have no rankings 80% down, its 14 weeks since i implemented the 301 and some of the inner pages are ranking (Therese are a lot lower than when we did the 301) however the home page even if i copy a line of text wont bring up my site.
The original 301 went textbook style and everything looked perfect, but rankings did not follow and all we did was a straightforward name change
My developer insisted on doing this in PHP however most his functions and he states when i asked him for the code "The 301 on the new site is integrated into the application and has dependences on other functions, which in turn will have dependences on other functions, which would basically mean handing over a substantial amount of code. Potentially most of the application"
So basically on the outside i am 100% convinced that the 301 is chaining somewhere causing me a problem, so i am going to change both old and new sites for htaccess
I currently have this single line on the old site
RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.newdomain.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L]
Originally tried the below but got an internal 500 error (ps any reason why that would give me a internal server error) as below would have been my preferred code
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^olddomain.com$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.olddomain.com$
RewriteRule (.*)$ http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]I think really what i need is the answer to is what do i put on the old site which is on server 1 is it just a single line 301
and on the new site which is dealing with the canonicals and removal of trailing slash
The original issue came when i changed URL name, and it was only the crawler that brought to light that i could not crawl the non www. version of my site (even though it is the www. version i wanted to crawl because the crawler should have gave a message that the site is 301 to the ww,
. version but it said page unavailable, however doing it on a colleagues site which had been correctly 301'd gave a message that the site had moved do you want to crawl the current or the new page ... so the crawl test will pick up on a 301 if implemented correctly
Hope that made sense
-
Hi Paul,
I've read this post and your initial post and I'm trying to figure out exactly what you are still having problems with. Is the issue that your rankings/traffic tanked after you implemented the 301 redirects from the non-www version of the site to the www version 3 months ago and you haven't seen any improvement since? Or are you just having issues with the SEOmoz site crawler? It really shouldn't matter if you use PHP or .htaccess for handling redirects since they are both on the server side, so there might be something else causing problems. I wouldn't worry about PR since it's natural for it to take awhile to move over to the new version of the page and plus PR by itself is not all that important anyways.
I'm willing to investigate further if you can provide some more details.
- Patrick
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirecting back to initial redirect.
Hello, I have an example site A.com that is currently being redirected to site B.com. My client is having issues with B.com and finding that there is more equity in site A.com. The client now wants us to have A.com as the site. What is the best way to proceed with implementing A.com without hurting search in the long run, since A.com was initially a 301 redirect to B.com. How should I proceed in this redirection back to A.com What pitfalls should I look out for that could affect SEO and how should I input safegaurds to protect myself? I appreciate the support
Moz Pro | | arousta0 -
301 or canonical for multiple homepage versions?
I used 301 redirects to point several versions of the homepage to www.site.com. i was just rereading moz's beginners guide to seo, and it uses that scenario as an example for rel canonical, not 301 redirects. Which is better? My understanding is that 301s remove all doubt of getting links to the wrong version and diluting link equity.
Moz Pro | | kimmiedawn0 -
Temporary Redirect Notice regarding Wordpress
Hello, Under the warnings in Moz, we have 44 temporary redirect warnings showing up because we moved our blog from timelinkblogs.wordpress.org to our subdomain blog.timelink.org within Wordpress. Wordpress indicates that these were permanent 301 redirects, but Moz is indicating that they are temporary. We want to be sure that they are permanent so we retain the SEO credit. Can someone please confirm that these are permanent redirects i.e. http://blog.timelink.com/2012/02/17/true-stories-time-and-attendance-pay-rules-2 Moz is showing the following- it has a "trackback" added to the URL? http://blog.timelink.com/2012/02/17/true-stories-time-and-attendance-pay-rules-2/trackback/ Thanks!
Moz Pro | | AndreaKayal0 -
I did a redirect and now I'm getting duplication errors.
I was told by SEO Moz to do a redirect so that our website would be crawled with and without the www in front of the address. I did and now I'm getting duplicate page and title errors because the crawler is seeing www.oursitename.com and its underpages and oursitename.com and its underpages and giving me duplicate page content errors and duplicate page title errors. Makes sense, but how do I make it stop? Anyone else have this problem?
Moz Pro | | THMCC0 -
Some questions on Canonical tag AND 301 redirect
Hi everyone, I'm new here - always loved SEOMoz and glad to be part of the Pro community now. I have 2 questions regarding the Canonical URL tag. Some background info: We used to run an OsCommerce store, and recently migrated to Magento. In doing so, we right away created 301 redirects of the old category pages (OsCommerce) to the new category pages (Magento) via the Magento admin. Example: www.example.com/old-widget-category.html
Moz Pro | | yacpro13
301 redicrected to
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html In Magento admin, we have enabled the Canonical tag for all product and category pages. Here's how Magento sets up the Canonical tag: The URL of interest which we want to rank is:
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html However Magento sets up the canonical tag on this page to point to:
www.example.com/old-widget-category.html When using the SEOMoz On Page Report Card, it pick this up as an error because the Canonical tag is pointing to a different URL. However, if we dig a little deeper, we see that the URL being pointed to
www.example.com/old-widget-category.html
has a 301 redirect to
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html
which is the URL we wan to rank. So because we set up a 301 redirect of the old-page to the new-page, on the new-page the canonical tag points to the old-page. Question 1)
What are you opinions on this? Do you think this method of setting up the Canonical tag is acceptable? Second question... We use pagination for category pages, so if we have 50 products in one category, we would have 5 pages of 10 products. The URL's would be: www.example.com/new-widget-category.html (which is the SAME as ?p=1)
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=1
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=2
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=3
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=4
www.example.com/new-widget-category.html?p=5 Now ALL the URLs above have the canonical tag set as:
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/new-widget-category" /> However, the content of each page (page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) is different because different products are displayed. So far most what I read regarding the Canonical tag is that it is used for pages that have the same content but different URLs. I would hope that Google would combine the content of all 5 pages and view the result as a single URL www.example.com/new-widget-category Question 2) Is using the canonical tag appropriate in the case described above? Thanks !0 -
We were unable to grade that page. We received a response code of 301\. URL content not parseable
I am using seomoz webapp tool for my SEO on my site. I have run into this issue. Please see the attached file as it has the screen scrape of the error. I am running an on page scan from seomoz for the following url: http://www.racquetsource.com/squash-racquets-s/95.htm When I run the scan I receive the following error: We were unable to grade that page. We received a response code of 301. URL content not parseable. This page had worked previously. I have tried to verify my 301 redirects and am unable to resolve this error. I can perform other on page scans and they work fine. Is this a known problem with this tool? I have verified ensuring I don't have it defined. Any help would be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | GeoffBatterham0 -
301 redirect in SEOMoz campaigns tool
I did a 301 redirect to another domain and I would like to change the domain name in SeoMoz campaigns tool to continue to track the keywords, is it possible ?
Moz Pro | | mhenriques0 -
Can I see backlinks to a specific URL, not including redirects?
Does SEOMoz have a tool that allows me to see backlinks to a specific URL sans redirected URLs? So, URL is www.website.com/search. www.website.com redirects to www.website.com/search and I want to see how many people have linked to the /search, the resulting URL. Thanks for any help! Erin
Moz Pro | | ErinTM0