Help fixing the traffic drop that started on 4 September 2012.
-
I'm happy to be a part of this wonderful community here and request help analysing my situation and would appreciate suggestions to fix the issues I'm facing.
First, The Website Setup -
We've a WordPress powered technology blog on main domain - http://www.crazyengineers.com & community forum on /community/ In the last 60 days, I've made following changes to the site that might have gone against us.
1. I added a sidebar to all the pages of our community forums to offer more useful information to the users, like recent threads, our latest exclusive interviews etc.
2. I added a descriptive welcome notice on all the pages of community at the top.
3. I added two ad-spots above the fold, didn't hurt user experience (IMHO).
4. I removed a LARGE number of unwanted tags from our WordPress blog that offered no value to visitors; resulting into Google Webmaster Tools reporting a large number of 404 - Page Not Found errors.
Point To Note: Since September 4, I've been noticing significant drop in our traffic to the 'community' forums. The traffic is down almost 40-50%. Corrective Measures I've Taken -
1. Made sure that all the removed tags show proper 404 HTTP status. I added a search box to the 404 pages so that users have opportunity to find what they're looking for.
2. Removed the two ad-spots and placed only one 728x90 leaderboard above the fold.
3. We never engaged in any black-hat SEO techniques, link-building or content-copying. I double checked whether there are any suspicious activities reported in GWT but haven't spotted any.
I'd really appreciate analysis of what might have really gone wrong and the direction in which I should proceed to recover our traffic.
-
Thank you for your words and interest in our website. We tend to focus on latest in engineering, technology (gadgets too) for our blog. Our aim is to simplify the latest in engineering & technology for people who're interested in being up to date with technical stuff.
Do you have any suggestions on setting up 301s as Rand suggested (I've stated my requirements towards the bottom of this thread.
-
I appreciate you hanging in there and glad Rand jumped in to assist. Thanks also for not being offended at my observations. I think it's super cool that you are a "gadget news" site. I signed up to follow your blog Please keep us posted on how this goes. I hope the suggestions you receive here help you to recover from the traffic drop.
-
Rand, Had to say that I am impressed on a lot of levels. But, I always have been.
Best to you and yours,
Robert
-
Well, makes sense. So leaving the 404s are they are, is more suicidal than 301'in them to relevant category pages? In our case, we only have one category called 'VoiCE' that gets all the news articles (from where the tags were deleted). So I'd be redirecting the tags to www.crazyengineers.com/category/voice/ .
But would it not be better to redirect them to homepage?
Also - is there any way to setup a 301 redirect for only the deleted 'tag' pages? I'd like to keep the 404 pages for other locations that are not existent. I'd really appreciate inputs on setting up 301s. Can't afford to go wrong.
I want www.crazyengineers.com/tag/ <deleted tag="">to 301 to http://www.crazyengineers.com or maybe the category.</deleted>
-
I think 404'ing is a worse "suicide" than 301s. And as I noted above, you can start by redirecting a few bunches, then see if things improve.
-
Wouldn't be disastrous (certainly no more than a 404). Better would be to redirect the tags to relevant category pages, though.
-
Rand - a simple question: There are about 20k tags that are removed. It's impossible to fix each one of them manually. Would you recommend redirecting each of the deleted tags to homepage (via 301)? Wouldn't that be disastrous to SEO?
-
Well, yes and I want to know what's the best way to fix these errors. I checked my backups and I don't have any way to restore those tags and associate them to relevant posts. I've received mixed responses about adding 301 redirects to the deleted tags - some say I should 301 all the deleted tag pages to homepage and some say it'd be a SEO suicide.
I believe the deleted tags were not helping much. They were the 'descriptive keywords' associated with posts and most of them were used just once.
What's your suggestion?
-
Sounds like it - fixing/redirecting those 404s is definitely a first step. You may also need to see if the content on those pages and the links to them were helping your SEO, and if for the future, you need to repoint/recreate categories that were lost or work on XML sitemaps + accessibility to recover.
Once you start down a path, just watch and see if you're recovering. You should know fairly quickly if you're on the right track.
-
Hello Rand,
First of all - I must mention that you're super-awesome and I'm a big fans of yours. I really appreciate your help.
Allow me to summarize: I deleted about 20-25k tags from wordpress (www.crazyengineers.com) which were added by our authors over a period of time (1.5 years). Each removed tag resulted into 404 error.
GWT reported large number of 404 errors on the site and at the same time (around 5th September), traffic from Google started declining. The to the overall site is down and it's quite noticeable on /community/ (where our forums reside). Over 70% of our traffic is from Google and our overall traffic (visits) are down by about 50%. I noticed that the keywords that used to rank high have slipped by 5-6 positions and some even got pushed to page 2.
Please let me know if this information is sufficient. I'll be happy to provide more information. I think my situation is similar to the following discussion -> http://www.seomoz.org/q/seek-help-correcting-large-number-of-404-errors-generated-95-traffic-halt
-
Kaustubh - before I could help, I need to know what you mean by "40-50% traffic drop"?
Is that:
- Traffic as a whole (all visits?)
- Traffic from Google?
- Branded or unbranded search traffic?
- If unbranded search, which keywords? Long tail? Or some specific head terms?
Knowing those will help sort out what might be the problem. Sorry if my answers are slow - I'm a bit overwhelmed ATM, but will try to hop back in when I can.
-
Okay, so I'm quite sure that it's the large number of 404s causing the drop. I've arrived at the conclusion after reading several threads on SEOmoz. This thread: http://www.seomoz.org/q/seek-help-correcting-large-number-of-404-errors-generated-95-traffic-halt is quite closer to the problem we're facing.
Now, the big question :-
1. GWT reports ~90k "Page Not Found 404" errors and our traffic is down by almost 50%.
2. The 404 pages are all generated via the 'wordpress tags' I removed in bulk (almost 25k of them).
Should I go and 301/302 them or just let Google decide the fate of those pages on its own? If I just let Google do that; it might take 3-4 months for Google to do that.
Any possibility of having Rand to answer this question for me?
-
Hello Robert,
I apologies if my response looked like I'm defending the changes. I'm not defending the changes because my intension is to learn and fix the issues our site is experiencing. I really appreciate your responses, but want to make sure that the situation is properly understood so everyone's on the same page.
The traffic to the community is not from the homepage or the blog. The community forums draw their own traffic and the discussions were ranked high in Google searches.
The questions on my mind are -
1. Is it possible that the large number of errors on blog might have caused the community rankings go down? (The GWT notice and traffic drop to community were almost around the same time)
2. Is it the sidebar in the community that's responsible?
3. Is it the page layout algorithm that's affecting community rankings?
-
Kaustubh,
If I am forthright, I would say that first you are defending changes. What I would approach the problem from is what can be reverted that would correct your drop. Remember none of us here are your customer/community. We can only speak to what we know or see and as such we have little or no emotional involvement in the site.
I went back to your original question and pulled this:
_"Point To Note: _Since September 4, I've been noticing significant drop in our traffic to the'community' forums. The traffic is down almost 40-50%."
Where does traffic "...to the community forums." come from? Is it direct to that landing page? Or, does it come from the home page?
I am guessing that with Dana and I that we both were assuming the traffic was originating at the home page. (Traffic to our community forums). Unfortunately, I could not see a cached page of the forum for a side by side.
So, unless you can lay it out in more analytical fashion, there is little to offer in the way of assistance. Your changes are likely what caused the drop. That is the only place I can think of to correct it.
Hope it helps.
-
Hello Robert,
First of all, thanks a lot for such a detailed response. Allow me to post my comments -
1. The list of changes I made is limited to what I mentioned in the first post. I never messed around with meta description, or link building or anything for the sake of 'SEO'. So that's not what I'd look at.
2. Most important point: The traffic to blog is almost normal (just down about 10%, but it bounces any-time we publish a breaking news).
3. It's the traffic to our community: http://www.crazyengineers.com/community/ that's getting affected. The sidebar was introduced on all the /community/ pages; the blog has remained intact, except for the bulk removal of tags.
So, I'm wondering whether it's the 'tag' removal from blog that's affecting the 'community' or something else? If it's the page layout, then I've already removed the ads; and now have only 1 ad-unit above the fold on community pages, and one below the fold. This is no doubt, acceptable.
-
Kasutubh
I think Dana gives some great places to look. The first place to look from my vantage would be Google Analytics (GA). I would go back to the good old days and start moving forward to find what happened when. Especially if you know you made change one on day one, change two on day four.
That said, I think it is a cautionary to any who are changing site structure/architecture or anything within the realm of UI/UX that results of changes can only be tracked to the degree that a single variant is isolated/isolatable. (Yes, there could be an argument to this-I am speaking broadly).
By making one change at a time, you are able to insure you have no oops moment that is lost in 5 changes of redesign.
I would focus on what most likely effected the ability of the user to get to the site. Did you change meta descriptions, were any outside the site changes made; do you advertise somewhere and now have halted it?
At the end of pondering I keep coming back to the ad changes and am wondering if the look of a month ago and now is so different you are getting people to the site but they are not going deeper (analytics will tell)? OK I have a thought. AH HA:
Using the wayback machine, I looked at home page cache from July vs Now. I like July 100% better. (Dana, don't think it was the tag cloud even though I am not much on them.)
I think you have messed with a UI/UX issue and need to slowly step back. when I look at both pages I just do not like the look or feel of the new. It is sterile, too news oriented. There is not a community feel at all. On July cache I have the FaceBook app showing people who are a part of your community (a good example of this is a site called SEOmoz), below that I have what an engineer said. They get to be involved. I was just looking at wired magazine and I had no sense of community but I did not pick it up for that. Here I came for community, saw a question that intrigued me, liked what Dana was saying and wondered if there was anything I could add. THINK ABOUT IT.
If I had to place a $100 bet right now, it would be that this is where your problem lies.
I hope this provides some direction,
All the best,
-
1. I've removed the tag cloud.
2. We're Google News blog and the posts aren't 'promotions'. Those are latest 'news' articles from the gadget world. We're a Google News accepted technology blog that frequently breaks stories.
3. Buy advertising is a common link on most of the blogs and that does not indicate we are all about 'advertising'.
4. I checked the traffic and it seems like the keywords aren't generating the traffic they used to. Now that does not tell me anything - it could be because the site went down in rankings and keywords aren't getting listed or the traffic to keywords shaded.
I look forward to responses from other members.
-
I would try getting rid of the tag cloud and see what happens. maybe it has no impact, maybe it solves the problem, at least you'll be able to eliminate it as the culprit.
The homepage of the blog. All of the blog posts were news stories about products, promotional stories, added to Adwords Ads, banner ads, and a big link in the navigation that says "Buy advertising"...all sent signals to me as a visitor that this site was about profiting from advertising.
Again, please don't be offended. I am one user, and I am only offering one user's opinion. I could be a sole instance, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
The best way I have ever found to keep track of historical rankings for keywords is SEOMoz Pro. You can get a free membership for 30 days.
If you had a good idea of what your rankings were before for specific keywords, put them into simple text list and load them into SEOBook's RankChecker Firefox extension and see where you are at now compared to where you used to be. Just beware that if you load in more than 50 words at one time to Rank Checker it will probably crash, so do them in groups if you have to.
I certainly hope this helps in some way. I understand how disconcertin huge drops in traffic can be.
Good luck!
-
Hello Dana,
Thank you for your response. I'm of course not offended and I'm willing to learn & improve.
1. I can get rid of the tag cloud - but is it a big deal? The cloud only lists the most frequently used tags.
2. Could you please point me to the page/section that looks like a collection of advertisements? I think we're very reasonable in putting up advertisements.
3. How do I check rankings for specific keywords?
-
Have you tried getting rid of your Tag Cloud?
My initial thought as a first-time user is that your site is a collection of advertisements. Please, don't be offended. I know that's not probably what you are intending, it was just my impression.
Try taking out the tag cloud and see if there is any positive result.
Have you been tracking your rankings for important keywords? Have these changed recently?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Href lang issues - help needed!
Hi, I have an issue with Google indexing the US version of our website rather than the UK version on Google.co.uk. I have added hreflang tags to both sites (https://www.pacapod.com/ and https://us.pacapod.com/), have updated and submitted an XML sitemap for each website and checked that the country targeting in search console is set-up correctly but Google are still indexing the wrong website. I would be grateful for any assistance with this issue. Many thanks Eddie
Technical SEO | | mypetgiftbox0 -
Help: domain name change and Google News
Hi. I work for a regional news source, and our (separate) Spanish-language news publication recently changed its domain name. The publication lost its Google News inclusion. Most of their traffic came from Google News, so traffic tanked. They're trying to get back in. They reapplied but didn't get approved. They're now in the 30-day waiting period to reapply again. The website is run by a third-party company, which handled the domain name change in April (2015). That company has been running their site for a couple of years. Our in-house devs' hands are tied on helping, because we (at the mother company) don't manage their site. This third party has not been responsive. The Spanish pub folks have reached out to me to help them prepare for Round 2 of reapplication. I'm the mothership in-house SEO, but I've never experienced this situation before. Because everything seems to be in order besides the ham-handed changes, my best advice to them so far is: You'll have to wait until Google gets to know you again, unfortunately. Does that sound right? Any pointers out there for bringing their best possible A-game to the next round?
Technical SEO | | christyrobinson1 -
Duplicate Content Issues - Where to start???
Dear All I have recently joined a new company Just Go Holidays - www.justgoholidays.com I have used the SEO Moz tools (yesterday) to review the site and see that I have lots of duplicate content/pages and also lots of duplicate titles all of which I am looking to deal with. Lots of the duplicate pages appear to be surrounding, additional parameters that are used on our site to refine and or track various marketing campaigns. I have therefore been into Google Webmaster Tools and defined each of these parameters. I have also built a new XML sitemap and submitted that too. It looks as is we have two versions of the site, one being at www.justgoholidays.com and the other without the www It appears that there are no redirects from the latter to the former, do I need to use 301's here or is it ok to use canonicalisation instead? Any thoughts on an action plan to try to address these issues in the right order and the right way would be very gratefully received as I am feeling a little overwhelmed at the moment. (we also use a CMS system that is not particularly friendly and I think I will have to go directly to the developers to make lots of the required changes which is sure to cost - therefore really don't want to get this wrong) All the best Matt
Technical SEO | | MattByrne0 -
4xx fix
Hi
Technical SEO | | gavinr
I have quite a lot of 4xx errors on our site. The 4xx occurred because I cleaned poor URLs that had commas etc in them so its the old URLs that now 4xx. There are no links to the URLs that 4xx. What is the best way of rectifying this issue of my own making?! Thanks
Gavin0 -
Traffic Drop in 1 month!
Hi guys, ok, i'm at the end of my line with this one, my site www.golfclothingdirect.co.uk has taken a pounding since 4th April and i'm blowed if i can find a real reason for it. Traffic has been increasing slowly in line with budget, sales were picking up, and coming into season should have been better - 24th & 25th robot had an access issue - host contacted and said there had been a site issue, but resolved and now all A OK. Sales are terrible and traffic is grinding. All comments greatly taken on board! Thanks Mark
Technical SEO | | UrbanMark0 -
Starting a Blog and URL Structure Advice
Hello SEOmoz Community, We are going to start a blog on our website and have a slight dilemma. Our site is a .Net site and the blog platform we've chosen (BlogEngine) only allows us to use the following url structure: www.domain.com/blog/post/post-name. We've looked at other .Net blog software and this one meets all of our needs except for the ideal URL Structure. We would like to remove the /post/ directory; however have not technically found a way to do it. We wanted to get some opinions on whether or not we should just start with this URL structure and not worry about the extra directory, or work to find another solution that eliminates this extra directory. Ideally we want to keep the posts as close to the root as possible for link juice distribution, and the extra directory could get in the way. Also, if anyone has any advice on a more flexible .Net blog platform, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. We thank you so much in advance for your time and help.
Technical SEO | | All-Star-Vacation-Homes0 -
Need help with home page on site
Hello! Thanks for reading in advance! I've got a relatively old site (12 year old domain) that has experienced a drop in rankings specifically for our home page. Some of the key terms that I'd assume we would rank well for are: "expedite us passport" According to SEOMOZ, our on page optimization receives a C for the termr. also, the root domain and page have decent links, etc. However; looking at Google (logged out and in incognito mode in chrome), a page on our site http://www.passportsandvisas.com/passport/index.asp ranks well and our HOME page isn't listed in the top 50 or 100. THis is the case for a lot of keywords we used to rank well for. I would have thought our home page would have at least outranked an internal page. Any thoughts would be very, very helpful!
Technical SEO | | santiago230 -
Very, very confusing behaviour with 301s. Help needed!
Hi SEOMoz gang! Been a long timer reader and hangerouter here but now i need to pick your brains. I've been working on two websites in the last few days which are showing very strange behaviour with 301 redirects. Site A This site is an ecommerce stie stocking over 900 products and 000's of motor parts. The old site was turned off in Feb 2011 when we built them a new one. The old site had terrible problems with canonical URLs where every search could/would generate a unique ID e.g. domain.com/results.aspx?product=1234. When you have 000's of products and Google can find them it is a big problem. Or was. We launche the new site and 301'd all of the old results pages over to the new product pages and deleted the old results.aspx. The results.aspx page didn't index or get shown for months. Then about two months again we found some certain conditions which would mean we wouldn't get the right 301 working so had to put the results.aspx page back in place. If it found the product, it 301'd, if it didn't it redirected to the sitemap.aspx page. We found recently that some bizarre scenerio actually caused the results.aspx page to 200 rather than 301 or 404. Problem. We found this last week after our 404 count in GWMT went up to nearly 90k. This was still odd as the results.aspx format was of the OLD site rather than the new. The old URLs should have been forgetten about after several months but started appearing again! When we saw the 404 count get so high last week, we decided to take severe action and 301 everything which hit the results.aspx page to the home page. No problem we thought. When we got into the office on Monday, most of our product pages had been dropped from the top 20 placing they had (there were nearly 400 rankings lost) and on some phrases the old results.aspx pages started to show up in there place!! Can anyone think why old pages, some of which have been 301'd over to new pages for nearly 6 months would start to rank? Even when the page didn't exist for several months? Surely if they are 301's then after a while they should start to get lost in the index? Site B This site moved domain a few weeks ago. Traffic has been lost on some phrases but this was mainly due to old blog articles not being carried forward (what i'll call noisy traffic which was picked up by accident and had bad on page stats). No major loss in traffic on this one but again bizarre errors in GWMT. This time pages which haven't been in existence for several YEARS are showing up as 404s in GWMT. The only place they are still noted anywhere is in the redirect table on our old site. The new site went live and all of the pages which were in Googles index and in OpenSiteExplorer were handled in a new 301 table. The old 301s we thought we didn't need to worry about as they had been going from old page to new page for several years and we assumed the old page had delisted. We couldn't see it anywhere in any index. So... my question here is why would some old pages which have been 301'ing for years now show up as 404s on my new domain? I've been doing SEO on and off for seven years so think i know most things about how google works but this is baffling. It seems that two different sites have failed to prevent old pages from cropping up which were 301d for either months or years. Does anyone has any thoughts as to why this might the case. Thanks in advance. Andy Adido
Technical SEO | | Adido-1053990