Does this content get indexed?
-
A lot of content on this site is displayed in pop up pages.
Eg. Visit the Title page
http://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/corporate.nsf/web/Certificate+of+Title
To access the sample report or fee details, the info is shown in a pop up page with a strange url. Example:
http://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/corporate.nsf/web/Certificate+of+Title+-+Fee+Details
I can't see any of these pages being indexed in Google or other search engines when I do a site search: http://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/corporate.nsf/web/Certificate+of+Title+-+Fee+Details
Is there a way to get this content indexed besides telling the client to restructure this content?
-
I would absolutely agree with you that the FAQ and Help pages would be very useful for searchers, and that the current lack of branding on those pages is a problem. I'd be really tempted to integrate their content into regular pages that could be linked to as usual instead of as popups with no site navigation or breadcrumbs.
Good luck!
Paul
PS I agree it's the CMS using the "+" signs - big job to change them & create all the rewrite rules, but they sure are a usabiltiy issue!
-
Thanks, ThompsonPaul. I found the pages on Google eventually but I agree that the + signs make them look strange to a human user. I think it's their CMS that's doing this. I"ll check.
My initial idea was that the content on the FAQ pages was quite relevant and keyword rich and I wanted to ensure it was getting indexed. It looks like it is, but if someone hit that page from a search term the page isn't branded at all - looks quite spamming, so I don't think in it's current state it's worth trying to get more traffic.
I'll focus on the pages higher up in the directory in terms of internal and external links.
Thanks!
-
Those pages are linked using normal hrefs in the page's code, so there's no reason they couldn't be indexed. The popup effect is being created by a JavaScript onclick event, which, as its name implies, only fires after a visitor has clicked on a link, which wouldn't affect Google.
The site isn't doing itself any favours with its unusual use of a "plus" sign as a word delimiter in it's URLs instead of a hyphen, but that only makes the URLs look strange to a human user and also shouldn't affect the search engines.
Are those pages linked from anywhere else on the site? Because they're on a page that is 4 directories deep, and the page itself has quite a few links, it's entirely possible that the search engine simply isn't crawling deeply enough on the site to get those links.
Getting some external incoming links to those pages might help with indexing, as would linking to them from pages closer to the root of the domain. The FAQ page in particular might be worth earning some extra visibility.
The bigger question is - are they the kinds of pages a user would actually enter a search term for?
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any idea why pages are not being indexed?
Hi Everyone, One section on our website is not being indexed. The product pages are, but not some of the subcategories. These are very old pages, so thought it was strange. Here is an example one one: https://www.moregems.com/loose-cut-gemstones/prasiolite-loose-gemstones.html If you take a chunk of text, it is not found in Google. No issues in Bing/Yahoo, only Google. You think it takes a submission to Search Console? Jeff
Technical SEO | | vetofunk1 -
Follow no-index
I have a question about the right way to not index pages: With a canonical or follow no-index. First we have a blog page: **Blogpage **
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO
URL: /blog/
index follow Page 2 blog:
URL: /blog?=p2
index follow
rel="prev" /blog/
el="next" ?=p3 Nothing strange here i guess. But we also have other pages with chance on duplicate content: /SEO-category/
/SEO-category/view-more/ Because i don't want the "view-more" items to be indexed i want to set it on: follow no-index (follow to reach pages). But now the "view-more" also have pagination. What is the best way? Option 1:
/SEO-category/view-more/
Follow no-index /SEO-category/view-more?=p2
Follow no-index
rel="prev" /view-more/
el="next" ?=p3 Option 2: /SEO-category/view-more/
Canonical: /SEO-category/ /SEO-category/view-more?=p2
rel="prev" /view-more/
el="next" ?=p3 Option 3: Other suggests? Thanks!0 -
Why my website does not index?
I made some changes in my website after that I try webmaster tool FETCH AS GOOGLE but this is 2nd day and my new pages does not index www. astrologersktantrik .com
Technical SEO | | ramansaab0 -
What to do with 302 redirects being indexed
Hi there, Our site's forums include permalinks that for some reason uses an intermediary URL that 302 redirects to the URL with the permalink anchor. For example: http://en.tradimo.com/learn/chart-analysis/time-frames/ In the comments, there is a permalink to the following URL; en.tradimo.com/co/50c450005f2b949e3200001b/ (there is no content here, and never has been). This URL 302 redirects to the following final URL: http://en.tradimo.com/learn/chart-analysis/time-frames/?offset=0&limit=20#50c450005f2b949e3200001b The problem is, Google is indexing the redirect URL (en.tradimo.com/co/50c450005f2b949e3200001b/) and showing duplicate content even though we are using the nofollow tag on these links. Ideally, we would directly use the last link rather than redirecting. Alternatively, I'd say a 301 redirect would be preferable. But if both aren't available, is there a way to get these pages out of the index? Is the canonical tag the best way? I really wish I could just add /co/ to the robots.txt file, but I think they would still be in the index, right? Thanks for your help!
Technical SEO | | etruvian0 -
How do I get google to index the right pages with the right key word?
Hello I notice that even though I have a site map google is indexing the wrong pages under the wrong key words. As a result its not as relevant and is not ranking properly.
Technical SEO | | ursalesguru0 -
One landing page with lots of content or content hub?
Interested in getting some opinions on if it's better to build one great landing page with tons of content or build a good landing page and build more content (as blog posts?) and interlink them back to the landing/hub page? Thoughts and opinions? Chris
Technical SEO | | sanctuarymg0 -
Site not indexing correctly
I am trying to figure out what is going on with my site listings. Google is only displaying my title and url - no description. You can see it when you search for Franchises for Sale. The site is www.franchisesolutions.com. Why could this happen? Also I saw a big drop off in a handful of keyword rankings today. Could this be related?
Technical SEO | | franchisesolutions0 -
Noindex all dodgy content?
Hello should I be brutal with noindex? should I noindex anything of no value to websurfers? from my understanding, nofollow is different to to noindex? Google follows through the site crawling and discovering subpages but will not put the noindexed page in serps. Is that right? I have subcategory pages in a business directory site, these pages just have links to there subpages.
Technical SEO | | adamzski1