Duplicate content issue with trailing / ?
-
Hi ,I did a SEOmoz Crawl Test and found most pages show twice, for example:
A: www.website.com/index.php/dog/walk
B: www.website.com/index.php/dog/walk/
I've checked Google Analytics and 90% of organic search traffic arrives on the URLs with the trailing slash (B).
Question 1: Can I assume I've a duplicate content problem?
Question 2: Is it best to do 301 redirects from the 'non trailing slash' pages to the 'trailing slash pages'?
Question 3: For some reason every web page has a '/index.php' in it (see A&B) above. No idea why. Should it be a SEO concern?
Kind regards and thank you in advance
Nigel
-
Hi Nigel
You only need to 301 one of the pages, 301 is indicating a permanent move, so in the case you outlined above,
I would 301, A to B the decisions to use B was based soly off the value of the url you indicated. If for any reason you prefer the url's not use trailing slash then use A.
It also would not hurt to add a canonical tag to B
To be clear here, whether you use
website.com/index.php/dog/walk
or
website.com/index.php/dog/walk/
Does not matter as far as SEO is concerned, I would make my decision based off of which url has the highest position in Google, and be consistent with this method throughout my site.
Hope that helps,
-
Hi Irving
Thank you for your reply. You mention a good point regarding the sitemap.xml!
If I was to 301redirect pages A & B to a new page eg www.website.com/dog/walk/ then how would I also canonical A & B to the new page?
Surely once I have 301'd the A & B pages will be dead and redirecting traffic to the new page.
Kind regard and my apologies for any confusion.
Nigel
-
Yes, index.php should never show so 301 that plus the trailing slash to remove it
Ddefinitely canonical all of the pages to have the URL without the trailing slash
Make sure your sitemap xml files and internal linking structure does not have the trailing slash. if they do,, then fix them to reflect the proper URL
-
Thank you Highland & Donford.
Re my 3rd question, can I just clarify, should I now 301 redirect both A & B URLs to a new URL say www.website/com/dog/walk ?
Many thanks!
-
Question 1: Can I assume I've a duplicate content problem?
-YesQuestion 2: Is it best to do 301 redirects from the 'non trailing slash' pages to the 'trailing slash pages'?
-Yes 301 is best, barring that use rel="canonical" on the page you want to indexQuestion 3: For some reason every web page has a '/index.php' in it (see A&B) above. No idea why. Should it be a SEO concern?
-Yes, this is a concern, use the same method to deal with the problem. Directories on the server side are usually assumed to have an index, if not the server can choose what to display, this can be very bad sometimes. As such most CMS content management systems fix the problem by generating content for the index.php or .html pages. However, there can be duplicate content issues since there are 2 urls with the same content, use 301 to get rid of the index.php at directory levels, or use canonical tags.
Hope that helps,
Don
-
1. Google can generally tell the difference between pages that have syntactically similar URLs but it's considered a best practice to not make any engine do any guesswork whenever possible.
2. I would 301 one version just for uniformity but you should be fine as-is right now.
3. There's nothing wrong with that being in the URL. Google sees it as part of the URL and nothing more. I don't consider it aesthetic or user friendly but that's a different matter.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content Question
I have a client that operates a local service-based business. They are thinking of expanding that business to another geographic area (a drive several hours away in an affluent summer vacation area). The name of the existing business contains the name of the city, so it would not be well-suited to market 'City X' business in 'City Y'. My initial thought was to (for the most part) 'duplicate' the existing site onto a new site (brand new root domain). Much of the content would be the exact same. We could re-word some things so there aren't entire lengthy paragraphs of identical info, but it seems pointless to completely reinvent the wheel. We'll get as creative as possible, but certain things just wouldn't change. This seems like the most pragmatic thing to do given their goals, but I'm worried about duplicate content. It doesn't feel as though this is spammy though, so I'm not sure if there's cause for concern.
Technical SEO | | stevefidelity0 -
Duplicate content and rel canonicals?
Hi. I have a question relating to 2 sites that I manage with regards to duplicate content. These are 2 separate companies but the content is off a data base from the one(in other words the same). In terms of the rel canonical, how would we do this so that google does not penalise either site but can also have the content to crawl for both or is this just a dream?
Technical SEO | | ProsperoDigital0 -
Duplicate Content
Hi, I'm working on a site and I'm having some issues with its structure causing duplicate content. The first issue is that the search pages will show up as duplicates.
Technical SEO | | OOMDODigital
A search for new inventory may be new.aspx
The duplicate may be something like new.aspx=page1, or something like that and so on. The second issue is with inventory. When new inventory gets put into the stock of the store, a new page for that item will be populated with duplicate content. There appears to be no canonical source for that page. How can I fix both of these? Thanks!0 -
Development Website Duplicate Content Issue
Hi, We launched a client's website around 7th January 2013 (http://rollerbannerscheap.co.uk), we originally constructed the website on a development domain (http://dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk) which was active for around 6-8 months (the dev site was unblocked from search engines for the first 3-4 months, but then blocked again) before we migrated dev --> live. In late Jan 2013 changed the robots.txt file to allow search engines to index the website. A week later I accidentally logged into the DEV website and also changed the robots.txt file to allow the search engines to index it. This obviously caused a duplicate content issue as both sites were identical. I realised what I had done a couple of days later and blocked the dev site from the search engines with the robots.txt file. Most of the pages from the dev site had been de-indexed from Google apart from 3, the home page (dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk, and two blog pages). The live site has 184 pages indexed in Google. So I thought the last 3 dev pages would disappear after a few weeks. I checked back late February and the 3 dev site pages were still indexed in Google. I decided to 301 redirect the dev site to the live site to tell Google to rank the live site and to ignore the dev site content. I also checked the robots.txt file on the dev site and this was blocking search engines too. But still the dev site is being found in Google wherever the live site should be found. When I do find the dev site in Google it displays this; Roller Banners Cheap » admin <cite>dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk/</cite><a id="srsl_0" class="pplsrsla" tabindex="0" data-ved="0CEQQ5hkwAA" data-url="http://dev.rollerbannerscheap.co.uk/" data-title="Roller Banners Cheap » admin" data-sli="srsl_0" data-ci="srslc_0" data-vli="srslcl_0" data-slg="webres"></a>A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more.This is really affecting our clients SEO plan and we can't seem to remove the dev site or rank the live site in Google.Please can anyone help?
Technical SEO | | SO_UK0 -
Duplicate content vs. less content
Hi, I run a site that is currently doing very well in google for the terms that we want. We are 1,2 or 3 for our 4 targeted terms, but havent been able to jump to number one in two categories that I would really like to. In looking at our site, I didn't realize we have a TON of duplicate content as seen by SEO moz and I guess google. It appears to be coming from our forum, we use drupal. RIght now we have over 4500 pages of duplicate content. Here is my question: How much is this hurting us as we are ranking high. Is it better to kill the forum (which is more community service than business) and have a very tight site SEO-wise, or leave the forum even with the duplicate content. Thanks for your help. Erik
Technical SEO | | SurfingNosara0 -
How to get rid of duplicate content
I have duplicate content that looks like http://deceptionbytes.com/component/mailto/?tmpl=component&link=932fea0640143bf08fe157d3570792a56dcc1284 - however I have 50 of these all with different numbers on the end. Does this affect the search engine optimization and how can I disallow this in my robots.txt file?
Technical SEO | | Mishelm1 -
Duplicate content issues with australian and us version of website
Good afternoon. I've tried searching for an answer to the following question but I believe my circumstance is a little different than what has been asked in the past. I currently run a Australian website targeted at a specific demographic (50-75) and we produce a LARGE number of articles on a wide variety of lifestyle segments. All of our focus up until now has been in Australia and our SEO and language is dedicated towards this. The next logical step in my mind is to launch a mirror website targeted at the US market. This website would be a simple mirror of a large number of articles (1000+) on subjects such as Food, Health, Travel, Money and Technology. Our current CMS has no problems in duplicating the specific items over and sharing everything, the problem is in the fact that we currently use a .com.au domain and the .com domain in unavailable and not for sale, which would mean we have to create a new name for the US targeted domain. The question is, how will mirroring this information, targeted towards US, affect us on Google and would we better off getting a large number of these articles 're-written' by a company on freelancer.com etc? Thanks,
Technical SEO | | Geelong
Drew0 -
Duplicate content
I am getting flagged for duplicate content, SEOmoz is flagging the following as duplicate: www.adgenerator.co.uk/ www.adgenerator.co.uk/index.asp These are obviously meant to be the same path so what measures do I take to let the SE's know that these are to be considered the same page. I have used the canonical meta tag on the Index.asp page.
Technical SEO | | IPIM0