Would this drop indicate a manual penalty?
-
Website short link: f c w . i m (copy and remove the spaces)
A few weeks ago now we dropped from around page 2 all the way to around page 14 for they keyword watches on Google UK. We have remained around the level of page 12-17 ever since.
Other important keywords which we monitor have slowly moved from page 1 positions onto page 2 or the bottom of page 1. Of course this is really worrying us as we are an e-commerce website and we are in peak season.
Natural suspects would be duplicate content issues, crawl issues or bad links. All of which we have looked into and spent the past month improving to the best of our ability.
I have gone through almost all of the content on the website. We have our own written descriptions on our 5000 products and have identified a small amount with issues using Copyscape. We have lots of unique customer product reviews and we have our own unique blog.
I have looked into Crawl Issues and fine tuned URL parameter settings, usage of canonical and added next and prev tags. All of the faceted navigation which shouldn't be indexed has been excluded through canonical for well over a month and again recently using URL parameters in WT.
Our link profile is small and doesn't contain a lot of spam links - we have identified some and wish to get them removed but even so I don't think the small quantity of links (a lot of which are nofollow also) would justify dropping us over around 100 places for a clearly relevant keyword.
The only other thing that might be an issue is a large number of on page links. This is partly due to drop down page navigation. All our pages are being indexed by Google though so I'm not sure if it is a problem. You could argue it dilutes page rank, but you would think Google's algorithms would take recurring page navigation into account somehow - removing it would probably be detrimental to our users.
So really we wanted to see if any SEO experts could help me out with this. It seems to us that it is either something we have already identified (causing a lot more impact than we would expect following the latest Google updates) or something else. Maybe a manual penalty?
Thanks if you read the whole thing! Didn't intend to write this much really!
-
Hey Ryan havent heard anything yet.
Have you had a chance to investigate further?
Thanks
-
Great, I look forward to hearing your response and proposed strategy.
The drop for watches was the first major indication that we had a problem and it was before the October Penguin update. Seems to be more likely looking at Analytics that it was late September.
Ever since then it seems are rankings have been going slowly backwards. Regardless, we need a new SEO strategy ASAP.
Thanks
-
**We have filed a reconsideration request but are worried they will look at our link - like responders have - and consider them low quality and then penalise us more. **
It is theoretically possible but highly unlikely. My best presumption is a basic "has my site been penalized" type of Reconsideration Request would be handled by a junior member of the Spam Team who would simply respond as to whether manual action has been taken on the site or not. Matt Cutts previously shared when the Spam Team receives a Reconsideration Request, they do not go looking for additional violations but if something obvious is discovered during their normal investigation, they may take action.
-
Hi Scott,
You hit the key points with your analysis. You mentioned a "slight drop" around the time of the September Panda update. Site traffic fluctuates normally so I would not normally be concerned with a slight drop.
You also mentioned a "plummet" for the keyword watches which is a different matter. Does that plummet coincide with a major update such as Panda?
I have received your email and will respond shortly. We would be glad to assist.
-
Well looking at the dates I have found it to be around the time of the overlapping Panda and EMD updates. I didn't originally suspect our link profile instead some sort of duplicate content issue. So I've gone through all of that - canonical, next prev, parameters, sitemaps, no index on generic forms, Copyscape on a whole bunch of pages (some still to fix but I would put us at 95% unique), new blog posts and improved product titles.
But a month later no real change. Do you think Google is still processing my updates (maybe some of the canonical stuff which is faceted navigation related)? How would I determine if I need to start removing links?
We have filed a reconsideration request but are worried they will look at our link - like responders have - and consider them low quality and then penalise us more.
Let me know what you think.
-
I would highly suggest that before you go removing links you find out what the problem actually is. I have seen a number of webmasters who have removed a large amount of links only to find out eventually that their site was hit by Panda. You mentioned you may have had duplicate content issues and that would be a Panda issue. Removing links could do more harm in this case.
You've gotten some great advice in this thread. File for reconsideration to see if there is a manual penalty. A quick look at your backlinks doesn't make me think Penguin. However, you've got a number of sites redirected to yours so if any of them have a Penguin issue then you would have transferred it.
Have a good look at your analytics, sorted by organic search traffic and see if you can determine if the drop happened on a known Panda date or on a Penguin date and that will hopefully help you figure things out a little better.
-
We have examined our Analytics already and it would seem to indicate a slight drop in Google traffic that coincides with the Exact Match Domain and Panda updates that ran at the end of September. This is when we first noticed our plummet for the keyword watches.
It seems to be almost exclusive to Google organic traffic. We rank reasonably well in Bing/Yahoo. Other channels like CPC are of course not showing any issues.
It seems to have affected some keywords more than others but it feels like the authority of the domain is slowly being reduced in Google's eyes. We still rank for more specific stuff and they are still indexing us.
I have made a general response further down that you might be interested in.
We are actually looking to partner with an SEO company that can improve our rankings. Is this something Vitopian SEO would be interested in?
-
It would seem the general consensus of responses focusses on our link profile.
While I will hold my hands up and say there are some questionable links in there I'm not sure what to do about some of them. We haven't actively "built" links for quite some time as the results look unnatural and it would be dangerous to do so. I can contact webmasters where possible and ask them to remove links but where do I draw the line?
Any overly commercial anchor text is probably a given. Do I also go after really old directory links, years old in some cases? Should I go after websites that are crawling the web and linking back to us (probably not?). There seems to be a little bit of automated stuff in there which isn't down to us.
Should I disavow any comment spam in the profile or stuff which looks bad? The thing is, nobody here will own up to doing it and it and they have all appeared in Aug 2011 - so it could be a rogue contractor or I wouldn't put it past a competitor (they've resorted to DDoS in the past, so negative SEO isn't out of their league). If I disavow these links would it be seen as admitting to being a spammer? I don't want Google to single us out any further.
Or would my time be better spent trying to get more links? Problem is, we've already been trying to get natural links for 8 years. There are companies which will charge us thousands to make infographics and "great content" but there's no guarantee of it working for us.
In the case of Wikipedia - I can't think of many reasons why someone would put a link up to http://www.wikipedia.org with that as the anchor text or something similar, unless the way there are posting the link doesn't allow them to change the anchor text. It is probably the case of automated links throughout the web as they are such a massive website.
I think people would be even less likely to do a link like that to our website, we do have the majority of our link going to our brand name though.
-
Hey Jamie
I just took a quick look at the back link profile and it could be a case study for a penguin style anchor text.
Where are the natural links? Where are the branded URL links? It is just so keyword heavy in the anchors that there is no way in the world that it is natural.
Take a look at your backlink profile:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?site=www.firstclasswatches.co.uk
Then compare that to something totally organic like say, wikipedia:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?site=www.wikipedia.org
Now, that is an extreme example, but that is the point. You represent one end of a spectrum with just artifical, anchort text driven links and wikipedia represents the other end with natural editorial links.
Wikipedia has like the top 20 as URL variations, you have the top 20 as keyword variations.
I did a bit of an analysis of the various penguin analysis's out there and tried to come up with some basic rules for anchor text and yours is certainly a mess. The following is probably worth a read (to save me a bit of typing here):
http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/seo/anchor-text-ratios-and-link-building/
This is a five minute analysis but I would pretty much hang my hat on some kind of link penalty or devaluation so it's time to clean house!
Hope this helps
Marcus
-
If you haven't been de-indexed then you really can't file a re-inclusion request because you haven't technically been "excluded."
Google uses the term "Reconsideration Request" whereas Bing uses the term "Reinclusion Request". Can you clarify which search engine you are having troubles with?
Bing is much more selective then Google with respect to the pages they index, and it is not uncommon for them to remove a "bad" site from their index, hence their choice of the term "reinclusion".
Google typically does not remove a site from their index but rather lowers the ranking which has the same affect in terms of the traffic drop. When you file a Reconsideration Request you are literally asking Google to reconsider how they choose to index your site.
Concerning Google, if you suspect manual action might have been taken, you certainly can file a Reconsideration Request. In my experience, Google quickly responds and will inform you if any manual action has been taken on the site.
Shortly after submitting a Reconsideration Request, you should receive the following response:
We've received a request from a site owner to reconsider how we index the following site: http://www.XXXXXX.com/
We'll review the site. If we find that it's no longer in violation of our Webmaster Guidelines, we'll reconsider our indexing of the site. Please allow several weeks for the reconsideration request. We do review all requests, but unfortunately we can't reply individually to each request.
After a period of time, Google will respond either notifying you of a penalty or stating a manual penalty does not exist. In my experience, this response presently comes in about a week. I have heard reports from others they have not received a response or it has taken much longer. I can only share my agency works with a lot of penalties and this is my experience. Below is an example of a response I received for a client on November 1st.
Dear site owner or webmaster of http://XXXXXX.com/,
We received a request from a site owner to reconsider http://XXXXXX.com/ for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
We reviewed your site and found no manual actions by the webspam team that might affect your site's ranking in Google. There's no need to file a reconsideration request for your site, because any ranking issues you may be experiencing are not related to a manual action taken by the webspam team.
Of course, there may be other issues with your site that affect your site's ranking. Google's computers determine the order of our search results using a series of formulas known as algorithms. We make hundreds of changes to our search algorithms each year, and we employ more than 200 different signals when ranking pages. As our algorithms change and as the web (including your site) changes, some fluctuation in ranking can happen as we make updates to present the best results to our users.
If you've experienced a change in ranking which you suspect may be more than a simple algorithm change, there are other things you may want to investigate as possible causes, such as a major change to your site's content, content management system, or server architecture. For example, a site may not rank well if your server stops serving pages to Googlebot, or if you've changed the URLs for a large portion of your site's pages. This article has a list of other potential reasons your site may not be doing well in search.
If you're still unable to resolve your issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team
-
Hi Jamie and Ryan,
Jamies, you said "Our link profile is small" - How small is small? If it's small and your only links are somewhat questionable, then, okay maybe I can understand. However, my gut says that's not it.
Ryan, you say that you can find out if you were manually penalized by Google by submitting a reconsideration request. My experience with Google does not play that out. If you haven't been de-indexed then you really can't file a re-inclusion request because you haven't technically been "excluded."
Okay, all that being said, and we are in the same spot as James. We have been in business for over 40 years, do #RCS and our Website has been online since 1996. Last week we had a number of keywords we had ranking between pages 2 and 3 of Google (We had many more on page one but I'm not going to talk about those).
Following up on a suggestion that was made by Fabio Riccota at MozCon2012, I decided it would be a good idea to isoiate keywords ranking on Page 2 and target those for improvement to get to page 1. I decided, before embarking on any campaigns, I'd check the current rank of those 30-40 keywords prior to trying to optimize the site and move them up toe page one.
What happened next shocked me.
I loaded them in my Firefox RankChecker tool only to discover that all but 4-5 of 50 keywords had dropped out of the top 200 SERPS.
What's even more discouraging is that this is after we fixed a big problem with a meta refresh on our home page, addressed all of our 404 errors and also worked through every single duplicate content issues identified in GWT.
James, I am with you. It looks like we have both dotted our i's and crossed out t's...what are we supposed to do now? What is it we haven't done????
Dana
-
Ryan is pretty much right on his point... I spent 2mins on your link profile data and I can say that this more seems like a link penalty. The links pointing to you are mostly spammy and irrelevant.
I think its better to check your messages in Google Webmaster tool and see if you received any email from Google.
In other case there are two things you can do:
- Design a viral link campaign that allows natural links to come in, focus on the link quality and relevancy.
- Use Link Disavow tool by Google to discount shitty links that are available in your profile.
And this should help you increase your rankings within few weeks of time.
Hope this helps~
-
You could be impacted by manual action from Google's spam team (i.e. a manual penalty), a named algorithm update such as Penguin, Panda, etc. or one of the 50 other algorithm updates Google makes each month.
The easiest way to tell if your site has been manually penalized is to ask Google (i.e. file a Reconsideration Request). Google will tell you if they have taken manual action on the site.
There are numerous other steps you can take to help diagnose why the drop in traffic occurred:
-
examine your Google Analytics data to see on what date the traffic dropped
-
drill down further to confirm what source(s) were involved. Did the traffic drop across the board? Or just for Google organic search?
-
how did the drop happen? Did it only affect specific keywords or pages?
The above information is of key importance. I would share your backlink profile is very spammy. It would take further investigation to confirm but there is a significant chance you are impacted by a manual penalty for manipulative links or a Penguin update.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site dropped in search for 95% after 18-19 feb
Hi people. I have a client which holds a escort agency website operating in Amsterdam the Netherlands. Please take note that Escort Agency is legal and holland is a liberal country with permit and all, so just trying to point out that it's a perfectly legal crafted business. To the point: we are seeing a 95% drop in traffic (basicly back to barely 10 clicks a day) after 18 to 19 feb. We've inspected the incoming links, and we did see some things going on that where not quite healthy. At first a banner was bought on a dutch advertising website. On their behalf, this sitewide banner got published with a follow on roughly 132k of pages. That was strike 1 (i think). After tossing this in disavow for temporarily basis and informed the advertisal website to put any sitewide link to nofollow in the first place, nothing changed. We found a 2nd site doing the same mistake. Frankly the banner got exposed on roughly 100k of pages on which some of 'm where barely 2 days old. Strike 2. Solved this by putting it in disavow for the time being and asking politely to put the banner again, nofollow. We cleaned out any incoming potential spammy links by using disavow. The data we obtained was a mix of google webmaster itself and moz profiling. However we're one month further now, and the graph is still a big phat flatline. What is going on? I've noted that, one other sites, which share the same brand, but completely different websites / subnets / content and all, has the same threatment going on showing a huge drop from 18th of feb 2019 and is unable to recover. We cannot see anything 'bad' actually going on @ webmasters and there is no manual action taken. So we're kind of stuck now on a site that was my project but now completely fell into oblivion and hurting someone's business. The url is https://www.qualityescort.nl/ - anyone has a reasonable advice to this issue? full.jpg full.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jvanderlinde0 -
Penguin 4.0 and homepage level penalties
Hey folks Looking to get some input from what other people are seeing with Penguin 4.0 and historically penalised sites. We have three sites we are looking at currently - all had historically brutal penguin penalties. All have done extensive clean up and are respectable businesses and have seen some manor of recovery or improvement. However, we are seeing issues at a homepage level with these three sites in that the homepage currently does not rank for the main terms but an inner page does in it's place (but not as well as we would expect given everything else). This applies to a single keyword on all three of these sites - add a modifier to that keyword and they rank top of first page (often 1st place). Example of modifiers being 'installer', 'uk', 'supplier' etc. That main keyword though only ranks top of 3rd page in this instance and it is an inner page and not the homepage which is the best fit for the targeted term. Question Is anyone else seeing this? Sites that have gone from no visibility in top 50 for a previously abused term that are now seeing some visibility page 2 / page 3 for the big terms and top of page 1 visibility for those terms + modifiers. Thoughts This seems a bit odd to me and hard to understand in light of the Penguin 4.0 announcement if there is no demotion and only devaluation of bad links then why would a single page still be seemingly so heavily effected how can an algorithm that focuses on devaluation of bad links still be granular as this seems to be a penalty of sorts that effects a specific page for a specific keyword (the one most abused historically in terms of link building). two of these are big companies, biggest in their industry in the real world with lots of high visibility clients like TV shows, IKEA etc. Lots of natural highly authoritative links, good content etc - we are digging in further but certainly looks like they have their house largely in order. Note We have one other client that I believe is seeing something similar on an internal page and that page was the main link target for spammy links of old that are now removed. However, it appears Google has a memory regarding even these removed links. I mention this primarily as I don't believe this is homepage specific but rather that is the case as the homepage was the main link target historically. Summary These sites are seeing movement - huge movement. Not exactly what we would expect though given the extensive clean up and talk around how this release of the algorithm works. Be interested to see what you are seeing out there folks and if anyone has seen anything similar. Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Marcus_Miller
Marcus0 -
How to avoid Google penalties being inherited when moving on with a new domain?
Looking for SEOs who have experience with resetting projects by migrating on to a new domain to shed either a manual or algorithmic penalty. My questions are: For algorithmic penalties, what is the best migration strategy to avoid inheriting any kind of baggage? 301, 302, establish no connection between the two sites? For manual penalties, what is the best migration strategy to avoid inheriting any kind of baggage? 301, 302, establish no connection between the two sites? Any other input on these kind of reset projects is appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | spanish_socapro0 -
Migrating EMD to brand name domain. Risk of Penguin Penalty?
We would like to migrate from an EMD to a brand name domain, since our service offer has become much broader than indicated by the current EMD. The current domain name is a money keyword. Do you believe there is a big risk of suffering a penguin penalty if we go ahead with the domain migration, due to large share of anchor texts containing keyword of old domain name? Quick facts about our site:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse
-about 500.000 pages indexed by google PR6 10 years old 1200 linking root domains 30% of linking root domains contain our domain name with domain ending as anchor text 5% of linking root domains have just the domain keyword as anchor text Any thoughts?
Thanks0 -
If Penguin 2.0 targets specific pages and keywords, should I spend less SEO effort on them since will they be harder to optimize? Penalty repair is only starting at end of year.
I’m working with a company that got hit by Penguin 2.0. They’re going to switch to white-hat only for a few months and review analytics before considering repairing the penalty. In the meantime, would it make sense to focus less SEO effort (on-site optimization, link building, etc.) on any pages or keywords that were penalized or hit hardest? Or are those the pages we should work on the most? Thanks for reading!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DA20130 -
Should I disavow without a manual penalty?
Hi all! I currently had someone remove about 70 bad backlinks pointing to our site. Is it worth disavowing the rest? We don't have any manual penalty or anything like that, but is it the sort of thing to use as a precautionary measure only? There are about 100 links in the disavow file that I had built. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | freeunlocks0 -
Ranking drop for a particular page on a particular keyword
Take a look at centerforhealthysex.com/sex-addiction. For months we were ranking in the top 3 spots with this URL for "sex addiction los angeles", even reaching #1 for a while. Late last year we redesigned and developed the site to clean up the code and redirects. We also cleaned up the internal linking structure. For years we had been ranking on "sex addiction los angeles" for the home page ... bumping around the top 5 spots, but we wanted organic traffic to go to /sex-addiction. In the Fall, we saw overall site traffic rise steadily. We made few changes to the site and none to this page or links flowing back to the page once we had achieved strong ranking -- we didn't want to mess with a good thing. Then November 27th we started losing ranking on this term and a couple others. The good news is that we gained ranking on some high volume traffic terms so overall organic traffic is reasonably strong, BUT we're not ranking on the terms where we want to rank. Centerforhealthysex.com/sex-addiction is now nowhere to be found on the target search term despite fairly strong page rank. I tried redoing and resubmitting the site map, cleaning out some potentially duplicative content but to no avail. I see no issues, errors or warnings in Webmaster Tools. We have a few medium priority fixer-uppers in SEO Moz, but we've taken care of the majority of the big stuff. What am I not seeing? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | joshuakrafchin0 -
Penalties for site going down often?
I have a client with a site that ranks for some very competitive terms who consistently has server issues and the site goes down for a day at a time. Each time this happens his site seems to drop in site wide rankings and then stay there for months without ever fully recovering. Only part of the rankings are usually recovered. Has anyone else seen this trend? Is it something Google keeps on record without fully removing any penalty addressed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | iAnalyst.com0