Would it be worthwhile to update URLs to include "for sale"
-
My team is new to the world of SEO. We were both in other departments when our last "expert" left and we became the entire department. Needless to say, we have many questions.
I have a site for an existing customer - she wants to know if it is a good idea to change her URLs. She went to a webinar that suggested she include "for sale" in URL, since that is the site's primary purpose These are the current inventory URLs:
http://www.dealerskinssite.com/used-inventory http://www.dealerskinssite.com/new-inventory
The change would give something like:
http://www.dealerskinssite.com/used-cars-for-sale
http://www.dealerskinssite.com/new-cars-for-saleI did some searching and could not find a solid recommendation one way or another. If it is true that people typically search for "used cars for sale" rather than a "used inventory", then there might be benefit to including that as part of the URL... but that is as far as my knowledge got me.
Please let me know your thoughts
Steve
-
Klarke,
Thanks for the response.
I guess I should have just reasoned it out. The statistics are staggeringly in favor of Used Cars over either of the other two (see image).
This might even be worth getting a permanent change in place away from our standard of Used Inventory.
-
Changing that isn't likely to result in much improvement. It might actually have a negative effect if proper 301 redirects aren't in place. And even if you do the 301's correctly, there's no guarantee the search engines will see it the same.
You'll get better mileage if you change the page's titles and the content to better satisfy those keywords.
Also rather than listening to what other people say, you should probably check the actual search volume of these keywords and compare.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Where are these "phantom visitors" and are they dangerous?
My Google Analytics always shows visitors on my site that do not show up with a location. They are always shown as being referred from "ads.google.com". Our service is exclusively domestic in the U.S., yet my user location map will show 1 domestic visitor, but 19 total visitors. PLease see attached linked image. Is there some sort of malware that is being exploited on my pages somewhere that these people are accessing? Is there some way of blocking them from my site? Should I? Aren't they skewing my Google Analytics results? Are they potentially dangerous? Thanks in advance for all replies. mKEjs2H.jpg
Search Behavior | | TTR10 -
Is there a tool that will find a string from the source code from a list of URLs?
I need a tool that will run through a long list of URLs (from multiple domains), look for a specific string in the source code and then produce a CSV showing in which URLs the the string was found. This is for legitimate research, not for any nefarious purposes Any ideas of such a tool already exists?
Search Behavior | | richdan0 -
Google search operator "site:" show different result.
Search operator "site:" show incomplete information. When I search with just domain name it show only 3 link that got crawl in past week, this is the link https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=mLr3VfrhN4_BuATQuYugBg&gws_rd=cr&fg=1#q=site:sierralivingconcepts.com&safe=off&tbs=qdr: but when i look a specific link it show them in any time (search tools), https://www.google.com/search?q=site:http://www.sierralivingconcepts.com/p-6300-white-silver-regence-louis-xiv-mango-wood-ornate-hall-console-table.aspx&safe=off&biw=1600&bih=775&noj=1&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ved=0CBUQpwVqFQoTCJ-4iOLK-McCFQFwjgod43gI9A But when i look in cached page it says "appeared on 11 Sep 2015" I am total confused why google not showing all the new link that it crawl from my site.
Search Behavior | | Sierra-Living-Concepts0 -
Recovering from the Penguin update finally w00t!
Since there is so little information out there for people who have recovered from the Google Penguin Update I thought I would share my recent recovery and what I did, and what worked for me. First let me say that I don't necessarily believe that you have to wait for a Penguin update to recover from it, unless there has been an update in the last few weeks that I am not aware of. When I got hit I got hit with penguin on April 24th 2012. The reason I know is because 90% percent of all my major keywords I completely fell of the map with rankings, luckily I did not lose my main cash cow keyword which kept me alive (thank goodness) but I did lose rankings on many other keywords. Here is an example http://goo.gl/nZYAu What I did When the hit first came like many others I went into panic mode. For many months I tried all sorts of things. Redesign of my site Changed to friendly URL's Rewrote Content Got rid of low quality content Added more images to pages Less ads to the page Redesigned internal link structure Removed links from other sites I owned and more None of which seemed to work for me, even with all these changes my rankings remained the same. I was scratching my head as to why Google thought my site was considered spammy. I finally decided to dig as deep as I could and literally start over from scratch in my research. The first thing I did was go to my godaddy account and first see every domain I had owned. I was surprised to see that I had owned 73 domains. After a while you forget what you buy I guess :). Some of these domains I bought but never did anything with, some I bought and copied one of my other sites just to get something up with the hopes to redesigned it and others I had completed sites with unique content. Obvious there are issues with copying an entire site over dealing with duplicate content. Honestly most of these sites I had forgotten I even owned and that even had content on them. Back when I did all these things (about 2 years ago) I really did not know what I was doing from a SEO standpoint. I have learned since then which is why I needed to go through all these and clean them up. One of the main things I used to do with my sites (Pre SEO) was I would take my big traffic sites and link to my other sites from either a footer or somewhere on a page that would have a ton of indexing (dynamic pages) Usually somewhere in the 90,000k+ in pages generated. I honestly did this not with the intent to manipulate rankings, but with the idea of sending traffic to those pages. I thought that was a great idea 🙂 As I started going through my domains one by one with a fine tooth and comb there were many sites which I had totally forgotten about that contained links to my other sites. Especially my main cash cow site. It took me about 2 weeks to get through all my domains and clean everything up. The things I did was Removed all duplicate sites Removed URL's I was not doing anything with (I know this had no effect, just wanted to clean my domains up) Removed all links that pointed to any of my other sites Now What About 1 week later (and as those links started to go away in Google webmaster tools) keywords I have not ranked for since April 24th started to gain rank. While many are still not raking and the ones that are have low rankings. They are ranking again. I know for sure now this made a difference for me. These are keywords that tanked from Penguin that all of a sudden I have ranks in them again. While I know the practices I did where obviously bad SEO much of what I did was done before I actually knew what I was doing. What worked for me was checking every domain I owned and looking at every page I had on those sites. Most of my problems came from sites I totally forgot I even had, which is what was hurting me. Finally going back to those sites and either removing the links/domains is what I believe is making the difference. Just thought I would share 🙂
Search Behavior | | cbielich2 -
Where can I find research into consumer behavior in URL input?
I have a hypothesis that the % of users that type URLs is decreasing. Instead I think users will be arriving at sites by clicking on links in emails, search and social. Where can I find data / research to back me up?
Search Behavior | | TomCritchlow0 -
Google Rel="Next" & Rel="Prev"
Hello, I have a catalogue website and I am implementing the rel="next" and rel="prev" to the website. My question is that we do have a view all page also, which apparently Google likes over a 'page1'.. Should I add the canonical to this page? I already have it set to WEBSITEURL/sonos (which is going well) I don’t want to have to change this to [URL]sonos/view-all (which is my view all link) as the first page is getting ranked well I am then telling Google no, the view all page is the parent. Any advice would be very much appreciated. Thanks Rick
Search Behavior | | Lantec0 -
Googles 'freshness' update and how it may affect Estate Agents.
We have some clients who have raised concerns over how this new update will affect them. They are an Estate Agents who regularly update their property portfolio, blogs and news section etc. Can you advise how they may or may not be directly affected? Thank you.
Search Behavior | | SoundinTheory0 -
UK Requiring "Opt-In" for Cookies. Suggestions on Compliance?
The UK is now requiring that websites, targeting UK visitors and/or hosted in the UK, to provide an "opt-in" option for cookie tracking. While I don't target UK audiences, I do foresee this potentially being an issue for US business. Anyone have any suggestions as to how web publishers, in the UK, will easily implement this change will not impacting their targeted advertising revenue?
Search Behavior | | ChristineCadena0