Why should your title and H1 tag be different?
-
Is it dangerous to have your H1 tag and your title the exact same thing? My thought was that it's not be the best use of space, but that it couldn't cause harm.
What do you think?
-
What I'm not seeing addressed specifically in the thread is can the KW term within your H1 & Title differ? I get that if the whole title and whole header differ slightly like:
Title: Best Plumber Local |100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
H1: Best Plumber Local offers 100% Satisfaction Guarantees!
*Please note - not my best copywriting effort at play here
Then it's not worth sweating over, so long as the searcher does't experience a disconnect between he SERP result and and the landing page messaging.
My concern is over the need to target "ugly" KWs - terms that don't fit well in to the UX equation, but have exponentially more search volume than they "prettier" version. Let's say "plumber local" has 1,000 monthly searches vs "local plumber" that has 300 monthly searches. But "local plumber" is much better for copy/user readability. Can you use:
Title for the SERP: Best Plumber Local |100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
H1 for UX: Best Local Plumber offers 100% Satisfaction Guarantees!
...and still be nicely optimized for "plumber local" assuming you can find a smooth way to work it into copy (easier than doing it in an H1), alt tag, and site has otherwise good authority/reputation. Also, ugly KW (plumber local) would be used in the url).
Thanks is advance!
-
It's your cms causing the problem. duplicate page titles are very different to duplicate H1's which would be regarded as duplicate content.
I suggest you go into your cms and get rid of the dupe titles, remove cache pages, and google fetch them all, in GWT's.
-
Hi there, So I'm trying out SEOMOZ for the 1st time + ran a report across my site - it's pulled out a heap of duplicate page titles errors! I've been trying to get my head around this as I have like 30 posts in my blog and the rest of the site is relatively tiny (home, contact us, services, blog) - the duplicate content factor leads me to think that it's due to the Title name being the same as the H1s? - am I going crazy here? I was of the impression that title + h1 the same was the way to go - I feel a bit shattered at the mo trying to work this out. Can anyone kindly shed some light on this? Each of my blog posts have unique names - I don't get it? Thx so much for any notes that you can provide. I'd grtly appreciate some tips on this.
-
In my experience: there is no significant difference as far as the search engines are concerned. I agree with Rand in that for many users, the first thing they will expect to see is the same title they clicked on via the search engine.
My rule of thumb is always do what makes sense to users. Even if a different H1 tag caused some significant affect such as moving you up on the SERP (unlikely), if the user doesn't get what they expect they will click back. If anyone experiments with this, pay close attention not only to ranking but also to bounce rates. I'd rather be the second result with a 10% bounce rate than the first result with a 90% bounce rate.
-
I will do that .
Many Thanks
-
Hi Sergio,
This is an old thread, and you might want to consider starting a new thread with your specific question. The Beginner's Guide to SEO should also be helpful to you at http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo.
-
My site dont have H1 AND H2 www.starplusservices.com we need to update our site now do you think that Iwill need to optmize this?
Regards
Sergio
-
If I am understanding Rand and Todd's opinions correctly regarding this subject:
Rand believes it doesn't matter.
Todd believes it does matter and can be beneficial.
To me that would say to err on the side of caution and choose Todd. Not because he is correct, but because there is no harm in doing so either way according to Rand.
-
Haha, yeah Matt should be a politician
-
Thanks Rand! This really makes sense to me.
I've always considered H1 tags a non-entity when it comes to SEO. I write my H1 tags to add a headline to help the user understand what the page is about. But my title is really written primarily for search engines (with the idea that it needs to make sense for the reader as well.)
-
I don't know... There's a surprising number of people who've reported hearing Matt say things. Yet, somehow, whenever there's video of him, he magically says next to nothing. I'd be skeptical at best.
-
Well, not meaning to sound like too much of a suck up... but I tend to be of the opinion that what Rand says is always right lol. I therefore must graciously accept defeat on the subject... there's no way I'm going up against you on stuff haha.
I still want to know though... I mean, I totally see what you mean that there's no point in worrying about it as the time is spent better elsewhere, but anything with opinions and evidence from both sides makes me want a definitive tested answer.
-
Just want to point out that personally, I disagree with that assessment and haven't seen anything data-wise to suggest it's an issue. It's hard to believe that Google/Bing would want to penalize so many millions of sites that do this by default (news sites, Wordpress, Joomla, Drupal, etc. all have it in default settings either in base or plugins).
That said, Todd usually has good reasons for his recommendations, so would be interesting to probe more deeply.
-
My general view though is that there's far better uses of most SEOs time than worrying about H1s
Yeah but it's fun trying to find out though
What about the Matt Cutts thing, do you think there could be any truth to that?
-
Wow - surprisingly good topic for such a relatively basic part of SEO!
So... I think Todd Malicoat and I still disagree. He likes to have a different title + H1 and claims they're good for rankings and keyword diversity. I largely disagree based on user experience and the relative unimportance of H1s (you can see from our correlation analyses and our ranking models work that H1s appear to have virtually no advantage over just having keywords at the top of a page in large text).
My view is that when someone clicks on a search result listing, they expect to find the thing they've just clicked on. The title is what shows in the SERPs, but if the H1 is substantively different, they're getting what feels like a somewhat different page. That dis-congruous experience can result in high bounce rates and in searcher dis-satisfaction.
In addition, I'm not convinced there's a measurable benefit from differentiated titles vs. H1s. No search engine rep has given guidance on this (in fact, they've stayed conspicuously quiet over the years about whether the H1 does anything at all).
So - there you have it - a small controversy on a small point of on-page optimization. I think the best practice is to do what feels right (neither Todd nor I think the other's opinion will have a negative impact) and, if you're uncertain, test it out on different sets of pages.
My general view though is that there's far better uses of most SEOs time than worrying about H1s
-
Righty... in the interests of defending my original position
I've looked around a bit, and granted not all of these are credible sources but again Todd Malicoat is as I'm sure you'll agree. Jill Whalen in one of the below links says she'd prefer them not to match and the others are people of whom I don't know their knowledge or experience, but (and admittedly this is hearsay) one guy says he heard Matt Cutts at PubCon say they should be at least a little different.
One guy (again I don't know how credible he is as a source) said he tested it and found it can be found as more spammy if they're the same.
Anyway, it appears this debate has happened before in other places and there are some good points made, so here's the links
http://www.highrankings.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=41271
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4078221.htm
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=0a4f386adacc7769&hl=en
Over all though, I think we need to know if the test Rand and Todd spoke of ever happened, and if so what the results were.
-
lol it did come from a pretty good source (not me, I mean Todd)... but yeah when I dug further I found that Todd and Rand were debating it (as per the screen shots on the other comment here), so I guess you're right.
I would have thought though that usually when someone like Todd says something like that, there's got to be a pretty good reason based on his experience.
-
Yeah, I read that, didn't agree with it though. That's the danger of depending too much on forum members for answers to your SEO questions. It's like going to Web Pro World or something. You'll get completely opposite answers depending on the day.
-
I think that duplicating the title tag and the H1 tag seek to maintain continuity and continued thought process in the mind of the consumer. I think subtle differences are ok and they make sense, but I do not think there is any danger in doing so whatsoever.
-
If we look at a site like a human would, which is what search engines are evolving to do, then always matching exactly your Title and H1 tags is going to be pretty silly in my opinion.
Good practice is to use a few targeted keywords in the Title tag that describe your page well and the content within up to 70 characters. Of course not all pages will use the full 70 characters. That might cause stuffing penalties.
For H1 you might match some of what you list in the Title, but not exactly. You're going to have commas, pipe characters, other kinds of descriptions, brands, etc. Matching all of this would be crazy and would make a site appear very spammy.
Since the search engines are striving to be more and more human every day a good long term strategy is to build sites for humans first, and search engines a close second.
-
Looked at it a bit further and found another video from earlier on with Rand and Todd discussing it...
Rand: Matching Title and H1 is fine
Todd: Matching Title and H1 is bad
Conclusion: Rand says "We should test it"
But no results on the video I'm afraid lol, so still none the wiser but that does make things interesting. I wonder if the test was ever carried out and if so, what were the results?
Rand??
BTW I hope you and Todd don't mind me adding these screenshots.
-
The average Joe Schmoe who has a website is going to type the title of his page into both the <title>and <h1>.</p> <p>I can't imagine any search engine deducting points for it.... and with 199 other factors in the rankings if this WAS in there the deduction for it would be really really low.</p> <p>Still... I think that a person can safely bet a month's pay that matching title and H1 will not make him rank #2 when everything else ranks him #1.</p> <p>Also, I can't imagine search engines placing this "invisible tripwire for SEOs" in their evaluation that is going to be automatically triggered by some of the most commonly used content management systems.</p></title>
-
I would have to disagree with that. To me, if there were no SEO in existence then the title would be a title and the H1 would be an H1, which as it is named is a heading. Title and heading are two different words because they mean different things (albeit only slightly).
Also, to have them both unique and that being SEO gamemanship doesn't make any sense to me, I mean, how many keywords is this page being optimized for that would allow that to work positively for SEO??
-
I can't imagine that this would cause problems. When I have a question of this nature, I try to take off my search engine goggles and think about user experience. From this view, differing title and H1 tags would be a better indicator of SEO gamesmanship. From the user's perspective, what they see in SERPs sets up an expectation for what is shown on the page. If I click on a link for "Top 10 Digital Camera Reviews," I expect to see an article of the same title on the page. For search engines to penalize this would be nonsensical.
Of course, if both your title and H1 tags say "camera, cameras, camera reviews, review camera, how to review camera," then you have a problem. But, as mentioned above, that's not intrinsic to the matching H1 and title tags.
-
I'm guessing it must be pretty close to fact if it's those guys over at MM. They must get their info from somewhere... anyway, apparently it's because the pages may appear over-optimized if the title and h1's match, which makes sense I think. The recommendation given is that in the CMS (Joomla for example) there is often an option not to have it display the title in H1 too, it's recommended to use that option and add your own H1 unique to the title tag.
-
-
It is not that having H1 and Title the same is damaging, it is the overall quality and trust metrics of many websites that employ this methodology that is the cause of problems: simply, correlation vs causation
In EGOLs case its fine as the rest of the site is fine, in other cases it may seem bad, but thats just because the rest of the site is bad
-
That would be great Steve. Let us know what was suggested in the video. This is one of the difficulties in learning SEO is that it's often hard to know if something is known as fact or is just an assumption.
-
I'll check the vid I got that from when I get home and post the reason, can't remember why it is now I just know it was described as a big "Don't Do It"
-
Thanks guys. In another thread this morning it was suggested that it could be damaging to your site to have both the H1 and the title tag the same.
-
I'd agree. I've never known this or heard of this to be "dangerous". In fact, in terms of on-page optimisation, your target keywords should be included in both the title and the H1 tags.
I'd say it's dangerous if you have multiple pages with the same title and H1 tags. Then the pages could be seen as duplicates and might not be indexed.
-
Dangerous?
I doubt it.
I have a site full of this and it is hard to beat in my SERPs.
Saves time in my opinion. Smart, if the title and the H1 make sense.
Lots of content management systems produce this automatically - and match the URL to boot!
Added: (I do have lots of pages where the title tag and the H1 differ. For those pages the title tag was written to elicit clicks and the H1 was simply the title of the article.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Different ways to write the same tyre dimension
Hello fellow MOZers, Im having a bit of problem of targeting all the different ways a user could type in their tyre size to google, and what we should put in our meta titles. For instance, We have a page called "205/55 R16" Which seems to be the most used and competitive in SERPs. But this could be written in a number of ways "205/55 R 16" and "205/55R16" I expected all these different ways of writing a tyre dimension to give you the same results in google which isnt the case, We rank in very different positions for these 3 searches. Google also sometimes corrects you sometimes for example "205/55 R 16" google might decide that you meant "205/55 R16" and rather than the usual (Did you mean:....) it shows you results for what google thinks is the right way (205/55 R16) We want to target these 3 ways of writing a tyre size not just the most common. Sooo, my question is how should we be doing our meta titles, would (205/55 R16 | 205/55R16 Tyres - Longstone Tyres) be classed as keyword stuffing? and if so how do we go for the term"205/55R16", using s? and would that be classed as stuffing? I mentioned 3 ways to write tyre dimensions, but in realty there are many more. See i would've thought google reads the numbers and ignores other characters in between when it comes to all types of dimensions and sized of things, but this doesnt seem to be the case. Any thoughts and advice on this would be massively helpful, Thankyou
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JamesDavison0 -
Best use of Canonical Tag with Mini-Websites
Hello, I was wondering what the best way would be to implement Canonical Tags in kind of a unusual situation. The company I work for creates single property websites for real estate agents. We register a URL such as 123MainSt.com - however through DNS we redirect that to a path. For example: http://www.944milmadadr.com would redirect to: https://www.qwikvid.com/realestate/go/v1/home/?idx=wDg1Gdwt7wnQiR3LMeCx28qPnWTKM0JV If we wanted to rank high in the search engines for our clients: "944 Milmada Dr" - Would it be the best practice to Canonical: http://www.944milmadadr.com ? Thanks in advance for any feedback on this!! Jason
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Qwikvid0 -
Long Title Tags
Hi guys, We have product e-commerce title tags which are over 60 characters - around 80 plus. The reason we added them in there is to incorporate
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seowork214
more information for Google. The format of these title tags are: Name + Colour + Rug Type + Origin Name = for people searching for the name of the rug
Color = people searching for a specific color
Type = The type of rug (e.g. normal or designer)
Origin = Where the rug is for. So this title will cover people searching for: People searching for designer rugs, the specific colour and also where it comes from. This then results in the title tag going way over 60 characters - around 80-90 characters. -- Would it be wise to try and shrink it down to under 60 characters, and what would be a good approach to do this? Cheers.0 -
Multiple pages optimised for the same keywords but pages are functionally different and visually different
Hi MOZ community! We're wondering what the implications would be on organic ranking by having 2 pages, which have quite different functionality were optimised for the same keywords. So, for example, one of the pages in question is
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TrueluxGroup
https://www.whichledlight.com/categories/led-spotlights
and the other page is
https://www.whichledlight.com/t/led-spotlights both of these pages are basically geared towards the keyword led spotlights the first link essentially shows the options for led spotlights, the different kind of fittings available, and the second link is a product search / results page for all products that are spotlights. We're wondering what the implications of this could be, as we are currently looking to improve the ranking for the site particularly for this keyword. Is this even safe to do? Especially since we're at the bottom of the hill of climbing the ranking ladder of this keyword. Give us a shout if you want any more detail on this to answer more easily 🙂0 -
H3 Tags - Should I Link to my content Articles- ? And do I have to many H3 tags/ Links as it is ?
Hello All, On my ecommerce landing pages, I currently have links to my products as H3 Tags. I also have useful guides displayed on the page with links useful articles we have written (they currently go to my news section). I am wondering if I should put those article links as additional H3 tags as well for added seo benefit or do I have to many tags as it is ?. A link to my Landing Page I am talking about is - http://goo.gl/h838RW Screenshot of my h1-h6 tags - http://imgur.com/hLtX0n7 I enclose screenshot my guides and also of my H1-H6 tags. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks Peter
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeteC120 -
How Come Meta is different based on different query?
We have a site we added a number to in the meta description. Once we did that we did a fetch as google to hopefully recrawl the page quicker. A few days later and we cleared W3 cache on WP and clear computer cache, then did search on common search for the site/page. WidgetA for example. The url is OurClient.com/widgetA/ - on organic in meta on SERP and we see our new meta with number. We then do a search on a similar term WidgetingA for example and the same url shows: OurClient.com/widgetA/ BUT THE meta description is different on SERP! It is the old meta. When we look at the element using mozbar, it shows the new meta as it should same as when we look at it under the original search term. So, search for WidgetA, get new meta in serps and search for WidgetingA (which returns same url as WidgetA) and we get the old meta. Thoughts???
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RobertFisher0 -
Canonical Meta Tag Best Practices
I've noticed that some website owners use canonical tags even when there may be no duplicate issues.For examplewww.examplesite.com has a canonical tag.......rel="canonical" href="http://www.examplesite.com/" />www.examplesite.com/bluewidget has a canonical tag.......rel="canonical" href="http://www.examplesite.com/bluewidget/" />Is this recommended or helpful to do this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webestate0 -
Google Web Master Tools: Duplicate Title Tags?
According to Google Web Master Tools it says my site has 910 Duplicate Title Tags. How verbose should title tags be? What's the maximum character length? For example, let's say I have an image of an iPhone 4S being held in someone's hand. How verbose of a title and how many characters am I allowed to have? Is the goal with title tags to be very specific in describing the image? In the above example, do I need to say something like: "iPhone 4S being held by white caucasian male" or will "iPhone 4S" suffice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | asc760