What Sources to use to compile an as comprehensive list of pages indexed in Google?
-
As part of a Panda recovery initiative we are trying to get an as comprehensive list of currently URLs indexed by Google as possible.
Using the site:domain.com operator Google displays that approximately 21k pages are indexed. Scraping the results however ends after the listing of 240 links.
Are there any other sources we could be using to make the list more comprehensive? To be clear, we are not looking for external crawlers like the SEOmoz crawl tool but sources that would be confidently allow us to determine a list of URLs currently hold in the Google index.
Thank you /Thomas
-
We don't usually take private info in public questions, but if you want to, Private Message me the domain (via my profile). I'm really curious about (1) and I'd love to take a peek.
-
Thanks Pete,
As always very much appreciate your input.
1/ We aren't using any parameters and when using the filter=0 we are getting the same results. For my just done test I was only able to pull 350 pages out of 18.5k pages using the web interface. If anyone has any other thoughts on this please let me now.
2/ That is a great idea. Most of our pages live in the root directory to keep the URL slugs short so unfortunately this one will not help us.
3/ Another good idea. I understand this approach is helpful to see your coverage of wanted pages in the Google index but won't be able to help you determine superfluous pages currently in the Google index unless I misunderstood you?
4/ We are using ScreamingFrog and I agree its a fantastic tool. The index size with ScreamingFrog is showing not more than 300 pages which is our final goal.
Overall we are seeing continuous yet small drops to the index size using our approach of returning 410 response codes for unwanted pages and dedicated sitemaps to speed up delisting. See http://www.seomoz.org/q/panda-recovery-what-is-the-best-way-to-shrink-your-index-and-make-google-aware
We are just trying to get a more complete list of whats currently in the index to speed up delisting.
Thank you for your reference to the Panda post I remember reading it before and will give it another go right now.
One final question, in your experience dealing with Panda penalties, have you seen scenarios where it seems the delisting/penalizing of a site has only happened for a particular CCTLD of google or just the homepage? See http://www.seomoz.org/q/panda-penguin-penalty-not-global-but-only-firea-for-specific-google-cctlds It is what we are currently experiencing and trying to see if other people have observed something similar.
Best /Thomas
-
If you're willing to piece together multiple sources, I can definitely give you some starting points:
(1) First, dropping from 21K pages indexed in Google to 240 definitely seems odd. Are you hitting omitted results? You may have to shut off filtering in the URL (&filter=0).
(2) You can also divide the site up logically and run "site:" on sub-folders, parameters, etc. Say, for example:
site:example.com/blog
site:example.com/shop
site:example.com/uk
As long as there's some logical structure, you can use it to break the index request down into smaller chunks. Don't forget to use inurl: for URL parameters (filters, pagination, etc.).
(3) This takes a while, but split up your XML sitemaps into logical clusters - say, one for major pages, one for top-level topics/categories, one for sub-categories, one for products. That way, you'll get a cleaner could of what kind of pages are indexed, and you'll know where your gaps are.
(4) Run a desktop crawler on the site, like Xenu or Screaming Frog (Xenu is free, but PC only and harder to use. Screaming Frog has a yearly fee, but it's an excellent tool). This won't necessarily tell you what Google has indexed, but it will help you see how your site is being crawled and where problems are occurring.
I wrote a mega-post a while back on all the different kinds of duplicate content. Sometimes, just seeing examples can help you catch a problem you might be having. It's at:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world
-
Does anyone have any insight on this? If the answer is simply there is no better approach than look at the limited data available through the Google UI this would be helpful as well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Title page google serp
Why does Google change the titles automatically? I have <title>Canyoning Açores - São Jorge | Discover Experience Açores</title> but google show Discover Experience Açores: Canyoning Açores - São Jorge
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tiagoarruda0 -
E-Commerce Site Collection Pages Not Being Indexed
Hello Everyone, So this is not really my strong suit but I’m going to do my best to explain the full scope of the issue and really hope someone has any insight. We have an e-commerce client (can't really share the domain) that uses Shopify; they have a large number of products categorized by Collections. The issue is when we do a site:search of our Collection Pages (site:Domain.com/Collections/) they don’t seem to be indexed. Also, not sure if it’s relevant but we also recently did an over-hall of our design. Because we haven’t been able to identify the issue here’s everything we know/have done so far: Moz Crawl Check and the Collection Pages came up. Checked Organic Landing Page Analytics (source/medium: Google) and the pages are getting traffic. Submitted the pages to Google Search Console. The URLs are listed on the sitemap.xml but when we tried to submit the Collections sitemap.xml to Google Search Console 99 were submitted but nothing came back as being indexed (like our other pages and products). We tested the URL in GSC’s robots.txt tester and it came up as being “allowed” but just in case below is the language used in our robots:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ben-R
User-agent: *
Disallow: /admin
Disallow: /cart
Disallow: /orders
Disallow: /checkout
Disallow: /9545580/checkouts
Disallow: /carts
Disallow: /account
Disallow: /collections/+
Disallow: /collections/%2B
Disallow: /collections/%2b
Disallow: /blogs/+
Disallow: /blogs/%2B
Disallow: /blogs/%2b
Disallow: /design_theme_id
Disallow: /preview_theme_id
Disallow: /preview_script_id
Disallow: /apple-app-site-association
Sitemap: https://domain.com/sitemap.xml A Google Cache:Search currently shows a collections/all page we have up that lists all of our products. Please let us know if there’s any other details we could provide that might help. Any insight or suggestions would be very much appreciated. Looking forward to hearing all of your thoughts! Thank you in advance. Best,0 -
Does google index the mobile version or the desktop version?
We use different headlines and text on our mobile site vs. the desktop. Our desktop headlines and text is highly optimized for SEO purposes, but because of user experience and space limitations the headlines and text on the mobile version isn't great for SEO. I'm wondering, what will google look at and will it make a difference? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Postable0 -
New Web Page Not Indexed
Quick question with probably a straightforward answer... We created a new page on our site 4 days ago, it was in fact a mini-site page though I don't think that makes a difference... To date, the page is not indexed and when I use 'Fetch as Google' in WT I get a 'Not Found' fetch status... I have also used the'Submit URL' in WT which seemed to work ok... We have even resorted to 'pinging' using Pinglar and Ping-O-Matic though we have done this cautiously! I know social media is probably the answer but we have been trying to hold back on that tactic as the page relates to a product that hasn't quite launched yet and we do not want to cause any issues with the vendor! That said, I think we might have to look at sharing the page socially unless anyone has any other ideas? Many thanks Andy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TomKing0 -
Google Map embed on Contact Us page
Greetings Mozzers, When doing a website, we generally link a Google Map image of the company to the Google Maps in a new tab. Reading other questions made us wonder. Is it better to do the above or is it more beneficial to SEO to have a Google Map embedded on the website. Which I guess means it links Google to the Business in one way? Thanks for any/all responses.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MonsterWeb280 -
404'd pages still in index
I recently launched a site and shortly after performed a URL rewrite (not the greatest idea, i know). The developer 404'd the old pages instead of a permanent 301 redirect. This caused a mess in the index. I have tried to use Google's removal tool to remove these URL's from the index. These pages were being removed but now I am finding them in the index as just URL's to the 404'd page (i.e. no title tag or meta description). Should I wait this out or now go back and 301 redirect the old URL's (that are 404'd now) to the new URL's? I am sure this is the reason for my lack of ranking as the rest of my site is pretty well optimized and I have some quality links.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mj7750 -
Should you stop indexing of short lived pages?
In my site there will be a lot of pages that have a short life span of about a week as they are items on sale, should I nofollow the links meaning the site has a fwe hundred pages or allow indexing and have thousands but then have lots of links to pages that do not exist. I would of course if allowing indexing make sure the page links does not error and sends them to a similarly relevant page but which is best for me with the SEarch Engines? I would like to have the option of loads of links with pages of loads of content but not if it is detrimental Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | barney30120