Repetition of Product Names considered Spamming?
-
We have long lists of products are displayed on individual web pages ... with the only variations being in product dimensions and prices.
Could the Search Engines consider these lengthy lists of products for sale to be attempted spamming efforts?
(Example: http://www.just-insulation.com/overview_of_celotex_product_buy_cheapest.html)
Thank you.
-
Yes I would think Google would consider it spamming - there are wat too many instances of Celotex in the copy.
I would look for places to remove instances of Celotex where not needed.
|
Celotex TB4012
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
12
|
0.50
|
2.00
|
0.50
|
1.44
Celotex TB4020
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
20
|
0.90
|
1.11
|
0.72
|
2.07
Celotex TB4025
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
0.85
|
2.45
Celotex CW4025
|
20x0.45x1.2 = 10.8m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
0.85
|
9.18
Celotex FR5025
|
16x1.2x2.4 = 46.08m²
|
25
|
1.10
|
0.91
|
1.00
|
46.08
Celotex PL4025
|
26x1.2x2.4 = 74.88m²
|
37.5
|
1.20
|
0.87
|
9.06
|
678.41
Celotex TB4030
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
30
|
1.35
|
0.74
|
0.98
|
2.82 ETC
Celotex FR5030
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
30
|
1.35
|
0.00
|
1.16
|
0.00
Celotex TB4035
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
35
|
1.55
|
0.65
|
1.11
|
3.20
Celotex FR5035
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
35
|
1.55
|
0.00
|
1.32
|
0.00
Celotex TB4040
|
1.2x2.4 = 2.88m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.26
|
3.63
Celotex CW4040
|
12x0.45x1.2 = 6.48m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.26
|
8.16
Celotex CG5000
|
12x0.45x1.2 = 6.48m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.56
|
1.48
|
9.59
Celotex FR5040
|
?x1.2x2.4 = m²
|
40
|
1.80
|
0.00
|
1.48
|
0.00
Celotex CG5000
|
0x0.45x1.2 = 0m²
|
90
|
1.85
|
0.54
|
2.55
|
0.00
Celotex EL3050
|
x0.6x1.2 = 1.44m²
|
50
|
1.85
|
0.54
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Also way too many instances in the copy, less is more with new Google algorithms.
Celotex have rebranded their improved products the '4000' series. For example, Celotex GA3000 becomes Celotex GA4000 and Celotex XR3150 changes to Celotex XR4150. These changes reflects Celotex's improvement in product performance, and highlights the improved thermal performance of the boards.
Title and meta descriptions are too long
<title>Celotex Rigid PIR Insulation Boards GA4000, TB4000, XR4000, CG5000, CW4000, EL3000, FF4000, FR5000, PL4000, SW3000, PL4000, TA3000, TC3000 and TD4000\. All available from Just Insulation, UKtitle> <meta name="<a class="attribute-value">Description</a>" content="<a class="attribute-value">Buy your Celotex insulation boards online at the very best prices, sa fely and securely. Celotex high performance polyisocyanurate (PIR) boards offer an unrivalled range of thic knesses from 12mm – 200mm with products suitable for pitched and flat roofs, walls, cavityies, and floors ... along with a Class O fire rated product range for when project specifications demand enhanced fire performance.</a>" />
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search Console Showing 404 errors for product pages not in sitemap?
We have some products with url changes over the past several months. Google is showing these as having 404 errors even though they are not in sitemap (sitemap shows the correct NEW url). Is this expected? Will these errors eventually go away/stop being monitored by Google?
Technical SEO | | woshea0 -
Homepage name in Breadcrumb for schema.org
Hi all, We have recently implemented the schema.org structure for our breadcrumbs. In our breadcrumb we include a link to the homepage. Since implementation I'm receiving the following error in Google Search Console: Either "name" or "item.name" should be specified The error is being triggered because we don't have itemprop="name" defined for the homepage on each page. Our breadcrumbs look good in search but I'm wondering if anybody else has experienced this error and what can we do to fix it. Should itemprop="name" be our Brand name? Or should we define this as our root domain? Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | Brando160 -
Is it a good idea to use an old domain name for a new product
Hi guys, I have a domain name XYZ.com which hosts the site of a technology service company as of now. The company however didn't do well and shut down a few years ago. Now, that company wants to launch a new set of technology products and wants to use the same domain name. Is it a good idea. The issues that I can see here are: 1. Google has previous pages indexed 2. There are a couple of subdomains totally irrelevant to the business. like employees.xyz.com there. 3. Can the previous indexing be completely undone. Regards, Mayank
Technical SEO | | mayanksaxena0 -
How do I handle duplicate content of the same product in Multiple product categories?
I am building a BigCommerce store for selling framed art. Many of the pieces of art will fall in more than one product category. Let's say I have a framed print of a photograph of a western landscape. This piece of art would fit into these categories; "western", "landscape", and "photography". I would have three pages with duplicate content for just this one framed print. Will google give me less page rank due to this? Can all the link juice be given to just one of the three categories by use of rel=canonical? If so, does anyone know how to do this for a bigcommerce site? I would appreciate any feedback. Thanks, Kelly
Technical SEO | | Kelly_S0 -
Does Google think My main keyword is my Company name due to over use in anchor text?
OK, i have recently noticed google is adding a keyword to my titles... I have attached an image which shows the results from a google site:mywebsite search... 8 out of the 10 results on the screen shot clearly have the keyword ( - CCTV Cameras) added to the end of the title. Now a lot of those pages are support pages i.e "Help & Support", "returns" etc etc.. nothing really to do with cctv cameras. The only thing i can think of, is the most common anchor text used on backlinks to my website (according to siteexplorer) is the keyword cctv cameras... (i am currently working on removing a load of the backlinks to my site due to what i think is some kind of google penalty as the anchor text is all keywords etc...) But it seems strange if google has started to discount these backlinks, that it then uses that keyword to add to my titles - unless of course, google thinks that it is my brand name... Any body have any thoughts on this? FqwooQY.gif
Technical SEO | | isntworkdull1 -
Best way to host new product?
Hi guys We are launching a new product, the web pages are being built by a 3rd party and fall outside our current CMS. We're considering either hosting it on 1) sub domain 2) folder within existing site (although will be tricky to implement) or 3) a different URL altogether. What would you say is the best for SEO? Many thanks in advance.... Nigel
Technical SEO | | Richard5550 -
Does removing product listings help raise SERP's on other pages?
Does removing content ever make sense? We have out of stock products that are left on the site (in an out of stock section) specifically for SEO value, but I am not sure how to approach the problem from a bottom line conversion stand point. Do we leave out of stock products and hope that they turn into a conversion rate via cross selling, or do out of stock products lower the value of other pages by "stealing" link juice and pagerank from the rest of the site? (and effectively driving interest away) What is your perspective? Do you believe that any content that is related or semi-related to your main focus is beneficial, or does it only make sense to have strong content that has a higher rate of conversion and overall site engagement?
Technical SEO | | 13375auc30 -
Empty <a>tag (no href or name attribute specificed) potential effect on link juice</a>
I have a client that insists on using the ProPhoto WordPress theme. This theme has an interesting habit of putting empty anchor tags in the site nav in order to nest css dropdowns. By empty I mean totally empty. For example: <a>Navigation Link</a> Since the anchor does not specify a destiation, do you think it would have any effect on link juice one way or the other? This wouldn't count as an additional link on the page would it? My inclination and personal practice is not to risk quirky things like this, but I'd like a second opinion before I suggest changes to the client's site. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Dameian2