What are realistic goals for local serch results?
-
I have a brand new domain, 2 months old, and am just finishing design. What are realistic goals for the 1rst year in local search results?
My competition appears to be the local directories. Manta, yellowpages, angieslist, BBB and so on. Is it realistic to expect to eventually outrank them for the local search terms? (City Service Keyword) If so, what is a realistic time frame for someone putting in 10 to 15 hours a week on SEO, Including content creation.
This was the humbling report I just ran. Looks like my choices are to beat them or pay them excessive amounts of money.
-
Thanks Littlesthobo!
I feel I am doing the right things, as you described, socially. Have all the accounts and I dedicate a couple hours every Friday to social.
"Also ensure you have cast iron on page, pick a keyword per page and make sure the page fully reflects that keyword"
I am going to start a new topic about this because I have a interesting problem. Being that I service rural area, my ideal keywords consist of four cities and two services. Thats tough sledding when trying to build a site that is easy to navigate, visually appealing and optimized. I assume it's not wise to put "city y service, city x service, city z service" in the title and then try to naturally implement all those keywords into said service page.
I need to decide if I should limit my city to 1 or build multiple pages for each city. Each has it's pros and cons from my inexperienced point of view. The multiple pages looks amateur-ish and takes away from navigation / appeal. (Lakeville lawn care page, eagan lawn care page, apple valley lawn care page) The one city limits my potential customers.
As a start up business, I am leaning toward 1 city and then worrying about expanding the scope of the site later, but am certainly open to suggestions.
-
Yeah. What she said. Well done. Good point about a keyword per page. Something not to lose touch of is that as people move more towards mobile search that search is changing and becoming more "long tail". That's where good quality content comes in. Good quality content on your site tends to capture the "long tail" search traffic.
One thing I would disagree about ... analyze your competition. If they are "stuffing" keywords to an extent, then I would stuff keywords to the same extent. Even though It's not popular, the fact is that keyword density can be the low-hanging fruit you can pick off to get quick results.
Jim
-
Hi Derrick
Back in November I built a website for a client that is already ranking between 1 and 4 for several keywords and I had similar concerns at the outset. One thing I noticed about that report you ran was that all the directory style competition had very low page authority scores. Good page authority can outrank directories.
What I've written below is based on what I did...It started off with a lot of work in the initial set up, but it's generally just a couple of hours maintenance a week..
As it's local, get a google + page and link the page to your site and focus on getting some good social signals for each page - tweet your pages, facebook like and share you pages, google +1 your pages and so on and if you are blogging, do the same. A good bit of content and plenty of social sharing can work wonders. Set up social media accounts on a few of the main networks and use them to really connect and bulid relationships, rather than churning our rss feeds.
Also ensure you have cast iron on page, pick a keyword per page and make sure the page fully reflects that keyword so that when a search lands on it they are truly finding what they are looking for. Have that keyword in the title tag and a good meta desc that tells the user what your page is about. Don't stuff the page with the keyword, just make sure it appears a couple of times, particularly in headings if you have it broken up.
You can also get yourself some free decent directory links - proper local business directories, not spammy ones and industry specific national directories.
The verified google plus page is invaluable and you can well optimise your google+ page, get reviews etc.
-
Thanks for the detailed response, James!
I have setup the G+ account and local listings on Google, Bing and Yahoo but I am disadvantaged there as well. The business is run out of a home in PoDonk, MN, population 1K, while my potential customers and competitors are all in the cities. When you search for "PoDonk, MN Keyword" I do just fine. Problem is, everyone who lives in Podonk already has a plow on their truck and half of them probably don't have an internet connection.
I noticed Google offered more options in the local listing as far as adding cities serviced, so I took advantage of that. The search results are not good at the moment for those cities but I am hoping by taking advantage of snippets with rel=author, reviews and location to improve. (This is where I will take your advice about offering discounts / begging for reviews and +1's.) I do wonder if having the markups for location is a hinderence if I am not located in the desired service area?
I do have one major advantage over my competitors and that is time on my hands and a touch of internet savvy.
-
Ok, here's the dope. Your best shot is local listings. If you enter your search term in Google, notice that after the first 3 listings on the top, there is a list of local providers, with addresses? If you have a local address, then you need to use snippets to mark it and point to them with your free Webmaster account at Google. Snippets really do work, especially for local search. What I can tell you from my 10+ years of SEO is find the "big dogs" and meticulously examine what they do.
Look at what they're doing in their header, H1 tags, use of strong/emphasis, copy, keyword packing, everything. And despite what you hear about "keyword stuffing" being bad, you need to have a certain amount of keyword density to rank highly, and that's just a fact. The other elements that will help you rise in the rankings are all the tried and true SEO methods: get links, and lots of them. Quality matters more than quantity, although if you can blend both you're going to be in much better shape.
Check out the local "watering holes." Where do folks in your local community gather online to chat? Be the expert. Pitch in to help with opinions and knowledge. And, of course, link to your site. Also, ask your happy customers (you have many of those, right?) to like you, Google + you, etc. OK, fine, bribe them with discounts and free things like fridge magnets and calendars if you have to, but those ratings will do much to keep you in that coveted spot with all those delicious local listings.
There's no magic bullet here, but if you work at it consistently, getting good links, getting good references, doing your social work (Facebook, Twitter), you can eventually get up there. It's like the old story of the two guys in the woods who come upon a bear. One starts running, and as his buddy starts catching up, he yells "what are you doing, we can't outrun a bear?" And his buddy shouts back: "I don't have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you." You don't have to be the best SEO in the world ... you just need to be better than the other snowplowing firms in the area to get traction. You're asking questions here, and that's a really good start.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Fetch and Render - Partial result (resources temporarily unavailable)
Over the past few weeks, my website pages have been showing as partial in the Google Search Console. There are many resources/ files (js, css, images) that are 'temporarily unreachable'. The website files haven't had any structural changes for about 2 years (it historically has always shows as 'completed' and rendered absolutely fine in the search console). I have checked and the robots.txt is fine as is the sitemap. My host hasn't been very helpful, but has confirmed there are no server issues. My website rankings have now dropped which I think is due to these resources issues and I need to clear this issue up asap - can any one here offer any assistance? It would be hugely appreciated. Thanks, Dan
SERP Trends | | dan_550 -
URL Parameter for Limiting Results
We have a category page that lists products. We have parameters and the default value is to limit the page to display 9 products. If the user wishes, they can view 15 products or 30 products on the same page. The parameter is ?limit=9 or ?limit=15 and so on. Google is recognizing this as duplicate meta tags and meta descriptions via HTML Suggestions. I have a couple questions. 1. What should be my goal? Is my goal to have Google crawl the page with 9 items or crawl the page with all items in the category? In Search Console, the first part of setting up a URL parameter says "Does this parameter change page content seen by the user?". In my opinion, I think the answer is Yes. Then, when I select how the parameter affects page content, I assume I'd choose Narrows because it's either narrowing or expanding the number of items displayed on the page. 2. When setting up my URL Parameters in Search Console, do I want to select Every URL or just let Googlebot decide? I'm torn because when I read about Every URL, it says this setting could result in Googlebot unnecessarily crawling duplicate content on your site (it's already doing that). When reading further, I begin to second guess the Narrowing option. Now I'm at a loss on what to do. Any advice or suggestions will be helpful! Thanks.
SERP Trends | | dkeipper0 -
Google News results ...can it be SEOed?
Hello Everyone. I simply wanted to know if anyone had some useful insight on what it takes for a legitimate website to appear within the Google News results. I have rarely, or ever, had to dabble in this kind of SEO, but after coming across a situation with a perfectly legitimate website, I'm now scratching my head. The site in question is a very well established website, with 0 "seo" done to it. All links organic, all traffic legit and they have VERY strong social media presence. The site's current DA is 50. Its a 3 letter domain. Some of the points I believe are important quantity and quality of content (% of aggregated vs actually original content) overall % of "news" content vs rest of the site content authors/writers credentials (how would Google evaluate the authority of a writer, so his/her content is newsworthy?) overall site authority rich snippet and code needed to be indexed? I think rel publisher or rel author tags have something to do with it? making sure to have basic SEO in place: canonical tag, unique headers, etc. What am I missing? They have one particular competitor that seem to be ranking for almost everything news related, while being a similar site in content and authority, however they are nowhere. They have submitted to Google News before (not even sure what that means) but have failed to be included -- does this put a "stain" on them for any reason or impede the possibility of being indexed in the Google News results in the future? ANY input is appreciated.
SERP Trends | | 1stOTLJK0 -
How often do you submit to local search/citation sites?
I recently received a Network Solutions spam/offer email regarding their internet marketing packages. One of the "benefits" they cited was that they submit your information to local search/citation sites once a month, to keep it up-to-date. I don't know about you guys, but my clients' information isn't changing on a frequent basis. I remember when it used to be a tactic to submit regularly to the same citation sites, but that seems like overkill now. Does anyone still do this, or is NS just trying to make their product sound good? Do we need to update citation sites frequently, or is it enough to update when there are actual changes to make?
SERP Trends | | ScottImageWorks0 -
Appearing in Universal Results drops us from Organic Results
Hi all, Has anyone noticed that achieving an appearance in the Universal Results (7 box) forced their previous organic ranking to drop out completely for that keyword? I thought Google would still show us in Universal AND Organic. Is this typical? Here's what happened: Last Week: Ranked no. 6 in standard organic results for specific keyword (but 7 box universal results appear ahead of us between position 3 and 4 and we're not listed) This Week: We added ourselves to Google Places a few weeks ago and this week we suddenly appear in the desirable 7 box Universal result, which is much higher and better ranking - great! But interestingly we notice at the same time our normal organic ranking at no.6 has dropped out completely (-50 in moztool). Is it an either/or for Organic vs. Universal or can you ever keep ranking in both?
SERP Trends | | emerald0 -
What options are there for local SEO when no physical location exists?
I work for a automobile transportation company that provides services in several different cities throughout the US. Our headquarters (and physical location) is in San Diego, California, however we have drivers stationed in several different cities throughout the nation. The problem is, we don't have physical locations in those other cities - our drivers essentially work from home. What local SEO options are available to us, if any, for those cities where we don't have an actual brick and mortar address? Listing the home address of our drivers is, for obvious reasons, not ideal. Thanks for your help!
SERP Trends | | SEOAspirant0 -
Local Search Not Responding To Optimisation
Hi guys / gals. This is quite rare for me because I normally can put together a good strategy based on the best articles / content etc I have read. However this time I am in a bit of a situation where I dont seem to be able to get results for my Google Local Listings or Google Plus Places page. The listing is good, has a description, images, url, address etc. The weakness was a lack of citations, so I got the White Spark Tool and went to work. I have probably built about 20 citations - all pretty good sites, nothing dodgy. The issue is my listing has gone the wrong way i.e. lost positions. What am I doing wrong here. Is 20 citations just not enough? Is there another ranking factor I am neglecting? I have digested this : http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml Please advise peeps 🙂
SERP Trends | | Jon_bangonline0 -
How to get Google Results for Did You Mean | Showing results for
If someone misspells our company name in Google, how do I get google to display **Did You Mean: **xyz. Our company name is difficult to spell and could be spelled multiple ways. What is the trick to this?
SERP Trends | | hfranz0