Google appending keyword to local search result(s)?
-
I noticed an interesting change today in how one of my clients appears in the SERPs. Google seems to be appending a keyword to his listing title.
Client website: www.mycalgarydentist.com
Keyword: Calgary dentist
Rank: #2 or #1 lately
Title tag: Calgary Dentist | Ambiance Dental
Google+ Local listing title: Ambiance Dental
Link title in SERP: Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentist
That last point is what's interesting, and new. As of a couple weeks ago (before I went on holidays) his link would simply show "Ambiance Dental", which makes sense because that's the title of his Google+ Local listing.
Given the above information, I can't see why his link in Google's SERP is "Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentist" when doing a search for that keyword. When I do a search for "Calgary dentists" or other similar searches, he simply shows as "Ambiance Dental", not "Ambiance Dental: Calgary Dentists"
To test yourself, use the Google AdWords Preview Tool (https://adwords.google.com/d/AdPreview/), change locality to "Calgary, AB, Canada" and search.
I suspect this doesn't mean he's violating Google's guidelines for business listings (i.e. businesses aren't supposed to add keywords to their business title). I'm certainly curious why this is happening though.
Can anyone provide any insight? Has anyone seen anything similar?
-
Hi guys, I see this as well for a client we have in a competitive space.
It's a little difficult to understand, because it tends to apply to only particular pages of a domain (please check by using site:yourdomain.com and view all titles)
There seems to be no correlation at all.
It could be a conversion / click through test for Google.
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the thorough response. Just what I was looking for, and that has opened my eyes to the discussion a bit more, and helped to explain it.
As for "Calgary dentist" being the term that Google is re-writing, maybe it has to do with the extensive focus on that keyword on the home page, and in link building? It could be more evident as the site's name than "Ambiance Dental", which is the actual business. Just a thought.
I guess I'll keep my eye on this. If there's anything particularly interesting, I may post a response here as well.
PS - Canmore, awesome.
-
Quite a few people have been noticing this over the last several weeks, KC.
It was mentioned a week ago on Search Engine Roundtable and I was discussing it with another Calgary SEO who had noticed it over 3 weeks ago.
There have been a number of suggestions about when Google's doing this kind of title tag re-writing, but no sooner does someone come up with a theory, but somebody else shows proof that contradicts it. E.g. for a while it was thought the re-writing was occurring for brand searches, especially where the brand name was split off at the end of the title by a separator like a hyphen or a pipe pipe. But your example shows for a keyword search, rather than brand.
It really looks to me that Google is experimenting with this. I've seen it come and go, and it is in no way consistent at this point, which is why nobody seems to have been able to nail down a specific set of circumstances in which it occurs.
Sorry this doesn't really give you any actionable info. Just wanted you to know that others have been seeing it recently as well.
Paul
P.S. And hi from just down the highway in Canmore!
-
Thanks for the input, Dave.
I have never seen this for any of my other clients, nor any competitors in the local space. And I find it interesting that...
(a) my client's listing didn't appear this way before and...
(b) the way the link is shown doesn't actually match the title tag. In the title tag I have the keyword first. Do you still think the new link test is related to the title tag, or could it be something else?
Has anyone else seen similar behaviour with their listings, or competitors?
If it's understood WHY this might happen, I could make changes to encourage it for my other clients. And others could learn and do the same.
-
I see this all the time. Usually when a pipe "|" or a comma is used in the Title tag. I can't say I know why it's happening though.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Abnormally high internal link reported in Google Search Console not matching Moz reports
If I'm looking at our internal link count and structure on Google Search Console, some pages are listed as having over a thousand internal links within our site. I've read that having too many internal links on a page devalues that page's PageRank, because the value is divided amongst the pages it links out to. Likewise, I've heard having too many internal links is just bad in general for SEO. Is that true? The problem I'm facing is determining how Google is "discovering" these internal links. If I'm just looking at one single page reported with, say, 1,350 links and I'm just looking at the code, it may only have 80 or 90 actual links. Moz will confirm this, as well. So why would Google Search Console report different? Should I be concerned about this?
Technical SEO | | Closetstogo0 -
404 or rel="canonical" for empty search results?
We have search on our site, using the URL, so we might have: example.com/location-1/service-1, or example.com/location-2/service-2. Since we're a directory we want these pages to rank. Sometimes, there are no search results for a particular location/service combo, and when that happens we show an advanced search form that lets the user choose another location, or expand the search area, or otherwise help themselves. However, that search form still appears at the URL example.com/location/service - so there are several location/service combos on our website that show that particular form, leading to duplicate content issues. We may have search results to display on these pages in the future, so we want to keep them around, and would like Google to look at them and even index them if that happens, so what's the best option here? Should we rel="canonical" the page to the example.com/search (where the search form usually resides)? Should we serve the search form page with an HTTP 404 header? Something else? I look forward to the discussion.
Technical SEO | | 4RS_John1 -
Search/Search Results Page & Duplicate Content
If you have a page whose only purpose is to allow searches and the search results can be generated by any keyword entered, should all those search result urls be no index or rel canonical? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | cakelady0 -
Why Google not picking My META Description? Google itself populate the description.. How to control this Search Snippets??
Why Google not picking My META Description? Google itself populate the description.. How to control this Search Snippets??
Technical SEO | | greyniumseo0 -
One Page - Targeting Multiple Low Searched Keywords.
Hi, First "Question" on SEOmoz, A client has requested me to have all the traffic going to the main/home page. In total its 25 Keywords and competition is pretty low, lets say "Builder In City", all the keywords are the sames except for the citys. "Builder In London" "Builder in Birmingham" Builder in Cardiff" .. and so on. Will it be ok and do-able to target 1 homepage with 25 keywords and expect decent results.
Technical SEO | | Prestige-SEO0 -
Site wide search v catalogue search
I have a client building a new web site who has agreed that a site search function is a good thing in order to get a view on how customers are using the site, the search terms they are using as a source of keywords etc. The problem is the developer has implemented a catalogue/product search which only queries the products in the database. On the one hand this is fine in that the search is directing users to products and not to other areas of the site. But the customer is disappointed that the search is not site wide. Are there any solutions where third party search utility could be implemented whithin the site which will search both? The ecommerce platform is Magento. Any views would be very helpful!
Technical SEO | | k3nn3dy30 -
Is it a good idea to make 301 from a site which you know google has banned certain keywords for to a new site with similar content
Here is a short question re. 301. I read Dovers article on how to move an old domain to a new one. Say you have been a little inexperienced regarding linkbuilding and used some cheap service in the past and you have steadily seen that certain keywords have been depreciating in the SERP - however the PR is still 3 for the domain - now the qustion is should you rediect with a 301 in .htaccess to a new domain when you know that google does not like certain keywords with respect to the old site. Will the doom and gloom carry over to the new site?
Technical SEO | | Kofoed0 -
Does having the local area name in a domain effect your results when branching out?
We have a domain which performs well within the local search and has got good authority and trust but we are now moving further afield to rank for keywords country wide. Our current domain contains our local area, does this effect your chances of ranking for broader searches? You don't seem to see many general searches bring domains up with the location keywords within their domain.
Technical SEO | | DragonsDesign0