Best Webhosting Suggestions??
-
Good morning my fellow Mozzers! I am currently looking at adding some diversity to my current web hosting and I was hoping I could get some suggestions. I dont currently need a VPS or Dedicated Server, I just need some shared hosting, you know, packeges that are sub $20 a month...i mean i will pay more than that, but so far everything i look at that meets my needs(basic hosting, email, ect...). This is for client sites and they are growing in number somewhat rapidly. I currently host with GoDaddy and they are amazing in the support department, but I do question whether their servers are causing slow page loads ect...but all in all I am happy with them. I have used Netword Solutions in the past, but left them because i was not a big fan of talking to support people in india and malasia. I do think that their servers might have performed better than GoDaddy so i am not ruling them out at this point
i am looking for a provider that has excellent support and who has servers that are not so overloaded the can render pages and content slowly. Performance is very important to me. I am not looking for the cheapest, I am looking for the overall best.
Thanks in advance SEOmoz family!!!
-
I am glad I was able to help. Please let me know if you have any issues with pair as I doubt you will. But they really are a fantastic web host and I think you made a great decision. I'm happy I could've been of assistance
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Well I am going to also go with your suggestion, I am going to pick up some hosti g from Pair next. Thanks for all your input!
-
Four attempts to contact a salesperson at Liquid Web was a complete failure and aggravation. They are a good host I am sure, but they didn't have it together enough to have a competent, friendly sales rep with a working headset available. And when I did get a rep on the phone...which I could barely hear, they seemed annoyed that I dare ask what the benefits of hosting with Liquid Web are. Really, I wanted to go with them, but I felt like I was already seeing red flags. Pair, honestly...and perhaps this was a mistake, but I didn't like their website...it seemed very bare bones and antiquated....I mean was not looking for a host with the flashiest website by any means, but their site was concerning to me....too, basic...like not even minimalist, but just looked unsophisticated. It made me concerned they may be very frugal, and I feared that frugality may also apply to purchasing infrastructure...and Orange....eh...I don't know..just wasn't feeling it. With Media Temple I spoke with someone that sounded very professional, not salesy, was quite candid and knowledgeable....he was one of their engineers...site was nice....their market growth impressive....I just got a good feeling from them. Perhaps I had the wrong mindset in my decision, but hey....it's $20 buck a month and I am going to be bringing on about 4 more hosting providers, so I am not too concerned. Honestly....liquid web REALLY irked me....
-
Nakul,
I was thinking of say ServInt.com as well goo.d call man. ASO is great, but no phone but great still Pair if not not 100% Wordpress I want firehost (not in shared) or Pair
tom
-
I am if interested why would you go to media Temple? Especially shared there really not known for reliability or speed grid infrastructure of their WordPress place them under with 3 hosts as suggested hosts however they've removed them and replace them with laughing squid since something based off rack space much more reliable. and it's also not showing up.
They look cool I as well
all the best ,
tom
-
I'm happy you like my pick thank you. I actually really love hosting and spend a lot of time in investigating it. One thing you might find very interesting is this this is the top 40 hosts in the country and then they go by the top 10 top 5 sometimes from month to month tell me if you see a pattern http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/performance/
I can cut to the chase pair networks is in 8/10 of the top ten in the world MT can't do anything link that. I could give you 100 links that show media Temple is decent further extremely high-end customers other than that they are not a good hosting system for shared host am sorry it's the truth and GS is not good it looks nice.
Media Temple doesn't show up I don't believe not list I can search for them
http://snnyc.com/2011/04/media-temple-issue/
Disclaimer I use a host web synthesis that uses a specific lamp they built on media Temple its work all right so this is not at all on media Temple as a company however it is a serious bash on them for this long and telling us its current GS using their GS service wasting people's money and having one of the slowest shared systems on the market and most complained about and by far in the lowest bottom 5% for uptime CS I don't care if it comes out or not I have no interest in it.
Below is a testimonial from a man Unger put the link up to this is for the person asking the question it's not a rant
"jim
http://hostjury.com/reviews/Media+Temple
| |
16 Feb 12
2 main products line: dv and shared. Those comes in several flavors. Have been with them 3 years and had both gs and dv. DV is not recommendable unless you are extremely ignorant in IT. They offer a great support in IT and guide you through a learning process so that you do not have to rely on them and they save support money. But what they offer at 50 bucks a month for the DV is much lower than other reliable companies for the same price. "
|
Do you host a little bit everything?
Yes liquid Web to be honest is not the same type of customer support that you're going to get from pair media Temple are using GS man?
There is a beautiful side to media Temple it is a gorgeous looking system. And their support is not bad but not great but they're not bad. There dedicated or virtual dedicated stuff is okay its really not anything that you want to use until you get into the VE or the helix cloud.
I hope you have a good experience on media Temple but I can tell you one thing man GS scanner crash
-
I second ASmallOrange.com, amazing support. Another one is ServInt.com
Both of them are great in support. I hope this helps.
-
So you know that if you're hosting WordPress. And you want to really speed and security. WP engine and Page.ly both outstanding WordPress only hosts that are extremely fast then built to be quick and safe. Offer discounts to SEOmoz pro members
Pagely offers 30% Off All Plans for life. That would bring your total under $20.
The WP engine offers 4 months of free hosting. If you take that into consideration it is less money than obviously paying for its full price.
These are each managed and extremely great companies to work with.
Just for informational reasons and because I think you should know
ZippyKid offers you an enterprise class DNS system and content delivery network
For $25 a month it is a WordPress only site like the others. However it too offers incredible speed and customer support.
Web synthesis is 8 web hosting company built for managed WordPress again however they like the others are outstanding security as far as speed and support. I felt you should know these at least exist.
Lastly page fully keeps giving you 30% off every new account you add and they're backed by fire host which is a 100% enterprise host.
Zippy kid charges $15 more per a site or $10 more per hundred thousand views per month
WP engine goes up to a much higher plan that would equal $10 a website if you were running all WordPress. It would be a good choice.
Web synthesis is $200 for no more than 3 domains so you don't save a lot of money adding sites. However they're very very good
here is the link you need to find the discounts through SEOmoz
http://www.seomoz.org/pro-perks
So you know these sites are going as far fixing that work hacked site's that was attacked for free and giving you a lot more than what you actually get by paying it to each different vendor to make a host like this.
Content delivery networks and any cast DNS make your website very fast along with private clouds and top tier data centers that's where the true speed comes in and I would suggest if it's WordPress one of these.
Again I understand you set under $20 and I do believe page.ly we now meets that criteria I don't know if you are going to use it for WordPress were not but if you are I would recommend using one of these.
So you know as well if it's not WordPress that's fine of course**, then** I would use pair networks and I would add either MAX CDN or CDN77 each content delivery network costs under $39 for 1 terabyte that's much more than many websites will ever use in a year. This will add speed to any of your sites you can also use a company like DNS made easy to get 10 domains hosted on their anycast DNS network with 11 year uptime
With Pair http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/performance/
I should also tell you SEOmoz perks gives you great deals on domains
If you need a name that is registered or very unique http://www.dynadot.com/ is the place to go a nother that seomoz made a deal me to deal with with is http://www.namecheap.com/
http://www.singlehop.com/partners/reseller-hosting/#white-label
Free reselling from Singlehop, Pair & Page.ly
I hope this was of help,
Tom
-
I just went with Media Temple....thanks!
-
I just tried Liquid Web...I was going to go with them, but twice I called and the voice connection was horrible and when I asked the sales rep to explain the benefits of going with liquid web as opposed to other providers, she almost acted annoyed...it was very uncomfortable...not a great way to enter into a business relationship....unfortunately they are scratched off the list of possibilities as a place to bring our rapidly growing web agencies client websites....
Trying Media Temple and your suggested Pair...thanks!
-
All of our websites are wordpress sites hosted by BlueHost, and I've been completely satisfied. They are however lower traffic sites (30-100) visitors per day. When I called them I think I talked to someone in Utah and the support was great.
If I were in the market for new hosting right now I'd probably be looking into Media Temple.
-
Every one of these are backed up nightly not weekly or monthly.
The 1st two are considered truly outstanding in the industry especially pair their uptime is literally almost unbeatable.
Can tell you from working with many hosting providers. That to give you a reference as to what is the faster host when you're talking about shared web hosting. Is very hard because unless you take out the shared equation is is possible for one person to use more of the ram and CPU than another depending on the company. They are also the only ones who offer a hosted email solution along with their product for no extra cost. This is very important because you don't want to share an IP address and have somebody blacklisted because they spam someone in you happen to share it because you're on shared hosting.
I would recommend one fantastic company that you can get shared hosting for under $20 is pair networks I also believe them to be the quickest as they really are very generous and very caring when it comes to their customers allocated space as opposed to almost every other shared host I can think of. Aside from the two others I am listing
Their plans are listed here so you know the start up most expensive of the top and go down to the least expensive. This is their shared hosting offering, and you'll see everyone gets a dedicated IP address along with quite a bit of extras and I can speak from experience there staff will treat you as if you've spent $4000 month the same as if you're spending 4. Their base plan and set $10 month and goes up from there
http://www.pair.com/services/web_hosting/
I believe if you research them you'll agree that they are probably the best bet. Considering shared hosting companies can limit the amount of people on a node or a server and pair is considered one of the best of the best also has some of the best uptime of any host at all. Your site is backed up every night and the server does not use a Cpanel it uses a perfect proprietary panel for security and speed reasons. This is why I know personally I believe the research should pair do not stuff people onto their servers as Go Daddy is known to and the way that they're run is optimized I should let you know there is a one-time $25 setup fee I believe however you may be able to pass them to waive it I would personally pay it to have the ability to host on such a renowned host
You have 100 days money back guarantee if you do not like it and 24 7 phones and e-mail support
The other two I could think of being liquid Web they offer a shared hosting plan for under $20 as well and they are considered to be a fantastic host.
Very also offer 24 7 phone and e-mail support and backup your site nightly
They are very up to date and considered amongst many one of the best hosting companies. Like pair they can work with you if you get larger until you get to whatever you want very large services. However I would still personally use pair. hears liquid webs shared hosting solution for under $20
http://www.liquidweb.com/configure/standard-website-hosting-plan
The other is a small orange.
Their plans are here
http://asmallorange.com/hosting/
They are a great company that does what I believe is a outstanding job for the money. They also offer a backup the difference between a small orange and the two companies I've listed is unfortunately a small orange only does e-mail support however this normally is not an issue if it is for you obviously I hope I've told you about her prior.
All of them allow you to buy domains through their services I don't know if you post WordPress but if you do I would look into managed WordPress hosting it really gives you a lot of bang for the buck however you did not want to exceed $20 and $25 is where I knew managed WordPress hosting starts so if you're interested in Matt let me know and I'd be happy to share my information and knowledge about that with you.
I hope this has been of help.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Well chances are godaddy is slow because of the number of sites per server. Check out these advanced hosting plans you wont be disappointed. The support is top level USA based technical support and the servers are ran on cloud Linux which is a dream come true when it comes to shared hosting. Plus you get a lot of nice extra's like daily/weekly/monthly restores from the cPanel, site builders, and 1 click installers.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best URL when adding an SSL certificate . . .
Our (small) company is a little late to the party on this, and we've only just realised that we're better off with an SSL certificate for our website. (Yes I know, I know, but we dropped SEO some time ago after getting severely bitten by a certain Penguin, and are only just making tentative step back to it after those intervening years, so we're running to get back up to date with these things.) This has now been implemented, but our web guy has dropped the 'www' element during the process. Our http://domain.com address has always historically been redicrected to our main http://www.domain.com address. Now our web guy has implemented the SSL cert, our website URL is appearing as https://domain.com, and he has redirected the http://www.domain.com to that new URL. Obviously all our historic (and more recent) link building has been to the http://www.domain.com address. Is this an issue, should the new Https URL keep the 'www', or does it make no difference what so ever? Conversely could it actually be of benefit dropping the 'www.' because our keyword specific product URL's are now 4 characters closer to the http and 4 digits shorter? Finally, on the links we have control of (professional trade associations etc) do we need to ask them to change the links to the new Https address, or does the transition from Http to Https make no difference?
Web Design | | Wookii0 -
What's the world's best hosting?
Hello folks, I'm looking at hosting options. In your opinion, what's the best provider out there and why? Cheers, Gill.
Web Design | | Cannetastic0 -
Is there a best practice for how to set up an Age Restriction prompt for a website (vape equiptment)
I am working on a website that sells vape equipment and supplies and is required to have an age restriction (birthday) prompt in order to enter the site. Is there a 'best practice' way to implement this?
Web Design | | RandolphMorris0 -
Best practice for product detail when all products are onepage
HI there,
Web Design | | Hephey
I have a page utilizing isotope with multiple products with small text excerpts and when you click an item i opens a detailed view without requiring a new page load. I've read some of the one page posts but can't get my head around what's best SEO wise when dealing with possible duplicate content. I guess one method could be to have the product list with small excerts of text and all the details hidden in some json and then when the user clicks it, it will open the product and fill with details from inline json. The click action is overring the a tag action e.g. with jquery, so the the a tag has a clean url to a proper subpage with meta, h1 and all that stuff so google can follow it. The jquery thing enables the navigation without a page reload and I can update the document url with pushState.
The subpage, if visited directly, includes the same animation stuff as the master but now has h1, p meta specific to that product but still with same effect, navigation and layout as the master page. Does anybody know if there is a better way to do this with one page sites when wanting to seo optimize detailed contents?0 -
Keywords in the page url for best SEO
Hello all, I am working in the keywors structure of a web and I have the following doubt: If I want to target these keywords: great food madrid and my website is: http://www.madridlive.com I do not know if I should keep either: OPTION 1: page url: www.madridlive.com/great-food-madrid or OPTION 2: page url www.madridlive.com/great-food I do not know if the search engines "understands" madrid in "madridlive", therefore I can avoid the "madrid" keyword, dicarding option 1 and going for option 2. Additionally I avoid duplication of the madrid keyword that can be seen as redundancy and also have a shorter page url. Thank you very much and sorry for such a question but I am new in this SEO field...just the excellent SEOMOZ's SEO Guide for beginners! Best regards, Antonio
Web Design | | aalcocer20030 -
Multilingual Website. Best SEO Strategy
Hello.
Web Design | | teconsite.com
We have a client that will extend his business to severak countries in Europe.
So far its main market was the Spanish one. In this market it works with his own domain that is the same that its brand name. The domain does not contain any important keyword but it has been working for 11 years: www.efutgol.com. In Spain has a good ranking. It ranks number 1 or number 2, it fluctuates. But it also sells to France and Portugal. In the France market they used a domain with exact match with the French keyword that they are interested in: www.equipementsfootball.com/. The same strategy www.equipamentosfutebol.com in Portugal. Both have number 1 for the main keyword in those Countries for that keyword Now they are going to sell in more countries.
The problem is that each website have a different CMS what makes necessary double maintenance. We are going to unificate in only one domain, one single design, one single CMS all websites. But were have doubts about SEO consequences of doing that What is the best thing for URLs?
www.efutgol.com/fr/ .....
www.efutgol.com/es/
www.efutgol.com / pt What should we do with the domains that are so well positioned in france and portugal? 301 redirect will work? What should we expect? What would you do? What things we should consider to keep the current position?0 -
Best Site navigation solution
Hi there, We are getting our website redesigned and would like to know whether to increase the links on our site wide navigation or not. At the moment we have around 30 links from the navigation. We want to use exploding navigation menu and increase the links to our most important categories. Say if we increase to 60-70 would that be alright. (what will be the highest we can go for) At the moment categories that get links from navigation are ranking pretty good. If we increase would we loose those rankings. What will be the pros and cons of increasing navigation links? Second question we are also adding fooer links to top 10 categories in the footer. Would this be ok as far as seo and google concerned. Many Thanks
Web Design | | Jvalops0 -
What's the best was to structure Product page information on my site?
Hi - I run a hobby related niche new / article / resource site (http://tinyurl.com/4eavaj4). One of the most critical components of the site is our product database. We don't actually sell anything directly - instead we monetize them by displaying relevant affiliate product feeds and price comparisons. However since the Panda update was implemented in February my traffic (particularly my long tail, product related traffic) has dropped off considerably. I had about a 20% drop in overall traffic, but have made up some of the ground in the past week. However I want to know once and for all how I should structure my product related information as I have a ton of great content that is ready to be published in this section but want to be sure I structure it the best possible way from a SEO standpoint. Here are a few different options I've come up with for displaying information about products on my site. For the purpose of these examples I am going to refer to all of the information that makes up my product pages collectively as "product profiles". Please let me know which is the best SEO wise (or if you have a better way of doing it let me know): - Option 1 - Current Method - Divide Content Sections into different pages / urls Example: http://tinyurl.com/4tpdlbl This is how the majority of my product profiles are currently structured. I did this to improve load times and to keep the total number of links per page down. In addition to the core product profile subpages: "Product Details","Compare Prices", **"**Product Review", "Hot Auctions", and "Checklists", I have the Checklists area further segmented by subset, each of which is on its own page that is only accessible through the main Checklists tab of the profile. - Option 2 - Everything on one url / page the old fashioned way, with everything available by scrolling vertically. This would make the page go on forever though. - Option 3 - Everything on one url / page, but visually segmented using css / javascript tabs. Example: http://tinyurl.com/4kqhauh I looked at the source code and all the page text is there, so it looks like it would be spider-able but you tell me. Or would another method of tabbing be better? My site is wordpress based so the functionality comes from a plugin. - Option 4 - Use post tabs that are technically all on the same page, but make each individual tab be accessible through its own suburl, all of which share the same core canonical url. Example: http://tinyurl.com/4bs9pjs Clicking on any of the individual tabs will result in something like ?postTabs=2 being appended to the core url. Example: http://tinyurl.com/4gvgufc Any input would be greatly appreciated asap! Thanks Mike
Web Design | | MikeATL0