Moving from www.domain.net to domain.com?
-
We're thinking about moving our domain from www.domain.net to domain.com as we just acquired the dot com domain. www.domain.net receives roughly 20million pageviews per month and gets about 90% of it's traffic from search engines.
What is best to do in this situation?
- Should we start using .com instead of .net? 301 redirecting traffic to the .com from .net?
- Should we drop the www in front?
-
Woohoo! Thanks for the update! If you have any lessons learned or a case study you think the community could benefit from reading, feel free to submit over at YouMoz.
-
Just following up again for anyone who has stumbled on this.
We recovered to about 95% of where we were before the domain tld switch in late September. We've been climbing ever since too.
-
I wanted to update everyone on this.
We switched move to .com from .net. 301s were all in place. No other changes.
We've lost about 30% of search traffic. Within the last two weeks, traffic has leveled off -- it's been flat so I'm expecting that the worst is over. WMT is showing a boatload of our urls getting reindexed which makes me feel a bit better.
Here's to a rebound these next few weeks!
-
Wouldn't recommend it! Just simply 301 the .com to .net and you're done. What's the use of doing it all? I mean with that amount of traffic you shouldn't be worrying about such trivial things. And in my experience, difference between those two is simply with direct traffic. Which accounts for how much of the access numbers? Simply put, you would be wasting a lot of time and money for it. But that's just my opinion on the matter.
-
Can you kindly give me an example of "plan a link and social strategy"? Just not sure what you mean exactly.
-
20million pageviews, so even a larger impact -- which is why we're incredibly nervous!
I think we may just point the .com to the .net address for now. We're not branded as company-dot-net so we're often told, "hey i went to company.com and i didnt see your site!" which is a major annoyance.
Our other problem is our URLs. Today, they look like domain.net/category/node/ID-number ... we were thinking about moving to domain.net/content-page-title/ but not sure if its worth it since our URLs are so indexed in google.
Thanks again for your input with all of this
-
Michael, I don't know if switching from the .net to .com would be the best solution. With 2 million page views per month, you're possibly talking about a big amount of traffic gone. It sounds like you have a well established website.
here is why. authorize.net is already branded as a company. If they were to become authorize.com, I would literally type into the browser authorize.net.
If you make the switch, expect to lose a little rankings. You can always make it up later to get back to 2 million page views per month.
-
Make sure that when you are migrating the URL's across that you get all the current URL's and redirect them to the equivalent on the new domain. Don't just 301 everything to the homepage as I've seen people do before!
In terms of the www. and non www, I always say to use www. because it looks better and more professional in my opinion, just 301 redirect the non. www to the www version.
-
301 redirection from old to anew domain will lose some of its juice so this will affect your rankings in search engine which will have a direct impact on your traffic. 301 redirection is the right choice but tray to plan a link and social strategy that you can implement right after the redirections and this will control the juice loss.
Dropping www is your choice, but keep that in mind that do not run two versions of the URL so decide first which version of the website you will be using and then redirect 301 all the other versions of URL to the preferred one.
-
- about 8k uniques per month
-
-
I don't think it's temporary or permanent. Although I think it's easier to remember the .com over .net version. I wonder how many people go to the .com instead/
-
Irrelevant to SEO. Just make sure one points to the other. Don't have both at the same time.
-
-
Thanks for your response.
-
would you say long term we're better off using .com? so do we sacrifice a potential 10% drop today for a 20% increase tomorrow?
-
is it relevant for SEO though if we switch?
-
-
-
If you do a redirect expect a drop in traffic. Rand says that there might be a 10% drop in some video I watched long ago.
-
www vs non-www is irrelevant to me. I do both (not on the same domain). www looks nicer because we are used to seeing it like that.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical cross domain Linkjuice
I know that back few years ago, rel=canonical used on cross-domain was passing link juice. As I've read based on many experts (case studies), the canonical cross-domain was working like implementing a 301. Is it still the case ? Does anyone tried to implement it recently and it worked ?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | manoman880 -
Are multiple links on the same domain worth pursuing?
Let's say you get a guest post on a blog that links to your site for $100. How much is the link from another guest post on the same domain worth? $90? $50? Does each additional link from the same domain lose its SEO impact? What if one blogger loves your content and is willing to post 10+ of your blog posts with links to your site in each - is that worth pursuing just from an SEO standpoint (I know it can be a good branding opportunity if the readership is right)?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | pbhatt0 -
Purchasing Expired Domains for SEO Value?
While doing competitive research for a client I have stumbled on a "site developed by" footer link for a fairly established business that points to an expired domain. I'm inclined to notify the business in question that the link is expired BUT I was curious to get some thoughts on if purchasing this domain and redirecting it to my site or another would be a good purely "SEO tactic" as it would seemingly pass "juice"??? Thanks, Dave
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DavidGadarian0 -
Keyword Named Domains
First, I'm new to SEO so bear with me. My company owns a list of domains with names that are keywords for us. Right now, all those domains are redirecting to our main site. None of the domains has ever had content; they were purchased recently and simple redirected. My questions are: 1) is there any value in having domains that are exact keywords on which we'd like to rank, (i.e. does this work to improve site traffic and ultimately rankings, or is this a black hat tactic)? and, 2) would there ever be any value in turning these sites into landing pages with content and outbound links that lead to our original site? Thanks for your advice.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SpearOne0 -
White hat link technique to banned domain
The question is: I have branddomain A (manually penalization by google, one year ago and after 4 consideration requests and more than 3/4 of links removed, stills banned) authority 42 And and new branddomain B (with fresh content created after penalization in the case of no recovery as it happen) authority 26 There are no links from A to B, both are now with same traffic but i want people that find me on domain A (partial penalized) to come to my new web brand. Both domains have same name, different extensión. So the question: Can i link with photo domain A to domain B, if i place nofollow and no ancor text on those linked photos. I want to have my traffic unified and i dont want to go against google guidelines
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Anyone else noticing that their expired domains have lost PR?
A while back I experimented with buying some expired domains that had some PR. I built a small website on each and created content with anchor text that linked back to my main site. For one of my sites I noticed a significant drop in rankings this week. At first I thought it was because of the latest Panda update. But, the drop was slow, not sudden like most Panda hits have been. Then, I noticed that some of my previously purchased domains that had held their PR for quite a while are now PR N/A. I'm guessing that the latest algorithm change caught on to what I was doing. Probably what I was doing was grey hat. I honestly think that every SEO goes through a period where they try out some grey or even black tactics. This makes me even more desiring to be completely White hat now....and build links that are going to last. I was just wondering if any of you guys have experienced anything like this this week? Would love to hear your thoughts. EDIT: A second question - What would you guys do with these domains? They're still in the Google index so they're not penalized, likely just stripped of PR. Would you scrap them completely? Remove the links back to my sites? Do nothing?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarieHaynes2 -
404checker.com / crawl errors
I noticed a few strange crawl errors in a Google Webmaster Tools account - further investigation showed they're pages that don't exist linked from here: http://404checker.com/404-checker-log Basically that means anyone can enter a URL into the website and it'll get linked from that page, temporarily at least. As there are hundreds of links of varying quality - at the moment they range from a well known car manufacturer to a university, porn and various organ enlargement websites - could that have a detrimental effect on any websites linked? They are all nofollow. Why would they choose to list these URLs on their website? It has some useful tools and information but I don't see the point in the log page. I have used it myself to check HTTP statuses but may look elsewhere from now on.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Alex-Harford0