Can too many "noindex" pages compared to "index" pages be a problem?
-
Hello,
I have a question for you: our website virtualsheetmusic.com includes thousands of product pages, and due to Panda penalties in the past, we have no-indexed most of the product pages hoping in a sort of recovery (not yet seen though!). So, currently we have about 4,000 "index" page compared to about 80,000 "noindex" pages.
Now, we plan to add additional 100,000 new product pages from a new publisher to offer our customers more music choice, and these new pages will still be marked as "noindex, follow".
At the end of the integration process, we will end up having something like 180,000 "noindex, follow" pages compared to about 4,000 "index, follow" pages.
Here is my question: can this huge discrepancy between 180,000 "noindex" pages and 4,000 "index" pages be a problem? Can this kind of scenario have or cause any negative effect on our current natural SEs profile? or is this something that doesn't actually matter?
Any thoughts on this issue are very welcome.
Thank you!
Fabrizio
-
Julian, we sell digital sheet music and the additional 100,000 are products from Alfred music publishing company. Of course they will not be "high quality pages", but they are product pages, each one offering a piece of music. We are an e-commerce website, how can we avoid having product pages?! But of course, as Wesley said above, we can improve each product page quality content by giving more/custom information for each product, increasing user reviews, etc.
Other suggestions?
-
Thank you Wesley, yes, I think you are right. Our business is suffering really too much without traffic coming from the "noindex" pages, and after many months we still don't see recovery. I think the best approach would be probably to keep the pages in the index and differentiate them as much as we can.
Thank you!
-
Panda is probably the worst penalty to have. Very few site ever recover, even though site owner have spent a lot of time, effort and money trying to solve it. e.g. http://searchengineland.com/google-panda-two-years-later-losers-still-losing-one-real-recovery-149491
In this video, about 12.43 - matt cutts is clear, if you think its low quality 404 it, in other delete it.
May I ask why you want to keep these 180,000 pages live? And why are you planning to add another 100,000 pages? Surely they cant be high quality pages?
-
Fabrizo, as far as I know Google Panda is now part of the standard Google algorithm and it won't be a periodic event anymore. Penguin still is though.
If your product pages are duplicate content according to Google try and see if you can do something about that instead of no-indexing it. Is there no way you can update the products so they display a more prominent description? I understand that manually it's not a possibility because there are way too much products for that to be an option.
I did notice that on a lot of your product pages you have a standard text: "This item includes: PDF (digital sheet music to print), Scorch files (for online playing, transposition and printing), Videos, MIDI and Mp3 audio files (including <a title="This item includes Mp3 music accompaniment files.">Mp3 music accompaniment files</a>)*
Genre: classical
Skill Level: medium"Since this is basicly the only text on a lot of pages I think it's a big part of the problem. Maybe you can change this text so it looks different for every product?
Try tools like http://www.plagspotter.com/ to find the duplicate content and see which solution is best for your specific problem.
I hope i helped and if you need more help let me know
-
I understand what you mean and I agree with you in general, but specifically to our own website, I have no idea who put that link on that page, which is by the way a "nofollow" link. We never built links, all our incoming links are either natural and/or links from our own affiliates. I don't see much of "that stuff" on our back-link profile... am I in error?
Anyhow, yes, we are aware the situation is quite complex. Thank you again.
-
I actually looked at the competitors ranking #3 and #4 for the phrase "download sheet music" since your ranking 5th. Either way, its not a matter of too much or too little. It's how much of the link profile is authentic vs how much is made up of stuff like this....
http://www.dionneco.com/2011/02/love-is-a-parallax/
that's what I meant by fake links.
I think what you may be missing is how complex the situation really is. There's a lot more to be considered than a number in Open Site Explorer - which is actually only a portions of what's really out there.
You may also want to look at changes you can make on-site. I'm a firm believer that proper HTML, accessibility, UX and all that really matter.
-
Thank you Takeshi, I think you got the problem right. The "crawling" side of the issue is something I was thinking about too!
We are actually working on every aspect of our website to improve its content because we have suffered by Panda a lot in the past two years, so here is the strategy we begun to take since March:
1. "noindexing" most of our thin or almost-duplicate content to get it removed from the index
2. Improve our best content and differentiate it as much as we can with compelling content (this takes a long time!)
3. Consolidating similar pages with the use of canonical tags.
In order to tackle the "slower crawling" problem you have highlighted here, do you think that would be probably better for us to stop engines to crawl those pages altogether via robots.txt once they have been removed? Would that solve the crawl issue? I could do that at least with these new 100,000 new product pages we plan to add!
Thank you!
-
Wesley, that's because of being penalized by Panda several times in the past... so we are trying the "clean-up" strategy with the hope to be "de-penalized" by Panda at the next related algorithm update. Looks like we had too many "thin" or "almost duplicate" pages... that's why we removed so many pages from the index! But if we don't see improvements in the coming 1-2 months, I guess we'll put the product pages in the index because our business is suffering a big deal!
-
Colin, what do you mean with "fake links" exactly? Our link profile looks actually in better shape than our main competitors:
virtualsheetmusic.com (our site): links: 614,013 root domains: 2,233
sheetmusicplus.com (competitor): links: 5,322,596 root domains: 6,149 (worse than our profile!)
musicnotes.com (competitor): links: 6,527,429 root domains: 2,914 (much worse than our profile!)
Am I missing anything?
-
The discrepancy between noindexed/indexed pages is not in itself a problem. However having all those pages will present a challenge to Google, in terms of crawling. Even though the pages won't be indexed, Google will need to spend some of your limited crawl budget crawling all those pages.
Also, to recover from Panda it's necessary to not only noindex duplicate content, but improve your indexed content. That means things like consolidating similar pages into one page, writing unique content for your pages, and getting unique user-generated content such as reviews.
-
Why would you want to no-index your product pages? They seem like the kind of pages you want to get found on.
There shouldn't be a problem between the amount of index pages VS no-index pages except you won't get found on the no-index ones. Product pages tend to be the kind of pages that you REALLY want to get found on.
I think you should rethink your strategy to recover from the penalties.
Try to find out where exactly the penalties came from and fix the errors in that area of our website. -
Can't say I've been in that situation, but search engines seem to interpret that tag as an on/off situation. and I think you probably know that your problems aren't related to or able to be solved by robots meta tags.
You need less fake links. OSE finds well over half a million links from 3K root domains to your site. Look at your competitors - a few thousand links from a handful of domains.
It's a shame because it seems like the internet wanted to make you the authority naturally - You've got a handful of really solid links coming in. If you could shed the spam somehow you'd be doing a lot better.
So yea, stating the obvious, I know. best of luck to you and hope the site recovers!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to index your website pages on Google 2020 ?
Hey! Hopefully, everyone is fine here I tell you some step how you are index your all website pages on Google 2020. I'm already implementing these same steps for my site Boxes Maker. Now Below I'm giving you some steps for indexing your website pages. These are the most important ways to help Google find your pages: Add a sitemap. ... Make sure people know your site. ... Ensure full navigation on your site. ... Apply the indexing application to your homepage. ... Sites that use URL parameters other than URLs or page names may be more difficult to broadcast.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fbowable0 -
Is their value in linking to PPC landing pages and using rel="canonical"
I have ppc landing pages that are similar to my seo page. The pages are shorter with less text with a focus on converting visitors further along in the purchase cycle. My questions are: 1. Is there a benefit for having the orphan ppc pages indexed or should I no index them? 2. If indexing does provide benefits, should I create links from my site to the ppc pages or should I just submit them in a sitemap? 3. If indexed, should I use rel="canonical" and point the ppc versions to the appropriate organic page? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrandExpSteve0 -
Do I need to re-index the page after editing URL?
Hi, I had to edit some of the URLs. But, google is still showing my old URL in search results for certain keywords, which ofc get 404. By crawling with ScremingFrog it gets me 301 'page not found' and still giving old URLs. Why is that? And do I need to re-index pages with new URLs? Is 'fetch as Google' enough to do that or any other advice? Thanks a lot, hope the topic will help to someone else too. Dusan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chemometec0 -
Canonical use when dynamically placing items on "all products" page
Hi all, We're trying to get our canonical situation straightened out. We have a section of our site with 100 product pages in it (in our case a city with hotels that we've reviewed), and we have a single page where we list them all out--an "all products" page called "all.html." However, because we have 100 and that's a lot for a user to see at once, we plan to first show only 50 on "all.html." When the user scrolls down to the bottom, we use AJAX to place another 50 on the page (these come from another page called "more.html" and are placed onto "all.html"). So, as you scroll down from the front end, you see "all.html" with 100 listings. We have other listings pages that are sorted and filtered subsets of this list with little or no unique content. Thus, we want to place a canonical on those pages. Question: Should the canonical point to "all.html"? Would spiders get confused, because they see that all.html is only half the listings? Is it dangerous to dynamically place content on a page that's used as a canonical? Is this a non-issue? Thanks, Tom
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TomNYC0 -
Duplicate peices of content on multiple pages - is this a problem
I have a couple of WordPress clients with the same issue but caused in different ways: 1. The Slash WP theme which is a portfolio theme, involves setting up multiple excerpts of content that can then be added to multiple pages. So although the pages themselves are not identical, there are the same snippets of content appearing on multiple pages 2. A WP blog which has multiple categories and/or tags for each post, effectively ends up with many pages showing duplicate excerpts of content. My view has always been to noindex these pages (via Yoast), but was advised recently not to. In both these cases, even though the pages are not identical, do you think this duplicate content across multiple pages could cause an issue? All thoughts appreciated
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chammy0 -
Indexed non existent pages, problem appeared after we 301d the url/index to the url.
I recently read that if a site has 2 pages that are live such as: http://www.url.com/index and http://www.url.com/ will come up as duplicate if they are both live... I read that it's best to 301 redirect the http://www.url.com/index and http://www.url.com/. I read that this helps avoid duplicate content and keep all the link juice on one page. We did the 301 for one of our clients and we got about 20,000 errors that did not exist. The errors are of pages that are indexed but do not exist on the server. We are assuming that these indexed (nonexistent) pages are somehow linked to the http://www.url.com/index The links are showing 200 OK. We took off the 301 redirect from the http://www.url.com/index page however now we still have 2 exaact pages, www.url.com/index and http://www.url.com/. What is the best way to solve this issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bryan_Loconto0 -
Rel="prev" and rel="next" implementation
Hi there since I've started using semoz I have a problem with duplicate content so I have implemented on all the pages with pagination rel="prev" and rel="next" in order to reduce the number of errors but i do something wrong and now I can't figure out what it is. the main page url is : alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/ and for the other pages : alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/p2/ - for page 2 alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente/p3/ - for page 3 and so on. We've implemented rel="prev" and rel="next" according to google webmaster guidelines without adding canonical tag or base link in the header section and we still get duplicate meta title error messages for this pages. Do you think there is a problem because we create another url for each page instead of adding parameters (?page=2 or ?page=3 ) to the main url alegesanatos.ro/ingrediente?page=2 thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dan_panait0 -
Has important is it to set "priority" and "frequency" in sitemaps?
Has anyone ever done any testing on setting "priority' and "frequency" in their sitemaps? What was the result? Does specifying priority or frequency help quite a bit?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline2